香港行會召集人葉劉淑儀專訪：2019年示威者試圖推翻政府－ BBC News 中文 |

[@yyykkkei]

Don’t touch her, DO NOT TOUCH HER! You are not the same age.

[@DanceDramaBGM]

age has nothing to do with it tho'. Their basic mindsets and world views are worlds apart.

[@Jnakajin]

DR K

[@berniethekiwidragon4382]

​@@DanceDramaBGM I am thinking you have no idea what this is referencing.

[@bosszola]

In other words, She can only be touched by people of the same age. 😂😂

[@jpnmystic5208]

@@DanceDramaBGM its Dr.K meme go check it LUL

[@tonichen9970]

Their talking just like two Parallel space。 他們的對談宛如兩個平行世界。

[@小飞-m2h]

认知不同本身就没法沟通！就像你认为地球是方的，我认为地球是圆！那怎么沟通？除非咱俩一起飞出地球看看地球到底是什么形状的！

[@tim055006101]

不在一個頻道上😂

[@小飞-m2h]

@@tim055006101 那能在一个频道上吗？在一个频道上不就不用冲突了吗？现在是敌我矛盾！

[@Mr.Agumon]

說給認知不同的受眾聽當然就平衡宇宙。

[@小飞-m2h]

@@Mr.Agumon但是这是英国平台！英国的目的是让香港官员在英国节目上出丑！所以他才会那么多咄咄逼人，诱导攻击性输出！

[@hikeithwong]

“We know they are lying, they know they are lying, they know we know they are lying, we know they know we know they are lying, but they are still lying.” Aleksandr Isayevich Solzhenitsyn - Also voices from Hong Kongers... 😥

[@brounlee8458]

葉劉林鄭等人都是成長受教育受薪在英治的香港 而且他們也清楚了解中國內地人民的苦難歷史和現狀 當今人類社會已經擺脫野蠻愚昧 天理可以得到昭彰 深深祝福他們得到應得的報應

[@MuLi-rv2is]

@@brounlee8458 祈祷管用还要军队干什么

[@panke216]

Yes, BBC does it all the time!

[@Wenshengzhai]

你不看频道中怎么说的吗？实际上英治时期根本就没有选举议员，港督是英国指派的，议员是港督指派的，他们比你更了解以前的香港与现在的香港的差异。@@brounlee8458

[@linay9960]

U r talking about big liar BBC rude host!

[@yvonneso1015]

姐姐真係一件好盡責嘅反駁隊隊員👍🏻每一句開頭都是：you are totally wrong. This is incorrect. You breached the contract. You grabbed our doctors. It's your fault. 繼續說好香港故事靠姐姐喇👍🏻

[@Universal_Holy_Consciousness]

@JamesChin-vq1sr黃藍已達成一致，現在只有攬炒絲。

[@Ritzrfx]

梗係啦,唔係咁易比個行會召集人個位比你做,佢想好似689咁,做完召集人跟手做特首,佢恨咗個位好耐㗎啦,屆屆佢都想選

[@lomondliverpool]

你是誰?! 細作嗎?!

[@kowl6708]

@JamesChin-vq1sr 黄絲不是仇陆 , 不是仇共 , 只是不舔中奶共 , 點解你偷换概念呢？？？🤔

[@sarronsin]

⁠@JamesChin-vq1sr藍絲走，黃絲走，對香港有相同睇法嘅係未－致？

[@user-uz12345]

葉太真正愛國愛港香港人😂👍

[@kaisangsum4291]

她更愛自己的權力，成日都想做凸手，可惜眼高手底，

[@user-uz12345]

@@kaisangsum4291 無可厚非 邊個唔想做阿一😀

[@楊正清-r5p]

@@kaisangsum4291 妳本人又如何？

[@hilarylau6840]

最後佢既人都冇資格選舉，成為一個condom

[@IshmaelDoe]

你唔得左打 s/

[@jckapparel]

To destroy a big city, it doesn't have to be the sky Disasters can also be man-made disasters. Man-made disasters are not necessarily wars. A few words and ignorant actions of a few people can completely kill a big city.

[@ghrosthelman3273]

As Robespierre said, the losses caused by the 2019 Hong Kong riots can be repaid in just one year, but the losses caused by the oppression of authoritarianism (whether it is the British government or the revisionist CCP) cannot be fully repaid by the entire Chinese people!

[@jizifeng]

hongkong still a big finance city,and even IPO more than New york o london...destroy?who says/

[@vc8230]

So well said.

[@berniethekiwidragon4382]

​@@ghrosthelman3273He's not wrong there. People will only invest if they feel comfortable and safe. Hong Kong is no longer safe, because of the draconian laws that threaten people's freedoms and thus lives. Say one word wrong, and you are in a heap of disproportionate trouble courtesy of nobody but this bully government.

