You do it really well! You talk about the really important things! You do it with the right speed, so everybody can fallow your steps. I like it much! Thank you :)
@5stargeneral6033 жыл бұрын
Didn’t see that move to Palau but it opens up many options. Really makes the Allied player thinking which direction Japan will go. Personally I think I would still buy the minor IC because you always need more ground units in Chinese territory, no matter which way you go.
@HamboneHQ3 жыл бұрын
Interesting move to Palau island, haven’t seen that before. Filing that move away for future use.
@TheCliffsideBunker3 жыл бұрын
Ya, I like that we're using 2 Island infantry without stripping mainland units for Island hopping, and their range from there is incredible even though they can only move 2 spaces.
@gregorybrown26353 жыл бұрын
I like your idea of moving the fleet to the Caroline Islands on the first move it opens the Pacific up to many more options. Like you I've been holding my fleet close to the Asian shore line waiting for the time to strike. I will need to try it a couple of times and see how l do with it.
@heavenriley54293 жыл бұрын
Good show, I think you really did a good.job putting Japan in the position to become an absolute monster. The Allies will have a super hard time to defend against that.
@waynedaly1003 жыл бұрын
Intersting position of the fleet, I would have never thought of that, I would have built the factory in China first round.
@jacksarles2353 жыл бұрын
Thanks for answering my comment YG, appreciate the engagement with the community. Yeah I understand why the OOB victory conditions can be polarizing, on a separate note I currently feel like the Pacific objectives for both the Japan and the U.S. seems somewhat difficult for either country to achieve. to take and hold 8 different islands seems super hard! This token takes 8 different amphibious assaults for either country. Would you maybe consider lowering the barrier to either country taking 5 or 6 of the opposing countries pacific islands? I think it might make the token more viable. I think it is super cool you have made holding the pacific a victory token which I think OOB makes the pacific islands not important at all. But I am concerned that taking 8 islands is too high of a barrier, I would be interested in your play testing how many times was this token acheived? Thanks for answering my previous question.
@TheCliffsideBunker3 жыл бұрын
Hey Jack, you don’t need to hold a victory objective to score the point, you just need to achieve it once during the game. Do me a favour and place 4 American transports off Caroline with 4 American infantry in Caroline. Then place 3 UKP transports off Queensland with 3 UKP infantry in Queensland... automatic Allied Pacific token threat.
@CBs_Bill_from_Montana3 жыл бұрын
@@TheCliffsideBunker that’s a good reply!
@jacksarles2353 жыл бұрын
@@TheCliffsideBunker Yeah I agree that's a valid scenario! I would just rate it as one of the hardest tokens besides supremacy. I would be personally embarrassed to give up the Pacific token for either US or Japan. Japan has the kamikaze tokens which help defend those islands. To stop the token either country only needs to defend 1 out of 8 islands.
@garygrassler093 жыл бұрын
Have you ever been in a game where the Japan player attack the Soviet Union turn one?
@CBs_Bill_from_Montana3 жыл бұрын
Around the 27 minute mark-it looks like you should have taken off two Chinese infantry on Yunan but you only took off one. Or did a I miss something? If I’m right you should reroll the single Chinese infantry because you will likely get a Japanese infantry back.
@grahammartin87733 жыл бұрын
My comment didn’t show up bc it only shows the ones you haven’t responded to.
@TheCliffsideBunker3 жыл бұрын
Makes sense... thanks for all your help.
@grahammartin87733 жыл бұрын
@@TheCliffsideBunker Your welcome and thank you for what you do for this community!