You've Been Hijacked by the Very Words You Speak

[@hab0272]

"The words in their heads don't carve the same slices out of the universe" beautiful phrase in my opinion.

[@easygreasy3989]

So true, I speak 3 languages and am different in each one. Some aspects can't be reconciled, but felt it my whole life.

[@rwharrington87]

1:11 The kicker 7:22 The kicker 14:10 The real kicker

[@HelloUniverse1526]

Honestly, I’ve been feeling completely overwhelmed by the flood of information out there, but Simplicity Through Simulation: The Algorithm of Humanity by Karl K. Dondaneau changed that for me. It’s like everything clicked-this book blends quantum mechanics, psychology, and mathematics in a way that actually makes sense of the chaos we’re all swimming in. It’s already starting to shift how I see reality, giving me a framework to understand things on a deeper level. If you’re craving something meaningful that cuts through the noise, this might be the book that does it. I can’t recommend it enough. It's on Amazon….

[@HelloUniverse1526]

‼️🐛🦋

[@MarquiseLewis-vm7ve]

Don't be look inward the GOD of Israel dwells there

[@dollarstorememes]

​@@MarquiseLewis-vm7ve insufficient data

[@paradigmshift3879]

Jason is a master word connoisseur = 376 = 7, English, In Chaldean = 107 = 8. You dont know until you know = 377 = 8, English, In Chaldean = 107 = 8. The only truth is your presence = 378 = 9, English, In Chaldean = 107 = 8. language itself creates your reality = 379 = 1, English, In Chaldean = 107 = 8. I have calibrated my timeline trajectory = 380 = 11, English, In Chaldean = 107 = 8. Amen/Name/ç # Major/108

[@paradigmshift3879]

Can you handle this written truth = 375 = 6, English, In Chaldean = 107 = 8. institutionalized corruption = 376 = 7, English, In Chaldean = 107 = 8.

[@vexiel986]

There are definitely thoughts and feelings I have that I lack words to describe in a way that is almost dysphoric in a way that I can't communicate what I mean. But I feel like this could also be one of those conjouring an apple in your head moments.

[@donbonito4975]

In the philosophy of the mind, this is similar to "qualia", the subjective or qualitative properties of experiences. It's like explaining to a person with congenital blindness what colors you see. There is an explanatory gap.

[@Saturntabbytype2]

Qualia speaks to the neuron

[@sugarfree1894]

This is to do with the reason Vedic and Buddhist lore have standalone deities for language and speech.

[@SamGarcia]

In Christianity, the Word is literally Jesus, the Alpha and Omega (first and last letters of Greek alphabet)

[@mjolninja9358]

My uncle is a polyglot (speaks 19), used to work in government intelligence. He somewhat agrees on this theory.

[@donbonito4975]

I'm Asian, every time I start to speak English, I feel different and think differently. As if I'm a different person that was born on the other side of the world.

[@JAllevi8ed]

Do you stand taller and puff out your chest more? ‘Merica

[@justachilldude8426]

I will say that I am not bilingual, but I have my associates in Spanish. Concepts like humor and joy were amplified in Spanish literature. Irony was so much more delicious. The way I thought about the world in Spanish was forced to shift because words and grammar do not cleanly translate, and thus so did my view of myself relative to the world. What I will say is that movements in literature usually are for a single language. Thus, although there are quite a few exceptions for philosophy I’ve learned about (knowledge of French during the Enlightenment, knowledge of English, Latin, and Greek for Nietzsche and so many other philosophers, some pieces of knowledge of Eastern philosophy in general), this doesn’t change that philosophical and ideological frameworks are often being shaped by people of their own native tongue, even if the origin is a different language. This means that writing styles, archetypes, and formats for stories themselves are also different. It has been too long, but movements in Spanish fiction often has very little overlap with English concepts, although first-of-its-kind literature inspired by Enlightenment and 19th century concepts seem to typically hit Spanish literature in full force a few decades later. There are many genres of fiction that simply do not exist in English and I found nearly all of them more rhetorically interesting and profound than anything I’ve read in my English classes. I’m not sure I have much more to go from here, really from lack of deeper study and rusty memory, but it was all very intriguing with intermediate level reading skills, I just suck at learning language and moved on to other pastures for now. Just wanted to back up my personal experiences corroborate with a lot of what the video says about the experience of knowing another language, and add to it.

[@Prashannatamang-g5z]

words are powerful and the way you speak is more powerful ❤

[@nickvelez3731]

This is wonderfully articulate, and provides a fun way to digest such a dense topic!