[@tonyatgoogle6076]

HKGers demonstrated against the HK govt in order to stop HKG govt from deporting a murderer who killed his pregnant girlfriend to Taiwan to face justice. The murder walks free in HK, that is the legacy of the freedom protest in HK

[@uruur4243]

有理有据

[@gegu2749]

一派胡言

[@brounlee8458]

厚顏無恥

[@hjMagic-ud5wx]

@@gegu2749要不照搬英国9部国安法😊

[@joe3223]

算了吧，你永遠叫不醒裝睡的人，那怕心底亦清楚明白卻要出賣靈魂。

[@sansnom9688]

​@JamesChin-vq1sr你問葉太佢個女喺邊度讀書？而家住喺邊？

[@lee-is3uv]

你也永远忽悠不了真正清醒的人

[@Mr.Agumon]

@JamesChin-vq1sr 美國駐華大使館的微博有很多說真話的中國人。😂

[@michanel888]

⁠@JamesChin-vq1sr哈佬， 粉紅隊😊

[@白志柔]

1.在美國駐華大使館的微博發表看法的人，口媚美帝是標準格式，怎可能有真話！ 2.美國駐華大使館可以設定微博，依據閣下恨華仇華的小心思，必然覺得很詫異吧！

[@gorgorchannel]

人在做天在看，一切報應只是時間問題。

[@wjxjxhwang-ov3kh]

看BBC没笑，看到你头像，我是真的笑了

[@alexhowe123]

葉劉淑 WELL SAID

[@wo3417]

給葉劉淑儀一個大大的贊！👍

[@angelafung2296]

支持葉劉，你的好口才非常棒，BBC自以為是，很多根本不了解香港，或者就是有意扭曲事實

[@色永信]

叶的口才很好

[@frankqin2991]

Stephen完全带有偏见的态度，粗暴打断受访者的行为，让我异常反感，相反，叶小姐不卑不亢，有理有据的受访态度，让人敬佩

[@DK-jz6cn]

傻逼粉蛆起来做核酸了😅

[@ChrisClark-oi3xy]

其实都是拿对己方有利的一面 的词语出来讲，所以根本就是你讲你爱讲的，我只管讲我的

[@yongzhongli8069]

巾幗英雄

[@moniqueq8399]

This man is very rude. When someone speaks about something that is not advantageous to his position, he will cut off the conversation.

[@cqyan191]

He is. Very very rude.

[@ChiChow-d8v]

The man n BBC is a mouth piece of USA 🇺🇸 and we normal hk people know there was millions funded £££$$$$ for the roits! But ask the main question why the west so interested in a small city affairs like hk ? To GET to China! Simple

[@terrenceoon4056]

yes, and they call their rude and disrespectful the free speech or hardtalk.

[@ourskydc3251]

Always rude and impolite, not just this time

[@ChiChow-d8v]

@ourskydc3251 n BBC give multi interviews for the trouble makers n rioters a voice to spread the cool in hk but not the normal people in hk who was held against their will in their home! Or interview the CIA ,nsa who help n funded the roits !

[@郭豪-l9u]

這才是真正的HK精英分子

[@cheonglaipeng6241]

葉刘淑仪講的非常好，我好敬佩這位香港行政官員。一位星加坡公民

[@zhiyuesun8860]

I love this woman! You are great 👍

[@hegehypo5914]

Well done Regina for rebuking all the false statements and invalid accusations by Sackur on HK law and national secuirty. As expected Sackur again followed the same playbook of Anglo Saxon (US/UK) tactics of smearing and instigating instability of China. The fact of the matter is HK since 2020 passing of the law ammendment is very peaceful and no more 2019 riot events which is not what US/UK wanted to see

[@IshmaelDoe]

what are you and at least 52 other genius are smoking? Xi's fart?

[@崔浩-f8k]

@@IshmaelDoe SB

[@IshmaelDoe]

@@崔浩-f8k yes, that's your name

[@jejd9605]

多謝葉太，據理力爭，拆穿那些裝睡傲慢，只許自己放火，不準市民點燈嘅自大心態💪💪💪

[@gocolago33]

UK and USA talk a lot about free speech but holds Julian assange in maximum prison.

[@ronyau761]

When Ms Yip responded with facts or truth answer that are not favor to the expectation from Stephen Sackur/BBC or BBC does not want you to know the fact, she's interrupted. She could not finish her talk and her voices were covered by Stephen Sackur. Ms Yip should not let it be, and should have continued to finishing her views/voices, and not be taken over by the interviewer.

[@thompsonchan7648]

Whoever said sth like this is completely and totally out of their mind, from my point of view Stephen is just stating the fact well supported with data and statistics, as someone who have been living here for over 2 decades i can completely feel the change. Whereas what mentioned by Regina Yip (we named her Cancer cells here) is totally nonsense and not true. The fact is, this city is decaying, our investors are losing, due to the strict law implemented by Beijing

[@wenou1200]

答非所問！

[@kamlunglam8269]

葉劉👍

[@IshmaelDoe]

認同， 十分ｏｎ９

[@wangjim5839]

The host is absolutely preconceived and bias. And rude too by cutting in when the guest is still speaking

[@bikjig9384]

we should thank for Regina's indepth explanations .

[@everage7]

When we were young, we felt when our motherland was strong, no one would dare to bully us. When we grew up, we realized that no one would dare to help us after our motherland became stronger.

[@wanchaihui2661]

when we were young, our motherland was weak!!!! now stronger and stronger!

[@orchidoutdoor648]

The west just don't welcome the fact that China is much more stronger than a lot of them, they can not withstand the fact that they are losing superiority, stay poor and you will have their mercy.

[@smliu86]

Why do you think you would need the help of foreign countries, when you don't agree with some polices of your motherland? Do you really think it is your motherland, to which you belong and need to find ways to cooperate just like family members. Personally, I think it is this mentality of resorting to foreign help that makes the reconciliation impossible, which is bad for both Chinese central government and Hongkong people.

[@sarronsin]

@@smliu86你對中國好似無認識喎，香港本土思唯同處事方式，與外國彼此認同咪有計傾，你係未香港人嚟㗎

[@DanceDramaBGM]

@@wanchaihui2661 omg u must be pretty old now. 😳😳

[@damingchan3840]

Let’s thank BBC for providing a platform for Regina to channel what’s truly happening in Hong Kong. A stark contrast of biased, hostile interviewing questions vs fact based, logically layered responses! Bravo Regina! It is a joy to see her debating every time.

