You Really Did Something NMS Sir | Ramanujan's Summation | Vakrahara

[@aariyandas11-a8]

Hare krishna sir! Sir what u did u don't know how much it will help and support me in presenting the existence of God through mathematics to my Genz classmates! Thanks a lot sir... And i after observing both the videos I realised that the RHS part is representing the Jivaatma and The series is representing The Supreme Lord Govinda! Bcoz we are the part n parcel of him as we are same in qualities but in quantity we are infinitesimal and he is infinite!

[@vakrahara]

Hare krishna... 🦚🪈

[@virat-k9g]

My respect for srinivas ramanujan ji ❤💯💯😊

[@vedansh7010]

The summation is just the solution to one of the unallowed inputs of the Reimann zeta function

[@Rovid1945editz]

Are ye baat mere sir The Ashish Agarwal sir ne mujhe pahle hi bataya tha

[@vakrahara]

Sach m?? Agar aisa hai to fir I think ki ye explanation new nahi hai. Apke pas koi video hai kya?

[@Challengeacceptingyouth]

The Ashish Agarwal sir lakshay batch pw ❤❤❤

[@vakrahara]

It's ok... I didn't find it. But anyways... It's nice to know about... ❤️❤️❤️ Lots of love Ashish sir if he really had this intuition. 😊 I don't know if NMS sir came up with this on his own or derives the thought from others. Whatever the case, he at least admitted that he has done something wrong and corrected himself. That's important by the way... 😅

[@sukritineogi8195]

Appne kon class ka kon lecture main Ashish sir ko ye bolte huye sune ho?

[@AdityaSingh-et8lb]

@@vakrahara It's highly improbable that NMS sir ne Ashish agarawal sir ki video dekhi ho..Ashish aggarwal sir ki video youtube par kahin nhi hai aur obviously aisa bhi nhi ho skta ki wo pw batch lekar iit jee ki maths padh rhe ho.. So don't shy away from giving someone their due credit...

[@rode_atharva]

apne jo video diya tha description me wo mene dekha . jo divergent series ko convergent karne ki bat karta hai by differnt summation method.

[@vakrahara]

Yes..

[@bourbaki-1]

Bhai us video ki methods mein kuch zyada spirituality nehin hai. Jo numbers unhone dikhaya, they are all p-adic numbers. What he demonstrated is, the 10-adic number ....666667 is equal to 1/3. Ye kuch new method nehin hai. Isomorphism ka matalab hi ye hota hai ki agar aap dusre field ko study nehin kar paa rahe ho to jo known field hai uske properties ko dhundo to dusre field ka automatic mil jayega.. they are like photocopy or image to eachother. And "The complex numbers and the algebraic closure of the p-adic numbers are isomorphic as fields". So, indeed they act the same as the structure of a field.

[@vakrahara]

Yes I have watched it, the veritasium video. 🙂

[@bourbaki-1]

@@vakrahara so you already got it. Main ye nehin bol sakta ki wo explanation (NMS sir ka) sahi hai ya galat, the answer can't be as black or white. But, A different p-adics-based perspective actually gives -1/8 🤔

[@vakrahara]

@bourbaki-1 ye ek aisa field hai jo mujhe lgta h bhut weird results de sakta until and unless hm use sahi se smjh na le. The reality is ki humne thik se av is field ko smjha hi ni hai, may be because of its divergent nature. I have no idea actually 😅 Whenever I see this summation, I am always amazed by Ramanujan's thoughts

[@bourbaki-1]

@@vakrahara na na..humne is field ko samjha hai sahi se.. but the answer for the ramanujan sum hidden in the realm of Riemann zeta function and analytic continuation. So, I think instead of thinking spiritually we should peek in the zeta function.

[@vakrahara]

Mujhe pagal bolna hai to bol sakte ho 😅 But, I know that complex numbers are just fairy tale stories and I have valid intuition and mathematical proof for this I didn't release it yet on KZbin because the work is still going on. So the approach used to solve the Reimann Hypothesis is pretty vague for me. Reimann zeta function (-1) pr valid ni hoti but analytical continuation hme dikhati hai ki iska result -1/12 hota hai Actually jab hm zeta function ko plot karte hain complex plane pr tabhi se hi galati ki shuruwat ho jati hai. Ek tarah ka meromorphic function hota h ye complex plane pr. Hme lagta hai ki complex plane real plane ka ek extension hai jabki aisa hai hi ni. Weird lg rha hai n? Mujhe pta hai Mujhe v lg rha tha, ki ye kya pagalpan wala harkat kr rhe h hm Lekin meri intuition galat nahi hai, bhut sure hu m... Look... M galat ho v sakta hu... I am not Ramanujan 😅 But, jo mujhe meri intuition keh rahi hai use ek bar test karna to banta hai n To filhal m ispr kuch bolna sahi ni smjhunga... Pehle proof krunga fir sure hoke bolunga However, av tk mujhe koi dikkat nazar nahi ayi hai I hope age v na aye

