" To The End of The Earth " By McManus a great book .
@philbosworth37892 жыл бұрын
An excellent presentation by John showing that the US war in the Pacific wasn't just down to the Marines. The Army had a big part to play here, as did the logisticians (as always). WW2TV delivers yet again.
@theccpisaparasite88132 жыл бұрын
A big part? The largest part. Certainly more than the USMC. The power of propaganda
@philbosworth37892 жыл бұрын
@@theccpisaparasite8813 Agreed. Not the best choice of words on my part. However, its only through shows like this (on WW2TV in particular) that these myths get busted.
@jeffhinson54522 жыл бұрын
Should've already known this
@philbosworth37892 жыл бұрын
@@jeffhinson5452 That's why I watch these shows - to fill in a large gap in my knowledge about the US war in the Pacific.
@briancooper2112 Жыл бұрын
Good morning from Arizona
@KevinJones-yh2jb2 жыл бұрын
This was a brilliant presentation by John, his knowledge and research is amazing, I have learnt so much about the Pacific theatre of war. The interaction with the USMC and the Army I found fascinating. Look forward to John on again in the future. Every week on WW2TV insights into new subjects etc , rather than just another rehash of subjects. Paul’s guests are outstanding and their presentations are perfect. If you are reading this and are not a patreon please join, this helps Paul to keep bringing us these great weekly presentations. Remember everyone one they are free, Paul puts so much time and energy into every program, so please support him 👍
@deanmurphy57352 жыл бұрын
Good episode Woody. John is definitely a world class author. I especially liked his mentioning of logistics to win these battles.
@dave31562 жыл бұрын
Another great presentation by John. Sorry I missed this one live. I always look forward to John's programs--vast knowledge and extensive research. He always adds a new perspective for me on many aspects of the Pacific War. Thanks for a great job John!. Great program again Paul! You have built the best channel on KZbin!. Thx!!!
@jefsantamonica6412 жыл бұрын
John McManus is the best! A really good discussion!
@jimwatts9145 ай бұрын
Dr John knows all about the US Army in the pacific and shares great insights with Woody. One of WW2TV best shows ever. McManus’ 3-volume story of the Army in the Pacific is some of the best military history on the subject.
@mpetersen6 Жыл бұрын
This channel is a perfect complement to Unofficial History of the Pacific War.
@WW2TV Жыл бұрын
Thank you
@jameshannagan4256 Жыл бұрын
Two of my very favorite YT channels along with Drach.
@billenright27882 жыл бұрын
awesome show. my dad was in army artillery then got moved to infantry in prep for the invasion. if it wasn't for the "big fircrackers' i probably wouldn't be here. he went as the army of occupation for about a yr.
@scottgrimwood88682 жыл бұрын
An great presentation by John. It is important to understand the role of the US Army in the Pacific. In he Pacific cooperation between all the US services was closer than any other war theater.
@jimwatts51922 жыл бұрын
Howdy folks. Another great one from Dr McManus. Learned stuff, made me think. All his books also are full of great stories, interesting perspectives and focused insight.
@chriscollins15255 ай бұрын
Superb discussion. Talking about the Army in the Pacific is talking about the future of US relationship with Asia.
@tbbb22 жыл бұрын
It seems I leave the same message each time Woody and John do one of their programs, but these two guys are just sensational. John's U.S. Army in the South Pacific trilogy is already essential reading and there's still one volume to go! This discussion was a WONDERFUL adjunct to those two books. Few authors dig as deeply into the sociological and political aspects of the war as John is doing with this study. Americans in particular probably know far too little about the Army's involvement in the South Pacific war and it certainly is an aspect of the war that we should have a real awareness of. As is pointed out here, lots of the fighting and dying the Army did in the South Pacific was not nearly as well known as the Iwo Jima type battles, but they are no less important. Thanks to Woody for giving John this platform.
@sparkey67462 жыл бұрын
Another excellent presentation, thank you.
@andrewbutcher61622 жыл бұрын
Another awesome presentation! John McManus is one of my favorite writers, and his presentations are always outstanding and I learn so much more every time I watch these. Great job! I can't wait for '43 and round two.
