How to tell good from bad typologists?

[@ad3l]

Can't wait for a based typologist to be like "I mistyped my self"

[@yellaperida7696]

Didn’t Rust mention that he was mistyped and made a video that he’s actually a SEE after a while?

[@TarzanHedgepeth]

I mistyped myself as EVERYTHING UNDER THE SUN. I even once thought I was beyond typing due to my strengths. Then I thought I was beyond typing because I was stupid. I somehow typed some people correctly around me… and the rest pretty much upside down. But seeing me? No.. that, yeah. That was agonizing. And still is. But I’m not a typologist. So… LOL

[@popkb]

If Peter Griffin was made in Einstein era.

[@friendlyanomaly6109]

What types did you get wrong? And why? And what did that teach you about personality type?

[@jaredvaughan1665]

Good typologists support Nigel Farage.

[@Lizology]

Banger

[@gandadorf7886]

I want a SEE vs LIE comparison and also debates against MBTI creators. As I see it there is little to no reason to keeping MBTI other than using it as a funnel for socionics. Replacing MBTI with socionics would make typing yourself quicker, easier and I think that typology community would become more refined. I think I have watched every single significant MBTI youtuber and contrasted different tests and websites with no avail. Most are about stereotypes too so that does not help either. When I took the socionics test I was about 90% certain about my results and then after having watched both WSS and Jason I could with 99% certainty embrace my typing all of this in the span of a month or two with minimal research. I would help with donations to have more socionics vs mbti debates. Always knew that MBTI was flawed but that another system which is superior in every way existed and that no one advocated for it pissed me off. In a way, MBTI creators are spreading misinformation. Its not apples and oranges, it is outdated vs current.

[@WorldSocionics]

SEE vs LIE will come in time. How do we get MBTI youtubers to agree to debate me?

[@gandadorf7886]

@@WorldSocionics We have to give an incentive in some way for them. Hard when we do not have much than truth to offer. A sum of money which we as viewers can raise for said debater on the conditions that they stay present the entire time and shoutout this channel. Maybe the biggest channels wont be too tempted by money but then we will know that which can be used as an argument for the overall debate. Other than that we can only indirectly get people engaged by making videos and poking at MBTIs flaws. Maybe more tactical and provoking titles, clickbaits and videos. Not sure however that this channel is particulary fond of such methods. It is basically just the same old strategies which require a lot of work and willingness to stir chaos, clickbaits, provoking titles, definite conclusions etc.

[@yellaperida7696]

​@@WorldSocionicsI think Joyce Meng is open to dialogue with different Typology System Practitioners. I suggest reaching out to her! 😄

[@user-xy5vl7hu5w]

@@WorldSocionics most dont know what theyre even talking about and understand things backwords (Extraverted feeling is social manipulation, Ni is Ne, Thinking is intelligence, the list goes on) people just want to hear what they already think once they stop humbling themselves

[@llunavermella_bloodmoon]

Yeah dude but how do you check if you're right or wrong? There is no scientific way to demonstrate if a typing is right or wrong. Socionics is not a science. It's a pseudoscience. You might believe you're right about a typing and actually be wrong, and you might believe you were wrong about a typing and actually be correct. Stop being so absolutely arrogant.

[@WorldSocionics]

It is an arrogance to invoke science's power to tell rightness from wrongness. Science has no such power. It operates on the principle of falsification, not confirmation. A scientist may never know if they are right, only that they are not yet shown to be wrong. If anything, I made this video in a spirit of science, to show that humility and a self-improving mindset makes much better typological practice than the stasis of arrogance, so I think you may have gotten the wrong end of the stick.

[@llunavermella_bloodmoon]

​@@WorldSocionicsGreat that you confirm your lack of intelligence by demonstrating how you didn't understand that "right" and "wrong" in this context means "falsated and confirmed true" or "falsated and confirmed false". I perfectly know that science needs falsation and not confirmation; which is exactly what you DON'T do. You continue being arrogant by believing you know more than anybody, manipulating and giving 0 proof of anything. How do you provide falsation and corroboration or falsation and non-corroboration of a typing? There's absolutely no way because socionics is not a science. That doesn't mean I don't personally believe socionics is untrue or unvaluable; it's just that you can never falsate someone's typing and affirm without a trace of doubt that you were absolutely right or wrong on a typing. You can say you were wrong on a typing and still be wrong on that affirmation of wrongness. You're arrogant and dishonest.

[@hagayuyu2941]

Very bold of you to assume someone as arrogant...

[@llunavermella_bloodmoon]

​@@hagayuyu2941 lol. Well, he is very much so 😂

[@llunavermella_bloodmoon]

Also I see that my answer to his answer is not visible if you don't click "recent comments". I wonder why