I'm sorry I couldn't be there when this was live. I had a medical appointment at the time. Tatiana, I haven't ever tested Prussian blue, by the way. It's not a blue I ever saw a need for in any of my own paintings.
@Divertedflight Жыл бұрын
That straight lead white without zinc test on Prussian blue was a shock. Fortunately I've never trusted that colour despite the ASTM 1 rating. Regarding the ASTM, I think there needs to be the split in the ASTM 1's. Those colours that don't change at all, and those that change just a little. As I type this perhaps ASTM 0 ? Zero for effectively no change at all within human eye measurement. Though I could see some resistance for this within paint producers. A number of artists will only want to use the most permanent pigments and the fear could be logically made that the spread of sales across their ranges would decrease. On the other hand Winsor & Newton effectively already do this with the AA and A designations with what I imagine little evil effect.
@MarinaMichaels Жыл бұрын
You might be surprised at how many famous watercolor artists don't give a hoot about whether their paints, and therefore their paintings, are fugitive. They have their favorites and they don't care whether those paints are lightfast and permanent. I've taken classes from a few locally famous artists who recommended paints using fugitive pigments, knowing the pigments were fugitive. And some artists are too confused by pigments, so they ignore the issue entirely. Some of the people who've been doing their own independent lightfastness testing have, in their naivety, politely contacted famous artists alerting them to the fugitive qualities of their paints and asking them what they, the artist, is doing about it, only to be ignored.
@Divertedflight Жыл бұрын
@@MarinaMichaels An old problem. Upon William Winsor telling the famous painter not to use certain colours. Turner replied: Your business, Winsor, is to make colours. Mine is to use them."
@RublevColours Жыл бұрын
ASTM standard has 8 categories of lightfastness, but only categories i and II are acceptable as part of the oil paint standard, ASTM D4302.
@masteroilpainting Жыл бұрын
I love that you are testing pigments and sharing the results with us! Thank you. Hopefully, the Quins and the Phthalos will be tested soon since they are some of the more popular pigments individually and are also used for many hue colors like Manganese. I've not seen many artists using Prussian compared with Phthalo - do you sell a lot of Prussian compared with other pigments? Would it not be useful to test the more popular colors first? Maybe I'm way off and Prussian is used more than Phthalo. Also, is the Alizarin the historically fugitive pigment, or one of the newer 'permanent' hues?
@RublevColours Жыл бұрын
We sell a lot of Prussian blue. Alaizrin is also somewhat fugitive. The so-called permanent alizarin is not really alizarin at all and only somewhat resembles it.
@vittoriobeghelli3561 Жыл бұрын
Very useful. Thank you!
@RublevColours Жыл бұрын
You're weclome!
@malreigh Жыл бұрын
Thank you for doing this :)
@RublevColours Жыл бұрын
Of course!
@Algabatz3 ай бұрын
Thank you, very informative as usual. I was thinking about the 40-year old tests made indoors and was wondering if there have been any tests made in LED-light. The museums may have incandescent lighting today, but here in Sweden they are getting increasingly hard to even come by.
@RublevColours3 ай бұрын
The international standard for testing the lightfastness of artist colors was established in the 1980s in cooperation with the American Society of Testing Materials (ASTM). The standards use two sources of lighting: Xenon arc lamps and sunlight. This is an accelerated test that is very harsh.
@Algabatz3 ай бұрын
@@RublevColours I see, then LED would practically have no effect. Thanks! Btw, I was very happy to find your European store a couple of months back. I have already bought a whole range of 20 Rublev paint tubes. I really love them. Thank you from Tony in Sweden!
@RublevColours3 ай бұрын
@@Algabatz@Algabatz Tony, LED lights will have an effect on the properties of pigments, but this depends on the spectrum of light and the total amount of radiation. ASTM uses Xenon lamps, and sunlight because these are standard methods used for many other products. Thank you for your patronage.
@chrisgriffith1573 Жыл бұрын
I would think that your anomalies have some chemical reactions with the pigment compositions they are inside- such as the additives in titanium white (or the titanium itself) are affecting and coupling/uncoupling with what is in the Prussian Blue to allow the fading. Like you stated, more extensive testing is needed, a control for this can be done by mixing titanium with other pigments which have certain similar compositions vs those that do not... once you identify a marker for change, then you can test them in a uniform way and develop "expectations" which will augment your trust in additive, pigments, and some arbitrary results.
@RublevColours Жыл бұрын
There are no additives in the paints tested. Only oil and pigment, so the anomalies may be due to operator errors or something else.
@deadlyradiation7977 Жыл бұрын
What is the ASTM Standard White? Thank you.
@Divertedflight Жыл бұрын
A mix of blanc fixe or barite, titanium white, and zinc white. It's mentioned in this very same video at 7:48
@deadlyradiation7977 Жыл бұрын
@@Divertedflight Thank you! I missed that.
@phillipmurphy842 Жыл бұрын
Is there a control for heat in these experiments ?
@RublevColours Жыл бұрын
Test samples in both the outdoor under sunlight and indoor artificial light are exposed to heat. This is not controlled but it is consistent with both exposures. The exposures in Arizona and South Florida are done between the months of October and March.
@MoonPlayingSaxophone2 ай бұрын
Heroes
@keepyourshoesathedoor Жыл бұрын
How did that happen?🤨
@keepyourshoesathedoor Жыл бұрын
And QOR (allegedly) does their own tests.
@RublevColours Жыл бұрын
Watch the video because it explains why the ASTM test method is not accurate.