What is Islam's stance on Homosexuality? I Have been seeing very disturbing videos recently on this Great Shame and Fahsha to be justified from some external Channels Gender is defined at Birth, we know that from Mary’s Birth “And when she was delivered she said: My Lord! Lo! I have delivered of a FEMALE (UNTHA)- Allah knows best of what she has delivered - the MALE (ZAKAR) is not as the FEMALE(UNTHA); and lo! I have named her Mary, and lo! I crave Thy protection for her and for her offspring from Satan the outcast.” 3:36 Allah makes it clear that male is not female and it is obvious at Birth, the mother of Marry did not have to do an interview to know her child is Female, other features of Females for example, are carrying weight(child) and having wombs in 35:11- So if someone got a womb and can carry a child she is a FEMALE- Now we know the Female knowing its counterpart(Zawj) which is Male(ZAKAR) would be very easy thing to do... Because Allah says he is the one who created the pairs of Male and Female 53:45 Homosexuality is a FAHSHA (Shameful deed) and is forbidden, unless someone wants to ignore the clear commands or deviate meaning of clear words in the Quran “What! Of all people do you come to MALES(ZAKARAN)*** And leave those whom Allah has created for you of your pairs? Nay, ye are a people transgressing " 26:165-166 Compare 26:165-166 with 7:81 : “Indeed you come to MEN (RIJAL) with desire instead of WOMEN(NISA)! Indeed, you are a profligate lot.’ 7:81 BASIC LOGIC would be enough to know that: RIJAL(7:81) = ZAKARAN (26:165) GROWN MALES, NISA (7:81) = Their counterpart pairs (26:165) GROWN FEMALES and people of Lut were doing Homosexuality because Allah says they were committing FAHISHA in 7:80, FROM ALL this we know GENDER is BIOLOGICAL The punishment for Homosexuality is mentioned in 4:15 for muslims, in the case of women (bring 4 witnesses against them, but do not through them out until Allah provides a way or they die, Amsekuhunna) and in 4:16 for Males ( to bother them - NOT physically though) Besides that, When Allah mentions categories of women who are prohibited for marriage Like your mothers, sisters, daughters, etc in 4:23 He Never mentions males such as Your fathers, your brothers, cousins, etc - If homosexuality was allowed he would have mentioned these as well ALL this makes it Crystal Clear that homosexuality has Absolutely no Place in the Quran and Islam and is STRICTLY FORBIDDEN **(In case you are a homosexual reading this, we all have done mistakes in the past, when we know something is wrong we repent and correct ourselves, and do not let society and the people abuse you and drag you to that mess, they can not dictate to you what is Normal and Masculine and what is Abnormal and Feminine, God tells you that if you are biologically a Male, you are a Male or if you are biologically Female you are a Female … The rest can not determine that)**

Dr Omar, i came here from a lecture of Sheikh Imran hosein where a person asked him a question about Freemasonry, he didn't answer the question and referred him to you telling him you are more qualified to explain freemasonry. I came here and i hardly find any content on this channel of yours regarding freemasonry besides an overview of 5 lectures which i couldn't find. Would you please take some time to enlighten us on this subject we would forever be grateful. Thank you.

Does Abdul Karim have a KZbin channel or website where I could follow his lectures as Dr. O wastes 2 much time with his nonsensical rumblings.

"Wanna be heard and seen, just like any other "Kid", on the Planet!"🌎🤣That was funny !😂👍 Dr.Omar's insights have gravity and makes you think and look past the programming that Religion and Government has been indoctrinating the Masses with for Centuries! Instructor Benjamin Bilal also has weighty insights and contributions to add to the conversations he has with Dr. Omar Zaid! I learn a lot from their lectures. May Allah reward them for their efforts and protect them! Alhamdulillah!☝️🙏🤲✌️🕊️

Do u accept that the written mushaf is the complete quran or is there a possibility that there r missing verses causing this colossal confusion. And we r being mocked by the very statement that quran is preserved

Dear Ayoob Karim. Who are you...? You come out of the blue and make your own deductions of how Qur'aan should be understood. You are actually a disgusting person to slander and discuss people in their absence, so that you can't be refuted. Do us a favour, if you actually can, and have a live debate with someone who actually have knowledge.

