one of the best lectured video i have reffered orginal book and seen many videos best one yet

Wish you had given solutions to the quiz

23:26: Not sure about this. A lack of diversity weakening the argument seems counter-intuitive in this instance. Others living in the same building as Rebecca with the same Sony-model TVs displaying a similar picture quality would seem to strengthen the argument that Rebecca will probably have a similar picture quality, too (i.e. simularities). If they all used the same antennas / cables, placement, lived on the same floor, etc., than that lack of diversity could weaken the argument.

I appresiate this great work

I’m writing an assignment applying deontology on banning same-sex marriage. For around 3 hours I was trying to apply the universalizability principle to banning same-sex marriage. Only until I watch your explanation, especially with the “in a world” illustration and the problems with the principle, I can finally understand and connect the dots. Thank you!

Where can I get your slides please

Thank you soooooooo much ❤

Thank you Professor! This really helped me out with my reaction paper for this chapter of Rachels’ book 😁

Well explained with solid examples! Thank you.

What are the answers ?

Hey, so i have a question concerning Socrates‘ Dilemma I perfectly Unterstand and fully agree to the First Part of the dilemma. However, it is still Not clear to me how the second Part of the dilemma poses a problem to the theistic view You say that if actions are inherently good or bad, and god just commands them to us because they Are right or forbids them for us because they Are wring, there are Independent reasons why these actions are right or wrong. So far, so good. Then you continue by saying that anybody can look at the independent reasoning why actions are right or wrong and this would contradict the theist view This, however, is still not clear to me. Wouldn‘t a theist just say that it is because only god is capable of fully understanding the independent reasons, That because only god has acces to those independent reasons, this does Not contradict their view, that morality still depends on religion, because only the god of religions can tell us mere humans what actions are right or wrong? Not anybody has acces to it for only god is capable to understand the independent reasons. Thus, morality still dépends on god telling us what‘s right and wrong. Thus, morality is based on god, which means morality is based on religion.

Thanks a lot. But is there any way we get access to the sides?

fucking kill me

Thank you so much for this video. I was having so much trouble to understand this chapter. Your lecture video really explained so briefly where I understood everything about this chapter. Thank you so much for your hard work.

I really need this. Thank you Sir😊

Thank you sir this topic was really interesting..

Nice one! The examples are very engaging and witty!

pretty good introduction to virtue ethics! deserves more views

nice work!

Abortion should b permissible no matter what

I wish I knew all u did about ethics. Hard class since I have to remember like 11 theories

Very helpful video... saved a lot of time

Testing