Well, I would agree with you! I should have put Dr. McGee on this video. 🙂 Thanks for commenting.

I'm not sure. Sorry.

I'm not sure. Sorry.

Thanks for watching. I hope it was helpful.

@@rapturebound197 Thanks for commenting. I love you KZbin handle name.

@ChristopherLScott Haha.. ya it leaves little doubt where I stand on the subject of the Rapture. My wife Cindy and I lived in Hawaii for many years and she started a bible blog years ago (Cindybythesea) but she goes by the screen name 'Heaven Bound'.. so I took the next best thing. Where is your church located Christopher?

@@rapturebound197 That's neat. Thanks for sharing. The church I work at is called Lakeview Missionary Church in Moses Lake, WA.

@ChristopherLScott Great part of the country! I see it's somewhat of a retirement community which if true has a large number of nursing and Geriatric professionals. See you in glory Christopher but until then may the Lord bless your efforts to reach the lost He has put within your ministry area! Mercy triumphs over Judgement! Amen! 👋

@@melissacoates5613 Sorry. It should show up for you after you highlight it.

Hello, I am not sure I understand what you are saying. Sorry.

@@ChristopherLScott I’d love it if you would do a show about Menedes bros trial, when they are testifying about their fathers abuse. A lot of people said they were lying. Btw love your channel

@@TheRomans9Guy Makes sense. Thanks for commenting.

Thanks for watching and commenting. I have a verse-by-verse preaching series in Galatians planned to start on Friday. Here's the link in case you'd like to see my responses to your questions. kzbin.info/aero/PL7VtGhpxYouMnO_DWGLJK3lzlHsRpItRY

@@ChristopherLScott I watched your other videos, it doesn't address the dilemma. What I did find interesting are your theories about Paul maintaining presence in Roman controlled areas of Gaul, which I would agree with for reasons pertaining to my original point. But as to the timing of Galatians 2 and Acts 15, not so much.

Hello. Sorry if I wasn't clear. On each Friday for the next 13 weeks I plan to published a video going verse-by-verse through the book of Galatians. This Friday will be, "A Hill Worth Dying On" from Galatians 1:1-10. I think those videos might address you comment, but maybe I am wrong. I appreciate you watching and commenting. Feel free to add your thoughts to the videos or if I am wrong on something feel free to point that out if you disagree. :-)

Thank you for watching and for your kind words.

@@dibecolonelaoun929 I think you can.

@@laurak.4717 Thanks for watching.

@@kamireddymanohar8716 Thanks for watching.

Thanks for sharing, David. That is surprising that it was removed from the current edition.

Rod, Ephesians truly is about the grace of God! Thanks for commenting.

Thanks for watching and for your kind words. May the Lord bless you as you study His Word.

@@ndimuhnobel9791 Thanks for commenting.

Thanks for your comment and thank you for watching.

@@ToniTehaara Thanks for watching.

@@Bibi_Kyut thanks for watching

@@ChristopherLScott love from Philippines

Well, thank you for watching and for your kind comments. Bless you.

Herb, those are good insights. Thanks for watching and commenting.

The problem with this is that it goes against what is taught in Genesis. This is not a denial of scientific discovery. We acknowledge that life is able to adapt to changing environments but one species evolving into a new species is not shown. I believe the evidence shown in irreducible complexity shows the impossibility of this.

@@herbbutterworth192 Good thoughts. Thanks for sharing and for watching the video.

@CrowdJusticeUS In Genesis 1 we read that God creates "after their own kind" (10 times that statement appears) which appears to contradict macroevolution. Thank you for sharing your comments. I didn't make these videos quite as long and expansive as I should have.

@@ChristopherLScott I would say that the length of the video was just fine. There is only so much you can cover in a short time. The idea is to point viewers in the direction and have them look into it for themselves. Those who say that theistic evolution is compatible with biblical truth just don’t understand the problems with this. They need to dig in and you inspire them to do so.

Herb, thanks for your kind and encouraging words. Thanks for commenting.

Hello, thanks for commenting DJ. I address several of your arguments in the video. Thanks for watching.

Thanks for commenting.

Thanks for watching and commenting.

Yes, we could add the MacArthur Study Bible. An excellent resource. Thanks for commenting.

