Пікірлер
@unmeritedfavour48
@unmeritedfavour48 3 сағат бұрын
The Son was made
@brightonkateka2307
@brightonkateka2307 11 сағат бұрын
Amen
@drkKennedy
@drkKennedy 6 сағат бұрын
@@brightonkateka2307 Amen
@melissawright5115
@melissawright5115 20 сағат бұрын
Jehovah witness do not argue they teach everyone first and foremost DO NOT ARGUE They offer bible studies free of charge to all those who would like to study the Bible.
@christopherroberts7110
@christopherroberts7110 Күн бұрын
Peter's confession is the rock.
@christopherroberts7110
@christopherroberts7110 Күн бұрын
Please remove background music.
@θειότης_Ἰησοῦς_Χριστός
@θειότης_Ἰησοῦς_Χριστός Күн бұрын
Here are some important fact that most people do not know. The 6 Corporations, also known as the organization of Jehovah's Witnesses, created their own customized translation of the “Bible” in 1950, which included the New Testament. The King James Version (KJV) they were using before caused them many problems, so they had to stop using the KJV and create their own customized Bible, which includes significant alterations to support their core teachings. Over the years, they created many New Revised Editions, one of which was the first complete New World Translation (NWT) that included both the Old and New Testaments in 1961. Since then, newer revised editions have been released. Here are the remaining revised editions in order: 1970, 1971, 1981, 1984, and 2013, all of which included more and more and more drastic alterations, such as verces removed, words altered, new words added, punctuation moved, verses restructured, and parts of chapters removed in order to support their false doctrines.
@drkKennedy
@drkKennedy Күн бұрын
@@θειότης_Ἰησοῦς_Χριστός Thank you for this information
@RiskeFactor
@RiskeFactor 3 сағат бұрын
You do know there have been significant text critical studies of extant biblical manuscripts since the NWT was first translated in 1947, right?
@MrRklewis
@MrRklewis Күн бұрын
Ok, let this Jehovah's Witness answer and correct you. So many mistakes to deal with. First, he mentions Rev.6:9-11 as proof that the dead are alive someplace, fully conscience. I mean, really? Rev.1:1 says this revelation was given in signs. Lots of signs and symbolic language. Or does he really think that there are dead people sitting underneath an altar, begging God for revenge? You have to deal with the whole bible and other scriptures that tell you of the condition of the dead. And the bible plainly says that the dead are conscience of nothing. Esc.9:5 Psalms 146:4 says that when you die, your thoughts perish. And from dust you are to dust you will return. Esc.3:20 Then he talks about the parable about the rich man and Lazarus. Nothing about this is literal. as if you can see heaven from a burning hellfire, which also is not literal. Especially if you understand the scriptures which talk about the conditions of the dead, that I just quoted. And the bible talks about God being a God of the living because in God's eyes, he will resurrect certain ones who at present are dead, but to God, they are alive because of His purpose to resurrect them. Next he talks about Rev.7:9-17 as proof that more than 144,000 will go to heaven, Thinking that this great crowd is in heaven. But these people survived the Great Tribulation, which is on the earth. They are the chosen ones which Matthews talks about who will survive. But he does not understand the 2 resurrections. Because those of the first resurrection will reign with Christ and the Second Death has no authority over them because they have been granted everlasting life. They will not need to be guided to the waters of life. And they number 144,000 . But the rest of mankind , or those of the second resurrection, will be guided to waters of life as is said about these survivors of the Great Tribulation. Rev.7:17 Which means that they as of yet, do not have everlasting life, as those of the first resurrection in heaven have. Next he talks about Thomas, when he said to Jesus, "My Lord and my God." But there were many people, al of them unbelievers, who wrongly thought that Jesus was God, because of the things that he was doing and saying. And in some cases, Jesus corrected them. But not in every case. Jesus did not ask Thomas to identify him. This is what Thomas thought in his excitement at seeing Jesus. But when Jesus plainly asked his disciples to identify him, NONE of them said that Jesus was God. And Jesus commended them for who they said he was. "The Son of God. " And just 3 verses after Thomas said this, at John 20:31, it says that we may believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God. Which clarifies what Thomas just said. Then he talks about Mark, 12:29.30 thinking that the bible calls God, Lord. Well, if he had a bible that did not remove the name Jehovah, from its pages, it reads, ...Jehovah our God is One Jehovah." Now let's stop there. When Jehovah said this, do you think that from what Jehovah just said that anyone hearing this would think that God is trying to tell them that he really is a 3 in 1 God? How did he not mention that? Then he tries to say that Jesus was worshipped. At Rev.5:11-14 it says that Jehovah was sitting on the throne and Jesus was near him and they fell down and worshipped. But no where does it say that they worshipped Jesus. He just assumed they did. They worshipped the one on the throne, Jehovah. And now I have some questions for you. 1. Does the devil know who God is? 2. Does the devil know if Jesus is God or not? 3. Can God be tempted? 4. When the devil tried to tempt Jesus by asking him to bow down to him in exchange for all of the kingdom of the world, did the devil think that he was talking to God? 5. And if Jesus did bow down to the devil , what would Jehovah have been forced to do to Jesus for this act of betrayal? I'll be waiting for your answers.
@victorordonez5266
@victorordonez5266 Күн бұрын
WE creatures have a flesh and a spirit , this is stated in numerous verses - Ecc12:7 and the dust returns to the earth from which it came and the spirit returns to God who gave it. Acts7: 59 While they were stoning Stephen, he prayed aloud, “Lord Jesus, receive my spirit.” 2Cortin5:8 Yet we are filled with confidence, even as we long to be exiled from the body and be at home with the Lord. 1Cortin2:14Those who are unspiritual[e] do not receive the gifts of God’s Spirit, for they are foolishness to them, and they are unable to understand them because they are spiritually discerned. 15 Those who are spiritual discern all things, and they are themselves subject to no one else’s scrutiny
@victorordonez5266
@victorordonez5266 Күн бұрын
Look up Revelation 7 and read it from beginning to end. You’ll notice that if the seventh chapter of Revelation is to be taken literally, heaven would consist of 144,000 Jewish male virgins who were taken from a square-shaped earth and are now worshiping a sheep. This would mean that Peter (not a virgin), the Blessed Mother (not a male), and Jehovah’s Witnesses founder Charles Taze Russell (not a Jew) could not be in heaven. Beyond this, we see in Revelation 14 that the 144,000 stand before the twenty-four elders from Revelation 4:4. This brings the grand total to 144,024 total people. But Scripture indicates that there are still more. Revelation 7:9 speaks of a countless multitude before the throne, which is in heaven (Rev. 14:2-3). We read also that all those with their name in the book of life are in heaven (Rev. 21:27), while all whose names are not in the book of life are thrown into the pool of fire (Rev. 20:15). There is no third “earthly” class.
@drkKennedy
@drkKennedy Күн бұрын
@@victorordonez5266 Thank you the response. I dont even to respond to him.
