Jump to 34:06

Yes, Jarman ate alone on the 1st floor, but it was a good 10-15 minutes *_before_* the shooting, not during it...and it goes without saying, Oswald ate no lunch at all that day (if you don't count his "curtain rod" sandy).

Yah, hopefully they step it up in the audio department.

Both, we had a lot of sound trouble on this one.

And _datsa soma bigga_ bad conspiracy, eh?

Attempting to discredit things that go against your "research"?

The truth hurts, eh?

It's not impossible that someone else was firing, there's just no evidence for it.

@9Ballr Apart from half a dozen witnesses that said they saw smoke coming from the knoll area. The 50 or 60 or so witnesses that said a shot or shots came from the knoll area. Or the vast multitude of witnesses that said 2 shots came on top of each other. Hard to know in terms of physical evidence. The ARRB got an envelope that had..."7.65 she'll found in Dealey Plaza, destroyed by FBI as deemed of no value" written on it. We also have Dr Shaw who operated on Connollys chest wounds say in a press conference that the bullet is still in Connollys thigh. How can it still be in his thigh if it was supposedly the bullet found on a stretcher 2 hours earlier? 2 FBI agents signed a receipt for a missile removed from JFK by Humes at the autopsy. On 29th Nov 63 Hoover rings LBJ and tells him there were 3 shots and we have them. 2 bullets splintered but our experts matched them to the rifle and the other was an intact bullet This suggests there are more than just 3 bullets which would mean there was more than shooter.

@@geoffreyjohnstone5465 All of the bullets and fragments were matched to Oswald's rifle. No other shooter, no other weapon, and no other bullets or fragments were ever found. 96% of witnesses said that the shots came from only one direction. Some people thought that two shots came close to one another because of the echo effects of Dealey Plaza. Dr. Shaw's comments came while Connally was still in surgery, so he didn't know how serious the thigh wound was or whether there was a bullet still in Connally's thigh. No bullet was recovered from his thigh. When an event like this happens there are always conflicting eyewitness statements, and mistaken statements--especially early on--by officials and authorities. You have to weigh those statements against the totality of the evidence to see if they have any veracity in hindsight. A good example is the claim that the rifle found was a Mauser. That was simply a mistake, and was corrected by everyone but Roger Craig, IIRC, but some people just take it at face value and run with it despite the overwhelming evidence that it was wrong.

@@9Ballr I am not so sure that ALL the bullets and fragments were even placed in to evidence. You would also have to prove ALL the bullets and fragments could be matched to the 7.65 Mauser that was sworn in to evidence by Seymour Weitzman by affidavit on 23 Nov 63. ALL the bullets and fragments would need to have full chains of custody. This means everyone with in that chain must be able to identify those bullets and fragments and the chain can not be broken. Looking at COC of CE399 ("the magic bullet") the first 4 on its chain of custody failed to idfentify it and it is in 2 places at the same time for a full 80 minutes. Good luck with that one. Dr Shaws comments came at approx 4pm after he himself had worked on Connollys chest wounds. CE399 was found before 2pm. He is asked by a reporter about this bullet and he states clearly, the bullet is still in the thigh and it eill be removed shortly. In Connollys autobiography it states a bullet fell of his stretcher and was picked up by a nurse. DA Henry Wade is on record as stating a nurse approached him and said she had a bullet and what should she do with it. He advised her to give it to a policeman. Patrolman Bobby Nolan stated he was given an envelope from a nurse which she said contained a bullet. He handed this in at the Dallas PD. A very different chain of custody to CE399. By your logic, we can rely on nothing or any witnesses. No autopsy photos would exist because the camera that supposedly took them is now missing. JFK had no brain as that has gone missing. Even the microfilm from which the supposed receipt for the rifle purchase came from is missing. Does that mean they never existed? You have to remember, in a court everything must be correct and above board. The Dallas police, especially under Wade's DAship were masters of the fix when it came to trials. Some of which became famous. Besides, any trial, anywhere would be a mistrial....the prosecution were and still are withholding evidence.

@@9Ballr Witnesses were pretty much split as to where the shots came from. What if the 96% of witnesses were correct in the sense that shots came from the places they said? Yes very few said the shots came from 2 areas, but is not most likely that the shots came from 2 areas rather than just the 50+ that said shots only came from the TSBD are right, and the 50+ witnesses that said shots only came from the underpass area are wrong? Add in the fact that several witnesses said they saw smoke in that area and others said they smelled smoke in thay area and it suggests a shot did come from that area. I wasnt there, I dont know what happened so I have to go by whats available in terms of evidence and testimony. Witnesses are not binary. You cant blanket say everyone that said something that suggests it was Oswald alone are correct, and everyone that suggests more than one shooter are wrong. I find it strange that you want to believe witnesses that changed their story and yet dont believe Roger Craig who maintained the same story. Jurors dont like that. Finally, let me give you a scenario. If you give me an apple today and tomorrow you ask for the apple back. I hold out an orange and say thats what you gave me, what can you do about it? The evidence would be the orange You wouldnt be able to identify the item you gave me if I have an orange. I am sure you understand why we go through the whole legal process. I have reasonable doubt, that is different from saying Oswald is innocent

"Oswald didn’t have the wherewithal or the smarts to ever plan or carry out an assassination of this magnitude on his own." Take rifle to work, set up boxes on 6th floor, shoot JFK. Which part of that was Oswald not smart enough to do?

@@9Ballr He was framed obviously! Frazier said no way was did that package contain a put it together rifle. Frazier was a hunter so he ought to know! It is possible he somehow got a hold of a rifle but that fatal shot came from the grassy knoll most people agree. He was framed, why did he go home instead of just going back to work as if nothing ever happened? He knew when he got up that morning he was going away somewhere but not to jail to eventually get shot!

@@JbrickM100A That's not what I asked. You said, "Oswald didn’t have the wherewithal or the smarts to ever plan or carry out an assassination of this magnitude on his own." Tell me what about the assassination he didn't have the wherewithal or smarts to carry out.

@@JbrickM100A The bag was 38 inches long, the disassembled rifle was less than 35 inches long. I'll take facts over, "Frazier said no way that package contained a rifle."