Beyond the Atom: INCREDIBLE Plunge into the Heart of Matter towards the Infinitely Small Documentary

🌍 Have you ever wondered what the foundations of our reality are based on?
What if I told you that the world around us is governed by mysterious particles and invisible dimensions?
Would you believe me?
Nothing could be further from the truth...
Yet the nature of the forces and elements that shape our universe is unknown to us.
Admittedly, scientific advances over the last few centuries have enabled us to understand in detail the events that unfold on a macroscopic scale.
But when we venture onto smaller scales, it's as if we're entering a parallel reality whose workings escape us.
In this world of the infinitely small, the laws of physics and relativity we know no longer apply.
Instead, we find strange, sometimes invisible particles interacting in ways so mysterious that we find it hard to believe how they work.
Quantum physics, string theory, supersymmetry, the uncertainty principle...
So much vocabulary that attempts to describe the mechanisms of this invisible reality to make it easier to understand.
🔥 As a reminder, videos are published on SUNDAYS at 6pm.
-------------------------
💥Voyage vers l'Infiniment Petit:
- Each discovery inevitably raises its own set of questions...
In their quest to probe the microscopic world, scientists have nonetheless been able to venture deep into nature's smallest secrets.
While a few decades ago we thought that atoms were the inseparable building blocks of matter, today we know that these elements are home to an incredible bestiary of particles.
Quarks, gluons, Higgs bosons, neutrinos, photons...
It's enough to make you dizzy!
To say that these elements are minuscule is an understatement.
To understand this, let's compare scales.
Observations of the cosmos tell us that the diameter of the observable universe is around 93 billion light-years.
This universe would include between 100 and 200 billion galaxies.
In fact, our Milky Way is but a tiny drop of water in a cosmic ocean.
Yet, from our perspective, its dimensions are inordinate: almost 53,000 light-years.
That's enough to house between 200 and 400 billion stars, and probably more than 100 billion planets...
Among these stars is our sun: nearly 700,000 km in radius.
That's around 109 times the diameter of the Earth.
Our beautiful blue planet, gigantic to our eyes, is in reality invisible to those of the cosmos.
For if the solar system were a city twenty kilometers across, the Earth would be little more than a grape.
And yet, nearly 8 billion human beings live on it.
But then again, appearances are deceptive, as man is far from occupying all the space available on Earth.
If we were to group together all the human beings currently living, they would fit on an area equivalent to the city of Los Angeles...
So, compared to a modestly-sized terrestrial planet, man is a grain of sand.
If this scale comparison gives you a slight headache, just wait for the next part.
Because it's possible to go much further.
Each human being, however microscopic compared to the cosmos, is made up of around 30,000 billion cells.
And these tiny cells, observable only under the microscope, are themselves made up of 100,000 billion atoms!
This figure varies greatly from cell to cell, but it's still completely excessive.
Wait, we can go even further...
If you look at the core of atoms, you'll be amazed to discover that they're 99.9%... empty!
In other words, matter is theoretically made up of nothingness!
It may sound crazy, but hidden in this nothingness are tiny elements of the quantum world that give life to the reality we know.
And although we are made of atoms, their profound nature seems even more distant than the confines of the observable universe.
So, the infinitely small conceals many mysteries.
So get ready to travel to the heart of matter!
Together, we'll try to unlock its secrets by literally looking deep inside ourselves...
-------------------------
🎬 Today's program:
00:00 - Introduction
06:11 - The macroscopic world
21:27 - Diving into the heart of atoms
35:44 - Subatomic particles
39:45 - Quarks
48:46 - Leptons
50:55 - Bosons
55:25 - The Standard Model
1:03:51 - Higgs boson
1:08:45 - The mysteries of quantum physics
1:18:20 - String theory
1:23:38 - Supersymmetry
1:26:26 - Quantum loop theory
Wondody is an official channel affiliated to the network ©Production Orbinea

[@MugiwaraTed]

Play this at 1.25 speed and it sounds normal

[@ViraL_FootprinT.ex.e]

Much better. Thanks.

[@andrewgallagher6612]

Nice 1

[@bmon4095]

Thank you. I almost gave up until I saw this. Thanks again.

[@johnlilley9363]

1.5 seems like the Goldilocks speed, reminiscent of the narrator for ‘how it’s made’

[@TBoneTheGreat1]

Holy crap your right!

[@jimmyballer7047]

The person who okayed this narration deserves to have their eulogy delivered by the same computer voice, in a church full of robots that can't cry.

[@johnotis8553]

Ha 🎉

[@easytokillme9910]

Many mysterieszzzzz

[@averteddisasterbarely2339]

Someone said to play it at 1.25. It sounds normal !!

[@khuti007]

HAHAHAHAHAHAHA that is a good one !!! I immediately think of Blade Runner

[@mikemines2931]

Wake me up when its over.

[@krishnakumar-kv8zu]

Indeed playing the video at 1.25 times the normal speed , a comment by one viewer , actually makes the narration sound more human and makes it possible to sit through the entire video at least one time.

[@kenhammscousin4716]

True

[@tolgamatouk7206]

There’s an entire section of KZbin where millions of people play these specific videos while they are going to sleep to help them sleep or have something to listen to while trying to sleep? Some people fall asleep easier when listening to something like this and I think this video in particular was targeting that audience. Instantly wanted to lay down and close my eyes and sleep hearing this video 😂,

[@CerberusHD]

Nice advice, now it's normal speed xD

[@ranjittyagi9354]

​@@tolgamatouk7206haha, yes.