@drkKennedy
@drkKennedy Күн бұрын
@@victorordonez5266 Thank you for responding on my behalf
@drkKennedy
@drkKennedy Күн бұрын
@@MrRklewis see responses. They have have answered you sir
@user-is8eu1tk9m
@user-is8eu1tk9m Күн бұрын
NEW LIGHT FOR JW ! IL BATTESIMO CRISTIANO È VALIDO SOLO SE COME DICE LA BIBBIA: NEL NOME DEL PADRE, DEL FIGLIO E DELLO SPIRITO SANTO ! LA SALVEZZA È SOLO NEL NOME DEL SIGNORE GESÙ CRISTO !
@janicemorton7581
@janicemorton7581 Күн бұрын
First 3 minutes and you're misusing parables and hyperboles. Not everything J.dub is wrong.
@drkKennedy
@drkKennedy Күн бұрын
@@janicemorton7581 kikiki. Such as
@janicemorton7581
@janicemorton7581 Күн бұрын
@@drkKennedy When people die they do not transcend death into an afterlife, that is to believe a misleading lie and it was the 'first' lie ever recorded I recall. The only hope we have of gaining life again after death is to wait patiently for the 'return' of Jesus Christ. He is God's chosen one. Our Messianic King of the Kingdom who will rule upon this earth. ~~~~~~~ [(before Christ:) Isaiah 44:24, 45:5; 9:6,7 + (Christ:) 1 Thess. 1:9,10 ; 1 Thess. 4:13-18 ; Daniel 12:2-4,13] Here are some misleading lies of JW related this subject: ~ "Jesus existed before he was born" ~ "Jesus was the 'master worker'" ~ "Jesus 2nd coming has already happened, invisibly" ~ "144,000 so called anointed have gone to heaven" ~ "Jesus is an angel'" ~ "Jesus will never return to earth visibly" ~ "Jesus is the word in John 1:1" ~~~~~~~ GOD'S WORD 'BECAME' FLESH:John 1:14 (The key to understanding what God's word was solely 'BEFORE' Jesus, is to research the bible verses found in the Hebrew scriptures. They are numerous. A prime example is found conclusively in Psalm 119) ~~~~~~~ "Sanctify them in the truth 'YOUR WORD' is truth" - John 17:17 - question?? Was Jesus speaking of himself, or his Father...
@ravinderchahal2391
@ravinderchahal2391 2 күн бұрын
Titus 2:13 KJV Looking for that blessed hope, and the glorious appearing of the great God and our Saviour Jesus Christ; 1 Thessalonians 5:9 KJV For God hath not appointed us to wrath, but to obtain salvation by our Lord Jesus Christ,
@drkKennedy
@drkKennedy 2 күн бұрын
@@ravinderchahal2391 Amen
@paulbaingana446
@paulbaingana446 2 күн бұрын
Have you seen the whole video you are just asuming
@Mr.DC3.1914
@Mr.DC3.1914 2 күн бұрын
YOU CANNOT DENY HISTORICAL FACT that your paganized Trinity was MAN-MADE and formulated after about 400 years - FROM BRITANNICA - The Council of Nicaea in 325 stated the crucial formula for that doctrine in its confession that the Son is “of the same substance [homoousios] as the Father,” even though it said very little about the Holy Spirit. Over the next half century, St. Athanasius defended and refined the Nicene formula, and, by the end of the 4th century, under the leadership of St. Basil of Caesarea, St. Gregory of Nyssa, and St. Gregory of Nazianzus (the Cappadocian Fathers), the doctrine of the Trinity took substantially the form it has maintained ever since
@drkKennedy
@drkKennedy 2 күн бұрын
@@Mr.DC3.1914 Who first used the Word Trinity and when did he live?
@Mr.DC3.1914
@Mr.DC3.1914 2 күн бұрын
@@drkKennedy Babylonia "The ancient Babylonians recognised the doctrine of a trinity, or three persons in one god-as appears from a composite god with three heads forming part of their mythology, and the use of the equilateral triangle, also, as an emblem of such trinity in unity" (Thomas Dennis Rock, The Mystical Woman and the Cities of the Nations, 1867, pp. 22-23). India "The Puranas, one of the Hindoo Bibles of more than 3,000 years ago, contain the following passage: 'O ye three Lords! know that I recognize only one God. Inform me, therefore, which of you is the true divinity, that I may address to him alone my adorations.' The three gods, Brahma, Vishnu, and Siva [or Shiva], becoming manifest to him, replied, 'Learn, O devotee, that there is no real distinction between us. What to you appears such is only the semblance. The single being appears under three forms by the acts of creation, preservation, and destruction, but he is one.'
@drkKennedy
@drkKennedy 2 күн бұрын
@@Mr.DC3.1914 I meant within Christianity
@Mr.DC3.1914
@Mr.DC3.1914 2 күн бұрын
@@drkKennedy TERTULLIAn, your father of trinity has a DIFFERENT VERSIOn of trinity - against Hermogenes Understand what he described Jesus as had AN AUTHOR TO BRING IT INTO BEING mean? AND understand what he said when mentioned that the FATHER IS OLDER AND MORE POWERFUL than Jesus, the Wisdom of God (whom he called BORN AND CREATED)? READ FROM TERTULLIAN AGAINST HERMOGENES - CHAPTER 18 - Let Hermogenes then confess that the very Wisdom of God is declared to be born and created ... Let Hermogenes then confess that the very Wisdom of God is declared to be born and created, for the special reason that we should not suppose that there is any other being than God alone who is unbegotten and uncreated. For if that, which from its being inherent in the Lord was of Him and in Him, was yet not without a beginning - I mean His wisdom, which was then born and created, when in the thought of God It began to assume motion for the arrangement of His creative works - how much more impossible is it that anything should have been without a beginning which was extrinsic to the Lord! But if this same Wisdom is the Word of God, in the capacity of Wisdom, and (as being He) without whom nothing was made, just as also (nothing) was set in order without Wisdom, how can it be that anything, except the Father, should be older, and on this account indeed nobler, than the Son of God, the only-begotten and first-begotten Word? Not to say that what is unbegotten is stronger than that which is born, and what is not made more powerful than that which is made. Because that which did not require a Maker to give it existence, will be much more elevated in rank than that which had an author to bring it into being.
@drkKennedy
@drkKennedy 2 күн бұрын
@@Mr.DC3.1914 If Tertullian who lived more 100 Years before the 325 Nicene Conference, how can you say, the concept of the Trinity was invented by that Council? This term reconciles scriptures that appear contradictory while others have reconciled these scriptures by changing verses that appear contradictor.
