Wittgenstein: Philosophical Investigations and How to Transcend the Limits of Language

Language constitutes the most powerful tool we have invented in order to communicate with each other, express ourselves, and evolve our perception.
But the essence of words and the use of language can be quite perplexing and can lead to anomalies in the way we operate within our social systems.
Ludwig Wittgenstein was fascinated by that and he truly believed that, with the use of logic, language can become more clear and more useful.
The limits of language are the limits of the world is his philosophical investigation.
Most didn’t understand him, but, the ones that did, opened their minds to a world full of clarity and reason.
Ways to Support the Channel:
Check out my ebook: 30challenges30...
Buy me a coffee: www.buymeacoff...
Donate on Paypal: paypal.me/andr...
Donate ₿itcoin: 345jY1BjcuPoVutB6tLAFW6z23aY8sCvNX
Social Media:
Instagram: / _metamorphosis_77
Twitter: / adrian_ilio
Facebook: / metamorphosis77official
TikTok: / metamorphosis_77
More Episodes:
Nietzsche: • Video
Carl Jung: • Carl Jung and the Shad...
Machiavelli: • The Dark Philosophy of...
Game Theory: • GAME THEORY: The Pinna...
Image and Video Sources:
xyz_k_: / b2sfd0ri6ea
simon.scheuerle: / b2-umkgj7qx
Alan Watts speech: • Video
Giphy: giphy.com/
#wittgenstein #wittgensteinphilosophicalinvestigations

[@DrLiaraTSoni]

This topic is fascinating. I myself am studying Modern Languages and Interculturality. Culture makes it so that language, as you mentioned, becomes a living being that evolves as rapidly as human thought. It's both a consequence and causality of evolution and history. In my career, we study the methodology and dilemmas of translation and what I have managed to conclude that as long as there is individuality there will be misunderstandings, because different experiences, which mean different perceptions (or associations) will automatically create different meanings and feelings related to every word and aspect of communication, such as images, symbols, representations, etc because every association is made during a specific context for everyone, and so it means your surroundings and the collective consciousness of the people you are with will make a direct impact as to why you perceive something the way you do, which is why there cannot be an undersating of a language without first deeply studying and trying to understand its context and society first. Each language has certain associations about life. Certain precepts. Certain judgements in which you can contain a coded communication of morality itself, the social paradigms ingrained like a shadow to every word or sentence (interesting topic: "cultural scripts"). This collective unconscious changes with every society or group for the simple fact they speak a language, decorate it according to their culture (or even subculture), their own wisdom as well as their set of beliefs. This is why colonizers such as the Spaniards wanted to colonize not only through violence or religion, but also the minds of the colonized. When you colonize their language, their culture is erradicated. Untimately what you think and associate is what you are and become and thought *is* language. If the Lingua Franca, for example, is English, then... what would that tell you about their influence? Globalization would also mean the predominance of power of one culture over the other. People leaving their culture for one that imposes itself thanks to massive media. Power dynamics of language. It's also an interesting topic. But I'm getting carried away. Back to translation.... to the degree that we analyze works of literature, the context in which something was written, the life experience of the author, the philosophy, the intent, the public it's directed to, then proceed to debate with other translators about different meanings (analysis of connotations vs denotations) in order to translate a text and finally finishing the whole piece. I think this process is amazing. It's almost like psychoanalyzing the author or almost trying to "become" them in a way (since you have to understand his or her intention, if something was a joke, an insult, sarcasm, an honest opinion, if something was informative, slightly condescending and if it was the case, was it a conceiled aggression?, then one has to preserve that level of conceiled aggression on the translated text if one wants to be a good translator, etc). You have to delve deeply into their mind in order to be able to express their thoughts or dialogue while preserving his or her own unique voice (aesthetic, humor, pace, or metric if that's the case such as poems) in a way that it can create the closest feeling of alikeness in original language as well the one you translate it to. This is very hard and tricky to do, but this is the reason there exists several translations throughout time of the same works. Each one aspires to be more distilled than the others before it thanks to trial and error, repeated discussion and analysis. Reasoning and arguments built on top of each other in order to "perfect" communication even though perfection will never be fully reached unless it's something like maybe a manual or a scientific and quantitative work containing only denotative language, in which case it's sort of dead and cold and has no personality in itself. Maybe only then perfection can be achieved, but just like anything, trying to achieve perfection makes it inauthentic and lacking of originality and personality, which makes it immediately closer to something dead than something alive, organic and truthful to human nature. Or another alternative would be to speak in a very primitive sort of way, such as using "semantic primes". Also worth investigating a bit about it.

