Most exotic machine in Germany it was the most advanced in the world
@emilio26474 жыл бұрын
Garrett Johnson I saw a similar plan like this in Captain America the first avenger movie.
@SpaceTravel17763 жыл бұрын
Hey Vlad, call me, honey, k? Smooches!
@luigiplayer143 жыл бұрын
JOJO
@HerrFresh2 жыл бұрын
No. It’s actually horse shit.
@jesusismyhelp90052 жыл бұрын
@@HerrFresh let me guess your a rotc kid
@stefanpaege20463 жыл бұрын
Göring's 1000/1000/1000 airplane: 1000km/h, 1000 km range, 1000 kg of bomb weight. The wet dream of my country's ruling powers of their day.
@theidiotictroublemaker22813 жыл бұрын
Jet bombers always carry these loads and maintain the speed or can even go higher even strike jets can take go at beyond these speeds
@TinyBearTim2 жыл бұрын
@@theidiotictroublemaker2281 in ww2 this would have been a good 100+mph faster than most fighters
@theidiotictroublemaker22812 жыл бұрын
@@TinyBearTim yeah kinda ish but the problem with prop planes are thier pickup speed cus once a Spitfire or a Mustang looses some speed while turning it takes them a lot of time to get that speed back but jets on the other hand had no problem with this other than not able to turn fight prop planes
@tylerguynn52784 жыл бұрын
There is probably more stuff like that in area 51
@alexandrugeorgescu6366 Жыл бұрын
they moved most of the stuff away decades ago because Area 51 was drawing too much public attention.
@grunkug3 жыл бұрын
German Engineering is good then lol
@kilianfirebolt3 жыл бұрын
They were the first in space, and many rocket scientist of the us and soviet were ex-nazi germans transported to then
@Mrbimmer112 жыл бұрын
@@kilianfirebolt Germany invented the modern world u can say. Gyros computers smart bomd stg44 fuel injection night wision
@red94mr287 ай бұрын
3:08 "For the last six decades the only surviving Horton 229 has been hidden in the shadows away from prying eyes." Lol, it was in Chicago sitting outside on display in plain view before being moved to the Smithsonian's restoration facility where it sat in a corner for 6 decades.
@FiveCentsPlease7 ай бұрын
+@red94mr28 The Smithsonian stored it in a wooden crate without climate control (possibly outside some) from the 1950s until the 1970s when it was moved into storage at Garber. That's why the wood structure has turned to powder from fungus rot.
@red94mr287 ай бұрын
@@FiveCentsPlease Go to the Smithsonian site and search. It was sitting in the corner of the restoration facility where people were restoring other artifacts in climate controlled buildings. What, you think the people restoring items didn't have heat in the winter or A/C in the summer??
@FiveCentsPlease6 ай бұрын
@@red94mr28 Let me clarify this for you. This is from a research study of the aircraft and the preservation. From "Technical Study of the Bat Wing Ship (The Horten Ho 229 V3)", authors Lauren Horelick, Malcolm Collum, Peter McElhinney, Anna Weiss, Russell Lee, and Odile Madden from The American Institute for Conservation of History and Artistic Works, 2014. Note this passage: "The National Air Museum (as NASM was called then) acquired the Horten in 1952 when there was a shortage of storage facilities. Consequently, it sat outdoors in wooden crates from 1952 until 1974, and that is where most of its condition issues originate. Extensive plywood veneer delamination, material loss, biological growth, and coating delamination are evident throughout the aircraft. The metal components are corroded, fasteners have failed, and numerous small parts are missing."
@Catsrule1132 Жыл бұрын
"Secret government warehouse" you mean the Smithsonian restoration facility in Maryland
@Catsrule1132 Жыл бұрын
Grumman team: "the model (unarmed with out guns or a bomb load and made up of99% wood with no tubular steel framing and no metal jet blades) had moderate stealth characteristics" How the writers see it: the horten 229 was an advanced stealth fighter that could break through the British home island radar chain undetected
@FiveCentsPlease Жыл бұрын
+@Catsrule1132 On the original, the engines were wrapped in steel panels front-to-back for fire protection. That's a big reflector.