@davidleach4689
@davidleach4689 2 күн бұрын
They are living because god will resurrect them I will talk to you about everything you said and then some you won’t be to explain my questions
@drkKennedy
@drkKennedy 2 күн бұрын
@@davidleach4689 😅🤣😅😂
@luisarivera437
@luisarivera437 2 күн бұрын
The most annoying assholes on the planet
@grannytrez
@grannytrez 2 күн бұрын
I agree when you read the Bible, you don’t read it word for word you’re listening to the inspiration from God and you’re the presence of God who cares about what verse says what
@dgomez828
@dgomez828 2 күн бұрын
If you actually read it you probably won’t like the god character in it. He is very evil
@criminal4631
@criminal4631 Күн бұрын
@@dgomez828Gods actions can be harsh and difficult to understand from a human standpoint , they are ultimately justified because he is the creator of all things. He holds the ultimate authority over creation. His decisions and actions are above and beyond human judgment, even when unfair. With that being said, God gave you the ability to make your own choices but also warns you that there will be consequences for sinful actions. Proverbs 14:12 : “There is a way that appears to be right , but in the end it leads to death.”
@dgomez828
@dgomez828 21 сағат бұрын
@@criminal4631 yeah it’s a story it’s not actually real
@TommyMisenhimer
@TommyMisenhimer 2 күн бұрын
The name Jehovah is another name fore the devil
@Patricia-cy7ij
@Patricia-cy7ij 2 күн бұрын
Not true
@drkKennedy
@drkKennedy 2 күн бұрын
@@TommyMisenhimer What is the basis of your statement?
@drkKennedy
@drkKennedy 2 күн бұрын
@@Patricia-cy7ij What is not true?
@criminal4631
@criminal4631 Күн бұрын
@@drkKennedy Jehovah’s Witnesses (JWs) study the Bible not with the aim of winning arguments, but to deepen their understanding of its teachings and strengthen their faith. They regularly engage in group study sessions within their congregations, where they examine the Bible to comprehend its theological messages. This approach emphasizes learning the true meaning behind the verses and applying these principles in their daily lives, rather than using scripture as a tool for debate or proving others wrong. I say this as a Catholic, your statement is not true and you’re pushing the wrong ideas onto others.
@drkKennedy
@drkKennedy 22 сағат бұрын
@@criminal4631 Why are you speaking for them. At least the read the Bible. I can't say the same for everyone. I speaking based on more than 50 years of interacting with JWs some are my relatives including my immediate Young brother.
@bretherenlee1404
@bretherenlee1404 2 күн бұрын
No one (MEANING NO ONE ZERO PEOPLE)has seen God at any time (MEANING AT NO TIME COVERS ALL HISTORY OF MAN). JOHN 1:18 JESUS NOT GOD
@θειότης_Ἰησοῦς_Χριστός
@θειότης_Ἰησοῦς_Χριστός 2 күн бұрын
No man but does not mean no spirt. Spirit sees Divinity but man, means body of person cannot fully see God unless you were out of the body and the body was not functioning.
@bretherenlee1404
@bretherenlee1404 2 күн бұрын
@@θειότης_Ἰησοῦς_Χριστός what verse is that? Have you just said no to the God of Jesus? Revelation 3:12 1 John 4:12 Exodus 33:20
@θειότης_Ἰησοῦς_Χριστός
@θειότης_Ἰησοῦς_Χριστός 2 күн бұрын
@@bretherenlee1404 You like most other do not know exactly who and what is Divinity. When you say the God of Christ Jesus your talking about himself, in other words the God of Christ is his very own Divinity,
@bretherenlee1404
@bretherenlee1404 2 күн бұрын
@@θειότης_Ἰησοῦς_Χριστός are you saying no to the God of Jesus? Revelation 3:12
@Victor-je6if
@Victor-je6if Күн бұрын
No one has seen God the Father but God the Son has made him God known. Jesus is God in flesh.
@bretherenlee1404
@bretherenlee1404 2 күн бұрын
Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, , 2cor 1:3
@drkKennedy
@drkKennedy 2 күн бұрын
@@bretherenlee1404 Amen
@billybari8081
@billybari8081 5 сағат бұрын
@@drkKennedy You are also wrong about question 2. You either lack understanding to identify speaker in Revelation 1:8 or are deliberately twisting the scriptures: The one speaking at Revelation 1:8 is not and cannot be Jesus Christ but, the Father, the most High God, YHWH himself: consider the context of Revelation 1:8 - In verses 4, 5 of the same Chapter 1 of Revelation, we have greetings from three entities: " 1. *“The One Who Is, Was, and Is Coming"* (verse 4) AND 2. *"The Seven Spirits"* (verse 4) AND 3. *"Jesus Christ."* (Please notice this “AND” at the start of verse 5 as well). In Revelation 1:8, the individual given the title "The One Who Is and Was and Is Coming" in verse 4, is clearly and without any shred of doubt the one identified as the "Alpha and Omega," the "Almighty," and "Lord God" in Revelation 1:8. Can you see that my brother? (If you are really humble, you should acknowledge this my brother). Incontestably therefore, “the Alpha and Omega”, “the almighty” is *grammatically* differentiated from both Jesus Christ (verse 5)and from the "seven spirits” (verse 4). Thus, it is impossible for Jesus to be the one speaking at Revelation 1:8 as being the "Alpha and Omega" or "the almighty". Furthermore, Revelation 19:16 says nothing about Jesus being Almighty at all. In fact, just like Jehovah’s witnesses, you lift this scripture out of its context and add what it does not say to support your false doctrine that Jesus is the Almighty God. Verse 16 tells us that Jesus is *"King of kings and Lord of lords"* ...it does not say that Jesus is *"Almighty"* at all! In fact, in this very CONTEXT my brother, Revelation 19:15 states: "And out of his mouth goeth a sharp sword, that with it he should smite the nations: and he shall rule them with a rod of iron: and he treadeth the winepress of the fierceness *and wrath of Almighty God."* Notice, the wrath with which he treads belongs to the Almighty God...not himself. In the entire book of Revelation, this *"winepress of the wrath of God"* does not belong to the Lamb or son of man (Revelation 14:14-16) but to God, the Father (Revelation 14:19-20). By the way, while we are here: since Jesus is apparently part of your "one triune God", why does Revelation 14:14-16 indicate that an angel from the sanctuary of God is sent to tell Jesus (the one seated on the cloud) that the time to harvest the the earth is ripe? Why can't Jesus just know it as he is within the same God? And what does this tell us regarding Matthew 24:36? That Jesus knows the day and the hour of his second coming? Of course not!
@charlesweber9780
@charlesweber9780 2 күн бұрын
People this is Satans ministry here. Think about it, if they can get you to turn against J W this is Satans ministry. They will say, do anything to keep you from learning the Truth !
@universalman5861
@universalman5861 3 күн бұрын
How can a soul be given a white robe to wear? (Rev6:11)
@drkKennedy
@drkKennedy 2 күн бұрын
@@universalman5861 Do you know the make up of a soul?
@universalman5861
@universalman5861 2 күн бұрын
@drkKennedy Yes, according to Jehovah's Witnesses it is the person themselves, but according to you it is the IMMATERIAL part of a human that survives death. If you weren't playing evasive, instead of asking an inane question that everyone already knows the answer to, you would elaborate upon how this IMMATERIAL aspect of a person can wear a robe.