[@wkwoo5333]

well said. so difficult to answer ignorant and deeply biased questions.what does it matter to you, intervening the business in hong kong!mind your own business and take care of your own people first!

[@拾叁-o6x]

You can never change the behavior of randomly interrupting others and think it is disrespectful to others.

[@w94vm]

在某種情況下，身為主持人需要把來賓的談話拉回來，以避免對話失焦。

[@cqyan191]

Such a rude man! Such a so called famous host. God save him. Can anyone be more rude? !

[@laulaulau8084]

賣烏絲素個老闆係光頭佬!衹不個用錢揾廣告演員唱好成效釣水魚!!除左財經演員還有老千醫藥保健演員!!!他/她們的目的都是唱高股價和唱好產品成效散貨~ #沒有雙盲測試衹有戲(騙)子吹噓🔊🔊🔊🔊🔊🔊~ 大家知不知道凍齡和逆轉齡產品能否延長職業運動員的生涯嗎？大家知不知道抗頑英文是什麼?#大ka又知不知道藥物放入口賣廣告背後的勾結嗎**來自元朗過往在香港從事醫藥保健騙局的老千[李美英]L0uise lee mei ying[屬狗1982年)現居住在英國諾定咸(edwalton)!大家要留意!#她的右眼眼白裡有黑點 在天水圍張煊昌中學畢業 她有一個被她操控的小男人老公名叫(horace tin田福偉)還有兩個三角形眼睛(12月12日2013年)十歲孖女名叫田芷逸Carina tin和田芷悅Cadence tin就讀於rosecliffe spencer academy#老千李美英即使被侵犯私隱也不會向私隱專員公署舉報 Faceb00k雙生兒逸悅在英倫 Faceb00k雙生兒逸悅在英倫 Faceb00k雙生兒逸悅在英倫 Faceb00k雙生兒逸悅在英倫 #大家小心這個騙局年代

[@IshmaelDoe]

@@cqyan191 I suppose you forgot to type /s at the end?

[@肖子月-h5b]

葉劉淑讲的太好了，我们就需要这样的爱国人士，满身的正能量。

[@illuminatiehmful]

Good answers to an biased press. Western double standards are very clear. Colonialism is already a thing of the past and won't be back forever. Check the UK security laws and compare it with that of Hongkong before you BARK.

[@bobevans9996]

hk was never a demoncrazy hk then was colony slave hk now is china - communist master 50yrs agreement was void by the riots funded n trained by cia to mess china n to get tsai ingwen elected - they use propaganda to mess up world they use rohinga ulghur tibet ... rohinga muslims gang raped n killed a burmese buddhist nun that started it all rohinga r not burmese they r bangaladeshi - immigrate back home to bangaladesh ulghur muslims must immigrate back home to turkey don't occupy myanmar n china - where is burmese chinese human rights - it's their home countries - go back to u r own home countries china free tibet of dali lama religious oppression poverty n illiteracy n if china doesn't control tibet india will n the 7 countries downstream from tibet will have to buy water from india - by the drop🤣

[@MichaelLi-ms1on]

Sounds more like an interrogation than an interview to me. The host keeps asserting ideas, opinions and even predictions to the interviewee and wishes to see she would back down and become submissive. If one hadn't known better, it's easy to confuse those two figures. Who has been working as a politician for many decades and who has been a TV show presenter. But the guest today just won't give in. Will done! Regina.

[@dougsilent4341]

White people think they are the lord. That is the mentality. Some Hong Kongers indeed regard white people as lord.

[@gkmail8718]

A good interviewer would allow the interviewee to speak their mind freely instead of interrupting. Very disappointing from a man talks so much about freedom of speech.

[@youtubenil2496]

that is full of ridiculous interview, the man Stephen Sackur obviously has bias on question to Ms. Ip. All countries have national security law to protect themselves from other unfriendly act or even seditious behavior, why Hong Kong has this law is a problem? I live in Hong Kong over 50 years, I was sorry to refuse Regina proposed the act of 23 according to basic law in 2002, if the act of 23 has been setup that time then I believe Hong Kong would not have serious offensive problem and damage in 2019, the year apparently has intervention from US and UK.

[@prettywoman8888]

人長大了，有更多時間去留意世界事態發展，會𢤦得思巧。凡事要客觀兩面睇，沒有全對或全錯，有了立場就有如瞎子摸象。

[@Humanrightshk]

繼續說好香港故事靠反駁隊隊員

[@aporiaolympu7131]

老實講，主持人嘅準備唔夠葉劉充足。好多議題都俾葉劉輕輕帶過，又唔作反駁，或者反駁得太膚淺。然後仲要反复打斷葉劉嘅話，唔知嘅人仲會覺得主持人無風度。結果雞同鴨講，毫無意義。

[@Jack-bg5sg]

Any question from this BBC is not simple but malicious😅

[@anna72572]

Hong Kong a proud of my Regina Lau👍👍👍💖💖💖👏👏👏🇨🇳🇭🇰

[@tigerwong4307]

葉劉淑儀真的是世纪大人才啊，怎么没有选她做特首？太牛了，相信在她的带领下，香港很快可以比肩天津了

[@AeoliaStudios]

您已经暴露了天津人的基因， 把我快笑死了， 佩服

[@Feu7331]

Motherland? 問問香港各高官的子女在那個motherland?

