Finally the Challenger but a LOT better than the Challenger 2
@GHOST-A2COСағат бұрын
a RAH-66 Comanche copy, they certainly copied almost everything from it
@earonspangler49323 сағат бұрын
The F-15 can carry 3-600 gallon external fuel tanks; giving it an extra 1800 gallons of fuel. A 600 pound external tank only gives it an extra 250 pounds of fuel. This wouldn’t get the jet off the ground. The F-15 EX has a max fuel capacity of 5500 gallons of jet fuel with conformal tanks and external tanks installed; giving it greater range and/or loitering time.
@johncipolla83358 сағат бұрын
They suck with names
@bobnomura206812 сағат бұрын
Let's not confuse the term "low cost". Developing and fielding the laser system will be some BIG dollars. Let's go for MEGAwatt class lasers on ships. Plus getting a better SM-X missile.
@jasons4413 сағат бұрын
They've done copied our designs
@loadmaster6115 сағат бұрын
Just imagine what the f14 upgrade would have been like
@AbdullahHusain-h3m17 сағат бұрын
Japanese is great in this game
@georgedoolittle901517 сағат бұрын
Biggest advantage is ability to produce in absolutely astronomical quantities if need be and economically so. *"Put 100,000 US Americans to work building Humvees"* plus all of variants, spare parts, trailers, etc. still make Jeeps in the Philippines actually 😊😊
@Chappy196519 сағат бұрын
It’s hard to be humble when you’re a Gunfighter! Yuuuut!
@antonc250620 сағат бұрын
The F-15 is still the heavyweight champion of the Air Force.
@garys875420 сағат бұрын
Your Ai voice sucks. I didn’t last 30 seconds and had to stop
@speedracer233622 сағат бұрын
Thanks Air Force for protecting our skies!
@andrimoko879622 сағат бұрын
Awesome
@donparker182323 сағат бұрын
When did the pronunciation of missile (2 syllables) become mis-eye-Les? (3 syllables)
@velavanlaack913423 сағат бұрын
Looks like the WWII German, forgot the name? Anyone can help?
@ameriswiss4676Күн бұрын
Through the Gate and across the stars comes this message from near and far...comes Darkstar. God bless all at "SkunkWorks" that make dreams into reality. "Peace through strength..." President Ronald Reagan.
@RICHARD-g4l9pКүн бұрын
SR-71THE COOLEST MANNED JET THAT WAS NEVER SHOT DOWN BY ENEMY AIR TO AIR OR SAM MISSILES . THE PILOTS WORE FLIGHT SUITS SIMILAR TO ASTRONAUT FLIGHT SUITS & IS STILL UNBEATEN IN SPEED & ALTITUDE RECORDS , & IT WAS MADE IN THE 1950'S UNITED STATES !
@djoswald9128Күн бұрын
F15EX “KnightMares”
@D56t37-cu7olКүн бұрын
I find this almost funny. This F-15 can spot enemy aircraft at 200 miles ? I was an avionics technician on the F-111 many years ago. It had a 300 mile radar range.. I repaired and tested it routinely ... God knows what this aircraft can really do...lol
@roijoi6963Күн бұрын
Yeah, assuming the enemy aircraft has an RCS the size of an aluminum barn, but vs Chinese stealth, not so much. Beyond that, that range is of little value given the AIM-120/D has a max range less than 80 miles vs highly maneuverable aircraft, and that's only the 1st missile shot when hi and fast, before you have to dive and defend a missile shot at you. At 5,000ft the MAR is less than 10 miles.
@BigPapi1965Күн бұрын
The Chinese J-20 is way too big and the canards on the plane stick out like a sore thumb. It will easily be detected by the F15 EX and especially the F22 & F35. Plus, there is the aim 260 that is being implemented.
@roijoi696323 сағат бұрын
@@BigPapi1965 Physical size is almost irrelevant. The F-15 has an RCS of 25, and the much bigger B1 bomber 10. The B2 has an RCS of only 0.0001, while the much smaller F-16's is around 5.0 - five thousand times the RCS. Better stealth helps in 4 ways. 1. You can get close undetected for superior SA. 2. You can fire on an aircraft without them knowing they're under attack. 3. You can fly towards enemy stealth aircraft while holding a radar lock using the more powerful aircraft radar much longer, increasing the missile's PK. 4. You can evade the enemy's missile because it can't see you. Expect aircraft radars to get much more powerful, and missile seeker's radars as well. The aircraft radar only improves PK if you can maintain a lock longer because you don't have to turn cold, increasing the odds your missile can find the bandit using its own much smaller, weaker radar.
@liontoneКүн бұрын
4 of these are literally a wall of destruction.
@jimcunningham5376Күн бұрын
I am impressed! Ob1 has taught u well !
@stefanuswidjaja4932Күн бұрын
This jet is insane in terms of armaments load capacity
@turnerdan53Күн бұрын
I wish they would certify the EX with the rudder cant and GE 132 engines.
