This is so cool - can't wait til we're all zooming around with these
@Justwantahover5 ай бұрын
KZbinrs might copy it, for more fun videos. The Chinese will copy it and use it for their POLICE! 😅
@i91142 жыл бұрын
While watching this, all I can think is, how awesome are flying animals.
@GoldKingsMan Жыл бұрын
Especially Dragons.
@Whateverl0l1236 ай бұрын
@@GoldKingsManyeah like Charizard 😂
@lower473 ай бұрын
@Dr.Kraig_Renhow troublesome... Birb better
@pheirphon46802 ай бұрын
Humans are not better! Humans consume many materials to be airborne.
@pheirphon46802 ай бұрын
I like this guy at trying to explain basic Math.😊
@joseph78582 жыл бұрын
Thank you for covering this. 💝
@mydogsbutler2 жыл бұрын
While technically you could do pure electric, limited flight time is a major problem. Batteries don't yet have even close to the energy density of fossil fuel to compete.
@ruzzodac2 жыл бұрын
but that goes against the green narrative!
@XAtmo972 жыл бұрын
Factor in developments in Beamed Energy towards Space Elevators, Laser Development for Fusion, Targeting Systems for Automated Point Defense, and factor in a Real World Development need and it's just an engineering problem which needs a dedicated team with cash :P No Military or Rescue Service operates without support resources, so a Local Energy Source seems reasonable. Plus if the intent is for training there's a strong likelyhood that permanent physical tethering could be justified by the use case in a controlled environment: say a warehouse with a Crane Gantry system delivering mains power. No Iron Man, but maybe a Tin Man? : D
@mydogsbutler2 жыл бұрын
@@XAtmo97 I'm just talking about the present and particular use cases where high energy density is critical (e.g. flight). Of course physicists and engineers are always coming up with solutions to seemingly insurmountable problems. Battery densities might one day improve to a point they are competitive or even beat fossil fuel. Some argue interplanetary rockets are a use case you can never use pure electric. I recently read an article about some physicists who speculate even electric rockets might be possible one day using an interesting loophole in special relativity. Since mass increases with speed, they argue in theory it should be possible to put particles in a loop where on one side of a proposed spacecraft their mass is greater than the other. (effectively simulating a rocket ejecting mass to accelerate) Physics is amazing.
@taiwoolaleye63332 жыл бұрын
thats because people still using lithium batteries, there is aluminium air batteries that can store far more energy dense, but cant be recharged like the way we charge lithium batteries
@sentinel81852 жыл бұрын
They could use nuclear energy and develop a way to keep dangerous radiation from effecting you…
@aniketjadhav5292 Жыл бұрын
Tony stark made it in a cave ....
@nisargdelvadiya06256 ай бұрын
that suit doesnt have flight capabilities like other suits
@Nugslab6 ай бұрын
WITH A BOX OF SCRAPS!
@MultiAaron12126 ай бұрын
Not funny lol guy
@Nugslab3 ай бұрын
its pretty funny
@Madmackz11072 ай бұрын
Fictionql@@Nugslab
@samxyx2 жыл бұрын
Flight time and cost are going to be the real limiting factors here. 5 minutes still really limits the possible applications.
@professorvoluck93112 жыл бұрын
Flight time is terrible on jet fuel, too. Batteries & fuel are too limited by space and weight. Better start upping my squats at the gym.
@archangel_one Жыл бұрын
That and getting tangled in power lines at night.
@smartwatchonpluto Жыл бұрын
@@archangel_one lol speaking from experience?
@LG123ABC Жыл бұрын
We could eliminate that problem by using a Radioisotope Thermoelectric Generator like the one on the Mars rover but everyone gets scared around plutonium. It's too bad, because its energy density is fantastic.
@archangel_one Жыл бұрын
@@LG123ABC Just ONE plutonium particle can cause cancer, that's why they are afraid. But the solution is simple enough, make quality parts ourselves.
