Young's Inequality

Young's inequality is stated and proven.

[@barslanafra]

Thanks from Turkey for the explanation. It was much more descriptive than the videos I found in my own language.

[@RealMcDudu]

Amazing explanation! Thanks

[@larisasaduk4129]

This is amazing! Thank you for this brilliant explanation and illustration.

[@tszngonglam]

very logic and clear, the diagram is helpful to remember this inequality, thanks!!!

[@bhavookbhardwaj3368]

Very nicely explained 👍

[@findusar1530]

Thank you from Germany, your videos are pretty helpful. Keep it up man!

[@nuet.school]

Beautiful explanation!!! Thanks a lot

[@timothytribone]

Excellent video sir!

[@enrydable]

another way to prove Young's inequality is through the Jensen inequality. By taking f(x)=exp(x) and differentiating twice we have that f(x) is convex. So by applying the Jensen inequality we have that f(x/p+y/q)=< f(x)/p + f(y)/q , so exp(loga + logb)=< exp(ploga)/p + exp(qlogb)/q => ab=

[@malikjavadov366]

such a cool explanation! Salut!

[@elenakalaidjieva]

Great explanation, thank you!

[@hegebaggethun5650]

Brilliant, thanks a lot!

[@omfgwasnnoob]

Cool and helpful stuff, thanks!

[@hegebaggethun5650]

Fabulous!!! Thank you!

[@cruzazul2609]

Te amo 💓, beautiful explanation

[@PEACEFUL_ISLAM148]

Good way to explain

[@GustavoPinho89]

Nice! thanks, mate.

[@ch41nbreaker]

very helpful, thanks!!!

[@jiang4962]

非常感谢

[@yannicko.5936]

p-1 needs to be >1 otherwise your function y would be concave not convex?

[@kashifnasim7349]

You can easily prove this using AM-GM inequality If a>0 and b>0 and if 0

[@075_ritikkumar7]

Can be easily proved by am gm inequality

[@sarasara2818]

thx alot sir .plz can you show me how we proof hölder inequality using minkowski inequality

[@abdulwahabkhantareen4499]

What is Young's Inequality for convolution..??

[@นทิตาชลหาญ-ฤ7ญ]

perfect

[@groovysteroidsstudios9674]

So a picture can act as a valid proof?

[@RealMcDudu]

Math actually has a meaning, so visualizing it is important, productive and even essential. The integrals are not meaningless symbols - they correspond to areas under a curve. Ever heard of geometry? A lot of what math does is related to the quantification of space - including its shapes.

[@zl7460]

u only know p>1, not p-1>1, thus the area proof isn't sufficient enough

[@zl7460]

NVM the proof is correct, but maybe nicer to entertain the case when y(x) concaves down (even though its the same)

[@zunairakhan2671]

your accent is very irritating

[@AsamaQureshi]

That's completely uncalled for. I think his accent is fine.

[@Leidulfable]

Zunaira, your presence is very toxic.

[@chainsahw]

yeah. why don't you ask your money back.

[@debendragurung3033]

Does it matter?