No video

Hitler's Stealth Fighter

  Рет қаралды 68,599

MYTH MERCHANT FILMS

MYTH MERCHANT FILMS

5 жыл бұрын

Пікірлер: 128
@Pothead2005
@Pothead2005 4 жыл бұрын
Most exotic machine in Germany it was the most advanced in the world
@emilio2647
@emilio2647 4 жыл бұрын
Garrett Johnson I saw a similar plan like this in Captain America the first avenger movie.
@SpaceTravel1776
@SpaceTravel1776 3 жыл бұрын
Hey Vlad, call me, honey, k? Smooches!
@luigiplayer14
@luigiplayer14 2 жыл бұрын
JOJO
@HerrFresh
@HerrFresh 2 жыл бұрын
No. It’s actually horse shit.
@jesusismyhelp9005
@jesusismyhelp9005 2 жыл бұрын
@@HerrFresh let me guess your a rotc kid
@stefanpaege2046
@stefanpaege2046 2 жыл бұрын
Göring's 1000/1000/1000 airplane: 1000km/h, 1000 km range, 1000 kg of bomb weight. The wet dream of my country's ruling powers of their day.
@theidiotictroublemaker2281
@theidiotictroublemaker2281 2 жыл бұрын
Jet bombers always carry these loads and maintain the speed or can even go higher even strike jets can take go at beyond these speeds
@TinyBearTim
@TinyBearTim 2 жыл бұрын
@@theidiotictroublemaker2281 in ww2 this would have been a good 100+mph faster than most fighters
@theidiotictroublemaker2281
@theidiotictroublemaker2281 2 жыл бұрын
@@TinyBearTim yeah kinda ish but the problem with prop planes are thier pickup speed cus once a Spitfire or a Mustang looses some speed while turning it takes them a lot of time to get that speed back but jets on the other hand had no problem with this other than not able to turn fight prop planes
@tylerguynn5278
@tylerguynn5278 3 жыл бұрын
There is probably more stuff like that in area 51
@alexandrugeorgescu6366
@alexandrugeorgescu6366 Жыл бұрын
they moved most of the stuff away decades ago because Area 51 was drawing too much public attention.
@grunkug
@grunkug 3 жыл бұрын
German Engineering is good then lol
@kilianfirebolt
@kilianfirebolt 3 жыл бұрын
They were the first in space, and many rocket scientist of the us and soviet were ex-nazi germans transported to then
@Mrbimmer11
@Mrbimmer11 2 жыл бұрын
@@kilianfirebolt Germany invented the modern world u can say. Gyros computers smart bomd stg44 fuel injection night wision
@Catsrule1132
@Catsrule1132 Жыл бұрын
Grumman team: "the model (unarmed with out guns or a bomb load and made up of99% wood with no tubular steel framing and no metal jet blades) had moderate stealth characteristics" How the writers see it: the horten 229 was an advanced stealth fighter that could break through the British home island radar chain undetected
@FiveCentsPlease
@FiveCentsPlease Жыл бұрын
+@Catsrule1132 On the original, the engines were wrapped in steel panels front-to-back for fire protection. That's a big reflector.
@Future183
@Future183 2 жыл бұрын
The us stealth bombers are all based on the horten
@HerrFresh
@HerrFresh 2 жыл бұрын
No they aren’t.
@callumcoyne5850
@callumcoyne5850 2 жыл бұрын
Yes they are where do you think the scientist in America come from they come from Germany and also Britain they can’t do anything on there own just look at Americans cars etc there all shite
@cheezyrider1111
@cheezyrider1111 2 жыл бұрын
Right, we all know they’re based on the ground.
@dennism2336
@dennism2336 2 жыл бұрын
No they're not lol
@Cyricaaa
@Cyricaaa 2 жыл бұрын
@@dennism2336 thats exactly why the B2 spirit and B21 raider are all so so close to looking like the horten where do you thing they got the idea for the coating and keeping the engines inside with inlets ... so stupid
@Catsrule1132
@Catsrule1132 Жыл бұрын
"Secret government warehouse" you mean the Smithsonian restoration facility in Maryland
@red94mr28
@red94mr28 4 ай бұрын
3:08 "For the last six decades the only surviving Horton 229 has been hidden in the shadows away from prying eyes." Lol, it was in Chicago sitting outside on display in plain view before being moved to the Smithsonian's restoration facility where it sat in a corner for 6 decades.