[@princess.wangeshi7141]

Currently i'm studying 3 foreign languages as part of my philosophy studies. This is profound outlook on language and philosophy. Good job

[@SecretCh0rd]

Ever wonder why older systems have a meaning for each letter? Wonder why Rome left our own Legend blank...

[@ibmor7674]

I’m not afraid to speak Nonsense, but I do pay attention to the Nonsense I speak.

[@dinacamposlopes]

It’s like junk DNA. What junk? Wittgenstein was a very devoted seeker but he misses a point which is there is no nonsense like there is no junk DNA and by the way no junk countries or economies. 🤷‍♂️👍

[@leandrodavila5975]

I pay attention too, and sometimes I feel that I could (and should) speak more clearly. But I guess I'm too lazy.

[@hassan91666]

Thanks again, Adrian. I find immense benefit in your synthesis of these complex ideas. Please keep creating.

[@stellaercolani3810]

What a man, an exceptional human being. Where are men like him today?!

[@yazanodeh8002]

At home, away from societal distractions, thinking.

[@jacklondon4292]

In third world countries where teachers still beat kids at school.

[@l1mbo69]

Precisely because of their nature you won't know where until they publish their works Who would've known a mathematician like Grigory Perelman existed

[@frederiquecouture3924]

...

[@peterbstrong]

Hello Mr. Iliopoulos, I appreciate your series of lectures very much. I must admit that I studied Wittgenstein years ago in my first year Philosophy course and I didn't like him very much. However, I appreciate him more now with your analysis and I like the fact that the trap of the Pseudo-problem is ever present. In point of fact I can see why the simultaneous expansion and contraction of his thought could nearly drive him mad. Consider: If Language is by inference effectively limitless, then the expression of it to communicate will always be effectively limited. Ergo, I can see the Pseudo-problem lurking around every corner. Please keep up the good work. Peter Bellini

[@paryanindoeur]

Wittgenstein and the Analytic philosophers helped me clarify and distill my thinking... but I had to take it as a whole. Reading _Tractatus_ and _PI_ did not do very much for me, except for the odd statement that stands out, like those you mention in this video. Add: Korzybski and Sapir-Whorf. My favorite statement from LW (and I don't know why it's my favorite): the opening of _Tractatus_ -- *The world is everything that is the case.*

[@metamorphosis_77]

I think that was Wittgenstein's intention and I think he would be happy reading that comment.

[@paryanindoeur]

@@metamorphosis_77 I found your newest video on Jung, liked it, and checked your back catalog and decided to start with LW, but I saw a bunch more I want to watch over the next week or two. Good stuff! Keep it up!

[@antropatico]

the most terrifying conclusion of Wittgenstein's philosophy is that we all are always and forever, alone within ourselves

[@navis5284]

Reductio ad absurdum... If his epistemology leads to solipsism, something went terribly wrong. He was muddled.

[@mochamadfarid5721]

@@navis5284 we live alone, we die alone, and we meet God (in the next life) alone.

[@louisj2256]

I don't find that particularly terrifying. Sanctity of the mind.

