Пікірлер
@nathanalvar9156
@nathanalvar9156 3 сағат бұрын
More Aggressor content plz :)
@croma81
@croma81 10 сағат бұрын
Wondering DMAS's rwr is the same or? If its same F-4E is totally crap package for me. Can heatlbur make captured mig-21 spo-10 retrofit option? It will be nice role play element. At least we can have launch audio against a2s 🤣
@ninelima1412
@ninelima1412 15 сағат бұрын
The rings RWR shows calculated "lethal range" and not distance. - The calculation considers the specific type of threat, altitude, speed and range. - The inner ring is 1x lethal range and the outer is normally 2x lethal range. For example, an SA2 Optic will always show dead center of you are below its ceiling, regardless of range, whereas a AAA threat will stay outside the outer ring as long as you are high enough, even if you fly directly over it. Airborne threats have similar parameters depending on the specific detection.
@AviationPlus
@AviationPlus 10 сағат бұрын
kzbin.info/www/bejne/m6enlqCnhtqZjLssi=NwSdDdGnXCAWq25x&t=184
@rama7267
@rama7267 22 сағат бұрын
Never had the 16 in DCS but seems like it very different start up wise
@vojtechvacek4783
@vojtechvacek4783 Күн бұрын
I´m no one to judge if its correct or not, just feel the urge to mention RWR knows nothing about distance to emiter, it relates its symbology to its power of the emiter.
@AviationPlus
@AviationPlus Күн бұрын
I am aware of the relationship with determining where the symbol is on the RWR. Either way a MiG21 showing up at 180 miles. This RWR is way too sensitive. Strength + Capabilities = distance portrayed
@Whiskey11Gaming
@Whiskey11Gaming Күн бұрын
@@AviationPlus AI Radars don't necessarily work the same as player radars... this can be observed by an AI MiG-29A locking you STATIONARY ON THE GROUND at 80+ miles. I see it happen every day on the Through the Inferno Servers. It's 100% not possible as a player. I would not be surprised one bit if because of this issue, the F-14 and F-4 RWR are overly sensitive to AI to compensate for lack of detection (when it should be) against player aircraft.
@AviationPlus
@AviationPlus Күн бұрын
@@Whiskey11Gaming Did not know that but that is still an issue PvE happens a lot.
@paulmoran2437
@paulmoran2437 Күн бұрын
Very useful thank you!
@nathanalvar9156
@nathanalvar9156 Күн бұрын
Can you explain the difference in tactics you would use in DCS vs Falcon? DCS the RWR is so good and the notch is broken. I can generally be shot at by a fox 3 in DCS with-in 10 miles and just notch and roll inside the notch to defeat the missile.
@AviationPlus
@AviationPlus Күн бұрын
I can't stand the RWR in the F16 in the viper. Notching a 120 in BMS is not a thing it will follow you and hit you. Respecting MAR and not being in danger will get you farther than learning how to defend one after being shot at, usually at that point it's too late.
@aviationrambler
@aviationrambler Күн бұрын
Did you missed the memo? They grabbed a signal processor from the F-35 to get that noise floor down. This was done back in [redacted].
@AviationPlus
@AviationPlus Күн бұрын
This is not wrong lol
@nickwanrooy6130
@nickwanrooy6130 Күн бұрын
I hate the current rwr, its so unclear i have no clue when I'm getting locked or if I'm getting shot at. it just makes the same sound all the time. doesn't matter if i take off or fly in a combat zone
@AmruMagdy
@AmruMagdy Күн бұрын
😂
@UmutCtak-rq9ro
@UmutCtak-rq9ro Күн бұрын
As a result, F4's RWR is crap.
@AviationPlus
@AviationPlus Күн бұрын
Ya I am not a fan at the moment.
@jeffmgNY
@jeffmgNY Күн бұрын
Can't thank you enough for your AWESOME videos!
@AviationPlus
@AviationPlus Күн бұрын
Not a problem. Great to see that they are being watched and people benefit from them.