@ArtstradaMagazine2 жыл бұрын
just having a protected futuristic cyberpunk city and tethered jet suits would be a MONEY amusement ride
@Mor4me7 ай бұрын
Thanks for the info and your time It’s well presented and appreciated 👍
@dunichtich1002 жыл бұрын
The Hacksmith and his team from Canada were trying to create an electric jet suit years ago as well but they failed at the cost. They wanted to use the "Schubler electric ducted fans - EDF" that were shown in this video and which are used by Gravity as well now. Great to see that the Hacksmith was on the righ track and the technology is now coming together.
@WaleOsinoiki Жыл бұрын
you forgot jlaservideo
@32BitJunkie Жыл бұрын
Yeah jlaser video has been flying around in one of these painted up to look like iron man. He had to lose 20 lbs to get airborne though lol
@lukewoodside94202 жыл бұрын
They should use this with a high voltage wire when training on the tether, would save a load of fuel and emissions.
@Tore_Lund2 жыл бұрын
The configuration is impractical, you need upper body strength to fly this, like a static pushup. Small fans are inefficient. So as a specialty vehicle for very narrow conditions. Ideally a bi-copter with large overhead rotors, preferably foldable down along the side of the backpack battery when stored= much longer flight time and we have the electronics to have it be easy to fly.
@foxfoxy54902 жыл бұрын
@@Tore_Lund that's what jetpacks are for
@Tore_Lund2 жыл бұрын
@@foxfoxy5490 Jet pack flight time 70 seconds, electric bicopter 20 minutes! Big difference
@jhendies2 жыл бұрын
@@Tore_Lund eh, your arms are pretty much locked downwards. Probably a bit easier than holding a push-up
@Tore_Lund2 жыл бұрын
@@jhendies I'd imagine there is a lot of balancing involved in piloting this, so his abdomen, shoulders, back will be working all the time, it will feel like exercise.
@SeldimSeen16 ай бұрын
Can't wait until it can be used for morning commutes. :)
@_MaxHeadroom_2 жыл бұрын
If they could make it quieter that would be huge because one of the current biggest disadvantages is noise level
@Darius-scifieart2 жыл бұрын
Unfortunately there's only so much you can do there. Most of the noise from a jet engine is just the sound of air moving through a tube pushed by a fan quickly. Which Is why car turbochargers and larger rc EDF jet's fans make a similar turbine whine even though no combustion is happening within them.
@cz15892 жыл бұрын
Nice idea for commando's dropping from planes. Instead of slow and vulnerable decent on parachutes, just a fast boost to slow down the last meters before hitting the ground.
@ddegn2 жыл бұрын
That sounds absolutely terrifying. If they wait to slow themselves near the ground, it would be too late for a backup parachute. Still, that would be really amazing to see.
@contessa.adella2 жыл бұрын
Halo…..
@absolution61918 ай бұрын
@@contessa.adellaOrbital Drop Shock Troopers?
@kevins90sc8 ай бұрын
Things are moving VERY FAST in this Field..good luck to all involved.
@adityakapoor8055Ай бұрын
Love this sharing and explanation, thank you! This is also the first time I'm hearing about voltage sag. Curious to go read up more about it
@MrElectrifyer6 ай бұрын
Soon as Solid State Batteries take off in conjunction with super conducting motors, this will really fly...
@Justanotherchannel-b7s10 ай бұрын
Try powering that electric jetsuit off of a disc with magnets on an alternator with more magnets to repell the magnets on the disc and spin it.
@bayusetiawan23572 ай бұрын
Nice teknology,i like this 85mph very fast in air
@lawrencecole6527 Жыл бұрын
This flight works close to what it does in my dreams. Put me in coach. Literally lucid dreaming this for my whole life. Nobody's going to be better than me. Think about it.
@NSGca Жыл бұрын
I understand the limitations of batteries, they've made great strides recently and will continue to do so. Excellent video friend, I'm looking forward to more of the same!
@P8FPV2 жыл бұрын
I like the drone building footage 😉 Yeah we need more motor and battery technology give it a few years im sure we can get there.