[@ahappyimago]

I don’t think he has the last word on philosophy as he believed

[@williamcrowley788]

Thank you so much, I’m attempting to tackle Tractus again now

[@wojteks2481]

sorry if this is a little messy ... english is not my main language and i don't use it in my daily life. also not a peoples person. We see the world and try to put it into words and that's how the language is created. but if someone else see something else in another part of the world or even look from another (emotional or life)perspective our lack of words will make us question the truth of said words, will sometimes make that person seem crazy even. If we cant say it how can we express it. than again our view on the life itself can be swayed by the language and people's inability to accept the another point of view. the hardest thing in for me so far was to accept that when talking with another person i am talking with someone who is looking at the same thing only from another perspective and i should not try to change his mind (and negate his own experience)but to listen to him and try to find out what he see and why and than to include that outlook in my own view. So in other words i am not responsible for someone else belief, i can only listen to him and share my own wievpoint and insight. Edit: Now that if read this it my not properly express the problem. I'v started my voyage with philosophy recently and have huge problem with having a proper Talk with another person about it It takes usually around an hour to express my thought and another hour to explain it. Even tho we both use the same language, same words hold different meaning.

[@metamorphosis_77]

Don't worry about your English. That was beautiful.

[@ramonalewis6050]

I'm glad I found your page. I was looking for a book title by Carl Jung out of curiosity while reading fiction. The title mentioned was Meeting the Shadow. I'm an avid reader but not so much in philosophy. I dabble in different genres. I'm learning much from this page. I thank you. I enjoy each topic. Have a great week 😀

[@ΖΩΗΣΩΤΗΡΙΟΥ-ν4ξ]

Thank you for the enlightening presentation. l've been struggling with Wittgenstein's propositions for quite a long time now, but as you said, interpreting them is no mean feat at all. After all, this is the key issue in his theory: INTERPRETATION, isn't it? Having watched quite a few videos and lectures about Wittgenstein's theory-ies, l could say that you've greatly helped me grasp the crux of the issue. I appreciate the crystal clear & concise way you put the main points in place. Great use of English too. Once l heard you, l recognized your Greek origins- l'm Greek too, so it was as if l could hear myself... This doesn't detract from our full command of the language though. 😉 Congrats

[@prashanthirai929]

Thank you so much for this video. I am currently studying Wittgenstein, and this video has provided even more enthusiasm. Your production of this content is extremely high quality, and I love it. Thank you so much for the effort. The content, Wittgenstein, is no doubtly deeply moving and important, but i wanted to bring attention to how much i loved this video through and through. The editing is masterpiece. It is an effortless introduction into getting to know more about the genius, Wittgenstein.

[@SyedMSawaid]

I likes the way he say Khow instead of how. I love the way he speaks. His accent is beautiful.

[@fawnwitherow8462]

This is the best channel on YT. We eagerly wait for each new video, and share you with everyone. I speak on this topic often but never really had a label or name for it. Usually when speaking on any topic, say "aliens", i often stop myself, because every time I think, well first we have to understand each others perceptions of the word "aliens" so we can find a common ground, to communicate affectively. Great topic. Can't wait for the next video brother. Amen-Ra -Would absolutely love new literature on this topic. He seems very interesting, and I am new to hearing about him.

[@metamorphosis_77]

Thank you brother!

[@frederiquecouture3924]

Aliens...Ouh,ouh?

[@filmomobalenatableta]

Firstly, thank you for doing the giveaway for those without social media ! I really enjoy the content here. Philosophy is my passion and your channel is very insightful and inspiring. I love the topics and mostly the aesthetics of the video! Please keep up the great work and interesting topics. I read the Tractatus and was really blown away from the complexity. I think I did not really understood well, but it gave me the essential understanding of his work. I would love to read one of other things he wrote! Once again thank you and keep the work !

[@JohnKumarBuses]

Thanks for this wonderful video

[@redbearwarrior4859]

Great video! I've been meaning to read Philosophical Investigations. I'm really interested in learning more about Wittgenstein's Fideism.