@Pillow_Cat
@Pillow_Cat Күн бұрын
Lol, I thought it always was like that. The thing is: rwr are programmable and every user has modified it as he like, so there is no truly one way how it must be. As i heard from users it is how it implemented now. It was distance for f14 times, but with mainstream EW tech where every emmiter tries vary its power in a smart way its become useless.
@AviationPlus
@AviationPlus Күн бұрын
It was not like this before. Upon release it worked in reference to signal strength and type of radar to determine the lethality and ring location. Now it is based on the radar mode regardless of strength.
@andyf104
@andyf104 Күн бұрын
3:04 Is that supposed to be a rearview mirror above the upper center part of the WSO's canopy..?
@AviationPlus
@AviationPlus Күн бұрын
That is what it seems like.
@agidotexe7167
@agidotexe7167 Күн бұрын
yes it is
@0xinfinite24
@0xinfinite24 Күн бұрын
This is exactly how western RWR is supposed to work, except for the fact that the Phantom's RWR detection range is ridiculously wide. The current F-16 and F/A-18's RWR place both an enemy at 10 miles and an enemy at 80 miles on the same outer ring unless the enemy does STT. Without datalinks, 4th gen pilot's situation awareness is worst then 3rd's.
@AviationPlus
@AviationPlus Күн бұрын
This is exactly how it is supposed to work except for the fact that it is completely broken. The current F-16 RWR is unplayable. Basing the rings on Radar status. It does not make any logical sense and is a complete SA killer if I am merged with a MiG and they are placed on the outer ring solely based on the fact that they are not locked on to me and in search mode. However, if someone is 60 miles and in STT they show up on the inner ring. Watch my video discussing the matter further. kzbin.info/www/bejne/m6enlqCnhtqZjLs
@0xinfinite24
@0xinfinite24 Күн бұрын
@@AviationPlus That is exactly what I wanna say.
@AviationPlus
@AviationPlus Күн бұрын
Heatblur almost had it but not quite also there are too many increments getting closer to the center. It is very hard to tell by quick glance if there are 50 increments in between leading to the center. There should be like 4 at the most.
@nyandyn
@nyandyn Күн бұрын
Don't even think about enabling the WIP handoff mode unless you want to end up in a padded cell. I'm planning on replacing those sounds with BMS ones.
@AviationPlus
@AviationPlus Күн бұрын
Classic early access meaning unplayable in an operational environment.
@nyandyn
@nyandyn Күн бұрын
Calling it unplayable is a bit harsh though 😅
@AviationPlus
@AviationPlus Күн бұрын
@@nyandyn Maybe but anything is playable even if none of the weapons work but that is not the intention of this module.
@IAMSEYMOURMUSIC
@IAMSEYMOURMUSIC Күн бұрын
I last played Falcon 4.0 IN 1998, I had no idea it was still going!
@mnmailman3489
@mnmailman3489 2 күн бұрын
Working as intended.
@gotanon9659
@gotanon9659 Күн бұрын
Also know as "even our in house expert on X plane knows its wrong but were not gonna change it" Answer
@AviationPlus
@AviationPlus Күн бұрын
Or saying the expert says it is correct.
@Guy_6397
@Guy_6397 3 сағат бұрын
You were both burning towards each other at high speed, the closing speed decreases the effective combat range.
@AviationPlus
@AviationPlus 2 күн бұрын
I really hope this changes.
@BlazejBucko123
@BlazejBucko123 Күн бұрын
But what if this is a correct behavior?
@AviationPlus
@AviationPlus Күн бұрын
@@BlazejBucko123 There is no way it is able to detect a MiG at over 180 miles. If it could the sensitivity would have to be decreased.
@BlazejBucko123
@BlazejBucko123 Күн бұрын
@@AviationPlus Sure, the range is iffy, I agree. But can you really say that it's not working as intended with regards to threat priority? It's working differently than in other sims but is there a proper manual that describes how it is supposed to work (in details)?