Thank you for watching and commenting.

Great resources! Thank you for sharing. I have a few of those and I agree they are excellent resources. Blessings to you.

Interesting perspective. Thanks for sharing.

@@ChristopherLScott Daniel 12:4 But thou, O Daniel, shut up the words, and SEAL UP THE BOOK, even to the time of the end: many shall run to and fro, and knowledge shall be increased. This is Daniel's sealed scroll, unsealed. Genesis 1 is Lucifer and the fallen angels making man in their image. Man is an idol, a trap for angels. (tares) Genesis 1 only uses the word ELOHIM. Genesis 2:7 the Lord God forms His representative in THEIR system. (wheat) Genesis 2:4 is where the word Lord God (YHWH ELOHIM) is found. Exodus 20:4 YHWH ELOHIM forbids idols and likeness (embodiment = human host body). Jesus called you a god/angel. John 10:34 Jesus answered them, Is it not written in your law, I said, Ye are gods? What law? Psalm 82:6 I have said, Ye are gods (H430); and all of you are children of the most High. 7 But ye shall die like men, and fall like one of the princes. Strongs H430 Elohim = angels, gods (little g). Right there, he called you a god (angel) that shall die like man, and fall. A fallen angel. Romans 5:10 For if, when we were enemies, we were reconciled to God by the death of his Son, much more, being reconciled, we shall be saved by his life. No mention of unrepentant man in Matthew 25:41. Matthew 25:41 Then shall he say also unto them on the left hand, Depart from me, ye cursed, into everlasting fire, prepared for the devil and his angels:

Thanks for watching.

I don't think there is a way to do that.

That is odd. I wonder if there was an update that changed the option for that?

I believe what I show in the video is the part of the larger commentary sets. It's just one book that I show. They have repurposed those commentaries in several ways. I hope that helps.

Thanks for commenting.

Glad it helped.

Thanks for your kind words.

Glad I can serve. Thanks for watching.

Thanks for commenting.

Thanks for watching and for commenting.

For Greek words, I encourage you to look for AT Robertson's "Word Pictures of the New Testament" and MR Vincent's "Word Studies of the NT." I think both of those will provide what you are looking for. In my personal opinion, I find that the New American Standard Bible is free of bias since it is published by a "foundation" and not a "book publisher." Hope that helps.

No!!! ( no note... se non per capire termini arcaici...)

I will pray it goes well. Thanks for commenting.

Thanks for commenting and for your open honesty. Blessings to you as you continue to study God's Word.

@@ChristopherLScott I wish that 1 did have red lettering in it .

​@@gregtowle8830I respectfully submit that earnest Bible students went centuries without red letters and not even quotation marks. If you slow down and watch your reading, you will know who's speaking. John chapters 4, 6, and 8 are great places to practice. Keep asking, seeking, and knocking.

@@bruceboettcher9977 I know But how come the esv does not use red lettering ?

@gregtowle8830 Unless the forward explains it, it's hard to know the reasons for translators ' or publishers ' decisions as to features of a Bible. Translations vary greatly in accuracy and readability. Besides that, editions vary widely in style and tools. If you are a serious student, it pays to consider such things as cross references, footnotes, margin size, paper type, appendices, maps, historical and language notes, and more. Red letters are actually pretty rare. They seem to be more common in old, traditional versions like KJV and the Catholic Douay. I welcome any reasoned disagreement, but my studied opinion is that the purpose of red letter editions is to give an appearance exaggerated respect for Jesus. A good question might be why the words of the son get special attention, but not the words of the Father whom Jesus came to magnify. The followup question might be why the son often quoted the Father, but the Father doesn't quote the son. That's a discussion for another day.

I agree. I regularly use all of these to preach each week. Thanks for commenting.

Thanks.

Thanks for your kind words. I do not think I have a specific video for your need. But I found this video that I think might help. kzbin.info/www/bejne/qmS5nYyJqthni5Isi=4TSJczu-wiDZLfM-

I don't think it works that way. Sorry.

Sorry it wasn't clear.

Bummer. Sorry about that.

Same I don’t care if it shows up for other people or not I want to see a indicator that I have a note whenever I come across this verse