@FiveCentsPlease
@FiveCentsPlease 3 ай бұрын
+@red94mr28 The Smithsonian stored it in a wooden crate without climate control (possibly outside some) from the 1950s until the 1970s when it was moved into storage at Garber. That's why the wood structure has turned to powder from fungus rot.
@red94mr28
@red94mr28 3 ай бұрын
@@FiveCentsPlease Go to the Smithsonian site and search. It was sitting in the corner of the restoration facility where people were restoring other artifacts in climate controlled buildings. What, you think the people restoring items didn't have heat in the winter or A/C in the summer??
@FiveCentsPlease
@FiveCentsPlease 3 ай бұрын
@@red94mr28 Let me clarify this for you. This is from a research study of the aircraft and the preservation. From "Technical Study of the Bat Wing Ship (The Horten Ho 229 V3)", authors Lauren Horelick, Malcolm Collum, Peter McElhinney, Anna Weiss, Russell Lee, and Odile Madden from The American Institute for Conservation of History and Artistic Works, 2014. Note this passage: "The National Air Museum (as NASM was called then) acquired the Horten in 1952 when there was a shortage of storage facilities. Consequently, it sat outdoors in wooden crates from 1952 until 1974, and that is where most of its condition issues originate. Extensive plywood veneer delamination, material loss, biological growth, and coating delamination are evident throughout the aircraft. The metal components are corroded, fasteners have failed, and numerous small parts are missing."
@chrislapp9468
@chrislapp9468 2 жыл бұрын
Right next to the Ark of the Covenant.
@EnterpriseXI
@EnterpriseXI 4 жыл бұрын
Great documentary
@chucknorris6640
@chucknorris6640 Жыл бұрын
American are crying that this plane wasn’t a stealth fighter and that the ho-229 didn’t inspire the B-2, watch the hole documentary, the Northrop engineers that worked on the B-2 admitted during the documentary that the 229 was indeed the first stealth fighter and an inspiration for the B-2
@FiveCentsPlease
@FiveCentsPlease Жыл бұрын
+ @Chuck Norris The 229 was never designed to avoid radar detection and it wasn't a fighter. The Horten brothers were prototyping a bomber using tailless aircraft theories from the 1920s and 1930s, which were low drag, fuel efficiency, and speed.
@chickenpurple6704
@chickenpurple6704 9 ай бұрын
The ho-229 did not have any anti-radar capabilities
@danielmolinar8669
@danielmolinar8669 8 ай бұрын
I think you are the one coping lmao
@roxximusik8958
@roxximusik8958 3 ай бұрын
Rather than being designed with a low radar signature, I've always assumed that the Germans were running low on aluminium and skilled fabricators. And of course, on locations to build them. But hell - they led the world.
@chumleywarner7245
@chumleywarner7245 2 жыл бұрын
t says here that it never flew over the USA , checkout Kenneth Arnold sighting 1947
@FiveCentsPlease
@FiveCentsPlease 2 жыл бұрын
+ chumley warner The V3 never flew at all. It was incomplete when it was found in the Gotha factory and the wings were 75 miles away. The US gave it to the British to study over the summer of 1945 and there was some discussion of attempting flight from both the British and the Americans but it did not fly. Northrop had their own flying wing designs and it is likely that Arnold spotted a test flight.
@chumleywarner7245
@chumleywarner7245 2 жыл бұрын
@@FiveCentsPlease Well all I can say is the drawing looks nothing like a Northrop wing non of his had that classic tail.
@roxximusik8958
@roxximusik8958 3 ай бұрын
@@FiveCentsPlease The similarity in silhouette struck me too, but I believe that Arnold claimed to have seen five or more crescent-shaped craft flying in formation. Their trajectory wasn't regular either. I very much doubt that either Northrop or the US Army Air Force of the time would have had so many trustworthy prototypes. 👽
@hughjohnson2674
@hughjohnson2674 2 ай бұрын
The engines were last suppoded between 20 and 30 hours they were lucky to get 10, same with the 266. Useless, as a realistic combat aircraft. The Mosquito also had a low Radar reflective capability. An interesting aircraft, but the Horten was totally impractical.