@abrahamoyevaar22262 ай бұрын
Thanks Woody and John. Great presentation
@RandallFlaggNY Жыл бұрын
I discovered Mr. McM's books from this channel. I'm now reading them in sequence. Best quality.
@RandallFlaggNY Жыл бұрын
Thanks for the heart. BTW my late father was 15th AF, 2nd BG(H), 96th Bomb Squadron '44-'45. The 15th did a lot of the dying but the 8th got all the glory...
@crunchytheclown96942 жыл бұрын
Thanks guys, the causes and symptoms of depresion havnt changed much have they
@stevej80052 жыл бұрын
Another fascinating discussion with John McManus, the context and insight he brings to any subject means that you always get to learn a bit more!! Great work Woody, enticing Dr McManus back to present again. The breadth of subjects you tackle and the quality of the guest speakers makes WW2TV a 'go to' channel for all things WW2, there is always something of interest and something new to learn.
@WW2TV2 жыл бұрын
Thanks Steve. Plenty more cool guests coming in 2023
@stevej80052 жыл бұрын
@@WW2TV Great news👍👍 Glad I took out channel membership, the sheer volume of high quality content you put together for us viewers is brilliant!!
@WW2TV2 жыл бұрын
@@stevej8005 Thanks for signing up Steve. I will have some mini breaks in 2023 of a few days to attend History conferences, but there will still be plenty of new shows
@TheVigilant1092 жыл бұрын
Wonderful presentation by John as usual. Learned a lot. Look forward to John's next visit. Many thanks
@WW2TV2 жыл бұрын
Glad you enjoyed it and John will be back
@roybaker69022 жыл бұрын
I've learned a lot about American history from viewing this channel, most of which was never taught in school. However, I find the discussion of what so and so is having for dinner tomorrow night rather distracting. Just my opinion. On a lighter note, as a former Marine I'm really looking forward to the upcoming show regarding VMF-114 on Peleliu. Semper Fi.
@WW2TV2 жыл бұрын
Simple answer - don't read the side bar
@misterbaker97282 жыл бұрын
I hope everyone knows I’m not related to this guy… 🙄
@stephenbrooks47132 жыл бұрын
Excellent show - John is always a brilliant guest
@matthewstephenson71732 жыл бұрын
Excellent presentation,Will read John’s books
@steveoliver7712 жыл бұрын
Another excellent presentation by Dr. McManus. I had read "Fire and Fortitude" a few months ago and the show is a great companion piece. I have done the reverse and either way works quite well.
@carlsmith90052 жыл бұрын
Another fascinating show, always learn loads when John is on. Top stuff!
@gmdyt18 ай бұрын
excellent
@gergemall10 ай бұрын
Thank you
@misterbaker97282 жыл бұрын
Damn damn !! I missed the live of this. I would of loved to let John know how great ISLAND INFERNOS is! I mean I really liked it. I learned a lot more about the Pacific than I thought I knew. I mean I really didn’t know that the Army did the bulk of it. The book is huge and I couldn’t put it down. Thanks again I’m enjoying a number after work.
@blueboats75302 жыл бұрын
If you're conflicted about MacArthur in WWII, just skip ahead a few years later to Korea. He completely over extended the intervention and then was extremely insistent that nuclear weapons be used to save the situation.
@steveoconnor7069 Жыл бұрын
Thanks for covering this topic. One of my uncle's was a staff sergeant in the 38th infantry. He was in New Guinea but the 38th was new and held in reserve, they fought in the Phillipines primarily in Bataan. The South Pacific doesn't get the attention it deserves.
@misterbaker97282 жыл бұрын
I highly recommend this brothers books. Especially if you have any interest in the 🇺🇸 Army. The marines get all the glory for the pacific yet alot of these battles and islands are never even spoken or written of. For example Biak. It gets a page maybe 2 anywhere else.
@blankcanvas7187 Жыл бұрын
It was mentioned in this program that the movies in the 50's were about the Marine Corps and not the Army. At the time those movies were made, there was a move to dismantle the Marine Corps due to budget cuts. The idea was that the Marine Corps was had evolved into an infantry unit, which was the Army's job. Eisenhower supported this among others. So, the Marine Corps was glad to help Hollywood with their movies. There was tremendous support by the Corps for Sands of Iwo Jima. The technical advisor ensured that actual Marine combat film footage was included for instance. For decades afterward, whenever it was shown on TV, enlistments jumped. Then there was the Flying Leathernecks.