Dr. Omar you have come a long way from when I first saw you speaking with Sheikh Imran Hosein!

Salaamun 'alaikum... Just wondering why of late this channel is being quiet..😢

Ma Malakat Aymanukum (What your right-hand owned), is referring to women in 60:10 and nothing else, We know either wives or Ma Malakat Aymanukum should be taken into NIKAH (marriage) because Allah says in 24:33 that those who can’t find Nikah (marriage) shall stay chaste, so without Nikah no intimacy, Allah reaffirms one more time in 4:25 that we shall marry ( do Nikah with) Ma Malakat Aymanukum so NİKAH (marriage) is necessary in both cases (Wives or Ma Malakat Aymanukum). In 4:24 Allah says: “And (forbidden for marriage) are women already married except what your right-hands owned ” - so a married woman that your right-hand owned, in the entire Quran only in 60:10 we see a married woman who leaves her husband and comes to your hand and protection and most likely with her kids, that is exactly what Ma Malakat Aymanukum means what your right hand owned - also in the entire Quran only in 60:10 we see a married woman who can be taken into wedlock (NİKAH) - Allah has never given permission to marry a married servant, these are not servants because servants have been mentioned with the names of IBAD/IMA(2:221 & 24:32) ….the reason they have been mentioned along wives is that they have not gone through a formal divorce and it might create some difficulties for the husband and also if they commit a Fahesha their punishment is Half of the other women (50 lashes instead of 100) - more details to be found in the Quran for rulings. It’s the only exception where someone can marry a married woman, If we claim they are servants we shall have proof for that, but there is no such proof. Muslims were supposed to provide food, shelter, and clothes for these women and their possible dependants and not to send them back to disbelievers. “O believers! When the believing women come to you as emigrants, test them - their faith is best known to Allah-and if you find them to be believers, then do not send them back to the disbelievers. These ˹women˺ are not lawful ˹wives˺ for the disbelievers, nor are the disbelievers lawful ˹husbands˺ for them. ˹But˺ repay the disbelievers whatever ˹dowries˺ they had paid. And there is no blame on you if you marry these ˹women˺ as long as you pay them their dowries. And do not hold on to marriage with polytheistic women.2 ˹But˺ demand ˹repayment of˺ whatever ˹dowries˺ you had paid, and let the disbelievers do the same. That is the judgment of Allah-He judges between you. And Allah is All-Knowing, All-Wise” 60:10 It’s very easy, a married woman that your right hand owned, we only see in 60:10 these types of women. Allah uses the phrase "Allah knoweth best (concerning) your faith" in 4:25 and also "Allah knoweth best (concerning) their faith" in 60:10 - The war captives shall either be freed or exchanged because that is the ruling in 47:4 for war captives, the war captives are named Aseer in the Quran, and according to 2:221 no one has permission to marry (NIKAH) a faithless man or woman. One more thing is Allah uses past tense OWNED (MALAKAT), It means at some point/time your hand owned something it does not say what your right hand OWNS. If Allah uses male nouns when referring to them in a group in some places, I believe, is because some of them would have kids with them it is impossible to think a married woman would leave all her kids and come to you freely we are here talking about the real world and not the stories of 'Romeo Juliet' women and children are always together. Another mistranslation that has been made is that the word Raqaba has been translated as a slave - the root of the word is RaQaBa which a loose translation would be "an Observant", for example, Allah is Al-Raqeeb(Observer) Over us or when the prophet Moses was going out of the Egypt Allah says he was afraid Yataraqabu (watching) - So when Allah says "Freeing a Raqaba" In 90:13 - it has nothing to do with freeing a slave, Allah does not use words randomly. Allah mentions in 33:50 for the prophet what Allah has “Afae” أَفَاءَ => “Turned/Returned” on you, if we think of servants this would make no sense but for women in 60:10 it makes perfect sense. Allah has turned these women from disbelievers on the Prophet. other examples of words "Afae" in (2:226, 49:9, 59:6,59:7,16:48)