[@eugene9661]

會講motherland 就讓我笑死了。 還一直辯護motherland 多偉大。 真是不要臉的女人。 自由的地方不會一直把motherland 掛在嘴邊。 Motherland 是 要照顧人民， 不是強姦人民。

[@eeyore345]

Even her own daughter is not living in motherland. Shame on her.

[@TAIWAN_PROVINCE_CHINA]

叶刘反驳得很好。黄尸港独们如丧考妣，犹如丧家之犬。无论怎么吠都无力改变香港与内地不断融合，继续繁荣进步的趋势。

[@CheukKwaiChiu-z5c]

掃把頭屈人

[@kellywilliam6726]

这个女人在撒谎，她说英国的国安法比中国的国安法更严厉，罪名更多。事实上，中国的法律制定的笼统模糊，更多是因为要给予政府和司法部门更多解释和自由裁量的空间。就像中国的“寻衅滋事罪”那样，当实在是找不到具体的罪名逮捕和关押一个人时，就是寻衅滋事罪派上用场的时候。😂

[@vc8230]

確是廢話連篇!

[@sarronsin]

法律呢樣嘢，有啲地方用嚟尊重，有啲地方用嚟做工具！

[@berniethekiwidragon4382]

​@@painkiller5664我們以「掃把頭」揶揄她，不單因為她的髮型，而是因為她零三年時以保安局局長身份硬推二十三條，強詞奪理，令自己形象一落千丈。還有，她不是律師。

[@zhangtony7476]

你不知道英法律体系是判例体系吧😅，你看看美国以国家安全打压华为是不是就可以呢？

[@margaretliu3409]

那你以為香港和英國都有的 loitering act 是什麼呢？ 都不可在街上游盪嗎？😅

[@williamwang8170]

葉劉淑儀讲得太好了！BBC主持人总要给她下套，都被怼的太精彩！太棒了！😀

[@candicewang7971]

你的观点太独特了

[@Mr.Agumon]

並不是主持問一次孽瘤說一次就叫怼贏了😂 除了剛開始孽瘤那些以偏概全的反駁外 後面很多都是回避了問題和裝傻的發言😂 同樣的回答大陸人聽起來像回怼，海外就會覺得她回避問題 像是經濟呀投資呀國際金融這些的，外面的機構都因為投資了中國和香港股票損手爛腳，韓國的老人養老金都沒了鬧出國際，你們大陸人沒感覺不等於外國人會和你們一樣😂

[@GoAll-re2uf]

葉劉的演技已經提升到金像獎級別

[@ltk4366]

姐姐係咪開始做緊「反駁隊」嘅工作 😂😂😂

[@DanceDramaBGM]

yup she seems well prepared. her answers are true or not.. we dont know.

[@terrytong8665]

佢唔做反駁隊仲有咩工作 ?

[@johnliao5383]

She is telling the truth

[@CheukKwaiChiu-z5c]

示威者從來未說過推翻政府，他是争取民主，还政于民，人民自決，吾好屈得就屈 ！

[@rosenZhang]

主持人很没礼貌的多次打断叶的回答，不管对方是否正面回答了主持人的问题，作为一位绅士这样打断一位女士的话礼貌吗？

[@qifee1]

Tell me since when, the governor of Hong Kong was elected by its people?

[@堇-s8l]

After "democratic colonial British" left

[@jefflai6077]

Democratic and colonial can't be in the sentence.

[@jilianghuang8431]

你要知道，现在最起码是中国人，不是洋人，洋人干嘛，来香港捞钱。你知道50/70年代的香港吗？蛇鼠一窝

[@paulwong5798]

Unfortunately this host seemed very superficial on nationalsecurity laws in the world in general, the privileges and responsibilities of Democracy, China, US, Aukus, ups and downs in economies....! He's a day to day public layman who is easily swayed by one sided info. BBC and any station, large and small, cannot afford such a low Calibre anchor! A Channel can only earn more following by hiring broadcasters who prepare comprehensively and produce quality shows and not just superficial shows to please the already biased minority readers!

[@楚戈-q3j]

他們唯一任務就是反中！😂一個和平穩定發展的中國是他們的威脅？中國強大了，他們再也不能象以前那樣到處開槍開炮了，再也不能去中國搶劫那些古玩寶物了，再也不能去中國設立殖民地了。😂😂😂中國強大了，他們連去非洲搶劫都困難了。😂😂😂

[@sourcecode999]

嘥氣啦，正常人都唔敢受訪啦，敢上去係咩料你知我知啦

[@ngsam3362]

正常做左特手特腳啦。一把年紀仲日日說故事? 好L野。

[@天霸安]

那你倒是想想办法呀，把驻港部队赶走

[@sourcecode999]

@@天霸安 你煽動，第一次警告

[@jpnmystic5208]

都咁既年紀仲想做大外孫 😉

[@jkjk8237]

@@jpnmystic5208 唔通你做？

[@大白大白-n5f]

屎蟲黨養屎蟲

[@tftf3598]

Thanks to the smart interviewer Mr. Sackur. He did not have to put on any argument at all to the truly obvious & shameless lies of Regina Ip Lau Suk-yee (葉劉淑儀, HK-born 24 August 1950; husband Sammy Ip Man-ho m.1981 - 1997). She is a Communist china politician. Mr. Sackur's questions cleverly made her exposed herself through the answers she provided. It was so very obvious she was lying through her teeth!!!!