@Future1833 жыл бұрын
The us stealth bombers are all based on the horten
@HerrFresh2 жыл бұрын
No they aren’t.
@callumcoyne58502 жыл бұрын
Yes they are where do you think the scientist in America come from they come from Germany and also Britain they can’t do anything on there own just look at Americans cars etc there all shite
@cheezyrider11112 жыл бұрын
Right, we all know they’re based on the ground.
@dennism23362 жыл бұрын
No they're not lol
@Cyricaaa2 жыл бұрын
@@dennism2336 thats exactly why the B2 spirit and B21 raider are all so so close to looking like the horten where do you thing they got the idea for the coating and keeping the engines inside with inlets ... so stupid
@chrislapp94682 жыл бұрын
Right next to the Ark of the Covenant.
@EnterpriseXI4 жыл бұрын
Great documentary
@chumleywarner72453 жыл бұрын
t says here that it never flew over the USA , checkout Kenneth Arnold sighting 1947
@FiveCentsPlease3 жыл бұрын
+ chumley warner The V3 never flew at all. It was incomplete when it was found in the Gotha factory and the wings were 75 miles away. The US gave it to the British to study over the summer of 1945 and there was some discussion of attempting flight from both the British and the Americans but it did not fly. Northrop had their own flying wing designs and it is likely that Arnold spotted a test flight.
@chumleywarner72453 жыл бұрын
@@FiveCentsPlease Well all I can say is the drawing looks nothing like a Northrop wing non of his had that classic tail.
@roxximusik89587 ай бұрын
@@FiveCentsPlease The similarity in silhouette struck me too, but I believe that Arnold claimed to have seen five or more crescent-shaped craft flying in formation. Their trajectory wasn't regular either. I very much doubt that either Northrop or the US Army Air Force of the time would have had so many trustworthy prototypes. 👽
@MC-nc1ib20 күн бұрын
Where is the rest of the show
@Beelzebububble Жыл бұрын
Can't trust any 'truth' from this company. They're great at suing anyone who exposes them though.
@errornamenotfound25132 жыл бұрын
Dafaq? Ho229 wasn't a stealth plane at all.
@FiveCentsPlease2 жыл бұрын
+ Error: Name Not Found Correct, it was not.
@mske9033 ай бұрын
it had stealth features, because it was made of wood. but also the coating, to some extent, showed stealth features. so the constructors indeed wanted to make the Ho229 a stealth jet fighter. the biggest problem for the german Luftwaffe, especially during the Battle over Britain, was not the british planes but their more advanced Radar system. so it made sense, to experiment on something new to counter this problem.
@chucknorris6640 Жыл бұрын
American are crying that this plane wasn’t a stealth fighter and that the ho-229 didn’t inspire the B-2, watch the hole documentary, the Northrop engineers that worked on the B-2 admitted during the documentary that the 229 was indeed the first stealth fighter and an inspiration for the B-2
@FiveCentsPlease Жыл бұрын
+ @Chuck Norris The 229 was never designed to avoid radar detection and it wasn't a fighter. The Horten brothers were prototyping a bomber using tailless aircraft theories from the 1920s and 1930s, which were low drag, fuel efficiency, and speed.
@chickenpurple6704 Жыл бұрын
The ho-229 did not have any anti-radar capabilities
@danielmolinar8669 Жыл бұрын
I think you are the one coping lmao
@roxximusik89587 ай бұрын
Rather than being designed with a low radar signature, I've always assumed that the Germans were running low on aluminium and skilled fabricators. And of course, on locations to build them. But hell - they led the world.
@hughjohnson26745 ай бұрын
The engines were last suppoded between 20 and 30 hours they were lucky to get 10, same with the 266. Useless, as a realistic combat aircraft. The Mosquito also had a low Radar reflective capability. An interesting aircraft, but the Horten was totally impractical.