[@Opticaltemperrr]

Would love to read philosophical investigations, but would also love to see some content on Robert green and the laws of human nature, the book of the law, the art of war, the republic-Plato, the alchemist- Paulo coelo, Anna Carenina- Leo Tolstoy, Tao te Ching, or even the meditations of Marcus Aurelius. You’re awesome man I’ve rediscovered your content three times now and I binge harder and harder every time I return.Much respect and appreciation for you sir.

[@frederiquecouture3924]

Hume...

[@ccdunca]

I have the book and I love it. To explain a little about myself first I spent 6yrs in US Army from 99-06 (rltw 2nd batt) after my second tour in Iraq was over I got out and started college by getting my BS in Physics but that intro to philosophy changed me. Seeing math as just another language (albeit a pretty precise one) the hard sciences seem to be to restrictive in scope. I was intending or contemplating a PhD in theoretical physics or quantum physics but philosophy destroyed ( opened my eyes really pulled the blinders off to limited specific fields in the hard sciences) that. So I changed and now I have a PhD in philosophy of physics. Wittgenstein and others were quintessential to my love and loathing of all things philosophy. She is both cruel and exhilarating at nausea most days. The basis of all his writings and his deepest yearning was just to be understood as we all do it's but using something that is so innately flawed like language to express oneself is innately illogical. Using language to express the innate flaws in language is either madness or genius. And I think he did a better than anybody

[@randysnewbiebluesrockguita7782]

I am a big fan of using my mind in philosophical game's and Wittgenstein is one tough nut to crack. The Tractatus was impossible for me to read, but Philosophical Investigations was a much more easy and understandable work for me to grasp.

[@visavou]

thank you for your work! it was great to listen to this ..

[@wsfree1]

Can there be anxiety without language? Can there be an ego? Can there be anger, regret, sorrow? Would we all be better off if we had never invented language? Can we think without it? Can we love without it?

[@Misutoslope]

I'd like the book to delve into his mind and leave the ladder behind

[@naeem4193]

Thank you ; very elucidatory

[@IFYOUWANTITGOGETIT]

Great video! Thank you for making these!!

[@quantumabyss13]

Hello and thank you for all your work! I am so excited to have found your pages. I am not sure if the giveaway is over, but that is not the critical piece to me. What is valuable is to thank you, and (hopefully) to share a little about myself. I am a philosopher with a Bachelors concentrating on Applied Ethics and Law. I currently work as a business analyst. The degrees is not what makes me a philosopher. What does is my insatiable passion for knowledge, and to understand life and humanity. I am currently thinking what to pursue next in terms of schooling, but what I do know is that so much always comes back to language for me in my experiences and in my studies. I have considered a doctorate in philology, ethics, and/or law, etc. Anyways, what I love most about your work is your ability to take these complicated topics which I have not found many others to share the unshakable desire to dive into. It makes so much sense to me and builds onto my ontology. My ontology is very conceptual and intricate at this time. I'd be happy to converse more on any subject anytime if you'd like. I will read the entire work from Wittgenstein whether I win it or purchase it. I have come from his work from my initial introduction many years ago, through so many fields, and now my current state in my studies had lead me back here. I think it will continue to build and grow my own work. I currently primarily do fine art in respect to an online presence. My Instagram is @GondorArt. Humbly, Michelle

[@goertzpsychiatry9340]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/iYC6pWWcd65kjKs

[@JuanRodriguez-tr6st]

Daniel bonevac has decent lectures on Wittgenstein for anyone wanting more insight into Wittgenstein.

[@enriquelasansky4412]

Excellent video! I share your fascination with this man!

[@metamorphosis_77]

He is amazing!