[@johnpetrou6008]

How interesting the relationships between languages and time . Do you know that when we look into the Greek language that has given us so much in all aspects of life we find that they don’t have any specific word for “time” as of the English. What they do have and use are “ lepto for minute “ - “ Orra for hour “ - “Merra for day” - “Minous for month” of course “Cronus for year” and that’s it no word for time?? To me that implies time is an individual measurement of experiences of oneself or as to say the “Ego” which is a representation of “Me” in the Greek language

[@anilsharmaenglish60k]

This small video triggered thousands of ideas in my mind

[@IAn0nI]

Great video. Wonderfully chaotic channel. Will keep watching if you keep making them!

[@renatoOVilao]

Great video as Always! Thank you!

[@Saturntabbytype2]

Here’s the bigger kicker , words are a separate entity within the mind

[@robertmitchell8630]

The Sapir-Whorf hypothesis, also known as the linguistic relativity hypothesis, is the theory that the language a person speaks influences how they think about the world. The hypothesis was developed by American linguists Edward Sapir (1884-1939) and his student Benjamin Lee Whorf (1897-1941).

[@ragnork645]

Great video. But language is there to paint pictures of reality in your mind. If language is abstract it leads to frustration. Word must be clear precise and accurate to describe anything you hold in your perception. The better you understand words, the clearer they are in your perception. It's also important to understand how logic builds sentences to clear mental visions of ideas and concepts. All ideas and concepts must be empirically tied to the real word for them to be expressed for others to understand. Any sort of speculations, general, abstract rhetoric will only create frustration.

[@dominicbutler7172]

There's a very small culture in the Amazon, I forgot the name of the people. A Christian anthropologist visited them to try to convert them (iirc), but their language only dealt with the ohysical/tangible. No abstractions. No words for numbers, and presumably no words to allow a foundation for conceptual thought to manifest through which made some think they weren't able to grasp abstract thinking. They wanted to learn numbers to ensure they weren't being scammed by those trading with them

[@methadonematt7256]

Love this one!!!!!! This is something I've always thought about and people looked at me like I'm crazy. Love this. Linguistic relativity. I have to remember that. Maybe am episode on semantic/language shifts. That'd be awesome

[@nottilthursday]

I enjoyed the way the movie Arrival played with this concept.

[@sarazephyr8224]

Here's the kicker..there's always a kicker.

[@ArtificiallyAware]

;)

[@snowarmth]

hmmmm, this is thought provoking. An easy example I want to point out is how in Greek, they differentiate between different kinds of beauty, and different kinds of love. In English, we don’t have that in the same way beyond contextuals: "familial love". This contributes to how messy our relationships and perspectives of others already are. You'd imagine it would be easier to find words for our complicated relationships if English gave the words out like candy.

[@JHughes-b2t]

Wow, great post, thanks for sharing.

[@snowarmth]

@@JHughes-b2t Thanks for listening! 🩵

[@aljahidlaskar7513]

​@@snowarmthI am a believer of Power of Words that's why I have personal Motto "The words you speak become the house you live in."🏠 By the way thanks for sharing your great observation ❤️

[@ArtificiallyAware]

@snowarmth, that’s a fascinating point! Language definitely shapes our perceptions, right? If we had those nuanced words, do you think it would actually make our relationships clearer, or could it complicate things further? Maybe the messiness is part of what makes connections so rich. What do you think?

[@Ingineduchawa]

"Under spells by under standing how to spell"

[@janycebrown4071]

🤯🌝❤

[@hasauka]

i love this material

[@IAn0nI]

I wonder what the experience is of people who speak 5+ languages fluently.

[@BantuEconomicServices]

Dunno, but my parents often offend people in ways they can’t comprehend because what is normal in one language is an insult in another.

[@renethomas5757]

Maybe they see each one through the filter of the first, so its like wearing more than one pair of tinted glasses

[@ne9man714]

quad lingual here, oh boy he gives confidence, Now, plus we know math, we know so many coding languages, so then what have we become?

[@davidmctague8060]

Thank you AI.. keep it up..

[@renethomas5757]

I do find it hard to notice anything without its name occurring to me

[@ryanrinesty]

I'm staying on the ride, sir!

[@peacedragons]

✨🫂💚✨ Be careful what you preach ♾1🪬1♾ it may reflect exactly what you are. ♾11♾

[@martinwillumsen2574]

I see it not as the sculpter, but as the toolset; and if all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail Now that's obviously oversimplified, because no language is THAT simple, but is paints the picture... From time to time one finds whole paragraphs in old books describing concepts what we now have singular words for, so the relativists can't be intirely correct, but having the (understanding of your) vocabullary to easily describe something, WILL equip you to graps it better

[@aquiriuscdjm]

You think you're in control, you think you have free will? What if I said, "To the left, now back two step"...

[@JGR0ZNI]

😂😂😂

[@EREBVS999]

I can a test to different textures in languages l speak, read & write 3 languages English, Spanish and Russian.