@errornamenotfound2513
@errornamenotfound2513 2 жыл бұрын
Dafaq? Ho229 wasn't a stealth plane at all.
@FiveCentsPlease
@FiveCentsPlease Жыл бұрын
+ Error: Name Not Found Correct, it was not.
@mske903
@mske903 11 күн бұрын
it had stealth features, because it was made of wood. but also the coating, to some extent, showed stealth features. so the constructors indeed wanted to make the Ho229 a stealth jet fighter. the biggest problem for the german Luftwaffe, especially during the Battle over Britain, was not the british planes but their more advanced Radar system. so it made sense, to experiment on something new to counter this problem.
@Beelzebububble
@Beelzebububble 8 ай бұрын
Can't trust any 'truth' from this company. They're great at suing anyone who exposes them though.
@TinyBearTim
@TinyBearTim 3 ай бұрын
How would a pilot even get this thing to turn without going in to a flat spin
@jadgpanzerkid
@jadgpanzerkid 3 ай бұрын
That’s like asking how a b2 spirit turn
@TinyBearTim
@TinyBearTim 3 ай бұрын
@@jadgpanzerkid that has loads of computers controlling it so it don’t spin 1 person with no computer would have to fly in a dogfight while controlling the yaw
@jadgpanzerkid
@jadgpanzerkid 3 ай бұрын
You’ve got a point. But I guess they are stable anyway because they would have thought of that too.
@brycewakefield6565
@brycewakefield6565 3 жыл бұрын
can it fly to hawaii non stop?
@Cxn1323
@Cxn1323 3 жыл бұрын
*interested japanese noises*
@tuanvandersluis9100
@tuanvandersluis9100 2 жыл бұрын
ho 229 is not the only fighter made in wood. the de havalen mosketo fighter/boomer is one to.
@enricoghirardelli2498
@enricoghirardelli2498 20 күн бұрын
Si,ma la Gran Bretagna,non sono mai riusciti a conquistarla! Come mai?
@christianguenther1276
@christianguenther1276 2 жыл бұрын
And the Americans are thinking: " Uhhh, what is it? Are the Krauts smart enough to build something like this? The answer to these irritatingly stupid questions is YES, WE GERMANS WERE SMART ENOUGH TO BUILD THIS. After all, we Germans put the first men on the moon.
@FiveCentsPlease
@FiveCentsPlease 2 жыл бұрын
+ Christian Guenther Northrop started building his YB-35 in 1941, years before the Horten brothers began their 229 program.
@christianguenther1276
@christianguenther1276 2 жыл бұрын
@@FiveCentsPlease Agreed BUT the Northop was Piston- powered, whereas the Horten was jet-powered. A huge difference in performance. Check out the KZbin video the mock-up of the Horten that was built by the Northrop-Grumann skunk works. They tested the Horten's stealth capabilities.
@FiveCentsPlease
@FiveCentsPlease 2 жыл бұрын
@@christianguenther1276 The Horten brothers started with piston and glider versions too. They should get credit for flying a wing with jet engines first and for the aerodynamic and flight control experiments. Stealth wasn't their motive, more coincidental and wishful thinking years later. Flying wing theories were speed and fuel efficiency, not avoiding radar. Northrop's work was slowed down by sub-contractor infighting and because it was a much larger design. And his work unfortunately cut short by politics and money by the first Sec. of the new Air Force.
@dimitrijestankovic6199
@dimitrijestankovic6199 2 жыл бұрын
@@FiveCentsPlease Brothers Horten worked under pressure, in worse circumstances, and still better then the others.Why don't you admit that germans are the best in science.
@FiveCentsPlease
@FiveCentsPlease 2 жыл бұрын
@@dimitrijestankovic6199 They didn't invent the flying wing. They didn't invent stealth. Neither did the Germans or the Americans. The brothers deserve every credit for their ideas and innovation but there has been far too much mystique around what was just an experimental development program that didn't get past infancy before the war ended.