[@juliancasablancas5579]

Thank you for this very clear explanation! However, I think the video caption would be better guiding if Tractatus was in the title rather than the Philosophical Investigations

[@Khallighanm]

Very interesting video! I loved your Ultralearning one too. This discussion about language reminds me of Jean Baudrillard's 'Simulacra and Simulation'. Sometimes we are so immersed in the use of language and symbols, that we often confuse the real world with the symbols and language itself. Could you please make a video about it? Also, the connections with the Matrix and Platos cave are excellent philosophical problems. In the book 1984, one of the forms that the government uses to manipulate the reality, is through the manipulation of symbols and the language, as this would shape people's conception of the real world. Thanks for your effort, and keep up with the high quality work! :D

[@fawnwitherow8462]

oh... would love a video on the wisdom of Thoth.... thanks brother

[@tahermparawala4043]

I wait for your videos anxiously, What a clarity of thoughts you provide on subject. And I specially like background music when VIDEO ends. Good luck, bring one video on MEMETICS, One of my favourite topic. Girard is the developer of this theory.

[@metamorphosis_77]

Thank you for the beautiful words. :)

[@moshefabrikant1]

6:00 What is philosophy 8:20 Master language. 9:00 Learn philosophical investigation Pay attention to your nonsense. Even when spoken

[@williamellencuartel8607]

Hello, im just needing materials and content for my religious language, and accidentally dropped by into your video which i think was a good intoduction.

[@ラヒム旬]

Wow, this blow my mind

[@JumpRopeVeteran]

Awesome video, brother. I would like this book because I am interested in learning about as much human psychology and philosophy as I can. Watts' assertion is interesting. Yes, a doctor would lose 100% of his patients if the doctor were 100% successful, however, the doctor would continue to gain other patients once people begin to discover the doctor's ability to solve their problems, particular if the doctor lived in a highly populated area. In this sense, even if the doctor only treated one patient one time, the doctor would still have a line of patients due to the population, and would then face a constraint of time to treat patients rather than the ability to treat the patients. Perhaps the same is true with the philosophy analogy. It would take hundreds of years for a catch-all philosophical solution to be implemented. Similar to a doctor with a special set of skills, a philosopher with a special skill set has limited time on this earth to deliver the solution, even if the philosopher records everything they've ever discovered.

[@metamorphosis_77]

Powerful comment 🔥

[@JumpRopeVeteran]

@@metamorphosis_77, thanks. Your content is mind-altering, but it an excellent, introspective way. Please keep producing. Perhaps you can cover Thomas Sowell"s Marxism: Philosophy and Economics or any of his other philosophies or works.

[@frederiquecouture3924]

Socrates.

[@frederiquecouture3924]

Bertrand Russell In search of Happiness.

[@JuliaDaCampo]

amazing content! 😎🤗

[@JonSebastianF]

Thank goodness! - I worried that KZbin was about to run out of superficial 10-mins introductions to Wittgenstein...

[@JonSebastianF]

Sorry, my more constructive point is that you seem too smart to just be repeating this sort of introduction that KZbin is already flooded with. You could do something much more original, and so you should! :)

[@sirius3333]

@@JonSebastianF It's difficult to summarize Wittgenstein. Tractatus as a book contradicts itself. It tries to undermine metaphysics but has an underlying metaphysical basis. The logical positivists interpretation is also faulty and all subsequent offshoots are at best , not useful as tool for doing philosophy. Tractatus should be taught as a phase of Wittgensteinian thinking, where he moves from picture theory to "meaning is use" in his latter philosophy. If Meaning is use, then how do we address the correct use of an expression ? The social or cultural context isn't sufficient for words to acquire meaning.

[@israelmejia5006]

Thank you Adrian for amazing video in philosophy great job. Yes I would like to get that book cause I want to understand more about philosophy for having a better perception of reality and logic. Thank you my friend.

[@metamorphosis_77]

Thank you Israel. :)

[@frederiquecouture3924]

Les Celtes...

[@sk8shred]

Do a video on Richard Rorty! He's a post-Wittgensteinian in some sense.

