3 weeks left. 🔥💥🎉🔥🎉💥🎉🔥

Drops to the 40s on a 4090. LMAO, pretty sure game will be unplayable at release for most.

After a BUNCH of testing and preferred settings I settled on this: AMD 7800X3D Nvidia RTX 4090 32GB DDR5 6000 CL30 Resolution: 3440x1440 Nvidia Driver: 572.16 DLSS 310.2.1 (Preset K) Frame Generation: Off Preset: Ultra DLSS Quality Vignette: Off Cloud Quality: Medium Volumetric Fog: Low Variable Rate Shading: Balanced Raytracing: Off (Interesting note, RT is NEVER enabled on any preset. You need to manually enable it. Also, High and Medium's differences are imperceptible, but High cost 10 fps and 3000 points when enabled) Nvidia Reflex/Nvidia Reflex+Boost: Off. Enabling this actually saw performance take a 5-8% hit for whatever reason Score: 33,850 Average FPS: 99.942 I wanted to use RT so badly, and if I drop to DLSS Balanced (Preset K) I CAN get RT Medium with a decent FPS average, but the RT reflections (what RT is used for in Wilds) are not that much better than screen space ones. It's going to be a super situational setting, meaning sometimes your performance will nosedive depending on the setting (for example, Scarlet Forest pools of water). I'm going for a more stable, high framerate experience. Edit: There were also settings that hurt my FPS if I lowered them, such as Character Render Distance going from Highest to Medium. My guess is that lowering this put me more into a CPU limited situation. Lowest (No Upscaling) @ 3440x1440: 37981, Average FPS 111.44. Plains FPS was 82-85 FPS Low (No Upscaling) @ 3440x1440: 35977, Average FPS 105.89 FPS, Plains FPS was 78-83 Medium (No Upscaling) @ 3440x1440: 31500, Average FPS 92.39, Plains FPS was 75-79 High (No Upscaling) @ 3440x1440: 30025, Average FPS 87.97 FPS Plains FPS was 68-75 Ultra (No Upscaling) @ 3440x1440: 30398, Average FPS 89.11 FPS Plains FPS was 60-69 Ultra Preset + No Upscaling got an interesting result. It's acutally MORE performant than High Something in Medium kills performance from Low, and Medium in general looks like MH World Ultra (No Upscaling) + Rendering Distance Medium @ 3440x1440: 29551, Average FPS 86.57 FPS Plains FPS was 59-66 The game is absolutely going to need mods because I remember World was found to have some baffling rendering decisions that were chewing up cycles but doing largely nothing, and some settings (Volumetric Fog) were hideous performance black holes.

My set up is similar to yours but I've 64GB of RAM and a Ryzen 9 7950x. My average with the same settings and ray tracing on high was 114fps. I have no idea why yours is lower.

remember folks .. this is only the first area of the game... you better pray your hardware can survive on their new lava area which is gurantee to kill your device lmfao. maybe, until you see Nu Udra that ink squid with its flame... I'm worried that its flame will not only burn your hunter, it will burn your CPU and GPU as well lmfao

These people in the comment flexing their fancy ass rig 😭

Tested my rig (R5 7600X + RTX 3080) and can only reach stable 60fps @1440p if I use upscaling even if I use the Medium preset (I ain't using Low & not touching frame gen). Using upscaling and/or frame gen as mandatory requirements to reach 60fps is embarrassing. They can't even get the slower paced RE games to run perfectly on PC. What makes them think the RE engine can handle this level of open world? This is also not unprecedented. Dragon's Dogma 2 happened. Did they just forgot to learn anything from that game?

Yeah, I don't know about the scores. Like you showed, and I've seen people posting on Steam, you can have different scores, and also it doesn't match performance with frames. I've seen people with lower scores, but higher frames and vice versa. I just go by FPS at this point.

They shadow dropped the benchmark tool as well.

"Risen" monsters was only a rise thing. As for shagaru comeing back. It might get the basarios treatment. As in, just because it is here dosen't mean shagy is too

according to gaijin hunter, he said on X that he found out that turning on ray tracing on high gave more performance for whatever reason. it seemed that it has happened to you too DG! i havent checked mine yet, but i wonder if it has happened to anyone else

Every department of Capcom should be like this. Even other gaming companies should take notes on how the monster hunter team cares for their game and how considerate they are with the players feed back and actually make the changes players want or close to what we want

Your nvidea drivers are out of date

I think it's scoring based on frames rendered not generated. Turning Frame gen on makes overall frames higher, but rendered frames lower.

7900xtx/9800x3d 4k, avg fps 74.90, ultra settings, RT high no FG, score 25538

my CPU : 13500 GPU : RTX4050 my average is like 80+

CPU : Ryzen 5 3500X GPU : Zotac RTX 2060 6gb Graphics : Lowest Avg FPS : 51.49 Score : 17572 (Good)

CPU: Intel Core 17-13700k GPU: RTX 4070 TI Graphics: High Resolution: 2560 x 1440 Raytracing: Off Average FPS: 146.67 Score: 25021

Sad i cant run that. see you nexr time hunters. xD

Frame Gen is definitely gonna be the move with most mid range to older high end setups. 1440p with an RX 6750 XT, Ryzen 5 5600X and 32 gb ram and im on ultra with frame gen on fsr 3 on quality with 90% upscale resolution and im averaging 90 frames. if I turn my settings down to high/med it still looks really good and averages 110. there was very minimal if any ghosting or artifacting as well so it seems like the fsr and frame gen is doing much better from the older builds of this game ive seen. turning frame gen off didnt really make it look any better but it dropped my frames down to an average of 50-60. no fsr 3 was pretty much out of the question cause it would dip down to 30-40 frames even on medium/high settings and low settings it just looked bad.