@roijoi6963Күн бұрын
The boost from 29k to 32k thrust is actually a field upgrade kit, and the SE needs the added power, and always has. The Silent Eagle had some badly needed aerodynamic tweaks because the Eagle pushes a ton of air and unlike the Viper, will never supercruise.
@antiquatedflatulence16072 күн бұрын
🇺🇲🫡🇺🇲
@lukundosingogo78252 күн бұрын
Who better between German teach and china because German is under America protection
@Rick-z4h2 күн бұрын
Anytime I’m fishing at the lake of the ozarks in Missouri and the warthogs fly over I stop fishing and watch them in total awe.
@toddw67162 күн бұрын
These vehicles were not intended as direct action vehicles. They made them because of IED’s and poor PR during the Bush admin. The military was improperly using them and getting people killed.
@ioanbota93972 күн бұрын
Realy I like this powerful fighters jets
@WeaponTheory-j5h2 күн бұрын
The US is always at the forefront of military technology, and it is difficult for any country to catch up.
@sasandadashzadeh-x8hКүн бұрын
If I had 800.000.000.000 $ annual military bughet , I also would be at frontier in technology 😂
@WeaponTheory-j5hКүн бұрын
@@sasandadashzadeh-x8h that fucking true
@roijoi6963Күн бұрын
Except that the Chinese have done exactly that, and that's according to the USAF. Read the news.
@joshuamccabe772915 сағат бұрын
Without it the US wouldn’t be successful and they would have killed each other.
@atbatb77992 күн бұрын
Perfect tank.
@danepple48842 күн бұрын
Include tag along drones with variable type missions.
@jorgebiboso-hb6xs3 күн бұрын
But these boats has no long range offensive capability like the anti ship missile launcher. For me a Filipino, I would prefer a fast attack boat with harpoon antiship missile or anti ship missile system from Israel.
@rossg47883 күн бұрын
Best, but unaffordable for many countries
@RealJeep4 күн бұрын
This video has so many errors and mismatched videos. Pretty pathetic.
@vonilao22094 күн бұрын
i think, this is 20 years away,,
@matthewgilmore20254 күн бұрын
I am curious about the impact of high altitude pollution on the ozone layer? Between these approaches, what are the environmental impacts. Something that flies every day would have more potential damage than the occasional rocket flight into orbit.
@wilfredjohnson-l9y4 күн бұрын
❤ Absolutely Awesome show ❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
@bw24424 күн бұрын
I’d rather read about how the money is used to remove our presence and bases from other countries of the world and bringing our troops back home and reduce the size of military and seek peace.
@CatShot19834 күн бұрын
It states in this video, that the new main gun is a 50 caliber, shouldn't that be a 50mm instead to be absolutely correct as it said it was twice the size of the 25 mm main gun of the Bradley IFV?
@abuubaydullah15 күн бұрын
Looks great but how will it fir against IEDs for IEDs are a leading cause of death and injuries in armed conflict (troops).
@crazymilitaryaircraft-q9e5 күн бұрын
China wants a plane like the X-59, but to do that, its plane needs to fly without crashing in the middle of the road. 😁😁😁
@ΔωδεκάνησοςΡοδοςΣύμη5 күн бұрын
Greek sub's please❤
@stephengoldberg3345 күн бұрын
It is already being decommissioned. It needs to be faster. It is now effective in a world with SAMS. Money has yet to be allocated to upgrade or supply continuous parts. Everyone is nostalgic, but we have better weapons for the same job. es, the A-10 "Warthog" is currently being retired by the U.S. Air Force, with the first wave of aircraft already sent to the "boneyard" at Davis-Monthan Air Force Base, signifying a shift towards more advanced fighter jets like the F-35; the Air Force plans to phase out the entire A-10 fleet within the next year. The A-10, on the other hand, has not been produced for nearly 3 decades, has suffered the highest loss ratio of all modern US Aircraft, and now airframes are cannibalized for parts to keep A-10Cs in service. It is not the F-35 that will have maintenance issues in the coming year, it'll be the A-10.🍋
@stephenwalling58785 күн бұрын
I want one, where can I get it.
@DrewWithington5 күн бұрын
Almost carbon neutral as a daily driver.
@DavidHolland-wh1qr6 күн бұрын
Does it have sonic boom issues? I also believe Space X will likely have the best solution. Operating cost and reliability could also have possible issues.some issues. I also have doubts of the VTOL ability. My exhaustive 33 hour flights from the US to Hong Kong trips were via S Korea were exhausting, not to mention the time differential 🤪 .
@وليدعابدين-م3ح6 күн бұрын
Very fort helicopter
@gino06126 күн бұрын
The JLTV will be the go to vehicle and that’s a good thing over this Sabre. I’ve seen IED’s pick and flip a 6x MRAP. I can only imagine what it would do to such a small vehicle. There is a need for something smaller in ship to shore operations, but this doesn’t seem like a big upgrade on the hmmwv.