[@dinacamposlopes]

Picture of the world is visual language 👍

[@voidlioc4033]

bro this video was trippy ur amzing

[@metamorphosis_77]

I trip while making them

[@tonysandy7803]

Imprecise use of language leads to misunderstanding. Details narrow down search in memory or when exploring world for people, objects etc. Manic-depression is a good example of how communication is affected by mood / emotion: The former moves and talks ceaselessly (extroverted energy / release / certainty). The latter doesn't move, doesn't speak (shut off / shut in - locked in doubt and thought (?)). Psychology comes into it, through speed simplifying speech and causing mistakes, which is why we don't all have the same vocabulary or use what we have accurately. Negative emotion (fear) speeds up delivery and muddles it, that is not allow correct word in line to present itself on the vertical axis. Calm people control what they say and what they do (allowing for more complex thoughts and delicate actions). Speed simplifies therefore as patience allows for depth and detail. A fruit machine is a good analogy as its wheels represent specific order for parts of speech (article / verb / adverb / noun or sentence as horizontal axis and the vertical axis as alternatives to go in that line's particular position e.g. articles as proposed by Saussure).

[@metamorphosis_77]

beautiful comment

[@lo5983]

Came for the clarification of Philosophical Investigations, stayed for the Greek accent

[@frederiquecouture3924]

...

[@olivercroft5263]

Language is a gateway for our psyche to see reality conceptually, to facilitate survival. How sublime it is to be aware, even of just some thing though, apart from any description, or value placement. What is it really :O We can feel what is true, to be alive, never to know, what we are...maybe just a weird, simple person (Whispers ubermensch?) But we know it's complicated and our brains are small #bluepillisbetter Haha but seriously, I think Wittgenstein brings up good points about the framing of things. Do you think there should be a frame that is good for everyone, something we can agree on, if there is it is out there already, waiting to be worded, cause fuck we have to publish a paper if we want to get anywhere. We will get somewhere in any case. Thanks for the great video brochacho. I do like books :) @oli_croft

[@Rocky1OO]

@rocky10o I'm considering philosophy as a double major and would like to read more relevant texts

[@jaimes7966]

The works of Wittgenstein echoes pseudo Dionysius heavily

[@Zero4revolution]

Great video. Although, some parts as that referring to lions and understanding is from his post-tractatus phase.

[@metamorphosis_77]

True

[@ahmadpoorgholam8964]

TNX mate do one with marcus aurelius

[@mlbreel]

Both of his books are correct.

[@linhtoan1851]

Will you be doing videos on logic and philosophy of math in the future?

[@metamorphosis_77]

Maybe. We will see.

[@goertzpsychiatry9340]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/iYC6pWWcd65kjKs

[@Annih1lateThis]

Hey there, I have never heard of this gentleman before, thanks for introducing him to us! It's clear to me the words and language have power, a lot of power, but I didnt realize there was an individual who delved deep into this concept! I would love to have a chance to dig into this guy and get a new perspective on language, as I'm a writer myself. Looking forward to more content! Perhaps a video about intuition would be interesting?

[@montsemajanmartinez9824]

Best advice : Disregard the opinions of anyone who refers to Wittgenstein as "Vitty". Logical problem now for you to disentangle: Was the above advice : A: Earnest B: Nonsense C: Witty ?

[@paultria]

