Im not Chinese (I wish I am) but thanks to google translate I was able to read comments. Thank you this is a good youtube channel. I am looking good info for Redmi AX6000
The review contradicts itself. You add up the scores and the redmi AX6000 scores 75.37 and the AX5400 scores 70.9 but ranks AX6000 #7 and the redmi AX5400 #5. Why? The price of the AX5400 is $111.00 and the AX6000 is $100 so why not get the AX6000 especially if these specs are better? On paper the AX6000 should outperform the AX5400 because the cpu clockspeed is 1ghz higher and has 2 additional cores. Plus, it has 8 signal amps instead of the 6 on the ax5400. The only downside I can see is the 2.5g wan port and lack of an additional lan port. 2.5G wan is purely a gimmick since all the lan ports at 1g would bottleneck the router if you hardwired it anyway. Mediatek can fix the rest of the issues with a new fw. For $100 I think this is an incredible value. Mediatek's cpus have been getting better and better in the last 2 years. My last 2 phones had mediatek dimensity 800u and 1200u cpu's and both were excellent cost-performance values. I think people have an immediate bias against mediatek in favor of qualcomm cpus but the same thing happened to intel in the mid 2000's when AMD's Athlon 64 was released. I wish the reviewer spoke English so I could ask him some questions as to how he decided to rank the AX6000 behind the AX5400 when the AX6000 clearly outperforms it in the review.
@user-dr1xk2kp1b2 жыл бұрын
Our scores are weighted for each item, so they are not simply added together. The translation may not be accurate.
@chenmoney1920 Жыл бұрын
cause all the values is fake, they just want to make clip. so data they get is not credible