[@anirbanbhattacharjee8462]

Aap ek detailed video baniye ki ramanujam summation kya hai aur usme kaise divergent series ko add karte hai Apne apne pehle wale video me bataya toh tha ki ramanujam summation alag hota hai par samajh nai aaya

[@vakrahara]

Jarur... Filhal mai ek dusre project pr kaam kr rha hu. Foundational mathematics ko correct krne k liye. Av turant to possible ni ho payega, but m apni puri koshish karunga jald hi video bnau is topic pr 🙂 Actually, Ramanujan summation ko achhe se smjhane k liye km se km 1 ghanta ka lecture v km padega 😂 But I will try my best...

[@anirbanbhattacharjee8462]

@@vakrahara Thank you

[@shreyanshkumar7118]

Sir aapne kahaa se padhai kari h mtlb kis institute se

[@vakrahara]

My true education is from a Gurukulam where no one goes nowadays... 😅 However, the highest degree I can talk about is: I have studied BTech for 2 years in NSEC and I did BA in history (hon)

[@shreyanshkumar7118]

@vakrahara Aap history se BA kiye ho to aapko maths ke baare me kaise pata wo bhi ramanujan summation jo ki kaafi abstract topic h

[@vakrahara]

@shreyanshkumar7118 sirf mathematics hi ni brother, mujhe game development, core java ye sab v ati hai. Aur bhi bhut kuch hai... Maine to bola n maine apni shiksha us Gurukulam se li hai jha aajkal koi ni jate 😅 Lambi story hai... 😅😅 Filhal mai itna hi bta sakta hu... Thank you so much for showing your interest towards me. I am blessed to have you... ❤️

[@Nimit_oc]

​@@vakrahara interesting... U can make a video about urself. It would be really amazing.

[@vakrahara]

Surely I would... ❤️🙂

[@GouravBagaria]

❤

[@abhwi]

Ha, aur "blackpenredpen" ka wo video bhi (sum of natural number ka-1/8) bhi galat hai, ye log zoo-tube pai kuch bhi kr dete hai

[@vakrahara]

zoo-tube 😂😂

[@Ashish-w4j]

Pehli baar bhi wo galat nhi thhe wo jee point of view se bta rhe thhe ....

[@vakrahara]

Yes... Correct... Wo to unhone apne bad wale video m clear v kiya

[@Ashish-w4j]

@vakrahara Bhaiya aapko bhi Maths wagera se prove karna chahie sab baato ko tab views bhi aaenge jyada...

[@vakrahara]

Hmm... 🤔 Thank you 👍🏻😃

[@dolichakraborty6020]

bakwas mat kar bhai mathematics is not bound to jee so he was wrong wrt that point

[@Ashish-w4j]

@@dolichakraborty6020 but wo jee aspirants ke lie unhone btaya thha jee advanced syllabus ke respect mein and wo shi bhi thha humare rational vichar and wisdom ke according

[@PAT_Cumminsog567]

Sab kuch mein Religion ko ghusane bale 🤡... Vhai theoretical proof dikhao... Jayse kuch Orange 🍊 uneducated speak person bolte hein Energy conservation law... But 😆 janta huin jyada pada likha nhi hein to noether's theorem nhi janta... Vhai be rational be scientific...

[@vakrahara]

I appreciate your thinking 🙂 Not everyone thinks the same way. For someone it means something and for someone it's not. Whatever the case, I acknowledge both. ❤️ I am neither religious nor an atheist. I follow dharma... I have no contradictions with your words. Your words are for the betterment of this humanity. I appreciate it, seriously... Whatever I do is for the betterment of the entire Earth 🌍 because this whole earth is my family. I am always eager to learn and still learning... I learned something from you too... Thank you for watching ❤️

[@PAT_Cumminsog567]

​No I have also no issue but I felt when this gen hate Pythagoras​ for Baudhyana.. also same about Newton's Calculus.. and one thing in your video 1/0 is not अनंत... It just undefined (from basic Definition of Division). Undefined is undefined.. but infinity just a unbounded form of a bounded magnitude.. you cannot say 1/0 is अनंत. अनंत means infinity na?? If not then sorry from my side 🙏.. Radhe radhe @@vakrahara

[@vakrahara]

You are absolutely correct... 1/0 is undefined in modern context. But this is undefined due to the limitation of the mathematics that we are currently using. The foundation of mathematics is not well structured. You can watch my other videos to have a clear understanding on the concept of zero and negative numbers. Especially the video titled as "soul of mathematics was murdered" When our eyes are covered with a layer of adharma, we are not able to enquire the basic existence of ourselves. We should question each and everything, we should not just accept something the way it is defined. If you can enquire, use all your potential to find the solution for it. For me the education is to learn what you don't know... ।। राधे राधे ।।

[@PAT_Cumminsog567]

@@vakrahara you cannot say limitations.. then it's limitations of our fundamental concepts. If UNDEFINED a limitation then we have to restructure our definition of DIVISION.. a/b=c then it must satisfy b×c =a.. here 1/0 doesn't satisfy b×c=a.. Now you will tell a new number that we cannot imagine.. but again from basic properties of multiplication is Anything × 0 is 0 because it can create a group but there will no element .. then where is limitation??