@jessejuliano8056 Жыл бұрын
High performance batteries are 3.2kg per kw currently(the likes of freefly alta X drone batteries).This thing is 96kwh. With 22.4kg battery pack you'd have 7kwh. At full throttle this machine would use 1.6kw per minute(96kw per hour/60). That is 4 minutes 20 seconds of full throttle. With 80% average you can be getting into the 5minute territory.
@Theforestbandit Жыл бұрын
Love to see one fly across the English channel from England to France.
@JCAH14 ай бұрын
The main things that are currently needed, like in all aerospace projects, are to make the pack lighter and cheaper. The use of supercooled motor components goes in the exact opposite direction, at warp speed.
@leander92632 жыл бұрын
The many times more power of superconducting motors does not come from higher efficiency. Efficiency is above 90% in all cases anyway. Advantage of no electrical resistance is high amps which means high magnetic field. The motors are strong for a given diameter and therefore mass which also additionally helps a little in flying operations.
@airman98202 жыл бұрын
As someone that flys turbine jets. They do flame out unexpectedly at times. I would think a electric jetpack would be safer but it would need a jump in battery technology to work.
@getsideways72572 жыл бұрын
Oh, it did flame out at least once, sending the "pilot" tumbling down into the water. Only idiots fly these - especially around rocky cliffs.
@Shopweasel2 жыл бұрын
You crack a cell your going down in flames MR!
@nealcorbett1149 Жыл бұрын
As long as you don't need to scratch your nose (or anything else), they're great!
@memozawidi47442 жыл бұрын
That's awesome and hopefully opening new horizon for flying safely
@alexharvey9721Ай бұрын
Yea it's the batteries. I agree that superconducting motors would be awesome, but really electric brushless motors off the shelf are pretty amazing. They can have 90%+ efficiency and the power density of a jet engine already, so that's not really the problem. But batteries are slowly getting there. At least cost has come down massively.
@brianbell16082 ай бұрын
I'm waiting antigravity suit!
@jamesoneill4607 Жыл бұрын
Raises the question
@English_Lessons_Pre-Int_Interm Жыл бұрын
these jetpacks should be part of an armored suit, a one-piece suit impenetrable for bullets. Otherwise the soldiers will risk too much while flying away and getting bullets in their backs, and limbs. I am not even talking about some energy shield or at least active protection (like on tanks) to intercept approaching projectiles. I like Speaking practice and talking with my students about futuristic ideas.
@VRtechman2 жыл бұрын
Looks like a crazy excuse to create a miniature Nuke power source.
@stevetennispro2 жыл бұрын
So Thorium Man instead of Iron Man? ;)
@rrocketman Жыл бұрын
Awesome I want one😎
@diwarto15506 ай бұрын
The future to small jet,jaket jet electrical,❤❤❤
@ChrisAnthonyGiles2 ай бұрын
I don't see the problem here. Just build an arc reactor! Tony did it in a cave!!!
@gamingdude79598 күн бұрын
a arc reactor that size isnt possible, and even if it did, i dont think someone would wanna hold a nuclear reactor near their bodies, they would pretty sure get radiation and die.
@willbrink Жыл бұрын
They were supposed to develop super conductors that don't need to be super cold decades ago! We need those...
@ololh4xx2 жыл бұрын
1.8 minutes flight time .... well ... at least you can put on a show. Thats pretty much the only application for this - shows and short-term fun.
@OBFYT2 жыл бұрын
Absolute banger
@JeffGarnaas-jf5if Жыл бұрын
Advanced lithium Batts with 4x storage such as the new catl Batts are almost online in china for cherry autos,wich will certainly advance yearly,before superconducting motors become available.Once the two technologies are coupled,an all electric jetsuit will be possible with range,speed,and size reduction
@richardike2342 Жыл бұрын
Use the wind-turbine principle (converting mechanical energy into electrical energy). As the blades spin, it produces electricity to charge the batteries. That's what the alternator in a Car engine does; the engine spins the alternator, which generates electricity to charge the Car battery.
@Angel-dp9sl9 ай бұрын
Ok, this is epic. What's an engine without an alternator?