@AviationPlus
@AviationPlus Күн бұрын
@@BlazejBucko123 Everything works a lot better then the DCS F-16 but the range makes this sensor a lot less useful. Check out this video where I discuss docs on the ALR-46 specifically. kzbin.info/www/bejne/m6enlqCnhtqZjLs
@BlazejBucko123
@BlazejBucko123 Күн бұрын
@@AviationPlus Hm, really looks like a bug if you compare behavior with the docs. But why would they impement it like this (or how they missed the bug) if F-4's RWR was supposed to be highly realistic.. Bummer.
@nedensevilmedim92161
@nedensevilmedim92161 2 күн бұрын
I had a chance to fly with F-4E in 1. Ana Jet Üssü it was soo good
@kontoniawon2642
@kontoniawon2642 2 күн бұрын
What variant is this F4?
@razgriz25thinf
@razgriz25thinf Күн бұрын
Looks like an F-4C based on the weapons selector group and the radar scope.
@AviationPlus
@AviationPlus Күн бұрын
Ya it is not an E
@agidotexe7167
@agidotexe7167 2 күн бұрын
u gonna be doing phantom stuff in DCS?
@AviationPlus
@AviationPlus 2 күн бұрын
Yes I will try. I am learning as fast as I can. I already noticed something about the RWR that I will share shortly.
@agidotexe7167
@agidotexe7167 2 күн бұрын
@@AviationPlus awesome
@blizzy6129
@blizzy6129 2 күн бұрын
Awesome stuff. I'm assuming the guy talking to you was a former Phantom pilot?
@AviationPlus
@AviationPlus 2 күн бұрын
Nah he was head of the Museum former military but engine troop if I remember correctly.
@BlueNexa
@BlueNexa 3 күн бұрын
This is really cool! Thank you for sharing ^^ Interesting to see how different this model is to the one we have in DCS
@spartan17696
@spartan17696 4 күн бұрын
I play DCS to chill and BMS to experience combat aviation.
@AviationPlus
@AviationPlus 4 күн бұрын
Ya DCS is pretty but Digital Combat Simulator is not living up to its name. Having Combat is important not just looks.
@spartan17696
@spartan17696 Күн бұрын
@@AviationPlus there’s so much responsibility in BMS (navigation, communication, TOS etc) that I could easily overlook the dated visuals. Plus it runs like a dream on VR with absolutely 0 stutters on my system.
@spartan17696
@spartan17696 Күн бұрын
@@AviationPlus a lot of knowledge i gained from BMS transfers to the DCS viper, but not vice versa. The A/A TGP function and bore sighting for the mavs don’t even work properly in DCS.
@rama7267
@rama7267 4 күн бұрын
I still dont understand what dynamic campaign exactly means. what is the main fun part about it. I know that DCS outside of the cockpit and airframe everything is simply trash.
@AviationPlus
@AviationPlus 3 күн бұрын
There is no need to create a mission when it comes to units everything is being made by the campaign. All you need to do is create your flight/package and you may have popup SAMs, a scramble of aircraft intercepting you, the battalion that you were attacking has moved, or a friendly flight created by the campaign took it out already. This goes on in the background even if you are not playing. I personally hate always having to create and place every unit when creating a mission.
@ILS_Aviation
@ILS_Aviation 4 күн бұрын
I make a campaign and my buddy and myself can't join eachothers lobbies? We just get a ''failed to connect to lobby'' please help?
@AviationPlus
@AviationPlus 4 күн бұрын
Have you opened ports? Have you googled how to host a server in Falcon BMS?
@MultiJp51
@MultiJp51 5 күн бұрын
nice cable catch :)
@hammock753
@hammock753 5 күн бұрын
That looks like so much fun!
@simgaminglife4392
@simgaminglife4392 5 күн бұрын
Fantastic job guys! Cool stuff 🙌 BMS is ♥️
@gump_roast
@gump_roast 5 күн бұрын
That was a great flight prime, thanks for the vid!