@brycewakefield65653 жыл бұрын
can it fly to hawaii non stop?
@Cxn13233 жыл бұрын
*interested japanese noises*
@TinyBearTim7 ай бұрын
How would a pilot even get this thing to turn without going in to a flat spin
@jadgpanzerkid6 ай бұрын
That’s like asking how a b2 spirit turn
@TinyBearTim6 ай бұрын
@@jadgpanzerkid that has loads of computers controlling it so it don’t spin 1 person with no computer would have to fly in a dogfight while controlling the yaw
@jadgpanzerkid6 ай бұрын
You’ve got a point. But I guess they are stable anyway because they would have thought of that too.
@EnergyWaver19x422 ай бұрын
It's not stealth, it has so much wooden part so it's makes less contact with radar.
@ProdRudeBoyT3 жыл бұрын
Horton 229 vs the u2 spy plane
@tinydooddan11783 жыл бұрын
ho229 sadly loses. it can only 1000kmph but its original designers could take it and remake it to make it better
@macmac07123 жыл бұрын
@Tiny Dood Dan “only” 1000kmph? the u2 could only do like 450 and plus the u2 has like 0 weapons
@tinydooddan11783 жыл бұрын
@@macmac0712 dont forget that its a prototype and nearly none were built other than just 1. and the fact that an alloy frame would break under pressure. so b2 still wins since theres more itterations and more of it. though the thing is, i beleive horten wins. but at the same time i doubt that it would. its a mix of emotions
@andrearomanelli62592 жыл бұрын
No engines musica !no Tesla!UFO Technology!fast and furious!Augsburg Abruzzo!Steve Hawkins diverso!
@enricoghirardelli24984 ай бұрын
Si,ma la Gran Bretagna,non sono mai riusciti a conquistarla! Come mai?
@noahwail24443 жыл бұрын
This clip is stolen from a National Geografic doku, about building a replica and test it foe stealth abillities....
@derdiedasananas8236 Жыл бұрын
Do you have a link to the Doku because I would be interested
@roxximusik89587 ай бұрын
I did wonder what became of the rest of this documentary !
@pilotmiami13 жыл бұрын
Where to see tudey???
@willywilmouth3 жыл бұрын
.........Beaucoup de documentaires dur le HO 229, une autre bonne vidéo, mais........le Horten était un avion furtif ???
@derdiedasananas8236 Жыл бұрын
It was a "stealth Plane" because the shape made it harder to pickup on radar
@alexanderholtmann23442 жыл бұрын
where is the real ho 229 v3 cannons?
@FiveCentsPlease2 жыл бұрын
+ Alexander Holtmann The V3 third prototype that survives was not an armed prototype. It was unfinished and never flown. Inside the Gotha workshop where the V3 was found in mid-April 1945 were three more prototypes under construction and I think one of those had mounts for cannons. I'm pretty sure that the remaining three prototypes were destroyed in place by Patton's forces or Allied intelligence as the fall of Germany accelerated.
@andrearomanelli6259 Жыл бұрын
Abruzzo GEO Map Jet 26/72 0Tarierung
@chickenpurple6704 Жыл бұрын
Me when I spread misinformation on the Internet
@moneyisking777 Жыл бұрын
All aircarft are be move to US under the name code of stealing nazi weapon😂
@MageOtter273 жыл бұрын
Its not a stealth figher lmao
@theidiotictroublemaker22813 жыл бұрын
Its not a full fledged stealth fighter as the f22 or su 52 but because of the shape the thing is very hard to read in a radar!
@MageOtter273 жыл бұрын
@@theidiotictroublemaker2281 yeah i know but i wanna say it was accidentaly "stealth"
@theidiotictroublemaker22813 жыл бұрын
@@MageOtter27 yeah u can say that cus it was accidental
@MageOtter273 жыл бұрын
@@theidiotictroublemaker2281 yep
@FiveCentsPlease3 жыл бұрын
@@MageOtter27 Put "Hitler" in front of anything to make it sound sinister. Goering approved the project and it wasn't for stealth or for a fighter. May as well be Hitler's toilet brush.