[@FaridShahidinejad]

It sounds normal to me at 1.75. This dude is sloooow

[@jcsealock]

Some unfortunate word choices that I am sure confuse some viewers - 1. At 18:30 while comparing moon-earth to electron-atomic nuclei, stating that electrons "gravitate" conotes that gravity play a role in this system which cannot be farther from the truth. 2. Using the term "element" to mean molecules - at 23:40 in the presentation - "But to form the countless types of ELEMENTS we know atoms have to come together and combine - this is how molecules form. " Elements are formed via fusion or broken down via fission not via bonds between atoms.

[@kellywhitcomb5508]

Putting emphasis on the end of the words, this AI is testing the patience of humans.

[@nikkiva7]

i thought i was the only one that noticed this... i'm half way through the video and i can't watch this anymore

[@timetravellingbackwardsisp5337]

i was done after 15 seconds

[@davidadams2395]

​@@timetravellingbackwardsisp5337 Same here.

[@user-yz5pk2mr8c]

exactly that is really annoying great video except of that fact

[@kookamunga2458]

Great video but I find the way the narrator drags his words out to be annoying. It's just as annoying as the way gangsters from the hood speak .

[@larrysorenson4789]

From my first exposure to science in elementary school I have been fascinated with smallness. I recall telling a teacher that I believed that there were particles of matter so small that they pass right through what we call matter without any interference at all, just like we are passing through our universe. And so in 1954 he encouraged me by remarking: “That’s interesting.” Those particles are now common knowledge.

[@bonerici]

Instead of speeding it up i slowed it down now it sounds like a wino cornered you in an alley to explain the universe

[@kevinsmith-yw9dq]

Genius! Can’t take the 3hr run time at 1/2 speed though

[@scottwickstrum6977]

Perfect speed for late night, or early morning.

[@boygraphychannel]

Never have I ever heard such an exciting subject narrated so dispassionately.

[@bretttobin9632]

The robot voice is lame.

[@TheEnigmaUniverse-vt2pm]

Whenever I'm sad, I often listen to your videos. It both helps me gain more knowledge and helps me sleep easier in this stressful life

[@whizzer2944]

Yes , makes you realize how insignificant we are in the scale of the universe,helps me too.

[@MadScientist267]

Great for generating anxiety at normal speed

[@infonestor2725]

Science is dynamic and its explaination to the " more understandig level" also takes time and simplification of this vomplicated matter. This presentation is the most outstanding o jsve listened to in my lige as scientist. Great job and all thumbs up for the creators of this extraordinary summary what is " everything what we know about our existing univers around us based on current knowledge...this is a never ending journey to " real origin of energy, which may never become possible. But that journey will reveal a lot of new inside view of what it is composed of.Our imagination will growth over time though, it always does.i just wonder now, since imagination, knowledge , consciousness and alike is also ( a form of) energy, how can " energy explain energy" other then by new subatomic theories. Where is the missing " Heureka " like the " source of enery" , the unique" all- in-one" source of energy? Singularity, big bang..hmm..? Actually why not only state, too wirde: everything is an illusion created by ....(dark) energy which always was there and will exist infinitely 😊

[@everettnichols9062]

It is as I have often remarked, "If one looks deeply enough into the nature of creation, they may eventually glimpse the hand of God at work".

[@IgnatiusVaz]

Imagine all these wonders, precision and complexity happened by chance, no one directing, for no cause!

[@STARDRIVE]

What are the chances.

[@IgnatiusVaz]

Zada, Zilch, Zero@@STARDRIVE

[@ricocapili6990]

With the rate of astronomical and quantum discovery we humans are doing right now till the next century, it will be quite rare for us to be alone. And one can truly say indeed we are special, no doubt about it..

[@timetravellingbackwardsisp5337]

How can we be special, if we're not even unique

[@hughstan1]

Watch this at 1.25 speed. Your 😊 welcome.

[@Stellar-Forge]

Better, but still not great. Thanks for the sugar coating for this episode. Lol

[@tksperformance8789]

Much better, thx 👍🏼

[@mrwright4343]

Thanks

[@manuelteixeira2496]

that you said with truth: "The forces involved in the foundation of our observable reality are unknown" to us.

[@TahirKhan-ez4dj]

Every new discovery produces new questions adding to our curiosity - this is good for us as we are better to be curious all the while rather than come to a stalemate by knowing everything.

[@ninner196]

For sure. This sounded humble instead of hearing a highminded haughty physicist think they can explain our existence away. Nothing against scientists especially since being one but we do not know very much in comparison to who made our universe, amazing how much power exists and could be used , infinite.😊

[@michaelbryant4703]

Mind blown, amazing, a true gem. Thank you

[@aarusty51]

No matter how small matter is, it has to be in something. That something must be infinite.

[@basedgamerguy818]

You just stating something doesn't make it true

[@jimbernard8964]

Great series. Glad I found it. Subscribed.

[@twisted1800]

I love these types of videos, there's so much that we don't know, it's truly mind boggling 😮

[@DrDeuteron]

There’s so much we do know

[@lobster7799]

@@DrDeuteron not really, we have no idea what dark energy and matter is which make up 96 percent of the universe. On top of gravity and quantum . We haven’t even scratched the surface.

[@synisterfish]

Yeah... but what here isn't made up or based in speculation...? These are the beliefs of the scientific worldview. There's no 'knowledge' here... just a bunch of 'real-ised' models one must put their faith in.

[@Noqtis]

I know everything, you are just being stupid.