@donindri2 жыл бұрын
If they use a tether to train why not skip the battery altogether and let the tether also run an electric power cable and plug into the wall? It seems it could work like those water flyboards that are tethered to a boat. Thanks for posting
@NeoFrontierTechnologies2 жыл бұрын
The most efficient way to get in the air is to jump. However, these jetpack are admittedly more impressive. I am sure, given enough time, good flight times will be achieved eventually.
@ThatBoomerDude562 жыл бұрын
If you'd accept the definition of "good flight times" as being two minutes instead of 15 seconds -- then maybe.
@ThatBoomerDude562 жыл бұрын
Figured I'd be watching a video about the most impractical thing ever. Discovered that I was not wrong.
@moose61442 жыл бұрын
I really love this technology it has many useful things that can be done with it if they could get the kerosine jet pack to actually run up to a half hour to an hour but every time you guys improve this stuff you are proving that gravity does not exist that’s what I think is so neat about this it’s so simple to understand why gravity does not exist with this technology
@mcbot62912 жыл бұрын
Lol
@supaorigamisensei7 ай бұрын
conceptually its here 15 sec flight time isnt alot but its a start, but will be epic once its in fruition. so many applications, already i have seen vids of search and rescue, rapid first aid, boarding parties, having an electric motor will also be so much quieter, can do more stealthier missions plus night missions too, wont have to worry about afterburners literally lighting you up at night wonder if pilot weight might also affect flight time as well, heavier the person is, harder the motor has to compensate
@n8-kiss1822 жыл бұрын
wow what a awesome video this channel is a good find
@ZirothTech2 жыл бұрын
Thank you!
@gangleweed7 ай бұрын
It will always be the battery that limits the jet suit...........you still have the weight of the battery to be carried once it is exhausted.......in the kerosene model the fuel is used up and the weight is reduced.
@mangjose54462 жыл бұрын
It will be more use if they remove the thrusters from the hand. They ould palce it on the side of the back pack and can be controlled through legs to feet. So the hand can be of more use.
@peterah79572 жыл бұрын
I think they should invent some wearable shock absorbing boots for landings also... Any unexpected drops would eventually damage a pilots spine and leg joints
@joewoodchuck38242 жыл бұрын
That must be tough on the arms and hands.
@rolflandale25652 жыл бұрын
Chem-fuel engines are hazard at melee range at anything. For a man-sute gear, the electric can also rid of liquid-mass storage volume, while only partiional dry-mass weight increase. With more powerful turbine engines batteres + pulse static/plasma afterbuns.
@airplanenut89 Жыл бұрын
"A tether to the pilot could also be used for power" ... I hope this would just be for training as there are so many chances for injury/death outside of that. Flying around at roughly 80mph while tethered to something is a no-go for me.
@edocor8081 Жыл бұрын
bro we're not even done making the first jetpack period, let's give it a little time before going all electric
@shintsu012 жыл бұрын
I wonder if any fuel cell tech is small and powerful enough so that you can maybe have Hydrogen, Gas or something else to generate power for the system. Is a hybrid solution like building a micro turbine to generate power for the rest of the suite not a solution maybe?
@nimrodquimbus9122 жыл бұрын
Imagine a jet suit that burns as efficiently as the Hindenberg
@joaomelo7018 Жыл бұрын
@@nimrodquimbus912 the og version of this has a bag of kerosene burning in your hands, and the hindenburg didnt use fuel cells.
@benjaminhoffman3848 Жыл бұрын
I want to commute to work with a jet suit.
@nobodynobody77292 жыл бұрын
FINALLY we have jetpacks. What took so long?
@getsideways72572 жыл бұрын
Can't wait to splat yourself with one?
@AydenVr7 Жыл бұрын
for electric you could also attach it to a small frame with wheels
@Trener_Artem2 жыл бұрын
I doubt it will be possible to reduce the weight\power of the engines much more. Maybe, but with staggering increase in price. The potential of this transport will be developed thanks to the development of batteries, not engines.
@manin10 Жыл бұрын
The limited flight time is not the problem with either the fuel or electric-powered version. It's the fact that your hands are not your own for the entirety of the flight.
@krumba100 Жыл бұрын
When I watch the flies circling my room all day it makes me wonder what type of batteries they are using.