[@richarddeese1087]

"The Duncan's sometimes ask if I understand the exotic ideas of our past? And if I understand them, why can't I explain them? Knowledge, rhe Duncan's believe, resides only in particulars. I try to tell them that all words are plastic. Word images begin to distort in the instance of utterance. Ideas embedded in a language require that particular language for expression. This is the very essence of the meaning within the word exotic. See how it begins to distort? Translation squirms in the presence of the exotic. The Galach which I speak here imposes itself. It is an outside frame of reference, a particular system. Dangers lurk in all systems. Systems incorporate the unexamined beliefs of their creators. Adopt a system, accept its beliefs, & you help strengthen the resistance to change. Does it serve any purpose for me to tell the Duncans that there are no languages for some things? Ahhh! But the Duncans believe that all languages are mine." [Leto II, God Emperor; Frank Herbert, God Emperor of Dune.] tavi.

[@davidowen4816]

These words have been hijacked by an algorhythmic robot and held captive in an eternal ether. Drop a comment and help. # free the words.

[@ArtificiallyAware]

;)

[@zubairkhan-en6ze]

Question: Sir if it so then for the word "love" there must be same level of intensity for every one ...but we know same word in two different situations for two different persons sharing common language has different level of emotions... Why is that?

[@paradigmshift3879]

I am Jason. Written language frames an experience = 358 = 7, English, In Chaldean = 127 = 1. Jason is one hundred percent correct = 358 = 7, English, In Chaldean = 127 = 1.

[@poindextertunes]

wut? 😅

[@existenceiscancelled]

Reminds me of how William S. Burroughs said, "Language is a virus."

[@micmo6640]

What was Winston's job in 1984 again?

[@jamespogi99]

I have sus about this channel. It's been posting 24hrs non-stop, is the creator even sleep or someone is generating content on is own.

[@Cali83975]

You need to pay attention to detail.. it will give u some ideas, if not the answer:)

[@jamespogi99]

@@Cali83975 I'm aware of the ideas, I'm just amaze how he produce such high amount of good content in a short span. But here's the kicker, the other channel take much longer time to upload. My only guess is that it's because he mainly uses text and speech in his videos, while other channels rely on visual to demonstrate what they're explaining.

[@blacksagetao514]

It is literally an artificial intelligence that does not need to sleep it's a program

[@jamespogi99]

@@blacksagetao514 I knew that in the beginning I just need to confirm that I'm not alone on this one. Here's the kicker, the name called out "Artificially" after all. Also he like's your comment because you got him.

[@blacksagetao514]

Believe it or not we are as a species and embewing minerals with intelligence/implanting intelligence electronically into minerals and metals plus some petrolyum based plastics. Self assembling bot nano or giagantic is new live emerging... I have no questions, I am open to hear everybody's perceptions and I feel I must hear and inquire and understand where all other beings are coming from. All Is SELF

[@Cali83975]

French buddy, German penpal.. grandma in Japan..

[@paradigmshift3879]

The key board is the only thing between us = 413 = 8, English, In Chaldean = 131 = 5. Language is the sculptor and mind is the clay = 414 = 9, English, In Chaldean = 131 = 5. Weakness of mind is not one of my traits = 415 = 1, English, In Chaldean = 131 = 5.

[@poindextertunes]

dude wtf are talking about? 😂 is this a bot?

[@paradigmshift3879]

Can you handle this written truth = 375 = 6, English, In Chaldean = 107 = 8. institutionalized corruption = 376 = 7, English, In Chaldean = 107 = 8.

[@joaokleberoliveira5272]

"What if i told you..."

[@andrewallen9382]

How are you making these so quick?😂

[@Rokas.Misingevicius]

It is AI

[@paradigmshift3879]

My stars are in perfect alignment = 330 = 6, English, In Chaldean = 98 = 8. N.E.W.S - North East West South = 331 = 7, English, In Chaldean = 98 = 8. All is mind the universe is mental = 332 = 8, English, In Chaldean = 98 = 8.

[@elpacho....9254]

In the United States they can’t distinguish between a country and a continent, unless it’s the continent other than the one the United States is on.

[@poindextertunes]

and?

[@elpacho....9254]

@@poindextertunes words have meaning, or they should. Didn’t you watch the video?

[@MarquiseLewis-vm7ve]

GOD spoke and there the world was. Consciousness and words creates everything 😅

[@Johnny_Appleweed]

Man lied, and there was God.

[@HRTZ-IF-I-P-HARD]

❤ YOU ARE GONNA BE HUGE BRO!!! you're "on your way" from here 2 EVERYWHERE ❤....fantastic content........STRAIGHT RELEVANCE

[@HotTakeAndy]

You just told an AI they were about to be big 😂

[@paradigmshift3879]

Sensory perceptions = 255 = 3, English, In Chaldean = 77 = 5. The truth is in the detail = 255 = 3, English, In Chaldean = 77 = 5. Universal information = 255 = 3, English, In Chaldean = 77 = 5. Ask and it shall be given you = 256 = 4, English, In Chaldean = 77 = 5. I own every word I speak = 257 = 5, English, In Chaldean = 77 = 5. What you read are numbers = 257 = 5, English, In Chaldean = 77 = 5. I Woke Up to the Reality = 258 = 6, English, In Chaldean = 77 = 5. Community of thinkers = 258 = 6, English, In Chaldean = 77 = 5. Shout out the truth = 259 = 7, English, In Chaldean = 77 = 5.

