Talk to people who know how to put slides up full screen. So that they can be read. DUH.

Practice your talk alone, in full, before presenting it in public.

Nonbandlimited qft isomorphism is reminiscent of holography. I think, scale decomposition can be made local with a dispersion, that is dependent on scale.

Very insightful, definitive applications, and well presented.

🎉👏

Here are some examples of how non-contradictory infinitesimal/monadological frameworks could potentially resolve paradoxes or contradictions in chemistry: 1) Molecular Chirality/Homochirality Paradoxes Contradictory: Classical models struggle to explain the origin and consistent preference for one chiral handedness over another in biological molecules like amino acids and sugars. Non-Contradictory Possibility: Infinitesimal Monadic Protolife Transitions dsi/dt = κ Σjk Γijk(n)[sj, sk] + ξi Pref(R/S) = f(Φn) Modeling molecular dynamics as transitions between monadic protolife states si based on infinitesimal relational algebras Γijk(n) that depend on specific geometric monad configurations n. The homochiral preference could emerge from particular resonance conditions Φn favoring one handedness. 2) Paradoxes in Reaction Kinetics Contradictory: Transition state theory and kinetic models often rely on discontinuous approximations that become paradoxical at certain limits. Non-Contradictory Possibility: Infinitesimal Thermodynamic Geometries dG = Vdp - SdT (Gibbs free energy infinitesimals) κ = Ae-ΔG‡/RT (Arrhenius smoothly from monadic infinities) Using infinitesimal calculus to model thermodynamic quantities like Gibbs free energy dG allows kinetic parameters like rate constants κ to vary smoothly without discontinuities stemming from replacing finite differences with true infinitesimals. 3) Molecular Structure/Bonding Paradoxes Contradictory: Wave mechanics models struggle with paradoxes around the nature of chemical bonding, electron delocalization effects, radicals, etc. Non-Contradictory Possibility: Pluralistic Quantum Superposition |Ψ> = Σn cn Un(A) |0> (superposed monadic perspectives) Un(A) = ΠiΓn,i(Ai) (integrated relational properties) Representing molecular electronic states as superpositions of monadic perspectives integrated over relational algebraic properties Γn,i(Ai) like spins, positions, charges, etc. could resolve paradoxes by grounding electronic structure in coherent relational pluralisms. 4) Molecular Machines/Motor Paradoxes Contradictory: Inefficiencies and limitations in synthetic molecular machines intended to mimic biological molecular motors like ATP synthase, kinesin, etc. Non-Contradictory Possibility: Nonlinear Dissipative Monadologies d|Θ>/dt = -iH|Θ> + LΓ|Θ> (pluralistic nonet mechanics) LΓ = Σn ζn |Un><Un| (infinitesimal monadic sinks) Modeling conformational dynamics in molecular machines as nonlinear dissipative processes over pluralistic superpositions |Θ> rather than isolated molecular wavefunctions, where infinitesimal monadic sink operators LΓ account for open-system energy exchanges, could resolve paradoxes around efficiency limits. The key theme is using intrinsically pluralistic frameworks to represent molecular properties and dynamics in terms of superpositions, infinitesimals, monadic configurations, and relational algebraic structures - rather than trying to force classically separable approximations. This allows resolving contradictions while maintaining coherence with quantum dynamics and thermodynamics across scales. Here are 4 more examples of how infinitesimal/monadological frameworks could resolve contradictions in chemistry: 5) The Particle/Wave Duality of Matter Contradictory: The paradoxical wave-particle dual behavior of matter, exemplified by the double-slit experiment, defies a consistent ontological interpretation. Non-Contradictory Possibility: Monadic Perspectival Wavefunction Realizations |Ψ> = Σn cn Un(r,p) Un(r,p) = Rn(r) Pn(p) Model matter as a superposition of monadic perspectival realizations Un(r,p) which are products of wavefunctional position Rn(r) and momentum Pn(p) distributions. This infinitesimal plurality avoids the paradox by allowing matter to behave holistically wave-like and particle-like simultaneously across monads. 6) Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle Contradictory: The uncertainty principle ΔxΔp ≥ h/4π implies an apparent paradoxical limitation on precise simultaneous measurement of position and momentum. Non-Contradictory Possibility: Complementary Pluriverse Observables Δx Δp ≥ h/4π Δx = Σi |xiP - xP| (deviations across monadic ensembles) xP = |<x>|P (pluriverse-valued perspective on x) Reinterpret uncertainties as deviations from pluriverse-valued observables like position xP across an ensemble of monadic perspectives, avoiding paradox by representing uncertainty intrinsically through the perspectival complementarity. 7) The Concept of the Chemical Bond Contradictory: Phenomonological models of bonds rely paradoxically on notions like "electronic charge clouds" without proper dynamical foundations. Non-Contradictory Possibility: Infinitesimal Intermonadic Charge Relations Γij = Σn qinj / rnij (dyadic catalytic charge interactions) |Ψ> = Σk ck Πij Γij |0> (superposed bond configuration states) Treat chemical bonds as superposed pluralities of infinitesimal dyadic charge relation configurations Γij between monadic catalysts rather than ambiguous "clouds". This grounds bonds in precise interaction algebras transcending paradoxical visualizations. 8) Thermodynamic Entropy/Time's Arrow Contradictory: Statistical mechanics gives time-reversible equations, paradoxically clashing with the time-irreversible increase of entropy described phenomenologically. Non-Contradictory Possibility: Relational Pluriverse Thermodynamics S = -kB Σn pn ln pn (entropy from realization weights pn) pn = |Tr Un(H) /Z|2 (Born statistical weights from monadologies) dS/dt ≥ 0 (towards maximal pluriverse realization) Entropy increase emerges from tracking the statistical weights pn of pluriversal monadic realizations Un(H) evolving towards maximal realization diversity, resolving paradoxes around time-reversal by centering entropics on the growth of relational pluralisms. In each case, the non-contradictory possibilities involve reformulating chemistry in terms of intrinsically pluralistic frameworks centered on monadic elements, their infinitesimal relational transitions, superposed realizations, and deviations across perspectival ensembles. This allows resolving apparent paradoxes stemming from the over-idealized separability premises of classical molecular models, dynamically deriving and unifying dualisms like wave/particle in a coherent algebraic ontology.