I updated my drivers and was getting the same results Then I went into the Nvidia app where you get the drivers and went into global settings and for some reason my fps was locked at 70 so I clicked force fps off and was getting 150 with frame gen and high to low 100's without it on and I also have a 4090.

My results at 1440p with a 7900 XT GPU, 7800X3D CPU, 32GB of RAM, Settings on Ultra, Upscaling: off, Frame gen: off, and Ray Tracing: off I got an excellent score of 28002 with an average 82fps. Turning RT on sees a drop of 9fps on average, turning Upscaling to quality with 0.50 sharpness sees an average increase of 17fps and last I ran a test with Frame gen and got an average of 164fps. One thing I noticed was that the AMD native AA option on Upscaling did horrible and actually lowered my FPS score to like 66 from the 82 average so I don't think that one is working correctly.

The score is just the total amount of frames your computer produced during the run, but it seems that if you turn on frame generation, it just cuts the score in half to tell you what it believes the real performance is, which is typically way off lol. So, whatever score it gives you with frame gen on, just know you got around double the score if they didn't make the correction. Hope this helps!

you should be getting better frames, maybe its the recording software?

For those of us Linux gamers, I put the benchmark into PopOs after my windows test. My setup is the same as his, except my monitor is 1440p. It ran natively but it didn't have RT and crashed a few times. Frame gen worked like windows but even turned off there were motion artifacts which could be down to the aliasing options. Depsite that on ultra, I got avg 120 fps w/ fg and avg of 90 without. Note: I couldn't get the beta to run in Linux in Nov. Also since it is Linux, your mileage is going to vary on your distro and drivers. Hopefully if the benchmark runs in linux then maybe there is a graphical sweetspot or setting I'm not using that would help.

Remember the full game has Denuvo if your pc relyon frame gen to get above 60 fps you will not have a good experience with the game

I got 20109 for AMD RX 7800 XT / AMD Ryzen 5 5600 (non-X) on 1440p Ultra preset, no HDR, frame gen ON

Wait up... is my 4080 Super faster than a 4090? I'm running Ultra graphics with Ray tracing on and fps is at 133. Without Raytracing it is 154fps.

Beautiful gameplay

Pretty sure this game will stutter like hell in actual gameplay and more complex environments. Losing my faith on this game. I still don't see the advantage of making a game that barely runs stable in high end PCs instead of making a game that runs well for most hardware and everyone can enjoy. It's sad where game development is going.

Charged staff randomly stopped working, anyone know why?

GOREEEEE

Same specs as me 13900k and rtx 4090. I was getting much better frames with frame gen off and ultra. Not sure why yours is dipping so badly.

my setup will not be able to handle mh wilds, its a shame but i guess i can wait a year or 2 till i can afford an upgrade

yeah im turning stuff to low an mid with frame gen getting like 80

rtx 4080 super , ryzen 7 9800x3d , raytraicing on y frame ,dlss quality 99 fps

Something off with your setup, my old ass Ryzen 7 5800X3d 32GB of DDR4 lol and a 4080super MSI Surpim X gets 105fps with your same setting FG and RT high at 2160p. Wonder is your Rebar is enabled in the Bios. You should be getting like 125-130fps Dear Gamer just a heads up.

Idk if someone could help me with this, my specs are a 7900xtx, a ryzen 7 7800x3d 32gb of ram with the last drivers of my gpu and all running it in a 4k monitor running it in ultra and just as I enter the game theres input lag when I move the cursor is laggy and in my finals fps are 40-45 even tho I see people with the same rig as mine and also same settings with 80-100 fps. I dont really know what to do I try everything but it just keep getting the same: Input lag as soon as I load the menu and even during the benchmark, low fps in the results and a lot of drops too during the benchmark. If someone could help me out it will be a lifesave for me because I feel kinda dumb and lost without knowing what to do and seeing people getting better results than me. Also I bought my pc on december 2023 so it dosent have any old parts.

22k points basically same set up as your second test except I didn't have dlss on and got an average 65 fps (also at 4k) pc specs: 9800x3d + 4090

the new pc i am getting is going to be a i78800k with a 4060 hope it is enough

I ran max settings on 1440p with Ray Tracing on. I had a score of 20,664, averaging around 120fps. My GPU is RX 6900 XT, and CPU is a Ryzen 7 5800X

From my tests, using frame gen is like "cheating" so scores are lower. Don't really matter too much as long as you like what you see.

I just Platinum'd it. I would buy the dlc and start new game plus but it leaves PlayStation premium in about a week, so I don't think I would have the time, but man, one of the best jrpg's I've played in a minute!!!

88 fps 4k 4090 i9-13th Frame Gen, DLAA, Ray Tracing: High, Ultra/Highest settings

Cpu : ryzen 5600 Gpu : rx 7600 Score : 19882

cpu: Intel i9 12th gen gpu: Nvidia 3080 score: 13980 Avg Fps: 81.94

Using frame gen lowers your score just for using it. Not really sure what the score is measuring but higher score doesn't equal better performance necessarily.

Score: 23333 (EXCELLENT) FPS: 68.63 GPU: Nvidia GeForce RTX 4050 for Laptop CPU: 13th GEN INTEL (R) CORE (TM) i5 -13450HX 😻😻 ( Ray Tracing and Frame Gen both turned on )

GORE MAGALA MY GOAT

sketchy benchmark. ran ultra with 4070ti 7800x3d 1440p and got average 90 fps. no framegen. just dlss quality. Yeah I will be playing on High instead of Ultra.