Η γλωσσα ειναι το σπουδαιοτερο εργαλειο μας αλλα και συναμα κατασκευασμα, αυτο που μας ξεχωριζει απο τα ζωα και αυτο με το οποιο μπορουμε να ξεχωρισουμε και απο τους αλλους ανθρωπους. Συνφωνο μαζι του στο οτι «με την χρηση της λογικης, η γλωσσα γινεται πιο ξεκαθαρη και πιο χρησημη». Αλλα θα ηθελα να προσθεσω οτι με την καλυτερη χρηση την γλωσσας η λογικη μας γινεται πιο ξεκαθαρη και πιο χρησημη. Μεσα απο την λογο εκφραζετε η λογικη. Οι ανθρωποι με δυσλεξια αντιμετωπιζουν την εξης δυσαναλογια: το ευρος και η ποιοτιτα των σκεψεων τους, δεν μπορει να εκφραστεί αναλόγος, απο το πολυ στενοτερο εύρος και ποιοτιτα του λεξιλογιου που κατεχουν.και αυτο βελτιωνεται με την μελετη λεξικων και την συνεχη χρηση της γλωσσας. Ισως ακομη και οι ιδιες οι σκεψεις μας περιοριζονται απο την γλωσσα μας. Με την γλωσσα μεταδιδουμε ή αλλιος περιγραφουμε τον «κοσμο» μας στους αλλους. «Αρχη σοφίας ονομάτων επισκεψις». Καθε φορα που φιλοσοφουμε για κατι πρεπει να οριζουμε την ενοιες της οπιες θα αναλυσουμε.(οπως το θεμα της ψυχης) Οστοσο οι ενοιες των λεξεων δυναται να αλαξουν με το περασμα των χρονων. Και οπος μια κοινονια δυναται να ειναι πιο υγειης απο μια αλλη, η αλλαγες τω ενοιων αντικατοπριζουν και εν μερη επηρεαζουν της αλλαγες της κοινονιας προς το καλυτερο η το χειροτερο (πχ η λεξη μαλακας ή αρετη). Αλλα επιδη οι ορισμοι των λεξεων δυησταντε και ανα τους ανθροπους, γιανα καταλαβουμε τον «κοσμο» τους τοτε θα πρεπει οπος ειπε να κατανοισουμε το πλαισιο. Καπιες σκεψεις και ερμηνιες μου. Μπορει να κανω λαθος. Θα ηταν ενδιαφερων να εκανες ενα βιντεο για της ξεχωριστες ιδιοτητες της Ελληνικης γλωσσας και την συνισφορα της στον «Ελληνικο»- λογικο τροπο σκεψης και κατεπεκταση στην αναπτυξη των επιστιμων ,τεχνων , φιλοσοφιας, λογικης, δικεου κα στην αρχεα Ελλάδα Συνχαρητιρια για την προσπαθεια που κανεις και το υλικο που φτιαχνεις! Παρακαλω συνχωρεσε την δυσορθογραφεια μου. Παυλός

[@metamorphosis_77]

Υπέροχες σκέψεις. Δεν εστιάζω στην ορθογραφία.

[@chrisrasmussen3822]

So per his early work, you are what you speak? I would like the book. I am sure it take many readings.

[@SecretCh0rd]

A=ladder : vehicle B=bow : tension C=crescent moon : subjective D=saddle : broken cycle E=gradient : measure F=baseless gradient : immeasurable G=counterclockwise : effort H=mortar : partnership I=pillar : mastery J=hook : edit K=confrontation : strike L=incorporation : profit M=encumbrance : mass N=generation : seed O=circle : whole cycle P=pregnancy : potential Q=milestone : marked cycle R=birth : result S=reversal : redirect T=cross, yardarm, frame : sacrifice U=cup : transient V=bird : hand W=mountains : choice X=intercourse :crossroads Y=unification : convergence Z=line break : interval #EnglishSolved

[@frederiquecouture3924]

Perfect puzzle ever.

[@SecretCh0rd]

@@frederiquecouture3924 The hints are scattered across folklore, but the Arthurian stories were straight up about this. The Grail is the hole where this table goes; instead of such a table, our languages use a "round" (twinkle twinkle repurposed into the ABC song). My methodology was drawing s'word from s'tone, after having my attention drawn to the damning lack (dame du lac).

[@KKSafak]

Thank you. Can i share this video with turkish translation?

[@metamorphosis_77]

For sure.

[@anotherone3666]

Hello ! I would love to win because I have an interest in languages and philosophy. I’m learning my fourth language at this time, and have read philosophy on my own for 3 years now. I believe Wittgenstein can be another great adventure for me and I absolutely admire his way of thinking and being from what I have seen until now. Thanks for the opportunity! My ig is underlebridge

[@lilybellejingle]

Language itself has been a lifelong fascination. I gleefully observe and play with the evolution of modern communication. I would love this book as a means to delve deeper into the broader concepts of language. My instagram handle is lilybellejingle

[@PpinkasArp]

You appear to fail to credit the clips you use from Wittgenstein,1993 film directed by Derek Jarman, based on a text by Terry Eagleton and produced by Tariq Ali.