@jwjim
@jwjim 3 күн бұрын
Regarding death, to what did Jesus liken death? “Lazʹa·rus our friend has fallen asleep, but I am traveling there to awaken him.” The disciples then said to him: “Lord, if he is sleeping, he will get well.” Jesus, however, had spoken about his death. But they imagined he was speaking about taking rest in sleep. Then Jesus said to them plainly: “Lazʹa·rus has died,” - John 11:11-14 Jesus likened his friend Lazarus’ death to sleep from which he could be awaken or as we see in the account, resurrected back to life from death. “Jesus said: “Leave the place, for the little girl did not die but is sleeping.” At this they began to laugh at him scornfully. As soon as the crowd had been sent outside, he went in and took hold of her hand, and the little girl got up. Of course, the talk about this spread into all that region.” - Matthew 9:24-26 This miracle of Jesus was raising this young girl from being dead, which Jesus likened to sleep. What do other scriptures say? Psalms 13:3 “Look upon me and answer me, O Jehovah my God. Give light to my eyes, so that I may not fall asleep in death,” Acts 7: 59 “As they were stoning Stephen, he made this appeal: “Lord Jesus, receive my spirit.”60 Then, kneeling down, he cried out with a strong voice: “Jehovah, do not charge this sin against them.” And after saying this, he fell asleep in death.” 1 Corinthians 6:6 After that he (Jesus) appeared to more than 500 brothers at one time, most of whom are still with us, though some have fallen asleep in death.” The likening of death to sleep is not just aJW teaching but a teaching from God in His imputed scriptures and Jesus whom was taught by God, his Father.
@bretherenlee1404
@bretherenlee1404 3 күн бұрын
to say thomas was calling Jesus almighty God would be saying Thomas was an atheist for a period of time. never assume on the holy words. Thomas did not call Jesus my God all he said was My Lord and My God out of excitement you have jumped to the wrong conclusion
@seannews
@seannews 2 күн бұрын
Thanks for your input, Satan. Read the verse again and look at Jesus response. Next he said to Thomas: “Put your finger here, and see my hands, and take your hand and stick it into my side, and stop doubting but believe.” In answer Thomas said to him: “My Lord and my God!” 29 Jesus said to him: “Because you have seen me, have you believed? Happy are those who have not seen
@bretherenlee1404
@bretherenlee1404 2 күн бұрын
@@seannews where in there did Thomas call Jesus my God? Are you saying Thomas was an atheist for a while? Have you like the devil said no to the God of our Lord Jesus Christ? Revelation 3:12 Ephesians 1:17 1 Corinthians 11:3 1 Peter 1:3 2 Corinthians 11:31
@drkKennedy
@drkKennedy 2 күн бұрын
Good response except for calling someone Satan. Some people are genuinely lost.
@drkKennedy
@drkKennedy 2 күн бұрын
Read Phil. 2:5-8. It explains that Jesus humbled himself though he was in the very nature God and became a man. That is why he calls God his Father.
@bretherenlee1404
@bretherenlee1404 2 күн бұрын
@@drkKennedy Jesus never stopped having a God as revelation 3:12 shows. Jesus is never equal to God. John 14:28 1 Corinthians 11:3
@bretherenlee1404
@bretherenlee1404 3 күн бұрын
have you to all that you deny the very God of Jesus? revelation 3:12
@drkKennedy
@drkKennedy 2 күн бұрын
@@bretherenlee1404 Who is comment directed to?
@bretherenlee1404
@bretherenlee1404 2 күн бұрын
@@drkKennedy to anyone. Do you deny the very God of Jesus? 1 Peter 1:3
@drkKennedy
@drkKennedy 2 күн бұрын
@@bretherenlee1404 No!
@bretherenlee1404
@bretherenlee1404 2 күн бұрын
@@drkKennedy tell us all who the God of Jesus is? Tell us all who is the God that Jesus is the Son of? Tell us all who is the God that Jesus is the Word of? 1 John 4:12 Exodus 33:20
@bretherenlee1404
@bretherenlee1404 3 күн бұрын
revelation 9:11 galatians 4:14
@drkKennedy
@drkKennedy 2 күн бұрын
@@bretherenlee1404 Kindly comment on these verses. What are you trying to communicate.
@bretherenlee1404
@bretherenlee1404 3 күн бұрын
all firstborns have a beginning as do images
@davidmcbrine4527
@davidmcbrine4527 3 күн бұрын
You are correct that in the English language "firstborn" is referring to the first one who is born. However, if your referring to the Bible i.e Colossians 1:15, the word there in the Greek can mean the first to be born and also means "chief" "principal" "first in rank" "preeminent" In the context of Col 1:15 the meaning there is "preeminent" or "first in rank" "He is the image (visible manifestation) of the invisible God, the "preeminent" one over all creation" v.16 "For/because by Him all things were created, both in the heavens and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or dominions or rulers or authorities- ALL THINGS have been created through Him and for Him" The context is clear, Jesus is the preeminent one BECAUSE He created all things. To say He is the first one born because He created all things is a contradiction and doesn't fit the context of the passage. Also, the other meaning of firstborn (prototokos) is ALWAYS referring to the birth of a child by it's mother in the human sense, NEVER is that word used to describe the act of creation by God. Paul would have probably used the word "ktizo" (created) used in verse 16 to refer to Jesus, if that was the case.
@bretherenlee1404
@bretherenlee1404 3 күн бұрын
@@davidmcbrine4527 all firstborns have a beginning. John 6:57
@bretherenlee1404
@bretherenlee1404 3 күн бұрын
@@davidmcbrine4527 name a firstborn that did not have a beginning or an image not have a creator?
@ericbulman1752
@ericbulman1752 2 күн бұрын
​@@bretherenlee1404John 6:53-58 Jesus therefore said to them , truly truly , I say to you , unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink His blood , you have no life in yourselves . 54 He who eats My flesh and drinks My blood has eternal life , and I will raise him up on the last day . 55 For My flesh is true food and My blood is true drink 56 He who eats My flesh and drinks My My blood abides in Me, and I in Him 57 As the living Father sent Me, and I live because of the Father, so he who eats Me he also shall live because of Me. 58 This is the bread which comes down out of heaven not as the fathers ate and died , he who eats this bread shall live forever Note that it does not say Jesus had a beginning and it does not say he was created. Your reading something into it which is simply not there .
