YuGiOh | Post Banlist Infernoble FlameSwords Deck Profile December 2024 Format

[@Iverson1590]

What does a combo look like for this deck? Got a combo guide?

[@marceloomarleiva2758]

I miss Isolde

[@Tatsuya-nx3sw]

i miss ur old crusadia vids

[@TeamCOG_YGO]

I really wish Konami would throw some legacy support, wild that themes like branded got so much support but nothing for any of the world legacy aside from orcust

[@xThatan0sx2410]

Even if crusadia gets support they lack the power to compete vs today's meta.

[@TeamCOG_YGO]

@ depends on the support

[@xThatan0sx2410]

@@TeamCOG_YGO I'm not even sure what would be a good support for the deck. It lacks a grind game honestly. Use to run the Kaiju version instead of the otk.

[@sadboyronnie5124]

Bro I tested your build on EDOpro with my friend and had like an hour match , would you add more infernoble equips and the infernoble Charles trap? Or more flame swordsman? also gave you a follow 🔥

[@TeamCOG_YGO]

Appreciate the follow, I’d add maybe more museum/durendal to increase the chances of seeing lvl 4 swordsman + lvl 1 tuner, and it would also reduce the chances of seeing the bad Swordsman cards.

[@mhearte8038]

For funsies, if there was no banlist, what would your Tier Zero infernoble deck look like?

[@Kollieprime9]

So my question for you would be what would you play if you had a single new mulcharmy? I pulled one so I’m at the point where I feel like I gotta run it, but since I’m only playing one I feel like I should be on crossout designator

[@TeamCOG_YGO]

I have the charmmys and they are options to play! If you do just have one, I would agree that playing it as a crossout target wouldn’t be a horrible option!

[@juancarloslopezseaman8676]

Great infernoble content

[@timbowden6289]

Any thought for thrust into a 1 for 1 to combat nibiru? Or is that just situational cope?

[@TeamCOG_YGO]

I mean it’s definitely a option!

[@mahmoudsaad9559]

How about including the flame sword man link-2 monster it can basicly reborn phoinex on ur opponent's turn and u can trigger that effect with princess u can also put phoinex in the graveyard by equiping it to your charles in the end phase and then pop it with its negate effect so u will almost always have phoinex on ur opponnent turn if u have princess in the grave

[@TeamCOG_YGO]

That’s something to consider!

[@Redballofficialchannel]

Unfortunately ferocious flame swordsman needs to either be destroyed by battle or an opponent's card effect to get the warrior monster reborn. You wouldn't be able to trigger it off your own princess.

[@mahmoudsaad9559]

@Redballofficialchannel Oh shit

[@TeamCOG_YGO]

@ that’s right. At that point the whale is just a better option

[@hectorrubio860]

What about a more pure build w the xyz engine? Including crossout designators to combat hand traps ?

[@TeamCOG_YGO]

It’s definitely an option to! I had a lot of success with a list like this just had the wanted package

[@hectorrubio860]

@ and if u sub that package for maybe super heavy samurai? Or even throw Angelica’s ring and Roland back in ? lol

[@TeamCOG_YGO]

@ I’ve not a fan of the super heavy engine, it has to many conflicting issues that people over look, that I think are bad. But never the less it’s still a one card Angelica!

[@squiglythegoon9678]

I never realised it before, but wanted was kind of... What was holding this decks guts in, maybe im calling it early, and theres a build, or theres a way, but it feels like losing the wanting cards made hard to actually play infernoble as infernoble.

[@squiglythegoon9678]

I brought a boxer crossout version to the last Utah regional, and would have topped if I didn't choke at the end, so I think with the right build it's doable probably? I dunno man, I'm sad. Not to overshare, but every time I think Infernoble is in a really good place, I gear up to take it to a regional and something gets banned, feels bad :T

[@TeamCOG_YGO]

No man you’re right, the wanted stuff gave the deck the ability to push through hand traps and even into boards and without it, we are lacking the umpf, it’s why I’ve set the deck down, because now the next best engine is fiendsmith and that’s just gonna get hit and the deck will be in the same spot again.

[@squiglythegoon9678]

@@TeamCOG_YGO that's exactly right, the deck just became so much more fragile without wanted, and the only way to push it up to a truly viable status beyond locals is just kind to...strip the deck of its identity, which feels horrible. Oh well, the deck is bound to get support eventually, there's still more Charlamange lore to go through so keep your head held high!

[@brandonnavas4014]

Camelot!

[@khainguyentuan5916]

I have kashira engine they can play armored xyz engine too in infernoble by usinh no60

[@carloscordovaarmijos4661]

We want combos

[@TheKingSnek]

isnt the deck 41 cards? or have i got something wrong

[@TeamCOG_YGO]

More or less I could’ve miscounted

[@TheKingSnek]

all good! Just thought I was going crazy lol

[@table1ygo952]

My goat

[@joshuageul6083]

No Cross-sheep in your extra deck?

[@TeamCOG_YGO]

I mention that I would make room for it moving forward!

[@ZippSoloTCG]

next time post the list in a word format so i can just copy it and paste it in tcg player

[@TeamCOG_YGO]

I’ll do my best!

[@theyugiboi]

First