I snapped off a bolt on the housing for the thermostat now what? Do I have to replace the whole water pump?

THat folding stock is a piece of shit in all ways i had one for about an hour and tossed it in the garbage after shooting. IT sucks...

Is there a way to detect the trajectory of the shots from adding a filter affect to the Zapruder film. This could be a possible savior for individuals deserving to be saved from death. The shots could be reversed and applied to the film. Individuals could be hologrammically saved. I like that term better than holigraphically.

What about the surgeon who pointed to his right temple as he explained the fatal wound to the media??

As the wise old used car salesman once told me," there's an ass for every seat".

I am so glad to see a view from behind the fence. I dont think there is anywhere behind that fence that a person could have stood and shot JFK straight through the right side of his face. There's no way. As you said, he was not shot from the side. The bullet traveled straight through. How could it be possible from behind the fence and with him already slouching towards Jackie. That eliminates Alotta the conspiracy gibberish which is just big business. There was people sittin in the car, people standing at the bottom of the stairs and a windshield in the way also hah. I mean the shooter would have to hang his gun out over the fence into the middle of ELM street to shoot him straight on. NOTICE noone has ever done or will ever do a shot trajectory video from the fence. It would be game over for all conspiracy stuff.

He is Ted Cruz’ cousin.

that wood is beautiful dont ruin that shotgun

More insight than I can use.

A couple of problems with your video. With the positioning of the Grassy Knoll shooter, you’re starting with a flawed assumption: that he stood right at the corner. No sniper would ever stand there because they’d be seen. The angle of the shot lines up if you stand about 10-15 ft back. And if you stand there as a shooter, you won’t be seen. You also left out the condition of Oswald’s rifle. For one thing, the scope wasn’t zeroed. For another thing, it had a sticky bolt. So it’s not that you can’t shoot someone from that window. It’s that it’s difficult to make a shot that precise in that time frame with a sticky bolt and a scope that isn't zeroed. And you also left out that a target moving away from a shooter and downhill - that section of Elm St is on an incline - throws off the trigonometry of shooting such that that, plus a scope that isn’t zeroed, makes not for a difficult shot, but a difficult shot with that precision. There’s no gentle way to put this: I call your acumen as a firearms person into question not just because you left out these important facts, but because you’re from California. The laws where you live are simply too strict to produce a person who is knowledgeable about firearms. Your username suggests that you went to military college. That may have made you knowledgeable - may have. But military people that I discuss this event with are all alike: they are so emotionally invested in all things military that any suggestion that military or intelligence people were involved in this event is taken as a personal afront. It is not my intention to be rude. But I call them as I see them. I’ve met a lot of people who are knowledgeable about firearms. And I’ve never met a single one who thinks Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone - in fact, they nearly always laugh at the idea. You are either deliberately turning a blind eye to obvious facts because you have arrived at a conclusion and are working backward to prove it, or you simply don't possess the knowledge that you claim to possess.

From six floors up, the windshield would not have been a problem.

My question is after JFK was shot in the neck why didn't the SS agent (driver) accelerate the car away. JFK would have survived the neck shot only if that driver did his job and sped away as he was trained to do. The SS agent in the passenger front seat turned around and looked at JFK and saw him clutching his throat. Despite if Oswa;ld acted alone or was the shooter, despite any conspiracy theory, the SS failed miserably at their one and only job and after that fact didn't even lose their jobs, that's disgraceful. I hold them fully responsible regardless of who the sniper(s) were. Not many people cover this issue but that was the first thing I thought of when I first watched the Zapruder film. You hear shots and even see the man you are suppose to safeguard with your life in distress and you don't floor that gas pedal to get the hell out of there, any normal person would do that, it's just a common sense reaction. Why wasn't the SS agents punished.

except the shot came from the front...............you're an idiot....hahaha

Question. If the hole in the back of his head measured 6mm how could the 6.5 mm bullet do that? A bullet makes a little larger hole going in the only rifle there that day with that diameter bullet was that ar15 just saying. And if you don’t think the secret service is closed lip you are mistaken.. they all party with the girls when they are on deployment and the Kennedy detail was out partying as well

I heard that they have video with the audio on it that hasn't been released

Does CGC require any internal work on the firearm?

Multiple shooters ya clown. We all know that

A nurse at Parkland Memorial Hospital pointed out a bullet hole in the front windscreen..there after the limo was moved away from public view..why ...the Warren commission never interview all the witnesses...shots fired from the grassy knol..smoke witnessed...bolt action carcano rifle fired three shots within seconds of each other ..how come police had a description of Oswald soon after the shooting... further more a lady that worked at the night club owned by Jack Leon Ruby ...said that Jd Tippett...Jack Leon Ruby and Oswald knew each other they met at the club on a few occasions... big difference between a plot and a conspiracy...

You were standing in the wrong spot. James Files fired a single shot using a mercury tipped explosive round 15 ft to the right of the fence corner more towards the overpass where the fence runs parallel with Elm. It’s a shame you went through all that effort without any of the historical data that has been learned and documented since that day.

It’s impossible debating with conspiracy nutcases. When you present them with hard facts they just shut the discussion down with “its been faked”. They’re delusional .. end of

Oswald had very easy shots and took those shots. The first shot that hit Kennedy in the neck, was from behind. Doctors have said that. The fatal shot was close as well. No one fired a shot from the Grassy Knoll. It would have been an easy bullseye from there, but the escape routes were closed. I have been there too.

Got mine today. Will install it tomorrow. I have a 550C.