[@LordofSyn]

​@@synisterfish Those models are tested time and again. Those tests and the scientific method give us insight as to the accuracy. Faith is not necessary at all unless you consider faith in the scientific method itself. Stay skeptical, stay resourceful, do not give up. Science is about moving the goal posts because it is impossible to know everything but we now know much more (even in a general stance) and understand more than we've ever done before as an animal species. All of those advancements are because of the toils of science.

[@JimKrause1975]

I absolutely love it!!! As always!

[@prestonbacchus4204]

Here is an hypothesis: If you look small enough and close enough we will find that every single particle in existence, though existing within a frequency range, is unique. No two particles are exactly alike, like snowflakes. That means that every interaction involving multiple particles will always generate a unique function.

[@ericvondell5157]

So; what You're suggesting here is That; Even I have a Unique Function! Here's My Hypothesis; Well, not quite Mine 😹 Although, I wouldn't Tell one, To It's Beak; The Kytuhryxhah "Kytuhrah" (Thaylaxhahs regalis) is actually a kind of Nudibranch!🙀💖 TWO THINGS: 1) Scriptures define The True God as Spirit, Invisible and The Light Of Eternal Mind! Thusly defining The Universe as a Simulation! Genesis 1:1 Says: "The Universe is a Simulation!" John 1:1 Says: "So's God!" (At Least the "God" We Physically Interact With!) 2) AN EXTRATERRESTRIAL VISITORS POV: We Don't Have To Invade Earth 🌎 IT'S ALREADY OURS!!! Stupid Monkeys! Long Live The Draconian Empire! Death to the Stupid Monkeys! Death to Their Gods! There's a Reason Why It's Called An EMPIRE!!! Nobody You Stupid Monkeys Know Can Defeat Us! The ONLY Thing We Fear is God; And, HE'S, On OUR Side!!! Don't Believe Us? Those teensy bits of weirdness You've been finding implanted in you is Merely to show you that Such Things Exist! THOSE, Are Just, Nonfunctioning Junk! The REAL Things are Smaller than Viruses, Utterly Undetectable to Your crude Monkey Technology, and: Zillions Upon Zillions of These Ultra Advanced Nanotechnology Drones Are With You Already; They're EVERYWHERE! In EVERYTHING! And EVERYONE! WE ARE WATCHING YOU!!! And, as for "Crashed Alien Spaceships, and UFO's"; Seriously? We Don't Even Need Spaceships!!! STUPID MONKEYS! 🙏🛸💫✨ PS: We're Already Running The Planet! WE Can Be Everywhere! We Can Be Anything! We Can Look Just Like YOU!!!😱 From Witches and Familiar Spirits to Your Pets, Toys, Friends, Bullies, Weird Neighbors, Normal Neighbors, Jewelry, Gadgets, Medical Equipment, Artificial Body Parts, Vaccines, Foods, Microbial Organisms, Every Cell In Your Bodies, Even In Your Underwear!!! The Earth, And, YOU, Are Already OURS!!! GET OVER IT 🙀😱🛸 THIS Video is further proof of the above! We Came, We Saw, We Conquered! A LONG TIME AGO 🙀😱😸🦖🦕🐲🐉🛸👽🌎🎉 God Bless The Draconian Empire 🙏💖🐉🛸🖖 Sincerely: GOD💖 C/O THE DRACONIAN EMPIRE🐉

[@ardasahin500]

I really like this video!! and this video made me get excited about astronomy again, so I want to become an astrophysicist when I grow up, but I'm not sure what I need to do or on what subject do I need to study when I get my diploma or how can I change the world in a good way but I really want to into this. Idk if I can be able to learn the language of this universe and imagine things that most people never does also I'm not that good at school like math and science stuffs but I like drawings, listening music, playing an instrument, thinking about sky asking questions and taking some notes and watching videos about math science and trying to understand the logic of the video also trying to learn computer science even if I don't understand so I have passion and I know I can, I think there are two ways for someone who is thinking just like me is you can learn all the stuff about it and you can do things that few people have accomplished or you could fail from school subjects and had a really bad situation and become a depressive person and people thinks you are weird, but I'm taking this risk and go forward as much as I can because I know that even If I cannot be able to learn those, it's not worthless as much as I Took some notes and share the information's and observations that I saw and witness before with the next generations of this world. Anyway in conclusion I have really long journey to go so lets focus our dreams and try our best's, because I don't think we have so much time this one was silly a bit yeah all I think about that have a nice day and Thank you to the team which produced this video!!

[@laurv8370]

nice storyline, it should have been even better if the images and animations had anything to do with the talk and not only random stuff from around the web

[@davidevans3227]

it's nice to come across someone else who thought that.. and together with the narration, very off putting for me..

[@C-man553]

Many deep science videos are like this, visuals corresponding to the subject at hand simply not being available. Boltzmann vids are like this,

[@laurv8370]

@@C-man553 Actually, it is not so bad like I initially said😀, sorry for my outburst, and you would not believe it 😛, but I watch it a second time (well... only some parts🤫) and the sound is just plainly shifted with few seconds (it is getting worse towards the end of the video). If you shift and squeeze a bit the sound column (VLC can do that easily) it makes a bit more sense. (edit: I am not talking about abstract stuff, Boltzmann and co., but especially when he talks about simple stuff, chemical bonds, and things everyone knows from high school chemistry classes, he talks about metallic bonds and show covalent, then he talks about ionic and show metallic, then he talks about hydrogen bonds but shows ionic, etc, this is killing my OCD 😳, but if you shift the sound column, it makes sense). I think the author(s) should repost it with the right alignment of the sound and image.

