That’s like asking how a b2 spirit turn

@@jadgpanzerkid that has loads of computers controlling it so it don’t spin 1 person with no computer would have to fly in a dogfight while controlling the yaw

You’ve got a point. But I guess they are stable anyway because they would have thought of that too.

+@red94mr28 The Smithsonian stored it in a wooden crate without climate control (possibly outside some) from the 1950s until the 1970s when it was moved into storage at Garber. That's why the wood structure has turned to powder from fungus rot.

@@FiveCentsPlease Go to the Smithsonian site and search. It was sitting in the corner of the restoration facility where people were restoring other artifacts in climate controlled buildings. What, you think the people restoring items didn't have heat in the winter or A/C in the summer??

@@red94mr28 Let me clarify this for you. This is from a research study of the aircraft and the preservation. From "Technical Study of the Bat Wing Ship (The Horten Ho 229 V3)", authors Lauren Horelick, Malcolm Collum, Peter McElhinney, Anna Weiss, Russell Lee, and Odile Madden from The American Institute for Conservation of History and Artistic Works, 2014. Note this passage: "The National Air Museum (as NASM was called then) acquired the Horten in 1952 when there was a shortage of storage facilities. Consequently, it sat outdoors in wooden crates from 1952 until 1974, and that is where most of its condition issues originate. Extensive plywood veneer delamination, material loss, biological growth, and coating delamination are evident throughout the aircraft. The metal components are corroded, fasteners have failed, and numerous small parts are missing."

+@Catsrule1132 On the original, the engines were wrapped in steel panels front-to-back for fire protection. That's a big reflector.

@whamtube,,Your channel and comments are irrelevant, no facts are in evidence, you are cautioned about "improper thinking", and all your comments will be stricken from the record, thanks for playing, you lose

+ @Chuck Norris The 229 was never designed to avoid radar detection and it wasn't a fighter. The Horten brothers were prototyping a bomber using tailless aircraft theories from the 1920s and 1930s, which were low drag, fuel efficiency, and speed.

The ho-229 did not have any anti-radar capabilities

I think you are the one coping lmao

Rather than being designed with a low radar signature, I've always assumed that the Germans were running low on aluminium and skilled fabricators. And of course, on locations to build them. But hell - they led the world.