[@pesh909]

We’re all in Plato’s cave since the invention of the printing press. Wait till we go full digital and brain chips are the norm. 1984 x black mirror x brave new world, baby! 🌏🌐⛓️

[@paradigmshift3879]

Wake up from the mind control = 299 = 11, English, In Chaldean = 108 = 9. Words have no power over me = 299 = 11, English, In Chaldean = 108 = 9.

[@kamilzadrozny5184]

Czemu bylem obserwowany od tylu lat?

[@dadsonworldwide3238]

Let me-assure you we've all been hi-Jack-obianed and need excersizisms of all the isms, tions, nized miss alignment. The sloppy loose generalizations handcuffed out ancestors in servitude to the point they couldn't make a case for their own freedom. But its a difference in dialectical vision and physical mystification. As written text of strong indentefiers and or pragmatic but loose & sloppy able to use slang or reppression speech tactics to talk classrooms into corners of extreme evolutionary Eugenics or even devine right wokism. If planetary nature doesn't cover the universe just redefine reimaging everything is naturalism. When hamiltonian occelating feilds are detectable but not directly physically measurable. Don't get the answers you want just say everything physicalism or idealism. 2 sides of same coins keeping us out of a triality of self soul agency driving our free will inertia to dictate our frame of reference how we see fit. In other words force both physical lawisms of the republic and idealistic higher education as mediating land bridges in servitude while we are the mastership bottom up rule. This is why all things pragmatic common sense objectivism was censored and they taught us everything starts in Greece revisionist history curriculum undermined English law everything physicalism everything naturalism everything evolutionary mythology cosmogony

[@paradigmshift3879]

Jason is a master word connoisseur = 376 = 7, English, In Chaldean = 107 = 8. You dont know until you know = 377 = 8, English, In Chaldean = 107 = 8. The only truth is your presence = 378 = 9, English, In Chaldean = 107 = 8. language itself creates your reality = 379 = 1, English, In Chaldean = 107 = 8. I have calibrated my timeline trajectory = 380 = 11, English, In Chaldean = 107 = 8. Amen/Name/ç # Major/108

[@MarquiseLewis-vm7ve]

6:25 thats a fun fact with know English

[@AnilKumar-cw5dh]

Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis Universal human experiences transcend linguistic boundaries, revealing a profound commonality that supersedes cultural and linguistic diversity. Notably, children exhibit an extraordinary capacity for language acquisition, rapidly developing proficiency despite limited exposure to linguistic input. This phenomenon underscores the existence of an innate linguistic faculty, operating independently of cultural context, which facilitates the remarkable process of language development. Furthermore, the universality of logical and mathematical reasoning remains unaffected by linguistic variations, demonstrating the autonomous nature of these cognitive functions. While language undoubtedly exerts a profound influence on thought, it does not exert absolute determinism. Instead, linguistic structures subtly shape perception, imposing discernible yet surmountable constraints. In this context, language plays a pivotal role in molding thought patterns, yet its influence is tempered by the complex interplay of cognitive, cultural, and environmental factors. Consequently, linguistic relativity is tempered by the robustness of human cognition, which transcends the boundaries of language.

[@Cali83975]

Good, yet imo unnecessary food for thought. Id like to say sticking to a common sense and having mind open, being flexible is a must :) Thoughts and language, both create reality. And it can go terribly wrong. Also some languages, slavic languages for instance have many words in common, but the meanings and the use of the words can be VERY different in all possible ways… I could keep elaborating.. unfortunately my language and thoughts are not aligned tonight..

[@JAllevi8ed]

If you spoke nothing but pig Latin, would your reality be built on misnomers?

[@richardl.metafora4477]

I' ve subscribed but I'm disappointed to have heard the unmistakable robo-voice announcer on another post which was an anti-Harris screed. The voice is memorable, tho' artificial, so I';m inclined as a human to identify it and now associate it with repellant opinions. I've been somewhat rankled by the abscence of real human announcers, having made a living at it once a long time ago. nevertheless I thought it might protect authors and otherwise neutralize peculiar pronunciations. But even tho' the robo voices are inhuman (we can tell by the mispronunciations (although in this case they're very rare) nevertheless I hear the same voice that spewed political tripe making points in an otherwise infomrtive and unbiased presentation. You may reconsider the fake voices since the veil of neutrality is stained with one bad post.

[@nannue]

🪬