@andrearomanelli6259
@andrearomanelli6259 Жыл бұрын
No engines musica !no Tesla!UFO Technology!fast and furious!Augsburg Abruzzo!Steve Hawkins diverso!
@exeaqtorder6645
@exeaqtorder6645 3 жыл бұрын
Horton 229 vs the u2 spy plane
@tinydooddan1178
@tinydooddan1178 3 жыл бұрын
ho229 sadly loses. it can only 1000kmph but its original designers could take it and remake it to make it better
@macmac0712
@macmac0712 3 жыл бұрын
@Tiny Dood Dan “only” 1000kmph? the u2 could only do like 450 and plus the u2 has like 0 weapons
@tinydooddan1178
@tinydooddan1178 3 жыл бұрын
@@macmac0712 dont forget that its a prototype and nearly none were built other than just 1. and the fact that an alloy frame would break under pressure. so b2 still wins since theres more itterations and more of it. though the thing is, i beleive horten wins. but at the same time i doubt that it would. its a mix of emotions
@noahwail2444
@noahwail2444 2 жыл бұрын
This clip is stolen from a National Geografic doku, about building a replica and test it foe stealth abillities....
@derdiedasananas8236
@derdiedasananas8236 Жыл бұрын
Do you have a link to the Doku because I would be interested
@roxximusik8958
@roxximusik8958 3 ай бұрын
I did wonder what became of the rest of this documentary !
@pilotmiami1
@pilotmiami1 2 жыл бұрын
Where to see tudey???
@MageOtter27
@MageOtter27 2 жыл бұрын
Its not a stealth figher lmao
@theidiotictroublemaker2281
@theidiotictroublemaker2281 2 жыл бұрын
Its not a full fledged stealth fighter as the f22 or su 52 but because of the shape the thing is very hard to read in a radar!
@MageOtter27
@MageOtter27 2 жыл бұрын
@@theidiotictroublemaker2281 yeah i know but i wanna say it was accidentaly "stealth"
@theidiotictroublemaker2281
@theidiotictroublemaker2281 2 жыл бұрын
@@MageOtter27 yeah u can say that cus it was accidental
@MageOtter27
@MageOtter27 2 жыл бұрын
@@theidiotictroublemaker2281 yep
@FiveCentsPlease
@FiveCentsPlease 2 жыл бұрын
@@MageOtter27 Put "Hitler" in front of anything to make it sound sinister. Goering approved the project and it wasn't for stealth or for a fighter. May as well be Hitler's toilet brush.
@andrearomanelli6259
@andrearomanelli6259 Жыл бұрын
Abruzzo GEO Map Jet 26/72 0Tarierung
@willywilmouth
@willywilmouth 2 жыл бұрын
.........Beaucoup de documentaires dur le HO 229, une autre bonne vidéo, mais........le Horten était un avion furtif ???
@derdiedasananas8236
@derdiedasananas8236 Жыл бұрын
It was a "stealth Plane" because the shape made it harder to pickup on radar
@saiko9472
@saiko9472 10 ай бұрын
All aircarft are be move to US under the name code of stealing nazi weapon😂
@chickenpurple6704
@chickenpurple6704 9 ай бұрын
Me when I spread misinformation on the Internet
@user-ph6vc3nk8k
@user-ph6vc3nk8k 3 ай бұрын
Horten ho 229
@alexanderholtmann2344
@alexanderholtmann2344 Жыл бұрын
where is the real ho 229 v3 cannons?
@FiveCentsPlease
@FiveCentsPlease Жыл бұрын
+ Alexander Holtmann The V3 third prototype that survives was not an armed prototype. It was unfinished and never flown. Inside the Gotha workshop where the V3 was found in mid-April 1945 were three more prototypes under construction and I think one of those had mounts for cannons. I'm pretty sure that the remaining three prototypes were destroyed in place by Patton's forces or Allied intelligence as the fall of Germany accelerated.
@machoalphabarbershop2569
@machoalphabarbershop2569 10 ай бұрын
Y aun asi disen que esta tecnología no es rusia ., ahora es de Estados Unidos
@HerrFresh
@HerrFresh 2 жыл бұрын
It’s not a stealth fighter.
