He wasn’t that bad his brother literally spent all his money on the crusades and he got captured by the duke of Austria was passed to the holy Roman emperor and was imprisoned on the way from the crusades twice and hid ransom was expensive and the English baron refused to support him because he was fighting for land in France and they were English lords so they didn’t care and he had no money since the royal coffers were already empty after paying the crusades Richards ransoms which left him in a lot of debt he wasn’t a bad king he just had a bad start
@danielchastain46024 күн бұрын
I have no knowledge about British rights to vote. I wonder what they think about American voting rights.
@dylanplumley2804 күн бұрын
The British were kind of the shit back in the day, that's why.
@yakkyuu125 күн бұрын
There is NO way this guy is a professor or even decently educated about the effect of the Versailles Treaty! 1) The reason the rise of Nazism was LATER is because the German people DECIDED ON THEIR OWN as part of signing the agreement -- they WOULD ABIDE by it! This IS THEE REASON the massive foolish effect of deep punishment! There does NOT NEED to be ANY OTHER REASON---PERIOD! 2) the German people suffered a DEPRESSION --ALL BECAUSE of the VERSAILLES treaty-- COMPLETELY responsible for the hundreds of thousand of people who starved to death and got diseases from being REFUSED medical care--- this went on for NO LESS than 7-10 years! The German Depression happened BECAUSE of the Versailles treaty and WAS ONGOING -----LONG ---BEFORE --- the Depression of 1929! 3) So , you have a DEEPER Depression than the 1929 depression that STARTED AFTER WWl and it CARRIED right into the World Depression of 1929! Even today, there is NOT ONE SINGLE country in this world that could SURVIVE 2 consecutive depressions! THE ONLY HONEST RESULT: the people of Germany were so impoverished, dying by starvation by the hundreds of thousands and disease-----FOR NO LESS THAN 12 years! The big 3- BACKED the German people into such a CORNER; they had NOTHING TO LOSE, they DID NOT CARE what the TREATY SAID, they DID NOT CARE about consequences --this is WHAT HAPPENS WHEN REVENGE GOES -----TOO FAR! The German people were WILLING to turn to ANYONE who would keep them from LIFE LONG POVERTY, LIFE LONG --SLAVE wages and NO chance to do better--- so they took their chance on a crazy man--Hitler! The other ONLY TRUTH that is NEVER discussed; how the Brits and France made SURE the German Citizens --WOULD NOT BE GIVEN---ANY LOANS---REPEAT---NO LOANS --period! This brought about the STRENGTHENING of the JEWISH BANKERS---this ALSO GUARANTEED the ENSLAVEMENT, through slave wages ----- the BORN German citizens would ALWAYS be enslaved by.---- the BANKS---that WERE PRIMARILY---- owned and run by JEWS! When you push ANYONE so DEEP AND SO LONG into a CORNER --- this is THEE RESULT YOU ---WILL GET! The SIMPLE CLEAR PROOF: WORLD WAR ll-- after the devastation and horrible killing of Jewish people--- the LEADERS of the FREE WORLD ----were MUCH SMARTER this time! GO LOOK at the UNCONDITIONAL SURRENDER by Germany AND JAPAN!!------NEITHER----TERMS OF SURRENDER --were EVEN --C:LOSE --to as BAD as the --TREATY OF VERSAILLES ! This is ALL THE PROOF YOU NEED! You are WELCOME for -----thee ------ONLY ---TRUTH!
@AhmedAadan-n2c6 күн бұрын
DrAhmed AdamAli +Crop Protection+Somali Land
@manpreetluthra16997 күн бұрын
Father and pioneer of democracy.
@LindaMerchant-bq2hp7 күн бұрын
Napoleon was similiar to oliver cromwell in that upon the overthrown english and french aristocracies subsequent executions of ,rose out of military conquerors to become tyrannical
@LindaMerchant-bq2hp7 күн бұрын
Napoleon was the brains of the french revolution
@priscilleachkar498611 күн бұрын
The video was really interesting and comprehensive !!! Could you please share the title of the song?
@DanielGriffin-hc4tw12 күн бұрын
What these poor women had to enudure was horrendous.
@andrewmiles337813 күн бұрын
She needs elocution lessons, the voice can be too high-pitched, and the residual Essex accent could be excised too.
@callmethecommentcountess932914 күн бұрын
Interesting
@callmethecommentcountess932914 күн бұрын
Interesting
@jasonfogartyflp16 күн бұрын
I remember reading or seeing this in either a book or documentary one time. And it went something along the lines as this An American general asked Sadam Hussein after his arrest why are all the muslim countries run by tyrant despotic dictators and he said look at the people we have to rule over
@tropicalgardenvlogs17 күн бұрын
I think the idea that there was any other possible outcome apart from sanctioning the murder of the King is modern-day sensibilities projected on to the past.
@mariannelandayan494118 күн бұрын
76 third class survied meanwhile not knowing how many third class died check google 😱😱😱 WHY 89 PORR WOMEN😭😭😭😓
@adam_p9918 күн бұрын
Give Cromwell credit. He brought the English and Irish together. We both despise him.