[@C-man553]

@@laurv8370 Outburst? No. History of the universe does quality work. An interim prob somewhere. I just started this but can tell it will indeed be interesting. Cool Worlds does superb work as well.

[@petemchardy3605]

Mind blowing it makes you wonder what it's all about great video thanks man

[@Tar-Von]

So.. Imagine if some bizarre alien species decided to observe us for decades.. One day, one comes directly to you and asks, "Your so-called human species, what's it all about?" What answer would you realistically give to that question? -- Or would you think that's probably an odd question? I'm just genuinely curious is all.

[@us3rG]

IF aliens exist every answer would change but only humans give meaning to the known universe, without humans everything is meaningless ​@@Tar-Von

[@Tar-Von]

@@us3rG Indeed, there's definitely some truth in that. The question seems a bit odd to me. It simply is what it is, or what it appears to be. -- If that makes sense. Also, I'm fairly certain that aliens do in fact exist. Whether or not they possess our concept of _intelligence,_ and have actually visited Earth? That's definitely questionable to say the least. -- A moot point, just a side interest. Still, interesting answer.👌

[@markdeffebach8112]

If matter is indeed energy, there is no end to the subdivision of "fundamental" particles since each is like a standing wave of energy and breaking them involves adding energy by smashing which likely increases vibrational energy resulting in more complex waveforms which will have more harmonic components.

[@ericvondell5157]

Energy is the kinetic State Of A Something, but, is NOT Itself a Something. Energy is, Actually, A "Nothing"! Sorta like Gravity is an Effect Rather than a Thing. There's no Gravity Particle Yet, Gravity has Force and creates it's own secondary effects. Gravity Waves are one Such Secondary Effect! That is Gravity's Kinetic State! Potential Energy (Static Energy) Kinetic Energy (Motion) Conduction Energy (The Transference of Energy from one thing to another!) This Was What We Were taught In My Century. But, It's probably different Nowadays 🙀🤪💖

[@handsupbud]

It would be interesting if we could discuss these therories with an Alien and they just looked at us and laughed explaining to us just how wrong we really were and then explained just how simple it all is but how we're approaching it the wrong way.

[@SovereignSlave1]

and that wrong way is that we wait way to long before we allow static electricity its formidable place in the early moments of creation immediately following the Big Bang. If we fit static electricity where it belongs string theory is no longer needed.

[@Titanis2000]

I truly agree with you , Cant prove it but I feel we for sure are not alone ...... I would absolutely enjoy a more detailed explanation on how and why all the element function as they do ........ If I was ever abducted that would be one of my questions .

[@timetravellingbackwardsisp5337]

@@Titanis2000 You dont have to ask anything, they shove a probe into your exit instead, dont you know?

[@jojolafrite90]

Come on, you FEEL???!!! David Grush! An,d the complete context of what was disclosed sionce 2017, the WHOLE THING, NOW!@@Titanis2000

[@krox477]

There are no aliens

[@digitalcommunity7621]

Informative and beneficial 🥰Geniouous presentation😘Brilliant video💖🥰👍

[@douglasperry8211]

Genius?

[@stefanschleps8758]

The narration is excellent. Clear and well enunciated. The pronunciation and syntax is perfect. I love this channel. I learn as much in two hours as I did in three months at school. Thanks for sharing with us. 😊

[@AndyWitmyer]

Yeah, bc it's AI haha

[@ranjittyagi9354]

​@@AndyWitmyerno, that's not the reason though.

[@johncalvin6124]

Except for the very annoying zzZZ sound at the end of every other sentence.

[@ericvondell5157]

It's perfect narration because the narrator Is AI! The Only Humans capable of Perfect Narration Are Morgan Freeman, James Earl Jones, and Patrick Stewart! 🙀😹💖

[@7deepbreaths.sounds]

Absolutely OUSTANDING presentation! I thoroughly enjoyed viewing this documentary.

[@michael.forkert]

Documentary? Where?

[@idegteke]

An atom is the smallest thing that has a full set of qualities, therefore, the atom is the smallest thing that gives us the opportunity to fully detect it in our discoverable universe in terms of size, weight, spatial position etc. By detecting all available aspects of subatomic particles, we still can’t have its complete set of physical attributes. This, however, means that subatomic particles don’t necessarily have to follow the axioms, causality, rules and constants we observe in the case of atoms, molecules and above. Talking about the mass, size, precise position of and, most importantly, about the role played by a subatomic particle is like talking about the taste of the rainbow, or the physical mass of an idea or the amount of light emitted by empty space - it’s like trying to display the value of a C++ variable without defining its type, let alone its value. For example, (certain?) particles appear to have dual nature because they are beyond being either matter or wave, appear to be entangled because they are not fully separated on a deeper level, etc - they are only partially described by attributes we observe in our discoverable universe - which means, however terrible it is even to consider: they just partially exist in our discoverable universe. Physical existence of subatomic particles, at least in our discoverable universe, is not a Boolean value.

[@dionnelong]

Thank you. The quarks and etc. of a single proton or neutron....are these small particles that make up protons and neutrons. According to Einstein are just energy, that has no mass. According to Einstein, it's only if/when their force can be determined against friction, only at that moment, do they have mass, but that's only because of the force of the explosion (causality), if they move slower than cause. If they move faster than cause, then they have no mass. The way I understood it, is if they move faster than cause, then they can't be sped up by another cause, then they have no mass. It's a blessing to be able to move faster than cause! If that is truly possible, then existence has always exist. If this is true then existed, is an incorrect word for it, because existence never failed to exist. You are the one demonstrating this video, because of forces beyond some of our control. The soul that is willing, if it is not prevented, if it can overcome your evil, the evil of Cain, then those souls will reach nirvana, and arrive at enlightenment. The enlightenment of existence, which is God himself. Good is determined by the needs of the souls of human beings. Without living creatures, good would have no reason to exist; however it still does exist.

