Never knew this was a thing. 🌞

667

Water under the surface makes more sense given what we know yet

What about the lunar rover that gm made for them to drive on the moon you didn't even mention it or say anything about the tracts it would of left . There lots of footage of them driving it .

Bro I'll donate to your ethereum wallet if you can tell me where that first song is from in the video? Is it an epedemic sound song? Infact if anyone can identify it, same reward applies to them.

Dang, $330 million, I guess it was worth it, who cares about all the elderly becoming ill and homeless eh!?

For my sake, let Gargantua be a very rapidly rotating black hole, slightly less deadly in some aspects, as I heard in another lecture. How much fuel would theoretically be necessary to approach the water planet, which is so strongly affected by the gravitational time influence, and then leave it again ??? Would any propulsion system (chemical, nuclear) be able to overcome this hurdle?

This model wasn't revealed at all in this bla bla video

No one cares what happened before yesterday

Meh. Not a great video. More info is out there.

ANYTHING WITH A CHECKMARK IS PROPAGANDA!

They use nuclear power which lasts hundreds of years I thought was the reason

Maybe the power of the magnetic field would remain powerful if there’s not many volcanic eruptions. I’m no expert but I think that in recent times there have been many eruptions. Maybe it’s a reason for the lost of the magnetic field

None of us have lived through the last flip but I think it’s the earth itself canted far enough to cause the flip. And I think the few surviving living things would be from those that were from the bottom pole who ended up safer

I think it’s impossible for a flip without the iron core that produces the m. Field itself doesn’t do a half flip itself Or if the earth itself doesn’t do a half flip to cause a change of magnetic field. I’m not a scientist but it’s not hard to think of a magnet that produces a m. F. If you half flip a magnet the direction of flow change

one of the few channels without clickbait

Most likely theory is that it is a huge constructed Building, but the drop of water metaphor, of a meteor hitting a cooling lava, then freezing is quite hilarious, but also quite the standard explanation of official archeologists on Earth's history, and quite juvenile as well, but thanks for the belly laugh!!

LOL, look at those two craters side by side at with the shadows of each facing directly opposite of each other! lol A peak and a valley.. I suppose the peaks are from the "LAVA" lol

Craters? Why is the Shadow on the wrong side compared to the sunken portion of the overall crater? Uhhuh!!!

Voyager 1😢

Hilarious Narration! "Someday we may have bases on the Moon" (wink wink) "Sprinkled", "Lava", "As if you were in the cockpit of an airplane" "Crater or Huge Circular Structure" "Never mind all the little fogged out spots throughout each view" "And No, those are not formed by mining, and of course those poorly camouflaged rectangular and tubular structures and mining equipment" "Just a coincidental Phenomenon" Your too funny!

A expert is a out-of-towner with a briefcase. Define expert ... "x" is a unknown quantity, spurt is a drip under pressure. 😅

Self renewing???

i used to like these videos but as time goes on they get harder to watch. 1 hour seems a bit much for a 10 min video.

If you are watching this video, please start fact checking immediately. Each spacecraft has 3 generators, generating a total of 474 watts on launch. And 157 watts is way more than a typical person uses to charge their laptop and phone. The overwhelming number of cellphone charges are still 15 watts and all current MacBook Pro laptops in 2024 come with a 70-watt charger. Also, the Radioisotope Power System is not a fuel source, it's a power generator. The author of this video should be ashamed of themselves putting a video of this quality that will be watched by so many people. Have some pride in your work.

To me, the easiest way to understand “dimensions” is as “a describable aspect of an object.” For example, a bar of soap has length, width, and height dimensions. It also has its hardness or softness as well as its scent or lack of scent, and maybe more aspects that could help describe it, each aspect a dimension. Defined this way, the bar of soap has at least five dimensions, plus it exists in time so a sixth dimension. From this we can imagine way there might be ways to describe things that we can’t perceive. Those could be other “dimensions” that are hidden to us because we lack the ability to sense, perceive, or comprehend them.

To me, the easiest way to understand “dimensions” is as “a describable aspect of an object.” For example, a bar of soap has length, width, and height dimensions. It also has its hardness or softness as well as its scent or lack of scent, and maybe more aspects that could help describe it, each aspect a dimension. Defined this way, the bar of soap has at least five dimensions, plus it exists in time so a sixth dimension. From this we can imagine way there might be ways to describe things that we can’t perceive. Those could be other “dimensions” that are hidden to us because we lack the ability to sense, perceive, or comprehend them.

P._D._Ouspensky reincarnated!

Creation is a nightmare spectacular!