❤

❤

God bless you

❤️

❤

You both sound so easy on the ear.. but unfortunately Satan uses a soothing easy voice.. I think you are both misguided Narrated Abu 'Amir or Abu Malik Al-Ash'ari: that he heard the Prophet (ﷺ) saying, "From among my followers there will be some people who will consider illegal sexual intercourse, the wearing of silk, the drinking of alcoholic drinks and the use of musical instruments, as lawful. Zina is zina an is haraam. Going against the majority of ulema is stupid foolish arrogance. I say this in sincerity. Why risk straying from majority scholars when we know from Hadith this has Allahs protection and hellfire is too severe to take these risks and play these games to assuage your intelligence and ego. Allahumma salli ala Muhammad wa ala alihi

Malik ibn-Anas is known to have stated: "as-Sunnah/Prophetic-Tradition is just like the Ark-Of-Noah. Whomever gets upon it is safe, and whomever refuses to get on it will perish." (ibn-`Asakir&adh-Dhahabi) This-Statement via Malik ibn-Anas: a. Directly correlates with the Statement of Allah: "Whatever the Messenger gives you, then you accept it. And whatever they forbid you, then you abandon it." (Noble-Qur'an: Chpt.59, V.7) b. Directly correlates with the Statement of Muhammad (Peace be upon them): "Whomever obeys me will enter Paradise. But, whomever disobeys me refuses Paradise." (al-Bukhari)

*A Muslim is Essentially a Quranist; if a person is not Quranist, he is not a Muslim. Prophet Mohammad and 4 Caliphs were Quranist. Prophet and 4 Caliphs banned Hadiths and Sunnah writings*

Many years ago Dr Omar Zaid was contributing to the highly intriguing insights of Iman Imran Hosein

Such an vital conversation for muslims today.

Omar Zaid talks from 11:30 to 23:30 about how fantastic he is and how Bilal's praise of him in the beginning should be taken serious. Mr Bilal's patience is incredible.

Does anyone know if everything is alright with Dr.O? Havent seen new content from him in a while..hope he is ok

Hadeeth rejectors are goin the wrong way. 😢

I'd like to ask 1 question that's lingering from this whole conversation ..I watched you in a previous talk about bukhari and you was saying about his history and how he started collecting hadith ..you said in disagreement with him his history was it started with a dream and his interpretation was he was to save mohammed from lies ...now I know you both had different dreams but what's important is you both interpret these dreams as God showing you what your job was ..now you said in regards to bukhari god dosnt need him to protect mohammed from lies...but yet you say God needed you to save people from hell.....so how canu make fish of 1 and fowl of another...like yours is true but bukhari dream and meaning is trash ...this is playing on my mind can you please clarify so I don't have this dilemma...respectfully plz brother

Nobody can confirm anything which is not in the Quran because that's the only truth according to Allah and the rest is fabricated history

Tafheemul Quran is a great Quran tafseer by Abul Ala Moududi. He preserved the Divine literature of the Arabic Quran during translation to his level best. It is important to know the context of each verses to understand the Quran completely. I read 3 verses daily, and read the explanation regarding those verses, the context and history regarding it. It made me fall in love with the Quran. It is beatiful as ALLAH willed.