[@晨杨-e4o]

这位女士在香港很有名气？她在撒谎，内地博客删帖封号很严重，其它平台都一样

[@ChrisClark-oi3xy]

那是当然啦，你“只能发出正确的、一致的”声音，其它的杂音统统都要被精选被屏蔽，党国的评论区容不下一粒砂子

[@dougsilent4341]

好像灯塔国不删一样。蠢，川普的号都给封了。

[@冰-Cheng]

废话，你会让你身上的毒瘤与你自由的共存吗？

[@wyz9815]

自媒体时代，既可以让人们有更多的渠道去了解世界，让人的视野更加开阔，更容易打破西方媒体的舆论独裁，但另一方面也会更容易建起信息茧房，媒体更容易利用绝大多数人的无知, 思维懒惰，缺乏思辨，容易被情绪煽动的特点，把民众成为乌合之众，变成助纣为虐的力量。 舆论宣传可以是激励大众参与社会进步的正面力量也可以成为无形的杀人刀，媒体及媒体人必须被监管和规范！ 但如何规范，规范原则，界限在哪里，不会引发矛盾和社会冲突的实际操作的方式, 如何引导民众，如何教育大众识别不良舆论的各种话术和逻辑陷阱，如何防范和应对外界敌意的舆论攻击.... 都是新课题！ 大学应该设立宣传学，尤其要好好研究昂撒洗脑术，要破解它们的宣传攻势，就必须对它们的各种招数了如指掌。有好辩传统的西方人的舆论操纵术之精湛绝伦，之无与伦比，之杀人于无形，是讷言而重行的中国人,还有亚洲人无法想象的! 教育大众才是防范媒体轻易煽动的根本。

[@chaochao712]

脸书推特INS删帖封号也很严重，就不要五十步笑百步了

[@user-fumoqing]

支持刘议员，说的非常棒，面对主持人的自大与专业性挖坑，不卑不亢，能应答自如！香港回归正规，拒绝打砸抢的破坏，拒绝做欧美情报集散地。

[@LVAAA8]

中國就是世界上最大的小丑😂😂😂 一起狗帶吧🎉🎉🎉

[@cx9327]

应答自如只是口才，不能说明正确、站得住脚。胡搅蛮缠照样可以对答如流。这只要训练 习惯成自然即可。她的观点在于 中共是祖国 ，必须维护，不能违背。

[@user-fumoqing]

是否在维护中共我不予置评，当前的中国执政党就是中共，也是当下中国利益的代言人，与其说维护中共不如说维护整体中国的利益，维护整体香港人的利益，如果她是为打砸抢，破毁家园基础设施的人辩护，那么她还有资格坐在那个位置？同理，全世界的议员哪一个不是维护自己国家的利益？哪一个议员会为不文明的打砸抢代言？民主诉求不是搞破坏，出卖自己国家利益的理由。@@cx9327

[@belledgeable]

Don’t forget China’s economy was poor in the 80’s, however they have done well since then. China not only improved life of her people but financially they are doing better if not great. Please accept the new kid on the block coming out to compete within the open arena of the world. China has her own rules on how to compete against other countries - that’s “we prospect together”. Certainly HK being a major financial hub, China, like the investment corporations of other countries, can too make used of HK’s international standing.

[@Failures_epic]

Well china has been using the advantages that Hong Kong have to grow but the development of Hong Kong actually stopped since "reunion" China. I guess Hong Kong could rule itself better without China. If China is really that great, why many people decided to leave when Hong Kong is going back to China's hug.

[@CL-fw2vp]

香港就係比呢d賤人害死😢

[@choyken6716]

雖然我同葉劉淑儀嘅理解係完全唔同，我都唔同意佢喺入邊講嘅任何說話，但係我真係好想知道佢哋呢班人究竟係諗緊乜嘢，我亦都好想由頭睇到落尾，但係我真係做唔到，佢講嗰啲嘢荒謬到我想睇多1分鐘都覺得罪過，我終於認同中國人係出最多漢奸嘅民族。

[@馬大理]

葉劉❤強大👍✌️

[@CannibaLouiST]

九七前英治香港政府唔會逼針，唔會搞垃圾稅，唔會搞強積金，唔會拆晒全香港鋪頭招牌落人面

[@FreeThinkerRonald]

这个人可说过所谓的「希特勒是由人民選舉產生的。但他最終殺死了700萬人。這證明民主不是萬能的。」 她这句话从根本上就是谎言，因为希特勒是非民主的！思考她所说的这句话就是了解她的途径之一。希特勒的言论完全包含了各种狂热不理性思想，各种侵犯人权的言论，只有40％的人支持他，有准军事组织在威胁其他政党！而且在他那个没有发达的媒体和网络纠正错误的时代，完全是当时监督不力和被极其严重的民粹主义迷惑所导致！而且希特勒的手段是对民众进行迷惑和剥夺自由与人权，和用非法抢劫物质蛊惑贪婪民众的共产党是同样的，用物质金钱来转移民众对人权的注意！没有严格和多方面的监督，当时的民主制度进化完善得还不够！比如传播更加广泛的网络媒体等，恰恰说明了民主制度有多重要！所以说正常的做法是应该不停地去完善民主制度 监督机制 ，与民主政治相比，武装夺取政权的政府出现专制政府的几率要远远高于有漏洞的民主体制，共产党就是这种例子！民主政治有各种漏洞是很正常的，关键是要去弥补这些漏洞！而共产党等专制政党严重侵害和剥夺了中国全体公民应有的这些民众建党选举和投票演讲等权利！既然不完善和有漏洞的民主社会都有一些漏洞，那么不受民众监督控制，那么没有民主程序的反人权非法和强迫操纵社会每一个角落的社会主义会更加十分地恶劣！完全不配和民主制度相比！

