Thanks!

네 물론이죠! ㅋㅋㅋ

It depends on your definition of VR. You'll be able to look around 360⁰, but you won't be able to "walk around" in the environment.

Theoretically, anything is possible, but it would likely be rather time-consuming.

You'll have to use some sort of VR headset. I don't have a functional headset anymore, so I can't offer any specifics, but I imagine some sort of image viewer application might work.

@@AmortMedia thanks for the reply. So for youtube the only option to upload 360degree video is flat mono?

Didn't make it into the top 100. I was disappointed that some of the top 100 had obvious errors that should have gotten them disqualified according to the rules (Like leaving in the frame 0 T-pose.).

In the output properties tab (the little printer icon), find the Output subgroup, then the File Format drop down menu. There you'll find several "movie" formats to choose from.

@@AmortMedia Thanks ❣️

Blender 4 hasn't charged the process. Just set the Stereo mode to Side-by-side. Even after you render it, you won't see the side by side image until you save it to an image file.

I have a tutorial! kzbin.info/www/bejne/jZrcaZVsiJVoq9E

I thought the same thing at first, but that assumption is incorrect. Blender is doing some clever trickory behind the scenes to make it work. Imagine you have a stereo camera on a tripod. The camera has two lenses spaced apart from each other the same distance as two human eyes. Each lens of the camera would be on either side of where the tripod pivot point is, so when the camera is spun around 360 degrees to capture a panorama, each lens is in the correct location for every angle because it's not rotating on it's own pivot point, but rather the pivot point of the camera as a whole. The neat thing is that Blender knows how to achieve this without rendering a bunch of separate images and stitching them together.

@@AmortMedia Very interesting, thanks for sharing. I suppose it's just capturing one vertical line at a time, like a scanner head? No post-stitching required.

Yeah, that's basically how I imagine it working. Coding that must have been an interesting challenge.

Thanks for bringing this to my attention. The link has now been fixed.

Great! I'm glad I could help.

You have to export at a higher resolution. Even if your video is only HD, upscale it to 4k before uploading it so youtube can play it back at a higher bitrate.

@@AmortMedia thanks do you have a tutorial on it

I don't have a tutorial on that, but I can describe the process here. How familiar are you with the Blender compositor, and video encoding output settings?

That was put together in Adobe After Effects. The clips were tinted blue slightly, they had animated, block style, fractal noise applied as a luma matte to make it flicker slightly, and I placed a black solid with the "venetian blinds" effect applied to give it a scan line appearance. I also composited some TV noise over the top. The glow was mostly done in post-render compositing.

Thanks! I'm glad you got it all sorted out.

I didn't use a "fog pass", It's just a big cube with a principled volume material. To render just the fog, give every object in the scene the "holdout" material. It's not 100% realistic because the fog won't be affected by light bouncing off the objects in the scene, so only use this method if you have to.

@@AmortMedia yea yea I got that part with the principled volume. But was a bit confused on how you got essentially the image that put the fog over the clean render. Would you know any other way of sort of separating these elements to render faster and separate that is realistic? As it shows up in rendered view?

Blender will fit the equirectangular view to whatever resolution you have it set to. I've never had any problems with 16:9, but it wouldn't surprise me if some playback applications require a 2:1 image. I imagine 2:1 is approximately the correct ratio to keep vertical and horizontal resolution even when viewed in 360. In other words, if you rendered 4096 x 512, you'd have plenty of horizontal resolution, but it would likely appear to have vertical blurring due to the poor vertical resolution.

@@AmortMediathanks a lot!

Maybe. I can't redistribute the textures, so I'll have to make a list to include with the project file. I'll look into it.

This is on my to-do list, but it won't be done for quite some time.

Short answer: No. Long answer: It's more tedious than it is difficult. It takes a long time, and there are a lot of things to keep track of.

I used Logic Pro, but you could absolutely do the same thing in GarageBand.

try modelling anything in after effects and you'll see 😂

So clueless 🤣

@@ihatetomatoees right, saying "colored models" explains it

It looks the same to me in Blender 4.0.1. Were you using eevee by chance? It only works in Cycles.

@@AmortMedia Thanks for responding. Yea I found it under "views format" in the output settings. When you change it from individual to stereo 3d it gives that option.

No, but some of the music I create for my videos is based on Amiga games.

@@AmortMedia Keep the fire burning! Was a lovely period of music!

​@@AmortMediaWould you mind releasing the music for this video by any chance? Sounds lovely!

Sure thing! I'll post a link here when it's available.

Here it is! There are a couple of other similar songs from other tutorials in the playlist, too. on.soundcloud.com/pfGML