This evidence for the ball earth, which is used by Dave, the "scientist" quoted in the video, is debunked already by Eric Dubay, and God knows best: kzbin.info/www/bejne/eKPJd6Fjo79mpNU I know the m3sons teach their ball theory to their people, and are proud of it, Aristotle being the pioneer of that idea, based on his ignorance and lack of telescoped to see that the ships are actually not disappearing on the curve, but simply due to a perspectival effect seem to sink, when they aren't. I want to think good of my brother, but this attitude... it's weird man... it's not from you my brother... It's true that the FE society is a scam and a counter movement, but again you didn't mention the International Flat Earth Research society, which was founded by scientists, unlike your claim that no scientist takes that stance, and in fact the FE society was made right after it, to discredit the idea and mock it... so you are right on that, but not totally. Also some pilots are FE, the reason they didn't realize before is because they were just so brainwashed, like the "muslims" who have been reading the Qur'an all their life, some even being "scholars" and yet didn't realize the hadith scam, it happens, social pressure, keeping your mind in a box even before you dare think... And hey, if i'm mistaken, at least i followed what was apparent, i look around and the earth does seem flat. Why assume the opposite based on hadiths (narratives) from NASA, many of whom are freemasons, and as you admitted, you know how they manipulate people... why then trust their sources? At this point most of what they present is from the unseen, since not anyone has the super expensive equipment to go to "outer space" assuming that was possible, and check they said the truth. This is not science. This is "Hadith science" Astronaut x who is a 33 degree mason, told the communication team at Earth that he saw the earth being a ball... and he saw no stars on the moon... but actually astronot Y saw many stars... Yeah that's literally a contradiction, that would be, even by the standarts of the "muslims" a "weak" hadith... and yet you accept it? Don't you? Perhaps you don't... some know the moon landing was a scam but don't yet connect it to the Earth scam... Anyways, this saddens me brother... Honestly... I recommended you Sam Gerrans, which has an excellent work on the Qur'an, which the brother (Ayuub Kareem) you talked to said he uses... and yet you talk to him but not to the author of the resource... only because of this? My brother, just know, in case you had an agenda we don't know about, it isn't worth it, and if you honestly fear a career suicide (which is what you seemed to imply), then you fear people instead of fearing Allah subhana wa taala... idk what is worst... I respected you because you did change your position when given evidence, but i don't get this... i'm not forcing you to become a FE... but just talking to intelligent people like brother Sam... he is not dumb... And if you claim he's ignorant, you are right, we all are. I'm sure Sam knows a lot you don't... and yet he would speak to you, and wouldn't be so arrogant to mock you down due to your ignorance... And yes i know this sounds as an attack, well as believers we are meant to make peace, but if a believer transgresses against others, we can indeed give him of what he gave back... as means of justice... You are our elder tho, so please, just come to peace with your brothers and sisters, and don't marginalize like people already do to us for rejecting the fabrications of the ahadith... We don't need now a brother who supposedly was aware to also marginalize and abuse us... based on a matter of the unseen at this point...

Peace. I watched Professor Dave, and he was quite convincing, but later i watched "Don't sphere the truth" and Dave, like the Hadithiyuns, was shown to have lied. He even conceded many times to the FE that even if the Earth was flat, the horizon would look slightly curved... which is kinda funny. But God knows best. If i don't know, i prefer to stand on what seems more logical. This is how i reached Islam after all, by means of abandoning dogmas i was indoctrinated into from childhood, even some which were true and good, and then i recovered that but knowing why... which is important. I quote this verse from the Qur'an: وَلَا تَقْفُ مَا لَيْسَ لَكَ بِهِۦ عِلْمٌ إِنَّ ٱلسَّمْعَ وَٱلْبَصَرَ وَٱلْفُؤَادَ كُلُّ أُو۟لَـٰٓئِكَ كَانَ عَنْهُ مَسْـُٔولًا And follow thou not that whereof thou hast no knowledge; the hearing and the sight and the heart, each of those will be questioned. (17:36) This is like the vaxx, you can't force it into people, and they don't need to be doctors to suspect it's bad. Or like us rejecting the Trinity, we don't need to be theologians to do so. Similarly, we don't need to be Astronomers to reject the Ball earth model. And if it ends up being the truth, so be it. But if it's false and we rejected the scripture which clearly says it's flat, then why did we trust random people over God's speech? Does Dave know the unseen now? I think my brother you did a mistake, yes the Flat Earth Society is an infiltration, a mockery of the movement. The founder founded it shortly after the International Flat Earth Research Society, which was founded by actual scientists and had actual serious arguments, precisely to make people think the FE is a crackpot theory only dumb people believe in, most of their arguments are trash and ridiculous... on purpose... the earth is not floating around, or going up all the time... where do their get that? They are making that up with no basis, they are as you said an infiltration movement. Anyways, take want you want, i do recommend the channel of Don't sphere the truth, since it refutes Dave which you claimed has "scientific refutations", well many of his "arguments" are refuting by doing experiments yourself... so he's not a scientist, most of what he does is just talk and assume, and discard ideas without testing... then take photos with his camera which deforms the horizon of his photos, and then admit even if the Earth was Flat the horizon would curve a bit... aka, his arguments of curvature were pointless... Anyways, i hope you don't hate your brothers just because they take this position, since the brotherhood should come first... even if we disagree on this. Salamun alaikum