@Riccardo-z7j22 күн бұрын
I agree bro
@josephobrien848322 күн бұрын
To the Irish there is not a lot of difference between Cromwell and Churchill. Both sent invading armies into Ireland to massacre the Irish just for being Irish. The problems of Northern Ireland stem directly from these two monsters. Plus a few more despots. Most British know nothing of their own history, so I wouldn't expect them to know Irish history.
@hiddenfan-3723 күн бұрын
England's greatest prime minister was Lord Palmerston!
@ctboy198924 күн бұрын
she makes me proud to be English
@neskam125625 күн бұрын
Hello la 1G8 :) M
@jonathonmitchell968425 күн бұрын
😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢
@GoldWingMafia27 күн бұрын
I'm a clifton
@AlineReynaud-bk2zt29 күн бұрын
While abusing african slaves, children in labour and trading in the empire !! Disguting rich people exploiting poor people because of their greed
@memememe555-o9t29 күн бұрын
this video was so unhelpful i didn’t learn anything it didn’t even talk about the significance
@memememe555-o9t29 күн бұрын
ew
@cody4109Ай бұрын
As an American I could never see having a monarchy.
@paulyeomans850Ай бұрын
He was good.
@bufordmaddogtannen5164Ай бұрын
This is basically what the Economic forum and Black rock are trying to create. Dumb commie liberals are brainwashed and will take us tgere if we donf stop them
@arnoldrimmer9161Ай бұрын
They weren't created to protect the aristocracy from us plebs?
@XDrang93Ай бұрын
I got an ad for an AI app before the video started.
@JL-ti3usАй бұрын
It's been a year. Has the project ended?
@Michael-hw5wkАй бұрын
I won't be around by then, so don't worry.
@adambohamad683Ай бұрын
im in year 7 and i have a history test tomorrow, this video is very helpful!
@MitoLS5Ай бұрын
same xD
@rosemarygrabowska9949Ай бұрын
Women didn't participate or couldn't participate?
@ivanhoeyi5261Ай бұрын
Yh I love Peppys faith
@PlorteeeriNoppАй бұрын
Vot a mli goiro psclummertx
@lawrencenoctor2703Ай бұрын
Why is this moment in history not referred to as the English revolution which is what it was? Much of English history has been doctored one way or another.
@houstonsam6163Ай бұрын
American here, just looking for a basic understanding of this significant event. I thought Grey, as PM, could force the King the appoint additional Whig Lords, and that threat caused the existing Conservative Lords finally to approve the reform. But that is not the understanding I get from this summary.
@sofiadeychoudhury3724Ай бұрын
Here in 2024, love this video and you just got a new subscriber!!!!!!!!
@kashfiaislam9995Ай бұрын
I hope King John I is burning in Hell with his direct descendants King Henry III, King Edward I, Margaret Beaufort, King Henry VII, King Henry VIII, Marie de Medici, King Louis XIV, Prince Edward, Duke of Kent and Strathearn, Queen Victoria, King Edward VII, King George V, King Edward VIII, King George VI, and Prince Philip. 👗👠👑💍🇬🇧
@MrHawkMan777Ай бұрын
This was not an invasion as half of William's troops were English and Scottish. Also, I don't know where this idea that William's army was more sophisticated than James's comes from. James had a standing army of 40,000 men which was more than twice the size of William's army. If James's army had met on the battlefield with William's he would have won easily. You can't cite the fact that the army dissipated on the news of William's arrival as proof that James's army was inherently disorangised. Far more likely is that James's army couldn't organise because the English population prevented them from doing so. News of William's landing sparked a mass revolt against James and this was what prevented James from getting his army into battle. Therefore William was betting on a revolt to succeed and would have known that a 15,000 strong army, by itself, had no chance of taking the crown. To see this as a Dutch invasion is like calling the Soviet invasion of Germany a Georgian invasion, because Stalin was Georgian. Revisonst Historians will go to absolute lengths to try and give some controversial interpretation of history.
@pinkzweibel985Ай бұрын
I need to get winstanley film from the it's amazing. Does anyone know how ?? ❤
@ElijahPillay-wn2qqАй бұрын
Here because of an exam ngl
@NatanyaAberraАй бұрын
Hopefully, the Westerners will understand that this also applyes to African nations too! 😮
@neil4817Ай бұрын
Why the stupid music over it?
@malicant123Ай бұрын
My take is that he was a personally decent man, but one unsuited to being a king. In many ways, he was a bit like Nicholas II of Russia. He was a good husband and father and not inclined personally towards cruelty, but that's not what makes a good ruler. Ultimately he failed in his principal duty to govern.
@lawrencenoctor2703Ай бұрын
If only English people knew there actual history rather the nonsense thaught them. The roots of many of the worlds greatest ideals were started and thwarted here.1984 started in the English 16th century. Try CV Wedgewoods "The Kings War"and The kings Peace. Bye.
@sdnlawrence5640Ай бұрын
An important Founding Father, sadly mych maligned in later life and hated after death by those who owed him much.