@christianguenther12763 жыл бұрын
And the Americans are thinking: " Uhhh, what is it? Are the Krauts smart enough to build something like this? The answer to these irritatingly stupid questions is YES, WE GERMANS WERE SMART ENOUGH TO BUILD THIS. After all, we Germans put the first men on the moon.
@FiveCentsPlease3 жыл бұрын
+ Christian Guenther Northrop started building his YB-35 in 1941, years before the Horten brothers began their 229 program.
@christianguenther12763 жыл бұрын
@@FiveCentsPlease Agreed BUT the Northop was Piston- powered, whereas the Horten was jet-powered. A huge difference in performance. Check out the KZbin video the mock-up of the Horten that was built by the Northrop-Grumann skunk works. They tested the Horten's stealth capabilities.
@FiveCentsPlease3 жыл бұрын
@@christianguenther1276 The Horten brothers started with piston and glider versions too. They should get credit for flying a wing with jet engines first and for the aerodynamic and flight control experiments. Stealth wasn't their motive, more coincidental and wishful thinking years later. Flying wing theories were speed and fuel efficiency, not avoiding radar. Northrop's work was slowed down by sub-contractor infighting and because it was a much larger design. And his work unfortunately cut short by politics and money by the first Sec. of the new Air Force.
@dimitrijestankovic61993 жыл бұрын
@@FiveCentsPlease Brothers Horten worked under pressure, in worse circumstances, and still better then the others.Why don't you admit that germans are the best in science.
@FiveCentsPlease3 жыл бұрын
@@dimitrijestankovic6199 They didn't invent the flying wing. They didn't invent stealth. Neither did the Germans or the Americans. The brothers deserve every credit for their ideas and innovation but there has been far too much mystique around what was just an experimental development program that didn't get past infancy before the war ended.
@machoalphabarbershop2569 Жыл бұрын
Y aun asi disen que esta tecnología no es rusia ., ahora es de Estados Unidos
@Aviator296 ай бұрын
Horten ho 229
@mpdmpd81183 жыл бұрын
so this is the b2 design is from...:D
@HerrFresh2 жыл бұрын
No
@errornamenotfound25132 жыл бұрын
It's not.
@HerrFresh2 жыл бұрын
It’s not a stealth fighter.
@Richardbottlik2 жыл бұрын
Yes it was a first stealth fighter
@FiveCentsPlease2 жыл бұрын
@@Richardbottlik It wasn't a fighter and stealth was not part of the design. Low radar profile was inherent to flying wings. The 229 program was designing a medium bomber and it only achieved three different prototypes.
@Richardbottlik2 жыл бұрын
@@FiveCentsPlease Horten brothers did not wanted to build stealth plane at first but after V2 prototype they found that it have much smaller radar detection than normal plane. So if it will be used in 1945/46 it could be a first stealth plane.You can watch a video about how they made a replica (not flyworthy) and test it on radar.
@Richardbottlik2 жыл бұрын
@@FiveCentsPlease it was a fighter bomber
@Richardbottlik2 жыл бұрын
Was” not will
@JohnAnderson-po1yh3 жыл бұрын
german blod tho
@andrearomanelli62592 жыл бұрын
1kmh/sec ..3.39 million km fly! Magnetic Steve Hawking kalkulation Universe chassy UFO alone!!!resultati 3 D and not 4D collision Is not to....Titanium Zone Universe Magnetic result bivalente system!engine!
@thethirdman2253 жыл бұрын
Nonsense. Absolute nonsense.
@mrk51343 жыл бұрын
Horten
@fiqaaljafri5887 Жыл бұрын
German engineering NO 1 . Soviet NO2. Others copy them . Lol.
@tuanvandersluis91002 жыл бұрын
ho 229 is not the only fighter made in wood. the de havalen mosketo fighter/boomer is one to.