This is called corporate greed, public service mismanagement and certainly some sort of corruption. Those people who sign the agreement back in 2014 are most probably no longer in that job. Look at 17.5M GBP may not be a bad deal from BT financial point of view. Since 2014, that mean 1.75M per year. The installation of the backup system probably cost more than that in 2014, plus the cost of yearly maintenance of this backup system is probably very high. If you have a backup system, you need to perform recovery drill for that system yearly. Both startup procedure for that backup system and then resumption procedure for the main system. Recovery drill is a big exercise. I dare to say BT is very lucky and they have got away with only 17.5m. If there are life and death involved, they will be in bigger trouble. That is why we need to have 4th power to monitor the government like this media. Good work.
@eyannoАй бұрын
我Broadband 用BT, 合約期間,由£39增加到£43 😢
@sprucew1138Ай бұрын
好離譜喎。覺得英國太多離譜既嘢
@winsonlam5126Ай бұрын
😵是幾多年合約呀 超唔合理喎 我用NOW都 佢要跟通帳加我3鎊 我PLAN緊轉台
@eyannoАй бұрын
@@winsonlam5126 1 yr
@honwaichu1926Ай бұрын
合約只縛時間,不縛價錢,不單電訊,連迷你倉都係,合約期一樣年年加。
@F1972HSI7Ай бұрын
我們有生意可以合作, 我們可以幫手退返啲印花稅
@user-fu4vu2xw9gАй бұрын
但係香港人來講,印花税實際金額仍然很平?
@winsonlam5126Ай бұрын
Good News 呀 咩叫合約精神終於有了 題外話 其實呢D野 會唔會有人玩集體訴訟呢 成日睇電視 聽美國果邊有D咁既野