Most of these craters and rilles are not from lava. There's no lava debris for my collapse or anything like that. Anybody who has grown up around love a fields can see this. These are obvious electrical scarring rilles. If you look closely at many of them, they are made of repeated craters like cookie cutters that progress all along the bottom of many of these rilles. Not only that, but sometimes they originate from the low ground and fizz allowed into nothing at high ground. That would not be possible with a level flow. Many of the craters and their shapes can be created in the lab with electrical scarring.... A majority of the craters on the moon, many of which are octagon shaped, even square, or perfectly round with the dome in the middle are likely electrically scarred with fewer of them being from impacts.

The speed of a bullet is no measure. If you want to make comparisons, use standard data, like the speed of sound or light, then we can calculate it more faster. So, brush up on your data!

the finger of God

Russians testing new bombs.

Wasn’t this channel supposed to be about space-related topics?

It would be a trip to see methane falls like water falls on 🌎

Fascinating

Countless and countless galaxies. how do they know where each one is? who counted them and how long did it take? in the known universe they know exactly where each one is! How???

Bones were buried under the ground not disintegrated asteroid didn't kill the dinosaurs, a flood did plus the earth is not millions of years old

49:52, Delayed Choice Quantum Eraser: totally forgot the thing what is: according to the Theory of Relativity, from the light's perspective, actually there is no time (because travels at the speed of the light - the maximum speed what we (objects what have mass and because of this, distorting the spacetime and cannot travel at the speed of the light) - measure), and probably the more confusing thing: there is no distance either. From the birth to end for it, it's in the same moment (or Planck time?), travels the whole universe or just jumps from an atom to another. So, in the experiment, the light doesn't "know" before what we do with the setup ("see the future") when traveling. For the light, the setup is always finished, from the birth (making it with laser) to end (detecting) and travels in those setup (paths, mirrors, detectors etc.). What we (again: objects what not travels at the speed of the light - "we" including the detectors of course) see: the timeless light travels the path and making interactions with the objects at the speed of the light (reflecting from mirror, splitted in beam splitter, detecting at the end). But for it, there is no modifications can do in the setup when travels. We cannot modify the light's path, after making. What we can only do, what we do before the light is created - from the lights perspective (of course if the setup is contains elements what actually absorbing light and creating another beam it looks like making decisions when traveling the light, but that's an another topic, because those new light beam is not the same as created at the start of the experiment and this can introduce delay). When we place a mirror/splitter/etc to a light's path looks after creating the light, there is an illusion: light always "see" this modification (when created the light); just for we (objects what not travels at the speed of the light) see this as modifying the light's path (after the light has created), because just we are experiencing time and causality - for the light, there is no causality (or can say: just before the born and after the end; in between, nothing can act to the light what not travels at the speed of the light). I know this statement (for the light - and all waves what travels at the speed of the light - experience no time and distance) is one of the most confusing of the Theory of Relativity's "things" and hard to understand (and particularly the consequences). Same for the double slit experiment: when we trying to detect what path travels the light, we actually doesn't do this. Actually we modifying the experiment to the light can travel freely to the detector or not. Can't do decisions in tour to do measurements or not. Either do detecting the path (=light's wave can't travel freely - there is no interference) or don't do (light's wave can travel freely - interference exists). Our decisions apply to the light before created (again: from the light's persp.), but for us, it's looks like light making decisions when travels according to our decision. But this decision already apply to the light when starts traveling (mind-blowing, I know: we do something and it looks like the light already know but that doesn't happen: we do decisions and light act as our decision's to allow, but just the consequence slower appear in our time than in light's "time"). From the light's perspective, the whole Universe is in a "freeze" state, doesn't change anything when "travels"; what done already is matters, what not, it doesn't.

😂Sure... I did mention this fact that drug induced space travel hasn't been proven possible.

Statements of String theory very well put into the accepted results of quantum theory!

The... Dark Side...

Please, please those beings from interstellar space save us from Biden and his idiot followers.

Time travel paradoxes are not a problem for the universe. They operate like quantum wave functions. They hold the superposition until the collapse results in the one and only solution. In Interstellar, that solution included the astronaut choosing to fulfil his role in the bootstrap paradox. If he had no chosen it, then the paradox would never have formed, which means by other random results, he would never be in that situation. That paradox could only arise because he had already, and always, done his part.

my god..... the forces.... the way the ground shears..... the coastline rise.... incomprehensible...

60% of the ocean is nothing lol

Thx u for informing us l,and being so thorough. simply enjoy videos❤❤

Quantum means magic. In the examples provided we discuss problems related to human perception, not to physics!