[@sonarbangla8711]

Infinitely small or atom, reality is made of quantum fields that collapse to produce fine tuned particles leading to life, consciousness, soul and faith as physics rolls into metaphysics.

[@EinsteinKnowedIt]

Quantum? Great comment! But do you actually believe any object can occupy any more space than that which it resides? Rotating fan blades no matter how fast, still occupy only one spot in a given iota of a moment.

[@OmniMale]

​@@EinsteinKnowedItremember, the quantum realm is counter intuitive. Quantum super imposition doesn't say, " same space at the same time. Now I'm a layman so bear with me. What we call matter (fan blades) is made up mostly if empty space. The particles that are there exist as probability fields. Imposition means they exist in a place and yet don't exist in that place, simultaneously. The double slit experiment shows that these fields (or particles once observed) take every possible route between a and z. Since it's based on probability, you take into consideration other factors like other particles in that same spot, speed, etc.

[@EinsteinKnowedIt]

@OmniMale My position is this. The cat in the box 📦 is either living or dead. It can not be both. Let's look at the real world. The box is the earth 🌎. Someone 60 light years away has a contraption, so refined that it can see humans on this planet. They see me as a child. They see living beings who we know have long perished. There is no escalated Vietnam War, etc. It hasn't happened yet. That is the Earth they see. However, I am not both a 7 year old and a 67 year old. The cat in the box can not be both dead and alive. I confess ignorance to what one can see and interpret on the subatomic level. Nature does what nature does. Quantum mechanics, smearing reality, and obscurity seem one and the same. So if we are using any Quantum technology, then by that fact, it can be said to be a part of nature because we are a part of nature using nature to do something puzzling. So we have Quantum computers. The power is either on or off. Not both. Send more examples defending Quantum theory. I'd like to read them.

[@paxwallace8324]

​@@OmniMaleIf all subatomic phenomena are actually higher dimensional phenomena, then the fact that the messy inelegant world of the Standard Model is invariably empirically verifiable is truly a tribute to the Scientific Method because we're working at an inherent disadvantage stuck in these 4 dimensions. Steven Weinberg one of the Nobel Laureates for the Standard Model said of Ed Whittens particular mathematical construct. M-Theory "That something as elegant and beautiful as M-Theory could just be wrong seems highly unlikely" He said it on a TV show by Brian Greene

[@ynkybomber]

I hope we can find an island of elemental stability. Metallic Hydrogen would be the most useful material ever.

[@briangiles2146]

Wouldn't it though

[@JohnSmith-ts2od]

Appreciate the effort in making this video, but I feel it may be somewhat outdated and not fully reflective of our current understanding of atomic structure. It's often stated that an atom is mostly 'empty space,' but this isn't entirely accurate. Quantum physics shows us that the space inside an atom is filled with electric, magnetic, and quantum fields. The electrons aren't located at fixed points but exist as a probability cloud, where they could potentially be at any given moment. Thus, while it's true that the physical components like the nucleus and electrons occupy a relatively small portion of the atom, the remaining space is far from being empty. It's actually filled with these fields, and that's a critical distinction. I encourage more updated research and information in your future content to ensure viewers are getting the most accurate scientific information. Keep striving for accuracy!

[@ricocapili6990]

With the rate of astronomical and quantum discovery we humans are doing right now till the next century, it will be quite rare for us to alone after all. And one can truly say indeed we are special, no doubt about it..

[@chriswaudby1084]

Very thought provoking video i love learning about the quantum world

[@richardofoz2167]

Thought provoking indeed. I keep thinking there must be a thousand things I'd rather be doing.

[@spaceman081447]

I don't usually do this, particularly on science videos, but this thing actually put me to sleep.

[@pitbullmom3234]

😂 I AGREED I love it

[@treyvon4444]

I usually like space vids but this is the micro universe so I can relate.

[@TheDavidlloydjones]

Are you sure you were awake to start with?

[@stephenjohnhopkinson8096]

Was that an attack or a compliment? Only time is fundamental for anything to ever have existed in infinity. These people know about the 0 space singularity yet believe in the plank length. Space doesn't exist it's information stored in the flow of time to contain the information of the reality we experience. I want to save the world but everyone is dumb.

[@kevinlutz5994]

Church sermons do the same thing to me.

[@naseradeli7207]

Exelent scientific research and show. Thank you

[@peterclarke3020]

Rather poorly presented.

[@Meme_city_111]

One of the best video u ever made mann....i love this video...❤luv from Pakistan

[@jasminejeanine2239]

What if gravitons only come into existence when enough virtual particles hit each other?

[@madhatter3492]

What if they don't exist because you are digging beyond the singularity, and it's all made up?

[@TheJadeFist]

or they don't exist because gravity as we perceive it is an emergent property of other systems rather than there being a single type of causal particle?

[@volcangoliatha4996]

Great content keep us informed 😊

[@jthepickle7]

Atoms are not absolutely necessary, but they do add texture to our experience. One, or 'oneness' makes far more sense than infinite variability. "The total number of minds in the universe is one." - Schrodinger

[@revert6417]

Playing this at .5x is literally me after messy night out on the plonk.

[@-AndAllThatJazz..]

Truly different in the sense that something in here is actualy new information that haven´t seen before anywhere else . . . and with this master storytelling voice unfolding it .