[@sungyle]

The Hong Kong government is pressing ahead with Article 23, and in a turn that caught me off guard, they've brought up "one country, two systems" while announcing their plans. Despite the negative overtones peppered throughout Article 23's draft, they're referencing a principle that should, in theory, ensure autonomy and protection for our way of life. We understand Hong Kong is seen as just a small cog in a much larger machine from Beijing's perspective. For its survival, the local government seems cornered into a path with limited choices. In this moment of crisis, there lies a hidden chance. The government has openly declared a period for consultation, so it's our duty to engage and voice our concerns. I know it's scary for those in Hong Kong to speak out, but for the lucky ones who've found freedom abroad, it's time to band together. In these trying times, our collective voice becomes our strength. The government's invitation for consultation is a crucial opportunity, not just for us to express our concerns, but to remind those in power of the mutual benefits of steadfastly upholding the "one country, two systems" principle. This foundational document doesn't only shield the freedoms of Hong Kong citizens; it also extends its protection to those often perceived as 'minor officials' within the government's hierarchy. Advocating for this principle is more than a defense of our current rights; it's a strategic move to secure a safer and more stable future for all - a future where the interests and safety of both the governed and the governors are preserved. As such, those of us who have found new skies abroad bear a special responsibility to urge the Hong Kong government to sincerely commit to this principle, which is integral to our collective well-being and enshrined in the pivotal agreements made at the United Nations. In Hong Kong, the "One Country, Two Systems" policy kicked off on July 1, 1997, when Hong Kong returned to China from British rule, becoming a Special Administrative Region (SAR) of China. This unique policy was designed to allow Hong Kong to maintain its capitalist system and way of life under the principle of "one country, two systems" for 50 years, until 2047, all while being a part of the sovereign state of China. At the heart of the "One Country, Two Systems" approach is the promise that Hong Kong enjoys a high degree of autonomy, including in administrative management, legislation, and judiciary matters, except for defense and foreign affairs which are managed by the central government. This means that Hong Kong gets to keep its legal system, lifestyle, economic system, and currency (the Hong Kong Dollar) intact, while China handles its defense and foreign affairs. The essence of this policy is to ensure Hong Kong's stability and prosperity, protecting the rights and freedoms of its residents while respecting the region's existing social systems and ways of life. The policy also applies to Macau, another SAR, which returned to China from Portugal on December 20, 1999, under the same principle. I'm reaching out because there's something super important that needs our attention, and it can't wait. It's about digging deep into the public documents of Article 23 legislation. We need to be like detectives here, examining every single detail with a magnifying glass and microscope to spot any hidden traps that could threaten our rights, our way of life, and the promise that things would stay the same for 50 years in Hong Kong. I'm asking, practically begging, for us, the people of Hong Kong, to push the government hard. We need them to lay out, clearly and in detail, how Article 23 will protect our rights and freedoms, especially when it comes to freedom of speech. It's crucial they outline exactly how they'll handle it and ensure there's no room for what's known as 'thought crimes'-locking people up just because of what they might be thinking or suspecting them without just cause. That's a big no-no, against human rights, and it needs to be declared illegal, straight up. Hong Kong's always been about the principle that the benefit of the doubt goes to the defendant, right? That's why it's essential we stand firm and demand the government to spell out the jury's role in this legislation and make sure we all have the freedom to hire any lawyer from anywhere in the world to defend us. These demands are non-negotiable for protecting our civil liberties and preventing any possible human rights abuses. So, let's band together and fight for what's right. Hong Kong, let's do this for justice. Stay strong and keep pushing forward. www.sb.gov.hk/chi/bl23/doc/Consultation%20Paper_TC.pdf #CIA, #MI6, #CSIS， #ASIS， #DGSE, #RAW, #BND, #SVR, #Mossad, #SUPO,#ABC, #BBC, #CBC, #globeandmail, #Toronto_Sun, #TorontoStar, #Citynews, #TheProvince, #The_Guardian

[@bennycheung5032]

Beautiful debate and showing the double standards that western countries have. I can set a big flame 🔥 but you re not allowed to light a lantern They jealous of China’s progress and modernize also depressed by their economic and social problems. HK never collapsed and will continue the legend. Support HK and thank you for Ms Ip excellent response to those trying to defame HK government

[@vc8230]

我有一個夢! 就係這位女士經常發, 乃是做一姐的夢。一些人對這她是非常陌生的，她就是帶領這黨於前幾年區選中全軍覆沒, 因所派出參選者,包括她自己，竟沒有一人當選。

[@Fghhgffhjngf]

😂这么残？ 你们HK人太不给肉喇叭📣面子了😂

[@poonwingchiu6308]

那因為大多數選民都是被洗了腦。

[@davischan2794]

還能說香港沒有民主嗎？

[@nandehutu2194]

她说苹果日报鼓励人民进行暴力， 香港是和平示威， 何来的暴力？

[@RS-ff1cv]

你眼睛瞎了？

[@阳顶天-p3c]

扔油气弹，打砸公共设施，不是暴力？

[@john8175]

@@阳顶天-p3c 选择性盲目是这样的，只要我不想看见那它就没有发生

[@yeetsang2018]

葉劉的雄辯確是十分有力，香港人的驕傲。

[@testfirsttestlast706]

Ha! Stop kissing a$$

[@xuzhu1823]

I am 80 years old. I own a News Corporation in the United States and a newspaper called Yali Daily. I accepted funds from the British government to engage in Texas de-Americanization in Texas. The United States has evidence to prove all this, but I am democratic because the United States The government does not agree with Texas' secession from the United States. The outside world has questioned whether the United States is a democratic country. Don’t you claim to be a democracy?