@nickdanger3802Ай бұрын
25.00 Woody "crossroads in decision making" Search Chapter VII: The Malay Barrier
@georgewnewman32012 жыл бұрын
Tomorrow (Sunday) is the 80th Anniversary of the US/Allied invasion of Guadalcanal, Tulagi, and Gavutu in the Solomons.
@jjp_nl2 жыл бұрын
New to the channel. Glad to have found it. I was just wondering wether there ever was given any though about deploying USMC in numbers to MTO/ETO? While we typically associate MTO/ETO with large more or less continues huge land campaigns fought by the 'regular' allied armies rather then USMC, these campaigns all typically started with a serious naval/amphibious effort (Torch, Husky, Baytown, Avalanche, Shingle, Overlord, Dragoon) In my mind it's not hard to imagine USMC units at least play a part in the initial naval/amphibious stages of any of these operations to help secure a foothold. Was it a mere matter of USMC not being big enough to be deployed everywhere? I mean, by comparison to other branches it was a relatively small force. Or were there other considerations as well to not use USMC in numbers in MTO/ETO?
@WW2TV2 жыл бұрын
Basically, no there was no thought given to using th USMC in Europe. Welcome to the channel
@larrytestmi59762 жыл бұрын
The Pacific war was about Air bases. The Japanese established Truk, Rabaul and were trying to establish Guadalcanal via Tulagi which is a deg water harbor and a huge sea plane base. The US preempted the latter.
@WW2TV2 жыл бұрын
Of course, and we've talked about this a lot in other shows
@michaeldouglas12432 жыл бұрын
5 🌟
@barriereid9244 Жыл бұрын
Prior to WW2TV my knowledge of the US in this theatre came from John Wayne.
@guyh99922 жыл бұрын
MacArthur did get control of the Pacific war in the end. He was appointed Supreme Commander for the invasion of Japan, the Philippines was the main base for the invasion and the US 6th army would have embarked from there for Operation Olympic. Australia was second only to the UK as a base for American operations in WWII with so many US servicemen passing through. Reverse Lend Lease from both Australia and NZ was also greater than actual Lend Lease in the later years of the war. It seems a bit unfair to criticise Australian historians for writing about Milne Bay and Kokoda when Churchill effectively wrote the New Guinea campaign out of The Hinge of Fate for self serving reasons. Churchill set the narrative for British historians then and ever since.
@chriscollins15255 ай бұрын
How did the Army resources mostly going to Europe affect the Army’s performance in the Pacific?
@WW2TV5 ай бұрын
That's a big question
@guyh99922 жыл бұрын
James Holland knows very little about the Pacific. His American guest on the We Have Ways podcast about malaria was hazy on the location of Milne Bay despite the US airfield engineers there and thought it was in the Philippines. Holland had no idea where Milne Bay was.
@WW2TV2 жыл бұрын
None of us know it all and James would be the first to admit his Pacific knowledge is less than other theatres. Every day is a school day for all of us
@EvangelistNickGarrett2 жыл бұрын
Amazing how modern initiatives like China’s belt and road, simply pick up where World War II left off and the struggles that were had with logistics to mainland China because of the lack of ability to have Road systems to that part of Asia. One might argue that China beat us to it with belt and Road. Maybe! I can see it being American strategy to simply take over the belt and Road if they needed it. Even Ukraine Russia to a degree, looks like we woke up after VJ day and it was the very next day in Europe, and the Pacific Islands with a now powerful China trying to make alliances with the very pacific islands that we liberated. It makes one wonder what the world powers have gained during the last 80 years? Was it just propaganda all the way? And the truth is most worlds military doctrine is you train to the last war, no? Another brilliant presentation Paul and John
@edmundcowan91312 жыл бұрын
American army led guerrilla movement.
@TimKitt2 ай бұрын
The popular Idea that the New Guinea locals were no better the slaves to the Allies is just not true, It is their War too, The locals were supplied with Clothes boots Equipment, Weapons & Rations, Villages were built by Australian & US Engineers as per the wishes of the local people.
