Wojciech Zurek | Emergence of the Classical from within the Quantum Universe

Abstract: Decoherence shows how the openness of quantum systems - interaction with their environment - suppresses flagrant manifestations of quantumness. Einselection accounts for the emergence of preferred quasi-classical pointer states. Quantum Darwinism goes beyond decoherence. It posits that the information acquired by the monitoring environment responsible for decoherence is disseminated, in many copies, in the environment, and thus becomes accessible to observers. This indirect nature of the acquisition of information by observers who use the environment as a communication channel is the mechanism through which objective classical reality emerges from the quantum substrate: States of the systems of interest are not subjected to direct measurements (hence, not perturbed) by the agents acquiring information about them. Thus, they can exist unaffected by the information gained by observers.

[@lyndamonchak4072]

I was thrilled to find another recent video featuring physicist Wojiciech Zurek elaborating on his explanations of how the quantum mechanical atomic and molecular worlds give rise to our every day classical reality!

[@tomwallen7271]

String Theory is one of many theories in unifying our view of the relativity and quantum, but in my good, Wojciech Zurek is still the most successful in explaining a unified view of physics. lol

[@blacked2987]

17 01

[@pistitoth1363]

Hello. Ok!

[@magnuswootton6181]

you dont need quantum phenomena to get an exponential optimisation, its all maths.

[@david_porthouse]

I do not agree with Axiom 3. If a quantum measurement is repeated from exactly the same initial conditions, then there will be a variation in the result due to the presence of intrinsic tachyonic Brownian motion of the entity or its detector. TBM is orthogonal to the wavelike behaviour of the entity, which is notionally an oscillation in the other way to travel faster than light. The tripartite interaction of TBM, matter and the electromagnetic field yields the random outcome in a measurement. Otherwise I agree with decoherence as a general idea and Dr Zurek has done much of the work for us. The principal objection to decoherence, based on unitarity, is answered by TBM, and TBM also answers Loschmidt's objection to Boltzmann's H-theorem.

[@bloodyorphan]

Skin theory - Quantum Entanglement Teleportation / Replication There are two types of entanglement. 1. The entanglement for Qubits is information based, which means they are using simple Newtonian energies, like velocity, polarity and spin, and encoding those into one photon and then transmitting it or a primed version of it into two photons and transmitting them, this entanglement is information theory entanglement, and only encodes information at the transmission point, changing any one particles properties by "reading" it, breaks entanglement to all the other photons. (i.e. no spooky action at a distance) The second type of entanglement is a particle skin theory, that postulates all particles are just compressed space skin apertures down to the SR plasma space, the visible aperture is a miniature black hole, and you can create a "Dark" particle like this using temperature dynamics (i.e. two interfered 50Watt lasers makes an electron). Any information that is transferred through this construct is relying on the plasma time dilation/compression being so high that you only have newtons cradle type energy transfer available, but the aperture skin information is in our visible space hence no time dilation for us the observer at the skin, so too transfer information you have to transfer whatever harmonic energy in the Photonium high temperature space that is creating the aperture in the first place, and being Newtonian if you aren't adding energy it will teleport the aperture to another observable space coordinate (i.e. teleportation), or if you add the equivalent energy into the transmitted harmonic the Newtons cradle effect can carry a duplicate of the aperture information to a new physical observable space coordinate (i.e Replication). (C) M.B.Eringa Dec 2021

[@bloodyorphan]

I've watched a few of this series now and you all are up against Particle Skin versus Particle Static Structure physics, or in my words "Skin Theory". The Static Structure is the Heat Density packet of the particle. i.e. heavily time-dilated/compressed because of temperature, measured by QCD temperature frequency and inverse square law e=1/(R2/R1)^2 The "Entropic/Information/Kinetic/Entanglement/Any interaction event" are all remembered in the 0C^3+ side of the 1C^3 particle.(which is a density harmonic of the core 10^4.5 degree Celsius photonium particle (which is not visible because x,y,z compression has gone less than plank (i.e. C^3 scale is a temperature-distance x,y,z compression scale in the metric system))) I've only just started to write the skin pages for Relativity as I know it, and I thank you all for helping me with the question. If you followed the above, here's the problem the theory throws at me/us ... - Particles with temps of 10^18°C have a time-dilation of 4.e+34 seconds to one. This means that no matter how much energy we throw at the electron the core energy that makes it persist will not show any movement for 1.271e+24 Years! (These particles are less than Planck and only reflect back into our space because of x,y,z space spacial entanglement i.e. Gravity WISC or WIMP) - The only way for any kind of interaction that we call matter in space (i.e. move an atom in any direction or induce electric current) is for the skin to zero°C aperture to "snap" across the golf ball of preexisting SR space particle weights" (this does give us Inertial resistance to any movement which is a yay! event for me but also demands superposition of all the stacked particle weight skins back to zero°C which have time-dilations of 16 and 4 seconds which could also be problematic, my answer is currently they all "snap" and an invisible SR particle weight has two skins, the outside skin can distort and become "visible" and "disappears" once the atom/particle has moved past ;)) So lets say we apply this "Field of holes" theory to laser beam quantum entanglement. - The laser emits particles that are an aperture in our space that exhibits a temperature of x°C - On the C^3 scale the photon itself is x+1C^3 and x+1°C weight scales. - The QCD temperature frequency of both lasers is consuming space which contains "potential" apertures. - The aperture space inside the box can only replenish itself at C. - The potential for a "Sympathetic" photon to appear is anywhere in the distance between the two lasers spacial phase causes an aperture to grow, an aperture with a primed harmonic of both laser temperatures. - All photons in the equation are balanced through the flow of space towards the apertures causing temperature frequency phase equivalence. - If you change the ambient temperature inside the box you should be able to moderate the entanglement effect by removing all particle weights "lighter" and exposing the desired SR particle weight where you want entanglement to occur. Cheers, Thankyou again, I appreciate your time(s) I'm gonna throw this out to the QGR as well. M.B.Eringa (2022)