@ImperatorTheodosius
@ImperatorTheodosius 6 күн бұрын
Imagine saying "box" over and over again in a fighter brief ;)
@AviationPlus
@AviationPlus 6 күн бұрын
It has been a few months since this mission. I will have to watch again but did I say "box" over and over again. I know I wanted to make sure the parameters were set for everyone.
@tinglydingle
@tinglydingle 7 күн бұрын
It looks like this might have been reversed today, there's a line in the patch notes stating "Fixed: RWR displays radars in "Track" mode in the inner "Missile Launch" ring." Not had the chance to test it yet however.
@AviationPlus
@AviationPlus 7 күн бұрын
I saw this too. It seems like an aspect was fixed to match the manual. I noticed there were only 2 rings with search being the outer and Lock/Launch was on the inner ring. Now there are 3 being Search, Lock and Launch.
@tinglydingle
@tinglydingle 7 күн бұрын
@@AviationPlus I've just done some tests against an F-15, the symbol stays in the outer circle until the Eagle locked me, even at sub 5 NMi, so it's still fucked unfortunately.
@AviationPlus
@AviationPlus 7 күн бұрын
@@tinglydingle Ya seems to be still broken...but works as stated in the DCS manual. But to me it is still unusable.
@lucaswoods1155
@lucaswoods1155 8 күн бұрын
Highly unlikely the MIG-29 is friendly and is NCTR in the game?
@AviationPlus
@AviationPlus 8 күн бұрын
Yes unlikely but depending on what theater you are in they could be friendly. Yes NCTR is implemented but at that point you are too close.
@lydjeb6064
@lydjeb6064 11 күн бұрын
Is it mandatory to have a microphone and to talk directly with other players, to be able to play in multiplayer ?
@AviationPlus
@AviationPlus 11 күн бұрын
You can play without but I am sure you can understand the disadvantage you put yourself at when you don't have a microphone.
@dominikraith1871
@dominikraith1871 11 күн бұрын
Nice Video! Is it possible to get your BMS and Nvidia settings please?
@jimmysavageultrabrutal8130
@jimmysavageultrabrutal8130 12 күн бұрын
Why did you take off with ews turned on?
@AviationPlus
@AviationPlus 6 күн бұрын
Did I? Well good thing it does not affect anyone.
@argus3091
@argus3091 13 күн бұрын
Reading a few comments of people just going at each other over which is better DCS or BMS is always really depressing like fellas we all love simulators and all have the sim we prefer stop trying to make some sort of grandstand about which is "superior" you look like an ass and the people who you attract to your comment also look like asses right along with you chill out and have fun i promise your life will be better if you do this 😅❤
@AviationPlus
@AviationPlus 6 күн бұрын
Ya some a re trigger more than others.
@stealthtomcat4739
@stealthtomcat4739 13 күн бұрын
Does hotas t16000 work in it and do I have to download something else?
@AviationPlus
@AviationPlus 13 күн бұрын
The controller will work but you probably won't have enough buttons to have a full HOTAS setup. No you don't have to download anything else.
@stealthtomcat4739
@stealthtomcat4739 13 күн бұрын
@@AviationPlus Thanks for the information
@hammock753
@hammock753 15 күн бұрын
The diagrams on the post you linked to aren’t showing anymore. Can you fix that or provide another way to view them please?
@AviationPlus
@AviationPlus 15 күн бұрын
Seems like you need a login for the link now.
@Nthaniel60X
@Nthaniel60X 10 күн бұрын
@@AviationPlus Even when logged in the images do not show up.
@AviationPlus
@AviationPlus 9 күн бұрын
@@Nthaniel60X Fixed seemed like the picture origin was lost. I have replaced it and it should be good now. Thanks for letting me know.
@wallabing
@wallabing 15 күн бұрын
Played this simulator when i was 7 years old. My school sold this game at the book fair in the cafeteria. Along with Flight Unlimited, Mechwarrior 2.