Xplane 12.1 to 11.55 Comparison

[@ChrisVirgilio]

“Stadium to the left” is the location of the former Candlestick Park which has been long since demolished.

[@tiemji]

Thanks for the video. Your XP11 is really awesome

[@cepathauss7227]

interesting, i do too once using the vivid sky. IMO, it makes the color of the sea look a bit weird doesn't it? What do you think.

[@hawktb9]

Great comparison. Have you flown in the soup yet? Heavy IFR with rain to really challenge your Mac Mini. Mine crashed when flying a Baron on a short flight in stormy weather.

[@kirkwebber6388]

I have done a "Cat III" into YVR and it was a bit sketchy. Mostly due to the Attitude Indicator being less than accurate. I did it again using the HUD screen and it was light years better.

[@ricka47]

As a former X-Plane 11 user, the frame rate appears very low and it can be seen most of the time in the lack of smoothness.

[@mikeanderson1393]

I still use XP 11 but I use Global TerraFlora which makes the landscape look awesome. I have on med to high settings and I get usually 45 to 50 fps. But I don't use SIM heaven.

[@shikharsingh3929]

which aircraft?

[@kirkwebber6388]

AOA T-6 Texan II

[@activex7327]

20 FPS, nice.

[@kirkwebber6388]

Full set up in XP12.1, all mods running, I can get 25 to 30 FPS normally. A few US airports can really draw the graphics down. SFO was complex enough for a good test.

[@confuseddad2865]

Wow Xplane is horrific performance vs what you see, man they have to get going on actually making this thing run properly. Competition has killed them