@aidorf2506 Жыл бұрын
bro be taking no walking on grass to a whole new level
@petergebert4817 Жыл бұрын
Schübeler fans are the best 👌
@youtubefrancais61382 жыл бұрын
combine the 2, small kerozen jet pack on the back that is monted with a generator and supercap, that can drive the electric jet fan on the arms
@RadekPilich2 жыл бұрын
Excellent channel, subscribing!
@graham5761 Жыл бұрын
Toroidal blades would improve thrust efficiency and noise emissions
@joshuamiller9136 Жыл бұрын
Design is amazing, but as technology gets more advanced ur going to have to shrink the fans and have them be more powerful, but for now great
@la7era1u542 жыл бұрын
A capacitor/battery hybrid might work if you turn on the capacitors at the same time the batteries are incurring the most resistance
@ddegn2 жыл бұрын
Capacitors have a miniscule charge density compared to batteries. After watching the video *"Super Capacitor Dragster" (Tom Stanton's* channel), I was amazed and disappointed to learn super capacitors held very little electric power when compared with batteries. I'm afraid the weight of capacitors would likely hurt the performance of the jet pack more than the fast release of power would help it.
@sharonbraselton31352 жыл бұрын
Wribg
@danko65825 ай бұрын
I summary, it runs (not all of which is flight) for 1 minute. Until we have several wouldn't-it-be-nice developments in future tech.
@stephenvince9994 Жыл бұрын
Oh..its Finally here.....Marvellous...Ive been waiting........Not....
@katuli36776 ай бұрын
I hope in the future there will be some civil version of jetsuit that has less horsepowers and smaller
@Anarchy_420 Жыл бұрын
Electric Tech is about to take off lol pun intended, Solid State Batteries, Graphene Batteries, and Nuclear Diamond Batteries! Horse Power and Flight time will drastically increase!👍
@cmyip11 Жыл бұрын
Will it be very tired to use two arms to support all your body weight during the whole flight?
@macrumpton2 жыл бұрын
Maybe they could design an electric fan with a hollow axle that you could put your hand through. This would allow a larger fan (higher efficiency) and reduce the number of fans. I wonder if fuel cells have the same voltage slump problem and if they have sufficient responsiveness for this application.
@dazerosn72 жыл бұрын
maybe just a small energy storage system in between the fans and the cell
@battlefront2dude66 Жыл бұрын
What if you add small wind turbine to the suit? That way as the suit drains one battery pack the backup would get charged. Then when the first pack is low it switches to the backup. Then the primary would get charged. You could possibly fly for as long as you want. The only problem is how quickly can the batteries be charged.
@sparksmcgee66417 ай бұрын
You must be young. The resistance of the fan would increase air resistance. Thw resistance would be considerably more fuel than the charge payback.
@kingmasterlord2 жыл бұрын
I see running stilts and jump jets in the future
@RonLWilson Жыл бұрын
There may be a niche application for an electric jet pack even if one has only 2minutes of flight time. That may be enough to allow soldiers to fly over a mine field , river, or swamp. For example if it only takes a minute to fly over a river a soldier could fly over the river land, and then have enough juice left in the battery to fly back over the river. Also, cargo UAVs could fly over extra batteries as well if needed or even ferry back the jet packs for more soldiers to use them to fly over the obstacle to reinforce the first wave. Breeching minefields is a big problem in Ukraine. Also, crossing the Dnieper and the swamps near it river. While kerosene jet packs could be used for this, it might be best to do this in the cover of night since the Russians have limited night vision capability but the plumes from the kerosene jetpacks might give them away. But an electric jet pack would not have a tell tale plume. And as far as its noise, that could be masked by flying UAVs around them so as to create other noise sources. So these might be used to get say a ten man team across a minefield of river that then could be used to gain a foothold on the other side that then could be reinforced by other waves.
@kingdetox36092 жыл бұрын
Traditional get pack !!
@robyguyroby Жыл бұрын
This idea originated in NASA. it was about Lt.Gen Kev Mckenzie. Something about how to get him on a Naval Ship or cruiser quickly and with little detection. The whole thing is about the anatomy of Kev, he is a little off balance...if this idea could work with Kev Mckenzie naturally then anyone could be able to do it, well atleast in the military. Coo right?