[@bama4467]

You mean the AI voice?

[@-AndAllThatJazz..]

@@bama4467 Mean the one took place of all the zombies ?

[@synisterfish]

The "master storytelling voice" which spasms nearly every single time it hits a word such as "atoms" or "questions" or "bosons" or "photons" ... or words which generally end in an "s" sound... - Are you a bot?? This 'canned narrator' is actually garbage.

[@peterclarke3020]

An AI voice would not have had this speech impediment. He adds ‘zzzzz’ to the end of too many words !

[@timetravellingbackwardsisp5337]

@@peterclarke3020 right, its a troll

[@abooswalehmosafeer173]

Many thanks for really trying to make this simple.I have to admit though I still find some of it really beyound my grasp.But I will persevere because Repetition helps to accommodate some concepts.But again Thanks speed of lights.

[@chuckgriffin3292]

Great video which does a good job of explaining a very complex topic.

[@user-es2ju9np9s]

Thank you to the team which produced this great work! This is an exceptional presentation and it made me question why my school physics lessons were so dull almost 65 years ago. Had those lessons been presented in this engaging and interesting manner, I may well have chosen the study of physics as my lifetime pathway. I really enjoyed this presentation.

[@ranjittyagi9354]

Schools tend to rush and don't care enough. A fact I see across the world, definitely not relegated to any particular nation. Thank you!😊

[@pauly362]

I wouldn't want children to be taught by monotone AI systems. Have you not noticed the fake volume change but constant speed of word delivery? It is very well presented as in documented and laid out but the narration should have been read by an actual person...in my opinion.

[@ranjittyagi9354]

@@pauly362 I hate AI.

[@user-es2ju9np9s]

@@pauly362 In an ideal world and all that... I ignored all of the things that did not add to the material being presented. This would include inflection, monotony, volume changes, inhuman voice &c. These attributes did not aid the clarity of vision behind the presentation. I could have requested that some world-famous cosmologist come to my home and present the materials personally. We have to be realistic and accept that the material was very well presented and introduced a complex subject to a wide audience. This form of presentation is one of the saving graces of the internet.

[@xXxTeenSplayer]

There is actually no science education in this video, it's just some random AI generated factoids. I don't think you would have made it as a physicist...

[@michals1967]

This video should be listened to at the 1.5 speed.

[@TheWhitefisher]

You have to change the playback speed in the settings, not the comments section

[@wayneallen9192]

0.5 Is better... Sounds he is pissed up at that speed lol

[@christosmani]

That's how I always listen to all these "almost documentaries". Isaac Arthur has better deals with great insights, instead of copies of a copy they barely understand.

[@ticklemeelbow]

Definitely helped. 👍

[@jonnyroxx7172]

Nope. Almost every other documentary needs to be slowed down. People these days have almost no attention span anymore. Slow down and THINK.

[@zinawilkins2364]

Cause I thank you for allowing us to see the beautiful of the mystery, the mysterious the powerful glory of having the trip created. Thank you God for letting me be able to see this and show us more. I love it. I love it I love it thank you god

[@junestorm]

Brilliant video!

[@KF-bj3ce]

One can not stop to wonder at this magnificent universe.

[@SeanSchwifty]

Why not’th? 😮

[@u2ooberboober]

I can: bills to pay, stressed out at work. hot outside… commercials popping up while trying to watch this video…!

[@Sctn187]

​@@u2ooberbooberespecially because ai is playfully slow speaking

[@jackdawson5273]

mea, eat when ya hungry, sleep when ya tired... aint no mystery. lol omgg peoples, whys yous trys finds shyt out that will never matter?

[@Sctn187]

@@jackdawson5273 I think you're asking why people want to know about things that will never matter I think you mean thinks that won't actually effect us. Well that's what makes humans so amazing our curiosity and willingness to learn. They do matter in the sense that we would like to understand what's makes the universe tick, what's out there, why and how we're here.

[@anomaliesandtherealdeal]

After watching antman, i often wonder about the quarks and muons etc and what they experience. I wish we could see it.. One day maybe

[@Earth2Ross]

Highly-complex concepts expertly-explained! TY

[@m.syassin5774]

The lecture is very good and useful. Thank you very much

[@richardrios6780]

The universe in a finger nail !!!

[@dadsonworldwide3238]

It shows us the micro is co dependant on the macro. We cant reduce away mankinds place. We have a great language model and tools to help speak and study in approximation about a paradoxical world around us. And this is ok . Its just how our ancestors predicted it to be. Its an amazing power almost mystical .

[@markwrede8878]

The layout of numbers suggests that the infinite resembles an ocean at all scales.

[@chousaru]

Beautiful closing statement. Inspiring,

[@PlanetXMysteries-pj9nm]

All your videos are great! One thing I’ve always wanted to do is to travel in outer space. Sadly it’s extremely unlikely to happen but I can dream

[@rodbarker1017]

An absolutely amazing piece of work. The somewhat ponderous delivery is very deliberate as for most it is talking about concepts way outside the norm. A bit like Feynmans comment on Quantem mechanics. If you think you can grasp all this at 140 wpm you clearly don't and it is just ear and eye candy. Why in God's name isn't it taught like this. I am a retired atmospheric research physiatrist and saying this is a masterpiece

[@AndyWitmyer]

It's deliberate sounding bc it's an AI voice-over

[@parsandstripes9445]

Reinforce AI takeover.

[@telsat]

Very interesting and informative thank you

[@michaelpenklis7580]

The theory of everything is putting a good documentary together.