@bretherenlee1404
@bretherenlee1404 2 күн бұрын
@@ericbulman1752 does the Father live because of anyone? No. But Jesus does for he lives because of the Father. Are you denying this? For anyone to have a Father means they have a beginning. For anyone to have a God which Jesus does means you are created. God has no God. Jesus is the image of God and the first born of all creation. Name one image that is not made? Name one firstborn that had no beginning? Revelation 3:12,14 Revelation 9:11 Revelation 1:5 1 Peter 1:3 1 Corinthians 11:3 2 Corinthians 11:31 Galatians 4:14
@bretherenlee1404
@bretherenlee1404 3 күн бұрын
you are proudly defending whiteianity not christianity you are a product of the doctrine of discovery
@bretherenlee1404
@bretherenlee1404 3 күн бұрын
have you said no to the God of Jesus and that Jesus said he lives because of the Father. John 6:57 ephesians 1:17
@javierrueda6647
@javierrueda6647 22 сағат бұрын
phillipians 2:7-11 jesus is God neofito satanic
@bretherenlee1404
@bretherenlee1404 3 күн бұрын
being before the throne does not mean being in heaven as matthew 25:31-46 shows the sheep and goats gathered before the throne the goats are surely not in heaven. one thing you cannot do is assume on the word of God John 21:23. only 144000 go whereever Jesus goes no more revelation 14:1-5 proverbs 30:6
@bretherenlee1404
@bretherenlee1404 3 күн бұрын
it is not up to you to decide if it is a parable or not for he would not speak to them without a parable
@drkKennedy
@drkKennedy 3 күн бұрын
@@bretherenlee1404 Why not?
@bretherenlee1404
@bretherenlee1404 3 күн бұрын
@@drkKennedy I don't understand, what do you mean why not? Jesus never spoke without a parable. So are you to set a different standard?
@bretherenlee1404
@bretherenlee1404 3 күн бұрын
@@drkKennedy you can get the watchtower on other things but not on this. What you are defending is a result of the Catholic doctrine of discovery.
@bretherenlee1404
@bretherenlee1404 3 күн бұрын
@@drkKennedy either you are about truth or the Catholic doctrine of discovery?
@drkKennedy
@drkKennedy 3 күн бұрын
@@bretherenlee1404 Kindly clarify what you mean?
@bretherenlee1404
@bretherenlee1404 3 күн бұрын
the parable about lazarus is a parable abraham is not said to be in heaven . the parable has a meaning which is not literal for if it were literal a a drop of water could cool his tongue you lack understanding. who are you to say it was not a parable .. Jesus said he did not speak to them without a parable
@bretherenlee1404
@bretherenlee1404 3 күн бұрын
Ecclesiastes 9:5,10 if death is not non existence you would not need a ressurrection. they were undeer the alter in s symbolic way as revelation says you have a misconception
@davidmcbrine4527
@davidmcbrine4527 3 күн бұрын
I'm sorry, but it is you who has the "misconception" There is a clear difference/separation between the "body" and the "soul" Jesus Himself pointed that out at Matt 10:28 Men can only kill the body, but cannot kill the soul. So obviously, when we die, our soul goes on living. This is what Solomon was referring to, the death of the body.
@bretherenlee1404
@bretherenlee1404 2 күн бұрын
@@davidmcbrine4527 Jesus did not say the soul keeps living. For if you never die why would you need a ressurection? John 6:39 John 5:28-29 The penalty of sin is death. Romans 6:23 Ecclesiastes 9:5,10 Jesus like death to sleep that required an awakening and that awakening is the ressurection. Mark 5:39 John 11:11-15 When you say people keep living after they die you deny the whole scope of things that Jesus went through. Revelation 1:18 The animals and humans have the same spirit and that spirit is what gives them life without it they are dead. Ecclesiastes 3:18-22 Psalm 104:29 Ezekiel 37:1-11
@davidmcbrine4527
@davidmcbrine4527 2 күн бұрын
@@bretherenlee1404 "Jesus did not say the soul keeps living" That statement contradicts Jesus' words. What does it mean to you when someone is "unable" to kill you? If you have half a brain it would mean you go on living! Do you not understand English?
@bretherenlee1404
@bretherenlee1404 2 күн бұрын
@@davidmcbrine4527 you said that that is not what Jesus said. John 21:23 Never assume on the holy words or you will be deceived. 2 Peter 3:15-16 Acts 20:29-31
@davidmcbrine4527
@davidmcbrine4527 2 күн бұрын
@@bretherenlee1404 The plain reading of Matt 10:28 is that the soul cannot die by man's hand. Man can only kill the body, while the soul goes on living. Only God can kill the soul. Do you not understand? That's as simple as it can be put.
@francoisdebruyn4424
@francoisdebruyn4424 3 күн бұрын
Sometimes, the NWT of JW org. has been changed.
@drkKennedy
@drkKennedy 3 күн бұрын
@@francoisdebruyn4424 Many times actually
@RiskeFactor
@RiskeFactor 3 сағат бұрын
I like the NWT
@tongakhan230
@tongakhan230 3 күн бұрын
Your brother's blood is crying out to me from the ground - Genesis 4:10 Was Abel alive in the ground and does blood have vocal chords? It just means a call for justice. Another trying to take on God's people to get subscribers. Pathetic!
@drkKennedy
@drkKennedy 3 күн бұрын
@@tongakhan230 If you can't present your arguments without emotions why do you watch youtube videos. I dont even know which scripture you are responding to by saying pathetic.
@tongakhan230
@tongakhan230 3 күн бұрын
@@drkKennedy : Using wordings in Revelation to contradict what the Bible teaches and what JWs do believe will always backfire. Here is the scripture this video used to try and show that dead people were alive. Revelation 6:9 When he opened the fifth seal, I saw underneath the altar the souls of those slaughtered because of the word of God and because of the witness they had given. 10 THEY SHOUTED WITH A LOUD VOICE, saying: “Until when, Sovereign Lord, holy and true, are you refraining from judging and avenging our blood on those who dwell on the earth?” 11 And a white robe was given to each of them, and they were told to rest a little while longer, until the number was filled of their fellow slaves and their brothers who were about to be killed as they had been. My response addresses this. Of course, if I am expected to debunk all the claims of this video, I can do it. But it will be a lengthy comment. One addressed as false should suffice.
@drkKennedy
@drkKennedy 3 күн бұрын
@@tongakhan230 😅😅😅😂🤣But you have not debunked anything here.
@tongakhan230
@tongakhan230 2 күн бұрын
@@drkKennedy : When a witness in court is found to perjure he becomes an unreliable witness. I showed that dead persons cannot cry out. It is metaphorical language to show that JUSTICE should be done on their behalf. Show me ONE Bible teaching that JWs do not believe. This videos teaching that dead persons are not really dead is terrible as I showed. (Ecclesiastes 9:5) For the living know that they will die, but THE DEAD KNOW NOTHING AT ALL, nor do they have any more reward, because all memory of them is forgotten.