@Richardbottlik
@Richardbottlik 2 жыл бұрын
Yes it was a first stealth fighter
@FiveCentsPlease
@FiveCentsPlease Жыл бұрын
@@Richardbottlik It wasn't a fighter and stealth was not part of the design. Low radar profile was inherent to flying wings. The 229 program was designing a medium bomber and it only achieved three different prototypes.
@Richardbottlik
@Richardbottlik Жыл бұрын
@@FiveCentsPlease Horten brothers did not wanted to build stealth plane at first but after V2 prototype they found that it have much smaller radar detection than normal plane. So if it will be used in 1945/46 it could be a first stealth plane.You can watch a video about how they made a replica (not flyworthy) and test it on radar.
@Richardbottlik
@Richardbottlik Жыл бұрын
@@FiveCentsPlease it was a fighter bomber
@Richardbottlik
@Richardbottlik Жыл бұрын
Was” not will
@andrearomanelli6259
@andrearomanelli6259 Жыл бұрын
1kmh/sec ..3.39 million km fly! Magnetic Steve Hawking kalkulation Universe chassy UFO alone!!!resultati 3 D and not 4D collision Is not to....Titanium Zone Universe Magnetic result bivalente system!engine!
@mrk5134
@mrk5134 3 жыл бұрын
Horten
@JohnAnderson-po1yh
@JohnAnderson-po1yh 3 жыл бұрын
german blod tho
@mpdmpd8118
@mpdmpd8118 2 жыл бұрын
so this is the b2 design is from...:D
@HerrFresh
@HerrFresh 2 жыл бұрын
No
@errornamenotfound2513
@errornamenotfound2513 2 жыл бұрын
It's not.
@fiqaaljafri5887
@fiqaaljafri5887 Жыл бұрын
German engineering NO 1 . Soviet NO2. Others copy them . Lol.
@thethirdman225
@thethirdman225 3 жыл бұрын
Nonsense. Absolute nonsense.
@tienta8362
@tienta8362 2 жыл бұрын
b2
@captainboose8788
@captainboose8788 2 жыл бұрын
Nope
Here Is Why The Horten 229 Is Garbage In Air RB
13:22
DEFYN
Рет қаралды 161 М.
Which Modern Plane Company Built Hitler's Luftwaffe?
8:02
Mark Felton Productions
Рет қаралды 236 М.
ROLLING DOWN
00:20
Natan por Aí
Рет қаралды 7 МЛН
小宇宙竟然尿裤子!#小丑#家庭#搞笑
00:26
家庭搞笑日记
Рет қаралды 32 МЛН
НЫСАНА КОНЦЕРТ 2024
2:26:34
Нысана театры
Рет қаралды 1,8 МЛН
Doing This Instead Of Studying.. 😳
00:12
Jojo Sim
Рет қаралды 30 МЛН
When A Gang Leader Confronted Muhammad Ali
11:43
Boxing After Dark
Рет қаралды 6 МЛН
Hitlers Stealth Fighter
50:58
MYTH MERCHANT FILMS
Рет қаралды 39 М.
Secret German Flying Wing Nearly Changed the War
10:20
Project Da Vinci
Рет қаралды 494 М.
Top 11 Insane Nazi Aircraft Ideas That Never Took Off
12:35
Found And Explained
Рет қаралды 1 МЛН
Not a Toy: World's Scariest Aircraft  | Last Moments
11:29
Qxir
Рет қаралды 3,5 МЛН
The Ultimate Flanker - Su-35S
10:58
Australian Military Aviation History
Рет қаралды 91 М.
Why Protecting Tanks is Getting Much More Difficult
12:36
Not What You Think
Рет қаралды 13 МЛН
Horten Ho. 229 - Hitler's UFO
7:02
Mark Felton Productions
Рет қаралды 2,3 МЛН
Flying Wings - John K. Northrop's Final Interview - 1979
28:07
Classic Airliners & Vintage Pop Culture
Рет қаралды 254 М.
Hitler’s Seven Jet Aircraft
18:53
Red Wrench Films
Рет қаралды 439 М.
ROLLING DOWN
00:20
Natan por Aí
Рет қаралды 7 МЛН