[@larrygraham3377]

This is a great video. Really learned a lot. Thank you for breaking everything down to a level that even a simple minded person like me could understand. 🤔🤔🤔

[@timetravellingbackwardsisp5337]

You cant be simple minded, youre commenting here on YT ^^

[@MasterBlaster3545]

You are far from simple minded. The majority of people can’t think at all. Did you know that 50% of the population can not imagine? What I’m getting at is when you walk down the road, do you think of stuff, like for instance what it would be like to be a millionaire, or what you are going to have for dinner, or you can’t wait to see your parents next week, or dreaming of that new car you are saving up for? 50% of people are blank totally. It shocked me when a top psychologist in a video I watched about 6 months ago said it. I thought it can’t be true and he did say it is just normal for them and it isn’t a bad thing either. Obviously they do not know themselves probably that people like us actually think, because they would not be able to comprehend that. Scary thought when you think about it.

[@veraivanova4664]

​@@MasterBlaster3545As someone with aphantasia I laughed very hard at this comment

[@Kratos_TM]

Watching this at 1.25x speed and it sounds great

[@user-yl5sq1eb4r]

I always thought that you can go down or up to incomprehensible scales. Think of a universe that is incomprensibly small. Could our universe be inside of an incomprehensibly huge atom? Could each of the atoms in our universe contain impossibly small universes?

[@amirthakateasan2957]

The story teller voice and the cap between the words has charmed us, is nothing like anything before, thanks a lot gentleman....a.v.pillai, chennai

[@wttw4942]

I'm wondering how two entangled particles might behave if they are smashed together inside a particle accelerator.

[@Noqtis]

they will have sex and create a new particle obviously, how do you thought new particles are made?

[@jabroski69]

Actually that would be dangerous if that were to happen it would affect the very fabric of our universe and make our reality more like the movie Idiocracy where we elect famous people into office and then the males would chop their dicks off and get on hormones to appear more womanly and then argue that just bc their chromosomes are male and they don't menstruate or have babies that they are in fact a woman and want to use the women's bathroom, stupid shit like that.

[@jthepickle7]

You pose a question that reminds me of marriage!

[@garychaney5484]

Many a quickie divorce! This coming from a carpenters point of view

[@idegteke]

What we perceive as 2 entangled particles is, actually, 2 separate spatial appearance of a single (something). Coming up with such a childish idea that they are “entangled” and picturing a magical worm hole between them (and even hoping to use that for interstellar travel) shows that the mainstream science has very little potential to get results - I’m just writing this down for the record. Some of you might see if I was right in some decades.

[@paxwallace8324]

What can be "seen" is dependent on the wavelength of light so it's (by definition) an absurdity to ask what "anything" smaller than the Wavelength of visible light would look like.

[@michaeld.coulombesr.583]

I, as one, thought it was a excellent video, very interesting and well written. Thank you very much. Michael said that, bye for now my friend.

[@richardremillard4451]

Great video. Thank you

[@elfootman]

I hate these AI generated video, makes no sense, filled with catchy phrases that don't make a coherent paragraph. Should be reported.

[@kenhiett5266]

I don't know what's up with this guys voice, but it sounds intentional. I think that's why it bothers me to point I have to quit watching.

[@codynix8213]

Me too. It's obnoxious. I think it's a computer voice.

[@m.d.classes3889]

Easiest intelligible explanation for all level of understanding people.

[@dathyr1]

You talk about the very small in this video. What if we were the atom to something much more bigger than our universe. Kind of makes me think how many levels are there and what if we were a small part of something much larger. But that is something for the SciFi guys to come up with a movie about.

[@Paducah_Guy]

ARE WE STILL QUANTUM ENTANGLED WITH OUR LOVED ONES AFTER DEATH...?

[@user-ki2cl9xe8z]

That's GROOVE! I hope you're right!

[@deeestuary]

'Infinitely Small' is impossible.

[@gisli12]

Infinity is 404 afk, in the math realm often in close proximity theoretically to a singularity, i am most sertainly just spewing nonsens. I just had to comment cuz of mind altering substances week makes me think im dumb but the creativeness of my thoughts expands and thinking becomes fun

[@OmniMale]

How so?

[@jacob.tudragens]

@OmniMale Theoretically, expansion can be infinite. Meaning, of course, that it goes on forever. While expansion can be infinite, shrinking can only go so small! At some point, the smallness is, at least effectively, zero!

[@OmniMale]

@@jacob.tudragens but what does zero look like?

[@jacob.tudragens]

@@OmniMale That's the point! Describe nothing. I'll wait... For a thing can be a thing, you have to be able to describe it. Zero is nothing. No thing!

[@ninner196]

Well definitely true, the more we think we know the more we realize we just don’t know and hence “theories “

[@miromihaljinec9728]

Great work! Thanks !

[@rwarren58]

That can't be a human narrator.

[@jennodine]

It’s not and you’re experiencing a phenomenon called Uncanny Valley.

[@guido764]

Thank you it's driving me nuts. Distracting.

[@jennodine]

@@guido764 lol same

[@SteedRuckus]

Play it at 1.25x speed, thank me later.

[@MugiwaraTed]

⁠@@SteedRuckusjeez is the video intentionally slowed down so they can get more watch time?

[@NondescriptMammal]

Something "infinitely small" wouldn't "look like" anything.

[@OmniMale]

How do you know?