@Mr.DC3.1914
@Mr.DC3.1914 3 күн бұрын
what Isaiah saw is Jesus glory as being sent as SON and messenger. jEHOVAH GOD sent ISAIAH as messenger to deliver the good news, and people DID NOT LISTEN TO HIM. The Bigger fullfillment is When GOD sent his SON as messenger to deliver the good news and people did NOT LISTEN to him as well. SO what is being FULFILLED is JESUS BEING SENT AND PEOPLE NOT LISTENING to him and the fullfillment of the prophecy is NOT ABOUT SITTING ON THE THRONE AS GOD. nOTICE, JESUS fullfilled the role of messenger. John 12 doesn't mention of Jesus sitting on the throne and sending a messenger , JESUS FULFILLED THE MESSENGER ROLE JUST LIKE ISAIAH.
@drkKennedy
@drkKennedy 3 күн бұрын
I totally disagree with your interpretation. Isaiah said this because he saw Jesus’ glory and spoke about him (John 12:41). Notice, its talking about his glory not as message.
@Mr.DC3.1914
@Mr.DC3.1914 3 күн бұрын
@@drkKennedy Isaiah saw Jehovah's glory and Jesus as well. Why, did John 12 ever describe Jesus as SITTING ON THE THRONE IN HEAVEN with the angels? Nope. So that's different. What Isaiah saw was also the glory of the SON who was WITH GOD. Who you think is the US in the "who will go for us?". Jesus is the oNE SENT by GOD in whom people did not believe in.
@bretherenlee1404
@bretherenlee1404 3 күн бұрын
Ecclesiastes 9:5,10 if death is not non existence you would not need a ressurrection. they were undeer the alter in s symbolic way as revelation says you have a misconception
@victorordonez5266
@victorordonez5266 Күн бұрын
Arianism, a heresy which arose in the fourth century, and denied the Divinity of Jesus Christ.
@Mr.DC3.1914
@Mr.DC3.1914 3 күн бұрын
Most truly I say to you, a slave is not greater than his master, nor is one who is sent greater than the one who sent him.q John 13:16 . Jesus was SENT BY GOD - and called as SERVANT OF GOD. Acts 4:27 WHO IS OVER ALL? Ephesians 4:6 one God and Father of all, who is over all and through all and in all. GOD and FATHER is OVER/ABOVE ALL and that "All" includes the SON so they are NOT EQUAL THE BIBLE teaches that Jesus was MADE As Lord and Christ and as Son (ACTS 2:36, Prov 8, HEB 1:5), CREATED/PRODUCED/INSTALLED (Prov 8) , COME INTO BEING/MADE (Mat 21:42 - egeneto) and GIVEN LIFE by the Father - John 5:26 and it uses TODAY (Heb 1:5), and uses future tenses and is a prophecy in Isa 9:6 (Isa 9:6, - WILL BE) . If you are called MADE AND CREATED AND GIVEN LIFE, and NEVER CALLED in the BIBLE as Creator or Maker , then you are A CREATION. ALL FROM THE BIBLE From the Lord was this (this is referring to the chief cornerstone who is Jesus) , the word WAS is egeneto (made or came into being) - Matthew 21:42 and the exact Greek word used in John 1:3 - MADE, egeneto (came into being) - JESUS WAS MADE/CAME INTO BEING FROM THE FATHER , yes, Jesus was MADE/CREATED!, See also Acts 2:36, Heb 1:5, 1 john 5 Jesus in FACT mentioned the FATHER IS GREATER than I am. JOhn 14:28. BEFORE he WAS SENT, the Father is ALSO GREATER than Jesus. Most truly I say to you, a slave is not greater than his master, nor is one who is sent greater than the one who sent him.q John 13:16 . Jesus was SENT BY GOD - and called as SERVANT OF GOD. Acts 4:27 AFTER his resurrection the FATHER IS STILL GREATER than Jesus - WHO IS OVER ALL? Ephesians 4:6 one God and Father of all, who is over all and through all and in all. GOD and FATHER is OVER/ABOVE ALL and that "All" includes the SON so they are NOT EQUAL
@jahtruthdefender
@jahtruthdefender 3 күн бұрын
The irony of your hypocrisy. You always talk about never coming back. Yet, you do a pretty good job of not coming back.
@drkKennedy
@drkKennedy 3 күн бұрын
@@jahtruthdefender You seem to taking my videos personal as if they are targeted at you. If I dont get back to you it means I have missed the comment or I my plate is full.
@jahtruthdefender
@jahtruthdefender 3 күн бұрын
@@drkKennedy Not personal at all, but laughable you cannot support your own beliefs, yet here you are making videos criticising others for the very same thing you do. Did it ever occur to you, maybe they are dead or lost you details or plate is full as to why they never get back. If I simply ask: Where does the bible incontrovertibly ever use 'God' anywhere to simultaneously teach he is three persons in one? Why does the bible speak of the Father, Son and holy ones as having thrones, yet speaks of no throne for the alleged person of the holy spirit?
@archieliburd3794
@archieliburd3794 3 күн бұрын
BROTHERMAN, YOU DO NOT KNOW THE SCRIPTURES, WHY DON'T YOU JUST GO AND TAKE A DRINK OF RUM AND GO REST YOURSELF? The smallest kid in a KINGDOM HALL could run rings around you with the scriptures. Ecclestiastes 9 v 5 and 6 ( king James version Bible) says, FOR THE LIVING KNOW THAT THEY WILL DIE, BUT THE DEAD KNOW NOTHING. AND THEY HAVE NO MORE REWARD, FOR THE MEMORY OF THEM IS FORGOTTEN. (6) ALSO THEIR LOVE, THEIR HATRED, AND THEIR ENVY, HAVE NOW PERISHED. NEVERMORE WILL THEY HAVE A SHARE IN ANYTHING DONE UNDER THE SUN. JOHN 5 v 28 AND 29 SAYS, " DO NOT MARVEL AT THIS, FOR THE HOUR IS. COMING,IN WHICH ALL WHO ARE IN THE GRAVE, WILL HEAR HIS VOICE AND COME FORTH etc etc. WHEN WILL THAT BE? IN THE RESURRECTION. BROTHERMAN, can you be dead and still alive at the same time? God told ADAM, IF you eat the fruit, YOU SHALL DIE, from the dust you came and to the dust you shall return. So GOD say you will die, and your father SATAN told EVE, you won't really die, you will become like GOD knowing good and bad. SO GOD SAY YOU WILL DIE, AND SATAN SAY YOU WONT DIE, WHO DO YOU BELIEVE? BROTHERMAN, John 3 v 13, says, NO MAN HAS ASCENDED TO HEAVEN BUT HE WHO CAME DOWN FROM HEAVEN JESUS CHRIST. BROTHERMAN let's assume that GOD ENTRUST YOU WITH HIS WORD, YOU GOT GOD'S WORD AND JEHOVAHS WITNESSES DONT HAVE IT, JESUS CHRIST commanded his followers, " YOU MUST BE WITNESSES OF ME IN JERUSALEM AND IN ALL JUDEA AND SAMARIA AND TO THE UTMOST PART OF THE EARTH, JEHOVAH WITNESSES OBEY IT, DO YOU? Would you say that the word of God is just for a few English speaking people? There are some Chinese people living near you, some of them speak Mandarin and others speak Cantonese, Jehovahs witnesses speak to them all in their native tongue, DO YOU, or rather CAN YOU? As we speak Jehovahs witnesses are paddling a canoe 100 miles up the Amazon River and hiking up the Andes mountain talking to all those remote villages in their native tongue, DO YOU, or rather CAN YOU? So how are you going to fulfill MATTHEW 24 v 14? JEHOVAHS WITNESSES ARE THE ONLY RELIGION FULFILLING MATTHEW 24 v 14, NO OTHER RELIGION EVEN COME CLOSE TO ACQUIRING THE ABILITY TO FULFILL MATTHEW 24 v 14, THERE IS NONE. WE ARE DEEP IN THE LAST DAYS, SO how will the people of Uzbekistan, Kragikstan, Norway, Zanzibar, Ethiopia, SENEGAL Jamaica Guatemala Australia Equador Indonesia Belgium Turkey France Haiti Cuba Sri Lanka, South Africa, Brazil Bermuda, Russia, Canada, THE falk lands, Camaroon,SURINAME, Venezuela etc ever hear the word of God,? Jehovah witnesses have thousands of congregations in all those lands talking to people in their native tongue every single day, DO YOU, or rather CAN YOU?
