hi Stephen i want to thank you for having entertained by your infectious laughters and most uninhibited titillation. i agree with you 100 % only when you speak the truth and understand the situation too well you could giggle like that. i wish more people see your view. garl
Democracy is government of the people, by the people, and for the people according to Lincoln.
@yiulokleung96193 жыл бұрын
Great Tutorial
@Sanctuary513 жыл бұрын
又學到,我哋應該更有深度咁反駁不過平常時都仲係鐘意直接叨9共產黨
@zjc56713 жыл бұрын
2016年的时候,保守派民众就在网上提到这个问题,美国人民究竟是得到民主权利还是民主幻象?
@amydabbs87793 жыл бұрын
2016年我说过,一个揭开专制的面纱,一个搓破民主的幻想。不好意思都说中了。
@黎啟華-o8s3 жыл бұрын
民主系保障公義的一种方式
@honwang62873 жыл бұрын
所以先有國際歌!
@oneofChasters3 жыл бұрын
對付小人可不能用君子的方法
@theredkop363 жыл бұрын
Dear mr. Siau, listen to you talking, mostly will receive new information, which is the reason I still continue to listen. I interpret your explanation on “democracy vs communist “ system, I could feel, (maybe I am wrong) you point of view is mostly on academic and at the context of 1960 or 1970 era. Academic. You say the Change of the leader (communist sys) cannot confirm will pass to a good leader. For example, democracy sys like USA , they have many great leader, but I could say it too cannot confirm a new good leader. So which system is good ?I assume it is definitely in a grey area, It ultimately depend on the current leader wisdom, greediness and vision. Context or 1960 n 1970 era. During this time, communist system maybe the worst system, due to information media, education and misc, the people in charge will have ultimates power which bring out the darker site of human nature. In current era , I could not say the communist system is the perfect system or a good system. But with current information media, education and the comparison of country to country is so visible. The leader in charge still have ultimate power but I feel ( m.i.m.w) is relatively difficult to bring out the darker nature of the human nature. However on the other side, democracy system at current era , I feel like the some politician have play the democracy system like a children game. They know the loop hole inside out. I could feel they abuse the law to satisfy their greediness. I feel the democracy system will bring out the darker side of human nature more easily. Or the greediness kind of ppl , will easily get the leadership role in this democracy system. However I assume when a good and great leader is in place. The system will be stronger. But this system involve not only real politician but also ppl or corporation with financial motive. A real politician may need luck , ultimate wisdom and many more to get to the top. I heard once a Chinese politician in south East Asian say, what is politician. The politician basic is he/she shall care for the salary, housing, education, medical, welfare of the people. It seem basic yet to fund this issue. You need to settle the financial issue first...... I am assume this is a view of a small country. A big country politician maybe have even more complicated issue. But just compare both system, on this basic issue the current statistic and it future potential. One might be able to say, which system perform better in our current era.
如果一個國家的公民是政府的資產,他們可以要求民主。 如果他們是一種責擔,政府就會不管 他們。 簡單而真實,就像你和公司老闆之間的關係一樣。 了解非洲政府的統治與瑞士相比如何? 香港人,您們是香港和中國的資產或負擔? If the citizens of a country are an asset to the government, they can ask for democracy. If they are a liability, the government will care less about them. Simply but true, just like your relationship between you and your boss in a company. See how the government rules in Africa compare to Switzerland?. Hong Kong people, are you an asset or a liability to Hong Kong and China?