[@NondescriptMammal]

@@OmniMale Well, consider the term "infinitely small". There are particles that we are aware of that are extremely small, but not "infinitely small", and even these particles are too small to see optically, such that they can't rightly be described as "looking like" anything, since they are too small to even reflect light waves back to our eyes, even under the most powerful optical magnification device. Beyond that, the term "infinitely small" is itself arguably a contradiction in terms... to describe something as small inherently implies that it has a finite size, even if that size is unknown. Therefore it cannot be "infinitely small" unless we consider that it has no dimensions at all, like a mathematical point... which is to say, it is nonexistent. Tell me, how can something that is so small that it occupies zero space, be looked at? If you can't look at it, it can't really "look like" anything, can it?

[@larrysorenson4789]

And last one: to measure and pinpoint the location of things in space, we must identify a universal starting point.

[@MssssppSoldier]

I love how slow the narrator speaks on such a complex subject

[@ralphmaughan7951]

I think the narration is done by a machine vocalizing a script.

[@peterhart1966]

Several years ago, at least fifteen to twenty years, I asked what if we could magnify so, so much that we could see behind the cracks to the other side?

[@OmniMale]

What cracks?

[@nomofomo3995]

Thus, cern was born.

[@kendallkirkham238]

KZbin did everything it could to ruin this.

[@ozymandiasultor9480]

KZbin did everything to ruin this very ordinary documentary that says nothing new about quantum mechanics? You think youtube cares so much about quantum mechanics, or has some opposing theory to those that were mentioned?

[@cousinivoryciv1309]

What exactly did KZbin do?

[@Gesus_23]

Bullshit, it’s a crap video anyway

[@davidharvey3743]

How?

[@tomhartl6330]

Are you referring to the incessant ads?

[@nuranigeria2080]

So the naked eyes are not enough!! Knowledge, Experience, Experiment and dedication 🥂 provide realities enough to believe even without the naked eyes.

[@MyKukutis]

My respect to the speaker, nice work, thank You

[@Tomichika]

These are so great. I wish there wasnt the accent on words endings. I find it so disruptive while falling asleep. It souns like the narrator is exhaling at the end of every sentene ending word.

[@Just.A.T-Rex]

It’s ai voice, I sped it up just a bit and it helped

[@michaelbryant4703]

Wow...

[@ozymandiasultor9480]

It is not made to make you asleep.

[@chriswaudby1084]

I agree 😊

[@ozymandiasultor9480]

OK, a relatively ordinary documentary about quantum mechanics with a voice that is slightly annoying.

[@cousinivoryciv1309]

All the space science channels are using AI voice is now, play it at 1.25 speed to be less annoying but yeah I agree

[@ozymandiasultor9480]

@@cousinivoryciv1309 I know, but some are slightly better than other AI voices... In any case, I will try that trick, thanx.

[@TheWhitefisher]

@@ozymandiasultor9480 This AI is running a little slower than in other documentaries. It has some unique inflections on the end of plural words. It's grown on me. I just want to say that this channel does a good job expanding a layperson's understanding and doesn't spend time on psuedoscience, except for to mention and discredit it. The thing about AI voicing is "you get what you pay for". Do you want quality content, or do you want studio production? You don't seem to get both in this economy. The original KZbin was made by volunteers using microphones on their earbuds, making zero income. That was quality content, and it cost nothing and produced nothing. Personally, I'm happy to listen to an odd inflection. If you focus on comparing this channel to space-specific channels, it probably appears differently. This is a generalised science-dissemination channel.

[@zack_120]

Textbook material! 👍 The first part on standard model is beautifally described with new informarion to learn (to me). But the quantum part it's better to wait for the conclusion from the strange quantum theories in order to save time. 50:05- how to prove that quarks, and electrons, are fundamental particles being indivisible?

[@STARDRIVE]

That´s a good question. The elements were thought to be elementary too..

[@seanbarrett2629]

Infinity streches down beyond quantum, and outwards to infinity beyond the universes

[@scottchapman5410]

Nice and relaxing visuals as well

[@malectric]

It seems to me that Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle should and does apply at any scale. To know the position of anything, big or small you have to "freeze" its position relative to the measurement apparatus. But if you do that, it has zero motion at that instant and therefore no momentum. So you cannot in principle know both at the same instant. It seems to me that the principle puts a limit on measurement - stop time and you can know one thing to at least the tiniest fraction of time allowable/measureable or allow time to continue and you know the other (momentum) but the position is no longer exact. Why should this not apply to everything?

[@ericray7173]

Because when you zoom out - those fuzzy probability clouds become more and more predictable due to the fact that the probability that the particles will be outside of an area of, say, a square inch, although not zero, is nearly impossible.

[@educatedmanholecoverbyrich8890]

Very good for the beginner, and the bright child.

[@juliew393]

Excellent video. Thanks!

[@wenaolong]

When modern scientific thought reflects realistically on its own present limitations of theory, it resembles a Titan being modest about his stature.

[@balasubr2252]

We are the discerning instrument nature has evolved to unify, understand and utilize.

[@DownhillAllTheWay]

I'm glad he said that the Schrodinger's cat experiment doesn't reflect reality. I kind-of get what is being illustrated by it, but the reality is that at any moment in time, the cat is either dead or alive - we simply don't know which - but it makes no intuitive sense to say it is both dead and alive at the same time. Maybe this makes more sense in the realm of sub-stomic particles, but a cat in a box is is a poor illustration.

[@satyajitganguly3135]

What we're able to see and perceive around us is miniscule and there's much more exit that maybe beyond our scope to imagine.......

[@rezzer7918]

Ohhh!!! LOL

[@kensanity178]

It's like the old watch that can't be opened. We can see it functioning, hear it ticking, but we cannot know how or why