To call Galatians the "emancipation proclamation" forces me to ask, from what exactly? If God Himself established a Law that was for the benefit of the people, and even warned of false teachers, teaching contrary to that Law in Deuteronomy 13, how does Paul NOT qualify as a false prophet/teacher? Especially with doctrine from Romans that reaffirmed 1Cor8, but was condemned in Revelation 2?
@ChristopherLScott3 ай бұрын
Thanks for watching and commenting. I have a verse-by-verse preaching series in Galatians planned to start on Friday. Here's the link in case you'd like to see my responses to your questions. kzbin.info/aero/PL7VtGhpxYouMnO_DWGLJK3lzlHsRpItRY
@Joe-pc3hs3 ай бұрын
@@ChristopherLScott I watched your other videos, it doesn't address the dilemma. What I did find interesting are your theories about Paul maintaining presence in Roman controlled areas of Gaul, which I would agree with for reasons pertaining to my original point. But as to the timing of Galatians 2 and Acts 15, not so much.
@ChristopherLScott3 ай бұрын
Hello. Sorry if I wasn't clear. On each Friday for the next 13 weeks I plan to published a video going verse-by-verse through the book of Galatians. This Friday will be, "A Hill Worth Dying On" from Galatians 1:1-10. I think those videos might address you comment, but maybe I am wrong. I appreciate you watching and commenting. Feel free to add your thoughts to the videos or if I am wrong on something feel free to point that out if you disagree. :-)