[@vakrahara]

Look brother... I have already tested it and it drastically reduces the abstraction of mathematics. Our very understanding of numbers is wrong. Watch my video... 😞 It's unfortunate ki hm apne hi chizon ko thik se smjh ni paye. It's not about argument, I don't want to win this argument. But just listen to me once in that video.

[@amritdubey789]

Ye sirf apne desh ke logo ko glat karenge baki ko karne ki aukat nahi hai n😅

[@vakrahara]

No Amrit... Bat ye nahi hai 😞 The thing I am searching for and currently working on is itna bada hai ki main ise ek statement m ni bta sakta. Bas itna keh sakta hu ki dipawali m jab hm safai karte hain to pehle apne ghar ki karte hain fir apne aas pas... 🙂 I am very positive ki jald hi m us position pr jarur aunga jab m pure vishwa ko wo bta paunga jo meri atma kehna chahti h... M kisi ko galat saabit kr k khud mahan kehlau ye mentality nahi hai meri. Just visit my website and read about me. M filhal apse itna keh paunga aur itna hi bta paunga. Mere andar jo hai wo pta ni kv bahar aa v payega ya nahi. I am waiting for it... But jab tak ye life hai I will never hold myself back... I really think ki mere pas waqt km hai aur kam jyada hai jise isi zindagi m pura Krna hai... I really hope so... 😊😅

[@dolichakraborty6020]

WDYM

[@amritdubey789]

​@@vakraharasir mai aapko kuchh nahi kah aur aapki knowledge aapke bato se pta chal jati hai you are too good 👍👍👍❤❤❤❤❤

[@vakrahara]

🙏

[@anmolsingh7272]

I just read @PAT_Cummingsog567 comment on this video. I really respect you for the way you encountered the situation. He was obviously rude but you nonetheless respected his thinking and expressed your beliefs humbly too. I am actually atheist too. I just cannot find myself accepting existence of a "God" or any type of higher being as described in religious scriptures. I am not influenced by someone for the beliefs I have. Can you express why you believe in god, religion? I might question you depending on your answer in reply section and I assure you that I will not be rude by any means, just a little debate like thing, i guess. And yes, I am not here to "Brainwash", I really am open for any changes in my thinking, If i'm satisfied

[@vakrahara]

😂😂😂 Thank you so much for this, I didn't expect anything like that. By the way, what I think about your question is here: For me or anything else, whether it is living or non-living, there has to be a truth. That truth is God for me. 😂 Now this is the most fundamental and basic definition that I can provide you here. But the depth of this is huge. The more I think about it, the more vast it becomes. Look, the entire debate over the existence of the god came into picture due to our consciousness. If it didn't exist, we don't have this question in reality. So, God and consciousness are the topics explained by many and regressed by many. 😂 However, 🤔 Let us consider something... Since this whole universe is the main culprit for this question ❓ There is one question that no one can argue about? "Why universe exists?" What if I ask you, Do you think that this universe is the effect of something? If you say yes, then there must be a cause. The primordial cause of existence. That is what I say God. If you say no, then this universe is self-sustained and pre-existing. So the whole universe is God in itself (from my perspective) In both conditions... Whether it was or not, there is something due to which we exist and that's the reality of course. For me, religion is a vague concept. I do not bind myself in religion where a group of people has some ideologies and others follow it. That is purely nonsense. Neither I am an atheist. And I gave you the reason why I can't be an atheist. It is not my belief but what I said is the truth. And that truth can't be a belief. So I am not a believer but a seeker of that truth. I don't know what it is and why it is, and this is the cause of my seeking. I don't know if you are able to understand my point. I am a proud sanatani who follows dharma. Dharma is not religious but is directly connected with that truth that we all are seeking. I call it brahm, the Veda call it brahm, the Upanishads call it brahm, entire scriptures call it brahm. 🙂‍↔️ When, I was young I didn't like samskritam and now when I started reading it and dived deep into the Veda and Upanishads, I am really amazed by the thoughts that our ancestors had. It opened an entirely different universe of reasoning and logical thinking that I never experienced before. I bow down to my guru, who really taught me how to seek it. The way we are taught about these books is wrong, but the reason for teaching it like that is absolutely necessary. I cannot explain it here entirely but the very purpose of Veda itself is to seek that truth. Devata in Veda is not God, it's a mistranslated version to justify one's supremacy and make Hindus ashamed of their own culture. For us, the gods are not that a religious person thinks about. Everything is about dharma and everything is due to this dharma itself. Dharma is not a religion. I am getting goosebumps right now while explaining it to you. The concept of dharma is not just for us but for everything that exists in this universe. The whole universe is held by the dharma itself and it is the brahm that gives existence to dharma. Look brother, even those rishis who transmitted Veda were unknown of that truth but still they says, "Everyone should seek that truth and should seek always, the one who doesn't seek or is ignorant of his own existence is nothing but a dead". I don't know if I have successfully explained my thoughts to you or not, but the thing that is inside my brain is so huge that I cannot explain it in a few statements. Thank you so much for reading my thoughts ❤️😅 I apologise to my guru if I said something wrong... 🙏