@patriciajohnson2
@patriciajohnson2 3 күн бұрын
Love your videos!❤
@drkKennedy
@drkKennedy 3 күн бұрын
@@patriciajohnson2 Thank you
@user-pm5zd1yl7e
@user-pm5zd1yl7e 3 күн бұрын
which church do you attain
@drkKennedy
@drkKennedy 3 күн бұрын
I attend a Pentecostal Church
@ravinderchahal2391
@ravinderchahal2391 4 күн бұрын
Thank you for this teaching, Amen.
@drkKennedy
@drkKennedy 4 күн бұрын
@@ravinderchahal2391 Thank you for the comment
@drkKennedy
@drkKennedy 4 күн бұрын
If you have any questions on the content and quality of the video kindly drop them here. Additions, subtractions, criticism, etc., are all welcome
@user-of7ph1sk2d
@user-of7ph1sk2d 3 күн бұрын
Luke doesn't have a 37 and 38 and please get a real 1611 kjv. Your niv is a (non inspired version from catholic manuscripts) if you don't think so , lay them down alongside of each other and observe the difference's
@user-of7ph1sk2d
@user-of7ph1sk2d 3 күн бұрын
Please give a list of verses your using, your accent is very difficult to understand
@drkKennedy
@drkKennedy 3 күн бұрын
@@user-of7ph1sk2d🤣🤣🤣 turn on subtitles
@user-bb2nr3jy9d
@user-bb2nr3jy9d 3 күн бұрын
I asked a Jw earlier today on his view of revelation 6:11 and he never got back to me.
@ciscokidfab7595
@ciscokidfab7595 2 күн бұрын
@@user-of7ph1sk2d Catholic manuscript? Now JWs are looking to the Catholics for validation?
@bss48
@bss48 4 күн бұрын
zzzzz the jws does misinterprete the verses... and so does the trinitarian. yes Christ Jesus did the creation of everything... but with whose power? all the power and the glory Christ Jesus have bestowed by who? THE FATHER YHVH. 3 in 1 Father, Son, Holy Spirit in 1 who is the 1? whose name is YHVH? GOD THE FATHER name is YHVH. that's why trinitarian is an error doctrine.
@timhaley3459
@timhaley3459 5 күн бұрын
I was waiting for at least one "proof" scripture to be addressed that Jehovah's Witnesses "force" to agree with them, but NOT one was forthcoming. It is said that if "a person talks the talk, then walk the walk", or provide SOUND scriptural evidence to support their view, as Jesus did and the Jewish religious did NOT.
@drkKennedy
@drkKennedy 5 күн бұрын
@@timhaley3459 What do you mean?
@alazartadesse949
@alazartadesse949 4 күн бұрын
Tell him the proof
@timhaley3459
@timhaley3459 4 күн бұрын
@@alazartadesse949 I will make known "proofs", once he provides scriptures showing that Jehovah's Witnesses have "forced" or mistranslated the Bible to "fit their beliefs". Take for example John 1:1, 2. Have Jehovah's Witnesses "forced" their view of it, that has been rendered as: "In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. The same was in the beginning with God" ?(King James Bible) No. Why ? Because the Codex Vaticanus of about 350 C.E. (located in the Vatican Library, the Vatican, Rome, Italy) and the Codex Sinaiticus of about 375 C.E. (many of its pages are located in the British Museum), reads: "In a beginning was the Word, and the Word was with the God, and a god was the Word. This was in a beginning with the God." And additionally, P-813 (or Papyrus 813), a Sahidic-Coptic manuscript of John 1:1 of about the same time as the above codexes (or "books") reads, whereby it has both a definite ("the) and an indefinite article ("a") as does English, so that it reads: "In the beginning existed the Word and the Word existed with the God and a god was the Word."(P-813, located in the Chester Beatty Library, Dublin, Ireland) At least the Codex Vaticanus and Codex Sinaiticus were written before "the Holy Trinity" became official church doctrine with the Council of Chalcedon in 451 C.E., adding "the holy spirit" into "the mix", as "the holy spirit is God". Here is how the Koine Greek of both codexes reads: "1 εν (In) αρχη (a beginning) ην (was) ο ("the", definite article) λογοϲ (Word) και (and) ο ("the") λογοϲ (Word) ην (was) προϲ (with) τον (the) θν (God) και (and) θϲ (a god, NO definite article) ην (was) ο (the) λογοϲ (Word) 2 ουτοϲ (This one) ην (was) εν (in) αρχη (a beginning) προϲ (with) τον (the) θν (God)." At John 1:18, the apostle John made it clear that "no man hath seen God at ANY TIME, the only begotten Son (Jesus Christ), which is in the bosom of the Father, he hath declared him."(King James Bible) There is more that can be provided, but this a "starter".
@timhaley3459
@timhaley3459 4 күн бұрын
@@drkKennedy Provide sound scriptural evidence to back up your assertions, with ALL the details.
@trinny881
@trinny881 5 күн бұрын
Hello! Jesus is the son of the highest Luke 1;32 KJV he is not God
@trinny881
@trinny881 5 күн бұрын
Hello! Praise JAH! Psalm 68;4 KJV and his name alone is the most high Psalm 83;18 KJV
@drkKennedy
@drkKennedy 3 күн бұрын
Amen
@trinny881
@trinny881 5 күн бұрын
Hello! God Almighty Exodus 6;3 KJV
@drkKennedy
@drkKennedy 3 күн бұрын
kikiki
@θειότης_Ἰησοῦς_Χριστός
@θειότης_Ἰησοῦς_Χριστός 6 күн бұрын
Here are some important fact that most people do not know. The 6 Corporations💰, also known as the organization of Jehovah's Witnesses, created their own customized translation of the “Bible” in 1950, which included the New Testament. The King James Version (KJV) they were using before caused them many problems, so they had to stop using the KJV and create their own customized Bible, which includes significant alterations to support their core teachings. Over the years, they created many New Revised Editions, one of which was the first complete New World Translation (NWT) that included both the Old and New Testaments in 1961. Since then, newer revised editions have been released. Here are the remaining revised editions in order: 1970, 1971, 1981, 1984, and 2013, all of which included more and more and more drastic alterations, such as verces removed, words altered, new words added, punctuation moved, verses restructured, and parts of chapters removed.