@JohnGodden-j1m Жыл бұрын
It should be pointed out that as many Americans died in PAPUA New Guinea as did in the Solomons but were nowhere near as effective there, having to defer to the experience in jungle warfare of the Australians who also lost a similar amount of men. Americans focus on the exploits of their marines but their Army personnel far outnumbered them, and the second front challenging the Japanese were the Australians dividing the forces which eventually ensured the Allied defeat. The American Naval and Airborne capabilities made the difference against the tenacious Japanese
@willpinder12292 жыл бұрын
When can you call yourself a historian? Virtually anyone can call themselves an 'historian' if they do indeed read and study history, even if they do so at the most basic level and without any prior formal training. In this respect, history is quite different from most other 'professional' pursuits.
@WW2TV2 жыл бұрын
Referring to anyone in particular Will?
@willpinder12292 жыл бұрын
knowledge and enthusiasm is fine for me
@willpinder12292 жыл бұрын
@@WW2TV knowledge and enthusiasm is fine for me
@Arcusinoz9 ай бұрын
Island hopping ...................Great except for the troops who had to go and regain the Islands that were hopped??? Usually the Australians!!!!
@WW2TV9 ай бұрын
Which islands do you mean, that were bypassed and left to the Australians? And Island Hopping doesn't mean skipping past, it means attacked, secured and used as staging post to move forward. Rabaul however was by-passed
@Arcusinoz9 ай бұрын
The Americans were a non event in New Guinea!! The Australian stopped the Japanese Troops in the Highlands of New Guinea!! Then they drove them back to the coast! Then the Americans arrived!! The first attempts to use the Americans in Battle against the Japanese at Milne Bay, the Americans actually ran away!! The Australians then had to attack 2 positions instead of 1 , The Australians then had to go out into the jungles and rescue the American troops!!
@WW2TV9 ай бұрын
There's no need to be so anti-American please. We are a global channel and respect the efforts of all the Allies
@sportsfanivosevic98858 ай бұрын
@@WW2TV Facts should never be dismissed but I agree, we should not promote derision.
@roybaker69022 жыл бұрын
The chat appears to be turning into the Lonely Hearts Dating Channel. Hi, hi, hello, hello, how's the weather where you are, whatever. Gimme a break. ther
@WW2TV2 жыл бұрын
It's called a Community Roy, and I'm glad to have it
@philbosworth37892 жыл бұрын
The getting to 'know' the regular live viewers is a fun part of the live shows. You don't need to take part in the general background banter, but Woody will show or answer any pertinent points you raise
@jonrettich457921 күн бұрын
I’m speculating that the brutal training and brutal policies taught japanese soldiers and the extremely autocratic home and overseas ruling style made the Japanese terrible people managers with a profound disdain for other cultures despite some very rare personal exceptions
@briancooper2112 Жыл бұрын
America i believe was still in shock because of Pearl Harbor.
@mpetersen6 Жыл бұрын
Partly in state of shock. Also deep into the racism of the time. There are also certain events that happened in 1942 that the Allies probably would not or could not prevent. 1) The lose of the Philippines. After Pearl Harbor the US Navy was in no position to effectively run resupply into the Philippines. And without resupply holding the Phillipines ws simply untenable. 2) The Dutch East Indies and Borneo. The Dutch were simply too weak and the RN, USN and the RAN simply do not have the sea power to stop the IJN and the IJN. 3) Malaya and Singapore. Too little too late. Especially in aviation. But I think even if the RAF in the area had front line fighter aircraft they faced a situation were the Japanese simply had more combat experience.
@edmundcowan91312 жыл бұрын
The joint US military operations in the South Pacific in 1942 and 43. The riots were between Australian and Americans not blacks. It should not take away from what the Allies did.
@WW2TV2 жыл бұрын
What's your problem? No-one was trying to say that, we were just stating a fact that there were tensions
@blueboats75302 жыл бұрын
Some of the incidents stemmed from Australians allowing blacks to mingle and to approach Australian women whereas the white Americans were still very steeped in segregation. It wasn't well expressed in the presentation but this was the type of situation that was being referred to.
@edmundcowan91312 жыл бұрын
What what what compared Japanese occupation to US colonial rule. This guy is cowardly saying that.
@WW2TV2 жыл бұрын
"This Guy" is a world renowned historian. What point are you making exactly?