@airraptor2 жыл бұрын
1050 hp to lift 400 pounds for less than 5 minutes very efficient. true ducted fans are more efficient but only with the same diameter prop/fan. You take the same power above and put that in to a larger prop and you need way less power to lift the cargo. It is nice they are trying but batteries need to be advanced by a lot to work well.
@airgunningyup Жыл бұрын
a hybrid suit might work , where a small engine is acting as the generator to recharge the batteries
@navaho543010 ай бұрын
50 years and still waiting for a jet pack, the closest I've got is a DJI drone cheers.
@Serachja2 жыл бұрын
75 K is -198 C --> Liquid Nitrogen has a bp of -195.8 --> I don't see this temperature as a realistic practical operation temperature
@macrumpton2 жыл бұрын
I would have liked to hear the difference between the electric version and the original.
@greenpowder8719 Жыл бұрын
it would work much better with VasyFan EDF's, I also bought an edf from VasyFan and I think it is much more efficient than Schubler .
@emilflognoid15322 жыл бұрын
“There real life guys” made a flying bath tub 4 years ago and out fire fire longer than 5 minutes.. and Jlaser built a fight suit out of his garage with off the shelf stuff
@juan.24382 жыл бұрын
Solid state batteries, help us
@Justwantahover5 ай бұрын
I want 2 black ones please!
@Gyfrctgtdbhf Жыл бұрын
Wireless energy transmission like envisioned by Nikola Tesla is the only hope for longer flights if no new major breakthroughs in battery tech are forthcoming soon.
@arcdecibel9986 Жыл бұрын
Yeah, and we have that. Have for decades. It's called a cavity magnetron. Now, do you have ANY idea how much microwave power is needed to sustain something like a jetpack? You can't just broadcast it everywhere, because that creates harmful EM radiation. You'd be transmitting the same power to everyone and everything as to the jetpack. So you have to focus the beam, or put it in an enclosed space, like a microwave oven Imagine your microwave being used to power a jetpack, from significant distances, cutting through atmosphere in a directed beam. That's a MASER! A microwave laser that will flash-boil whatever it hits. We already have those, too, but so far they're used as non-lethal weapons because they can't be made into lethal weapons with current power supplies. It just takes way too much energy to flash-boil even tissue at limited range, much less get through any armor. Your idea isn't wrong, but the sheer amount of power it would take to transfer energy from a power source, THROUGH the air, to a jetpack that might change direction at any moment is just a maser beam waiting to go wrong. It's nowhere near worth the devastating cost.
@gaius_enceladus3 ай бұрын
I wonder if they would consider using a *fuel cell* instead of a battery? Fuel cells are extremely efficient and they may not have that "voltage sag" problem.
@frakyo6672 жыл бұрын
Start to put exosquelette to pilots to help in landing times and don't brake their legs.
@jokobodo82222 жыл бұрын
Make shoes or boots version of Jetpack as well like the Ironman does.
@pleasestandby59542 жыл бұрын
They tried putting jets on the feet when he was first developing the suit. Didn't work. He explains it in his TED talk
@nishi1870 Жыл бұрын
hes cute aw cute boi
@pforce92 жыл бұрын
That suit is obsolete before it is finished, The version we end up with needs to be stood on like the Green Goblin so you can hold a weapon in your hands. This present suit is as clumsy as the James Bond flying suit in Thunderball.
@gusjackson36582 жыл бұрын
And even after years of research and improvements, absentmindedly scratching your nose in flight is still fatal.
@bratalistic16174 ай бұрын
Hear me out... Neuralink + Electric Hip-Mounted AOT style ODM thrusters to free up hands for futuristic light sabers😅
@user-fi5mn8vj1j10 ай бұрын
when scientists create a portable fusion reactor, we can fly to others continents
@cvspvr2 жыл бұрын
how bad is the battery life on this? not only is most of the weight taken up by the rider, but edfs are more than 3x less efficient than propellers