Thank you thank you thank you

Beautiful, men from Christian and Jewish upbringings and understanding, discussing what they are discussing. Alhamdulillah. All credit to the creator .

Quran Thinkers net says : "S’oum (singular) and S’ayam (صِيَامٍ)- plural is normally translated as fasting from food and drink during the month of Ramadan, but the word S’oum means to abstain, to stop, to control, to halt, to discontinue, to prevent, to break, to adjourn, to interrupt or to pause or to put an end to something. Basically, in Quran, it’s used in the meanings of ‘restrain, put an end to, to control, to discipline, to halt or to restrain either something or oneself in the meanings of self-control, self-restraint or self-discipline’ for instance, in Ayah 19:26 “So Kuly and Ashraby, and Qarri Aienan. And if you Tara’ena from the Bashar Ahadan, then Quly, ‘Indeed, I have Nazarta for the Rahman, S’auman, so I will not Aklamu the Youm Ansyaan.’ Here, the word Kuly and Ashraby, do not mean eat and drink as is normally mistranslated, but even if we take these meanings then it’s very obvious that the word S’aoum is not used here in the meanings of fasting, since in the very beginning of the ayah is talking about Kuly and Ashraby. The word S’aoum is used in Quran in the meanings of self-discipline, restraint and self-control and this ayah mean that ‘if she Ara’a (observe, come face to face, perceive) from the Ahadan (same type, whole) Bashar (that is, ‘with’ ‘Shar’- Shar means anything that is done to destroy human capability or to waste human efforts- the purpose of which is to cause death, destruction and Fasaad on earth) whereby she should not then Aklamu (consume, interact, engage, benefit from) the Youm (well-known aspects) of Ansyaan (Insaan, human beings)- describing the concept of Siyaam as a self-control, self-restraint and discipline to stay away, and not Aklama (engage, benefit from, consume, interact with) Ahadan Bashar (those, same types of aspects of Shar that are well-known of us as human beings)."

From Quran Thinkers website Shahida the Shahru, then should Yas’umhu it (فَمَنْ شَهِدَ مِنْكُمُ الشَّهْرَ فَلْيَصُمْهُ) This phrase is not talking about witnessing the moon in order to start the fasting period. This is not what this phrase is saying, neither the word Shahida means witness here in this ayah. Shahida refers to each and every step and role as required in order to uphold the justice. This divine guidance is basically saying that whoever takes it upon themselves as the Shahida- the upholders of Justice and Haqq of the Shahara Ramadan, the periods of extreme difficulties, hardships, injustices, oppression, decline of humanity’s moral and ethical values to its worst, then they should S’iyaam it. That is control, restrain, and endeavor to put an end to it with the process of Si’yaam as through the whole regime of not only self-restrain, self- discipline and self-control; but also, should endeavor to control and put an end to Shaharu Ramadan.