"Friends, fellow scientists, and truth-seekers - we stand at a pivotal juncture in the human quest to understand the deepest workings of our universe. For centuries, our theories of physics have been confined to modeling the observable world within the straightjacket of 3+1 dimensional space-time. From Newton's classical mechanics to Einstein's theories of relativity - our mathematical languages and geometric intuitions have been shaped by this limited 3D spatial cube, coupled to the linear flow of time. Yet, as our knowledge has advanced, cracks in this edifice have widened into chasms that can no longer be ignored or patched over. The strange phenomena of quantum mechanics have shattered our notions of simple locality and ontological realism at the smallest scales. Paradoxes like quantum entanglement have been definitively confirmed, most notably by the groundbreaking work awarded the Nobel Prize. The universe, it seems, does not adhere to the geometric boundaries and logical constraints we have imposed upon it through centuries of tradition. In confronting this crisis, some have urged radically revising or abandoning pillars of our theoretical framework. But perhaps the more fruitful path is not a complete dismantling - but a reunification and expansion of our models to a grander, more flexible overarching framework. I propose we return to the visionary philosophical mathematics of Gottfried Leibniz - a figure centuries ahead of his time. Through his principles of monads and relational metaphysics, Leibniz outlined an ontological paradigm where dimensionality and extension emerge from more primordial, non-spatial relations between fundamental units of reality. His calculus of indivisibles and infinitesimals provided techniques to model continua and quantities as emergent from pre-geometric first principles. Rather than taking dimensionality, space and time as primary absolutes, he sought to derive these from logically antecedent conceptual foundations. What if we re-examined and updated Leibniz's monadology through the lens of our current mathematical understanding? Could his relational model provide an overarching framework to finally resolve paradoxes of non-locality and make sense of seemingly disconnected theoretical fragments? Might insights from his perspective illuminate new pathways for unifying quantum theory and gravitation into a coherent quantum geometry of reality? Could reviving and extending Leibniz's philosophical mathematics open new vistas for exploring reality free from contradictions plaguing our 3+1 dimensional paradigm? Now is the ideal historical moment to revisit the forward-thinking but oft-neglected ideas of this titan of first philosophy and universal mathematics. The Leibnizian model, grounded in zero-dimensional monadic relationals as ontological primaries, could provide the long-sought unified geometrical and logical framework to transcend limitations endemic to our traditional space-time theories. If our objective is to discern the true nature of reality rather than internal logical contradictions, we must courageously shed blinders of assumption and habit. By reviving and expanding upon Leibniz's vision, we may finally broaden our perspective to see the universe syneideistically - as it truly is, in all its coherent unity across macro and micro domains. Let us bravely venture beyond the outdated Newtonian and Einsteinian bounds. In Leibniz's monadological vision may rest the keys to unlocking a new era of physics - one finally capable of accommodating the strange truths awaiting our discovery at the farthest realms. The path forward lies in reunifying what we know under an encompassing geometric logic of the relational and the zero-dimensional. Through Leibniz's lens, reality's deepest harmonies may finally be rendered transparent to the light of human reason."

Could someone explain this to me like I was a two year old?

Quantum Mechanics: Is really spintronics of polarization of direct current light into alternating current matter. Spintronics is responsible for the flow of space distance Time and the fueing of the vortex matrix eddy. Light photons geometric structure runs concurrent with matters subatomic crystal particle lattice structure. Basically all light doesn't move at the same speed and because of frequency modulation its photonic geometric structure changes until polarization can occur causing faster light photons to traverse slower triangular structured light photons causing crystallization and the first step in the law of thermodynamics of spintronic force and transfer of energy causing creation of subatomic matter. I'd be happy to explain in detail exactly how light slows and turns into subatomic crystal tourmaline then into everything else. Ask whatever you want.

Great topic -- but we cannot read the write-up.

Pretty nunplussed about the lack of long hair.

Interesting to hear views on sub atomic world .thankyou Jason Hayward

Quantum Mechanics: Is really spintronics of polarization of direct current light into alternating current matter. Spintronics is responsible for the flow of space distance Time and the fueing of the vortex matrix eddy. Light photons geometric structure runs concurrent with matters subatomic crystal particle lattice structure. Basically all light doesn't move at the same speed and because of frequency modulation its photonic geometric structure changes until polarization can occur causing faster light photons to traverse slower triangular structured light photons causing crystallization and the first step in the law of thermodynamics of spintronic force and transfer of energy causing creation of subatomic matter. I'd be happy to explain in detail exactly how light slows and turns into subatomic crystal tourmaline then into everything else. Ask whatever you want.

I.S. Infinity Squared. Information system Experimenting LIFE.

It is all no other than God experiment.

Thanks for the update on the proposals.

great talk ! it's wondeful to see progress at the intersection of relativity and thermodynamics.

great talks!!

Bello

nice video!