[@frederiquecouture3924]

The World is all that is the case... I prefer his latter work.

[@paulkardoulias9547]

without clarity we are mere talking heads with our mouths moving with no meaning

[@tru_710]

The dark side of language is lies, when one seeks to be unclear, deceptive or misleading. Language can be a beautiful thing, but it can also be destructive and ugly. 2 sides of the same coin.

[@drendelous]

why did he shout? and considering he is one the most important why so little in ghe vvideo on it?

[@metamorphosis_77]

he wanted to be heard

[@shawnburnham1]

6:00

[@jimalop8757]

Too many ads.

[@FBI-zd2no]

Subahibk fans when

[@runthomas]

personally i dont think he did that much, i dont rate him....just simple basics saying that language cant really describe something fully...thats it..i did what wittgenstein did in 1 sentence.

[@endgcns7399]

If u understand it , you would be silent !

[@crakavelithedon]

I love your channel and look forward to your videos. (Will watch this one later when I'm not at work.) Keep providing the excellent content! I want the book because it's been in my To-read list for a while now, but haven't got my hands on a copy yet. I hope I win! :P instagram: comfortably.rum

[@mitchellkato1436]

How dreadful, Clarifying language with logic. The don of Reason of Western civilization. Of course they risk their sanity for true language. The brain was not made for that. That being said, I have my own agenda. Rather than to talk about thought, world, and language. We should just talk of world and language. Here, the world is the brutal existence that we cannot completely capture. Between the real world's point a and point b there are infinity that cannot be exhausted. So the world cannot be captured and exhausted. Perhaps we should talk about thought now. While language sits put. Thought will be lost very easily. The writing "dog" will be there while in writing. With thought, what one had in mind just disappear when one walks out of the scene.

[@navis5284]

Young Wittgenstein was enamored with the Vienna Circle and linguistic "positivism," which later was demonstrated to be self-stultifying. Wittgenstein is what Kafka would be like if he had philosophized. Wittgensteinian "mysticism" is a pastiche made from Kierkegaard and medieval mystics who discussed the ontological status of universals. He is overrated as a philosopher, in my not so humble opinion. Also, Nietzsche was an idiot.

[@pranav_chalotra]

Just to know reality but what the hell is reality... does reality differ from person to person.. and I also want to know about philosophy of mathematics as student of mathematics My insta id : pranavsingh_gurjar

[@jorgevaldes6160]

Ironic title for Wittgenstein lol

[@metamorphosis_77]

Hi guys, if you like challenges, check out my "30 Challenges - 30 Days - Zero Excuses" project. You have nothing to lose and so much to gain -> 30challenges30days.com

[@stellaercolani3810]

Money is meaningless and destructive and insidious!

[@wojteks2481]

Money has as much meaning and power as we give it. it is not the money that is loosing power but trust for one-another. also are you trying to get multiple entry's for the book?

[@diodelrio]

sexy accent

[@diodelrio]

πολύ όμορφος

[@peterugwuoke8573]

Ll

[@tsunningwah3471]

zhinaQ!

[@kaanaydn8497]

I want the book because I would like to learn more about how we should improve our language. And I think you should make a video about kant

[@quantumabyss13]

Yay to Kant if there isn't a video already by this point. 😍

[@oskarsjostedt]

Understanding and acting with the dominion of language, even being able to sofisticate it, is extremely powerful. In a way it's right under our nose how, differently from other known species, humanity overcame certain natural weaknesses and devised many ways to interact with and modify reality. Largely interesting topic, indeed! Thanks for the video, very inspiring!

[@stellaercolani3810]

Rip sweet soul

[@milenapetrakieva738]

Really really good video and thats that

[@meregaming1770]

Makes sense to me.

[@pratyushavakkalagadda7172]

how long did it take for you to research and understand all this content on wittgenstein??

[@metamorphosis_77]

One week