@drkKennedy
@drkKennedy 6 күн бұрын
@@θειότης_Ἰησοῦς_Χριστός Thank you for this detailed update
@user-pg9lx7hi8v
@user-pg9lx7hi8v 6 күн бұрын
Why Argue?! Just Praise GOD!! W/Luv!!! Aman❤
@drkKennedy
@drkKennedy 6 күн бұрын
@@user-pg9lx7hi8v kikiki
@θειότης_Ἰησοῦς_Χριστός
@θειότης_Ἰησοῦς_Χριστός 7 күн бұрын
Here are some important facts that most people don’t know about. The Corporation💰, aka the organization of the JW created their first custom made new world translation “bible” in 1950, which contained the NT. The KJV that they were using before then was giving them a lot of problems, which is why they needed cease all use of the KJV, and to create their very own custom made “bible,” which had drastic changed all in which were done to support their own key False doctrines. Over the years they came up with the many Newer Revised Editions, one of which was the first complete nwt that contained the OT and NT in 1961. Since then newer revised editions have came out. Here are the rest of their New Revised Editions in order: 1970, 1971, 1981, 1984, 2013… all of which contained more and more changes like verses removed, words removed, words changed, new words added, commas and periods moved around, verses restructured, parts of chapters removed, etc.
@mirekmazur3822
@mirekmazur3822 Күн бұрын
I see you are Greek. In what year was the New World Translation written in Greek?
@Mr.DC3.1914
@Mr.DC3.1914 7 күн бұрын
Most truly I say to you, a slave is not greater than his master, nor is one who is sent greater than the one who sent him.q John 13:16 . Jesus was SENT BY GOD - and called as SERVANT OF GOD. Acts 4:27 WHO IS OVER ALL? Ephesians 4:6 one God and Father of all, who is over all and through all and in all. GOD and FATHER is OVER/ABOVE ALL and that "All" includes the SON so they are NOT EQUAL THE BIBLE teaches that Jesus was MADE As Lord and Christ and as Son (ACTS 2:36, Prov 8, HEB 1:5), CREATED/PRODUCED/INSTALLED (Prov 8) , COME INTO BEING/MADE (Mat 21:42 - egeneto) and GIVEN LIFE by the Father - John 5:26 and it uses TODAY (Heb 1:5), and uses future tenses and is a prophecy in Isa 9:6 (Isa 9:6, - WILL BE) . If you are called MADE AND CREATED AND GIVEN LIFE, and NEVER CALLED in the BIBLE as Creator or Maker , then you are A CREATION. ALL FROM THE BIBLE From the Lord was this (this is referring to the chief cornerstone who is Jesus) , the word WAS is egeneto (made or came into being) - Matthew 21:42 and the exact Greek word used in John 1:3 - MADE, egeneto (came into being) - JESUS WAS MADE/CAME INTO BEING FROM THE FATHER , yes, Jesus was MADE/CREATED!, See also Acts 2:36, Heb 1:5, 1 john 5 Jesus in FACT mentioned the FATHER IS GREATER than I am. JOhn 14:28. BEFORE he WAS SENT, the Father is ALSO GREATER than Jesus. Most truly I say to you, a slave is not greater than his master, nor is one who is sent greater than the one who sent him.q John 13:16 . Jesus was SENT BY GOD - and called as SERVANT OF GOD. Acts 4:27 AFTER his resurrection the FATHER IS STILL GREATER than Jesus - WHO IS OVER ALL? Ephesians 4:6 one God and Father of all, who is over all and through all and in all. GOD and FATHER is OVER/ABOVE ALL and that "All" includes the SON so they are NOT EQUAL
@ravinderchahal2391
@ravinderchahal2391 6 күн бұрын
The Lord Jesus is the Creator - Hebrews 1:10. and the heavens are the works of thine hands: Hebrews 1:10 And, Thou, Lord, in the beginning hast laid the foundation of the earth; and the heavens are the works of thine hands: Who is the First and the Last in Rev. 22:13, Rev. 1:17, Rev. 2:8. Who is the Alpha and Omega in Rev. 22:13 and who is coming quickly in verse 12? Rev 22:1 And he shewed me a pure river of water of life, clear as crystal, proceeding out of the throne of God and of the Lamb. So who is the Alpha and Omega in Rev. 21:6, who the Faithful and true in verse 5 and Rev. 19:11? Rev 19:11 And I saw the heaven opened; and behold, a white horse, and he that sat thereon, called Faithful and True; and in righteousness he doth judge and make war. Rev 21:5 And he that sitteth on the throne said, Behold, I make all things new. And he saith, Write: for these words are faithful and true.
@Mr.DC3.1914
@Mr.DC3.1914 5 күн бұрын
@@ravinderchahal2391 Rev 21:5,6 the Alpha and Omega is the ONE SEATED on the Throne. He is different than Jesus who is the Lamb, who is STANDING in the midst of the throne. Rev 5:6 - And I saw STANDING in the midst* of the throne and of the four living creatures and in the midst of the elders+ a LAMB+ that seemed to have been slaughtered,+ Where is the FATHER in REv 22 if the Alpha and Omega is Jesus? You rejected the Father in Rev 22 if you excluded him. ALPHA AND OMEGA. there are different speakers here, otherwise, u will say the Father is missing. Rev 22:8 - JOHN REV 22:9 - ANGEL REV 22:10-11 JOHN AND ANGEL REV 22:12-15 - ALPHA AND OMEGA (FATHER) Rev 22:16 - JESUS, THE SON ( He clarified who he is - CONTRAST - ROOT, and Offspring of David, BRIGHT MORNING STAR) Rev 22:17- Spirit and the bride
@Mr.DC3.1914
@Mr.DC3.1914 5 күн бұрын
@@ravinderchahal2391 Heb 1:10 does NOT USE THE WORD CREATOR OR MAKER and NO BIBLE TEXT use Creator or Maker for Jesus. ZERO. NONE. Paste the Bible text that explicitly use those terms for Jesus and if you cannot provide, you know you are lying
@Mr.DC3.1914
@Mr.DC3.1914 5 күн бұрын
@@ravinderchahal2391 LAYING THE FOUNDATION is DIFFERENT from MAKING the foundation. understand the difference
@monologuemonologue2785
@monologuemonologue2785 3 күн бұрын
They are one through Union… same as marriage