[@xperiasony706]

佢都廿幾年.....仲係度... 賴響度唔走....

[@kevin_sai]

反送中變反政府，一個佳佳就要全港人都有機送大陸的條例變了反政府，真係你講哂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 誰反對就是反國家反對黨😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

[@zhanhuijiang207]

最初的引渡条例也不是大陆引起的。是台湾

[@YHChan-s8w]

佩服佩服，比人大巴大巴打都面不改容，謊話連编也吾'暫'眼，世上只有你

[@testfirsttestlast706]

Of course, these people have no shame.

[@张秀-o8h]

确实，这老头脸一点都不红

[@C.Y.JimmyTai]

「我們知道他們在說謊，他們也知道自己是說謊，他們也知道我們知道他們在說謊，我們也知道他們知道我們知道他們說謊，但是他們依然在說謊。」

[@张秀-o8h]

@@C.Y.JimmyTai 不许你这样说bbc这样的西方媒体

[@dingli1900]

讲的好！

[@CountrysideFreeCloud]

The more powerful China becomes, the more people in the world suffer.

[@FairusAbdullah-j1v]

Your mother fooking land bull shit

[@gengbeili9709]

两位主持人水平极高！表述言简意赅，针针见血。基于双方文化政治背景相悖，虽然有互相对牛弹琴之感，但恰恰能引发进一步的思考。

[@swinswinbox7255]

西方的主持人哪里水平高？不断引用非事实的内容，某些人的看法和不断用先立为主的形式来逼对方进入辩论的盲点，还一直逃避或不让一方在有利点时谈论下去。这看上个更像一个四方的主持人成立审批香港的法官。

[@tinche888]

​@@swinswinbox7255👍👍👍

[@Jnakajin]

作為地球人都想要民主和自由。但是要知道一點，所有的統治者和權力者為了保住自己的權利，他們只能剝奪我們的民主和自由。因此結論是，去找一個民主自由的地方生活，珍惜僅有的一次生命。有史以來，時間會見證一切，時間也會推翻一切。

[@hongdeli6148]

到美国去吧，那里自由，被枪击杀死也自由。

[@kerwinhuang3319]

加了最后一句话，瞬间把你的言论的价值降低了非常多。

[@羅永歐中國民主正義黨]

中國的民主自由革命必將爆發，也終將取得全面而偉大的勝利！👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍

[@hongdeli6148]

到美国去吧，那里能满足你的理想，珍惜僅有的一次生命，有人主动合法送你去极乐世界。

[@ss-rp3kq]

那是你，不是别人。作为精英。我可以负责任的告诉你，什么民主和自由都是话术！我只相信哪个制度更能让国家富强就是哪个制度优秀！黑猫白猫抓到老鼠的就是好猫。事实上，世界很多国家都相信了民主那套并完全照搬实施，一些国家领导人甚至都是美国指派的.但实际成功的寥寥无几！绝大部分都是失败！一样的贫穷，社会动荡！如果共党阻碍了人民的富强，那必然会被推翻！中国几千年的帝王朝，权力比习近平大得多！最后灭亡都是民不聊生导致。水可载舟亦可覆舟。现在只是由外媒掌握的媒体在抹黑打压中国。目的就是希望中国内乱，达到不战而屈人之兵的目的！最好解体！这样就能继续保持霸权来更好剥削全世界！我个人十分赞成世界该多极化发展！如果一家独大注定世界绝大部分人都会成为霸权的韭菜！就像现在美联储加息洗劫全世界财富一样！

[@jacklo3976]

若DSE 考試，問東答西， 睇下會點？有幾多分？ 狡辯砌詞， 葉九，妳開班教中學生答考試問題， 睇下家長會不會吊七妳？ 狡猾的毛娑，問非所答，主持問佢1，佢就答2。佢知道英國文化和語言的特性，所以明白問東就答西。 你睇下，若香港人問佢東，睇下佢敢唔敢答西？插Q死佢。 全部訪問過程，一片垃圾對話。

[@888megageorge]

Rubbish. Evil woman.

[@bruceevangelismandrevelati841]

I really liked the content. Keep supplying us. Thank you for sharing with us. ❤✌😘🥀🍀

[@yindu_Weige888]

*多谢分享💓*

[@laulaulau8084]

賣烏絲素個老闆係光頭佬!衹不個用錢揾廣告演員唱好成效釣水魚!!除左財經演員還有老千醫藥保健演員!!!他/她們的目的都是唱高股價和唱好產品成效散貨~ #沒有雙盲測試衹有戲(騙)子吹噓🔊🔊🔊🔊🔊🔊~ 大家知不知道凍齡和逆轉齡產品能否延長職業運動員的生涯嗎？大家知不知道抗頑英文是什麼?#大ka又知不知道藥物放入口賣廣告背後的勾結嗎**來自元朗過往在香港從事醫藥保健騙局的老千[李美英]L0uise lee mei ying[屬狗1982年)現居住在英國諾定咸(edwalton)!大家要留意!#她的右眼眼白裡有黑點 在天水圍張煊昌中學畢業 她有一個被她操控的小男人老公名叫(horace tin田福偉)還有兩個三角形眼睛(12月12日2013年)十歲孖女名叫田芷逸Carina tin和田芷悅Cadence tin就讀於rosecliffe spencer academy#老千李美英即使被侵犯私隱也不會向私隱專員公署舉報 Faceb00k雙生兒逸悅在英倫 Faceb00k雙生兒逸悅在英倫 Faceb00k雙生兒逸悅在英倫 Faceb00k雙生兒逸悅在英倫 #大家小心這個騙局年代

[@ChiChow-d8v]

The guys know how to twist the questions n answers!!