Yes! As Muslims we must ask and most importantly learn. Me and my family (husband and few more) are eagerly trying to read qur'ane to understand after watching these videos and the videos from brother Ayoub. Please do make videos also explaining us (women) what we should do, because in the aHadith we have so many concerns (menstruation etc, praying) and we need to know on what we need to focus concerning all these.

Ma Sha Allah, Instructor Bilal amazes me, thank you Dr O.

Your full of shit. Dont talk on what u dont know.

subhan Allah, its amazing to see how deep all these deceptions are, the rabbit hole is just endless.

Qur'anism literally defies Basic-Intelligence. garethbryant.wordpress.com/2019/11/13/quranism/

Both The Qur'an & Sunnah/Prophetic-Tradition are at-Tanzil/Revelation. garethbryant.wordpress.com/2013/08/17/quranandsunnahjointly/

The Qira'at/Recitation-Types alone, are Proofs that The Qur'an & Sunnah are both at-Tanzil/Revelation. garethbryant.wordpress.com/2023/07/26/quranrecitationhistory/

This-Video proves what I always tell People: Apathy is worse than Ignorance. Number-1: al-Qur'aniyyah/Qur'anism (Rejection of the Sunnah/Prophetic-Tradition) never even existed via the Lifetime of Malik ibn-Anas. Number-2: Malik ibn-Anas was literally a Muhaddith (Hadith/Narration-Scholar). Number-3: Malik ibn-Anas is credited with being the Author of the Oldest Surviving-Musnad/Collection of Documented-Sunnah. #Proof: Ibn ‘Asakir reported: Malik ibn Anas, may Allah have mercy on him, said, “The Sunnah is like the Ark of Noah. Whoever boards it will be saved, and whoever does not board it will drown.” Source: Tārīkh Dimashq

Because as a rasul the responsibility is to deliver the quran without corruption including the rasul's own interpretation. As a nabi, he was a nabi for the israelites not the followers of the quran. He was the last nabi for the torah as the torah was lost, but with the quran he was a rasul and he is prohibited to provide additional understanding from the quran as the understanding is to be delivered by Allah directly to the student of the quran.

You ok

Great sir . 🌹🌹🌹❤

Great discussion.

Alhamdulillah very knowledgeable discussion

See these two Muslim quranists This is there fatwas Muslim women can marry kafir men No need for rakats in prayer Sell alcohol Engage in riba Zina is normal is both consent Lol these guys are kafirs

These quranist guys are kafir because there destroying 1400 years of tradition to fit in with liberal thinking

Assalamu alaikum Brother please give an explanation on the verse 3:124 Jazack Allahu khair

God willing i hope you're doing good Dr. Omar, it has been a while since you uploaded a conversation.

This guy is dumb enough not to have enough understanding of the Quran. he got beard and kepi, does it mentioned in the Quran, so why do you have them.يَـٰٓأَيُّهَا ٱلَّذِينَ ءَامَنُوٓا۟ إِذَا نُودِىَ لِلصَّلَوٰةِ مِن يَوْمِ ٱلْجُمُعَةِ فَٱسْعَوْا۟ إِلَىٰ ذِكْرِ ٱللَّهِ وَذَرُوا۟ ٱلْبَيْعَ ۚ ذَٰلِكُمْ خَيْرٌۭ لَّكُمْ إِن - O you who have believed, when [the adhān] is called for the prayer on the day of Jumuʿah [Friday], then proceed to the remembrance of Allāh and leave trade. That is better for you, if you only knew.- it clearly states the Friday prayer, but as said, you have to be dumb enough to follow this dummy

I don't believe in hadiths. But i remind the people of the fact that history books are also hadiths or even weaker. May Allah guide us all, this is a place of testing. Just as there is misguideance in the main sect, small sects can also be even more misguided in other ways. We need the group, it's what it is, but make sure it's good. In the end we come individually before Allah subhana wa taala. Salamun alaikum