[@anmolsingh7272]

First of all, Thanks for giving your time! I would like to say that not only consciousness, but the ability to think and question is what truly made the concept of god to emerge. I mean animals and plants too have consciousness, but there sole purpose is survival by adapting as per environment and nature demand. The ability to think made humans question every aspect of nature and that's how the concept of God came into emergence, atleast that is how I believe it. Because humans lived in societies, these thoughts were shared among themselves. These thoughts were 'the stories' of how the thing they see came into existence. I do not have to mention it, but there are very large differences in all religions about existence of different things in nature. We are debating on why this universe exists whereas in that time shape of earth, cause of earthquake etc. were maybe the debates. Which ofcourse were answered by the stories which some of them fabricated and everybody believed. Today we know the true cause of these things which is again thanks to the same thinking ability of humans. Why universe exists?, How really was it created or it was pre existing ?, Is there any other planet where life exists too?, What consciousness actually is ?etc.These questions are un-answerable, or they may be answered by humans in future. But then again, a new question will come up. Un-answerable questions should not be the basis to prove something, If a concept literally answers something, only then it should be accepted. If it doesn't, we should find its flaw and improve the concept. These concepts are called theories in science and if it fails, its failure is accepted. But in case of relegion, one should have 'faith' his believes, you cannot question it.

[@anmolsingh7272]

​@@vakrahara I feel like, I can't really grasp the meaning of "Dharma" as you perceive it. You declined Dharma's connection with God, Does Dharma means doing good things, something related with that concept of Karma ig?

[@vakrahara]

@anmolsingh7272 Dharma is not about doing good things. If I ask you... 🤔 What is good and bad? Who decides it? Who makes this distinction between good and bad? These terms are of no use for God (for others but for me it's brahm). A normal person might consider killing someone as bad but a terrorist can consider the same thing as good. So, good and bad are based on the person who is doing something or tends to do something. Good and bad is a very limited word. Dharma doesn't talk just about humans, it talks about the entire universe itself, whether living or not. Everything has a dharma assigned to it. The English word for it is "righteousness" and seriously 😶😅 this english word is of no match to the original meaning of dharma. Right now what I am doing is my dharma. Right now, what your smartphone is doing is its dharma. Right now, what pruthvi (earth) is doing is her dharma. Right now, what the sun is doing is his dharma. Everything is bound by the dharma and dharma is due to that brahm. Dharma has a very deep meaning that the entire Mahabharata was written on it to convey the actual meaning. Some can understand it in hours, some can understand it in days, some can understand it in months and years, and some cannot understand it in his entire life. 😅

[@vakrahara]

What you see is different and what I see is different for the same word. That is what I felt till now. Purushashuktam in my scripture talks about this. The exact meaning of consciousness, why it exists. The only thing I can tell you is, if you really want to understand something... Don't close the doors of wisdom. Keep it open, someone might come and enlighten you with the context that you need. Erwin Schrodinger was highly influenced by Upanishads, and his thoughts were highly aligned with the Advaita philosophy. He was mesmerized reading them. I don't know what he gained from it and why he read it? Why did Oppenheimer feel a deep connection to bhagawad geeta. Why Neils Bohr was influenced by these scriptures. I am not saying, that these scriptures have science and they extracted it. It's not the case... But, there might be some ideas and thoughts that you can take as a foundation to work further in the search of that ultimate truth, the param brahm. Rationality is not about denying something, it's about understanding and thinking, what can lead us to that solution correctly. The only most rational thing I have seen existed in this world is Veda itself. When you read it, you will think the same. But, only when you are logical enough to understand the meanings of it. Don't read like the others. Connect to your roots if you are an indian and read those texts. I have already given a lot of time. I did what I must... (It was my dharma by the way 😅😉) I must focus on something else that is more important right now. Thank you so much for listening to me. If you want my website has some blogs that I have written there. Read them if you want to. Thank you again... ❤️❤️❤️❤️