[@michaelxyz01]

言論自由!謝偉俊!示威自由!2個人!

[@calvinng8368]

Bye bye HK. This video is a waste of time watching.

[@leungchicheung8311]

你做得唔好人民武力推翻你有乜問題？成功嘅就係革命義士，失敗嘅就係叛國暴徒，古今中外每個朝代都係咁，你老共都係咁起家

[@aprilwu6521]

是啊，最后还是成败论英雄，只是败了也没得说了，古今中外，革命失败也都是被处理了😂😂

[@yiliangchen229]

言论自由，尊重他人，立场中立这些都是媒体人的基本原则。媒体人有权向受访者发出提问，受访者也有权对媒体人作出回应或者反驳。但是双方要本着相互尊重的态度，等待对方诉说完整。这才是淑女和绅士的本质。但是看起来这位主持人并非绅士也不是一个主持人应有的素质。在对话中这位主持人不断的打断对方的讲话，只要是他不喜欢的。你不是一直强调言论自由吗？为什么不能让对方把话讲完呢？

[@ZHENGQUANWU]

这位女士可以担任中共外交部发言人了，说谎真的可以不打草稿！

[@williamwang8170]

哪里说谎了？请说出来！要不然就是你在说谎和污蔑！

[@kplow19861]

来！！！告诉大家哪里说谎????? 我们要听

[@williamwang8170]

她哪里说谎了？请指出！说不出来就是你在说谎！

[@ZHENGQUANWU]

她在视频中说大陆有言论自由-------

[@sunny-nv7mq]

BBC. a mean and an evil media with liar makers

[@peterleung2580]

呢条死鬼又在胡说八道，扮晒嘢，鸠唔搭八，香港事，关你七事咩，不自量力，倾臭屎都过头近啦，討厭鬼。

[@nixcryleon]

足够努力了，别人没法比，点赞！

[@kellyy5834]

How dare you not letting us meddle in your country’s internal affairs😅

[@apogatsby5294]

她曾经是 保安局局长！！ 保安局局长这个位置权力非常大的！ 过去 真正的 实权官员

[@jpnmystic5208]

對, 想要推23條弄到自己得下台的局長, 對啊

[@scsc9092]

Has this low EQ_/IQ guy ever attended Jimmy Lai's Trial? Has this guy ever watched 2019 riots in HK-TV and HK-news media to get a fair judgement about thesituation in HongKong in 2019 - rioters/protesters occupying the Polytech University and CUHK and those rioters who took to the streets to destroy the public transports (MTR, Buses, railways，airport) and beat up other law abiding citizens.... It seems that this BBC guy is still living in his dream inside his cocoon - BBC. He hears nothing, sees nothing, he never traveled to China, never been to Hong Kong. He is in his ivory tower sleeping. Good Job - Madam 葉刘! PoorJob/Baby talk-idiot BBC Guy! WAKE UP: BBC Guy! GET OUT OF YOUR COCOON!! LOOK AROUND..DON'T BE NAIVE, SIMPLE AND LAZY...

[@puppybb3376]

✌️✌️💪💪🙏🙏

[@ericlee7203]

You did a good job,Stephen👍

[@illuminatiehmful]

Are you SURE?

[@yiaplengwee5909]

Well said, all those arrested had caused destruction and injuries, same as what other countries would do....so why asked the obvious questions hoping for different answers?

[@jtuyoshi5833]

香港股市最近4年太糟糕了，财政也都赤字了，她选择视而不见

[@天霸安]

那你倒是说说怎么让港股涨上去？怎么让财政没赤字？是要上街游行还是要独立？

[@jtuyoshi5833]

什么都别做就好啊，50年不变，为什么要折腾搞残废自己呢？ @@天霸安

[@kaliwong4669]

@@天霸安 那就要問問李特首了⋯⋯😂😂😂

[@君君-n4o]

葉劉淑儀

[@JOSEPHWONGAU]

Stephen Sackur is using"poison well" questioning based on false assertion. Lot of crap.

[@korris]

雞同鴨講 。。。TALKING BETWEEN CHICKEN AND DUCK EVEN THOUGH THEY WERE NOT BEING IN THE SAME SPACE.🙃

[@benpaaka896]

黃明志唱得好，愛國的龍的傳人呀，為什麼偏偏都住在倫敦😂😂😂

[@DanceDramaBGM]

工作啊生活啊。住海外也可以偏愛中國文化不行嗎? 印度裔也愛印度文化看bollywood entertainment。日本人也愛sashimi, 意大利也愛pasta, 在倫敦or anywhere都很正常。😊🌹

[@user-uz12345]

你是說BNOer嗎？

[@benpaaka896]

@@DanceDramaBGM 我是說愛國，不是什麼中國文化。龍的傳人都有long long的根😂

[@benpaaka896]

@@user-uz12345 BNO 依啲怎能夠話自己是龍的傳人！係住倫敦姓XYZ果啲😆

[@user-uz12345]

@@benpaaka896 我講笑啫😂