I took the Kennedy tour. First off the shot came from the 6th floor not seventh. The museum has the window locked up with a gate chan

I knew Oswald was guilty as hell when I learned he discarded his jacket.. Because why else would he do that?.. In fact, he repeatedly engaged in criminal intent behavior on the streets of Oak Cliff.. The actions of a guilty man..

american untold stories

More than a few professional "trained snipers" have claimed that they couldn't duplicate Oswald's performance--and more than a few have actually demonstrated that they could under test conditions. I counter that most of those professionals would have opted for better rifle and ammo--that is IF they could be persuaded to shoot POTUS. An expert shot could have done the Oswald shots with a revolver from the southeast corner sixth-floor window of the Texas School Book Depository. Could have--using .38 Special 148-grain match wadcutters in a six-inch revolver with target sights. The PPC fired out to 60 yards back in the day. I have been shooting pistols at 50 yards, 75 yards, and 100 yards for forty years and results range from dismal to surprising--the surprise is that I managed to hit at all. Speaking of surprises, one evening when I was running my county's public rifle range a pair of archers showed up. The range was empty except for them, and I held the range open a few minutes late while they nailed 4-inch diameter bulls' eyes with their compound bows and target arrows out to 50 yards distance 100%. Firing speed is another issue. I'll confine this comment to accuracy because discussing time would take much more space. The shots were not impossible for a semi-skilled rifleman. A skilled sniper probably would have pulled off the assassination differently. No record of Private Lee Harvey Oswald being trained as a sniper has been revealed to the public.

I finally got around to touring Dealey Plaza and the Sixth Floor Museum in Dallas, Texas during May 2021. The event happened when I was six and living on the Air Force base in San Antonio--and I didn't find out that my president had been murdered for two days. I watched a replay of Ruby shooting Oswald on television--and learned why all the adults were so damned angry at me that weekend. Hint--it wasn't me. The Kennedy Assassination has a lot of unknowns and unknowables. Speculation is assumption--and I was warned decades ago that when I assumed I made an ASS out of U and ME. Still, assumptions and logic are the majority of how the crime gets recreated. What assumptions? First, I''m going to assume that there was ample time to shoot three times with a bolt action rifle. Here's a factoid that suggests Lee Oswald fired FIVE shots in the allotted time frame: kzbin.info/www/bejne/nmXGZo2obM2tsKMorigin= Doesn't prove anything. The Carcano has a six-shot clip that, like the eight-shot Garand clip, must be shoved into the rifle's magazine so that the mechanism will feed cartridges from the magazine. Locate a photo of the three empty cartridge cases on the floor of the sniper's nest--when I visited the Sixth Floor Museum, there was a gaping hole in the wall at floor level. I have picked up thousands of cartridge casings from rifle ranges during police call (picking up brass and other "residue" as it's termed--the spent casings, bandoliers, ammo cans, links, clips and all are accountable items on military ranges--and then contractors get to dig the lead out of the backstop from time to time). It's easy to lose some of them. As early as 2 PM on 22 November 1963 Dallas Police expected to find three spent casings because according to their best guess only three shots had been fired. Witnesses heard from zero to more than eight shots. Given the acoustics of the Plaza, one shot might sound like a machine gun burst or a dozen shots might be mistaken for something other than gunfire. Why would they be looking for more than three cartridge cases? They found a clip in the rifle and a live round in the chamber. How many people know that a Carcano clip holds six shots? It would take a lot of persuading to change a closed mind that ANYBODY can fire off five shots from any bolt action repeating rifle in under ten seconds. "They're gonna miss!" Reportedly, Oswald, did, at least twice (unless Connally was an intended target). I have personal experience--on a 300-yard rapid-fire rifle stage at Kaneohe Marine Corps Air Station on Oahu, Hawaii, I put two five-round magazines into my Dog target in under 15 seconds and was booted in the ribs by a corporal for wasting my ammunition through shooting too rapidly. All ten shots were covered by a five-inch spotting disk and I achieved my 50-point maximum score. In case you're unfamiliar, the Marine starts with rifle loaded and on-SAFE standing, and when the targets come up, the Marine drops into a sling-supported prone and begins firing, reloads after the first magazine is empty and continues firing. I dropped to prone, fired four hits, dropped my magazine and shoved in a second that had been in a belt pouch, fired rounds five through ten, cleared my rifle, and my sore ribs negatively affected my record fire the next day. Prejudice is painful! Besides, proving to a jury that someone MIGHT fire three or more shots in a ten-second period doesn't prove that Oswald did. Because of the Fifth Amendment, Oswald couldn't be forced to demonstrate his rifle skills. As a member of the jury, would YOU believe that Oswald was shamming when he failed to get off more than two shots--both misses--in a ten second period? Yes, I know, the time frame is estimated to have been from four to eleven seconds. "The truth turns out to be more complicated." historynewsnetwork.org/article/35445 It's always more complicated. Nobody was timing the event with a stopwatch! I've coached poor shooters who took longer than 5 seconds between shots with their M16-series rifles on SEMI and failed to get off all ten shots during their rapid-fire stages on the Marine Corps rifle qualification--and soldiers failed to fire rapidly enough on their Alt C marksmanship table with the same rifle. The Zapruder film is more of a Rorschach test (History News Network's words) than conclusive concrete evidence. Zapruder's 8mm camera had no batteries--it was key-wound clockwork powered by springs. Worse, the 50-foot film cassette was good for 3 to 4 minutes of filming at 18 frames per second. Zapruder paused filming because he lost sight of the Presidential Limousine (why waste limited film on unimportant events) and this messed up timing of the entire assassination, catching only the last two shots. Grain size (fast color film) limited resolution. Today's smart phones take better movies--longer video clips, higher resolution, WITH sound. It is easier to digitally enhance a digital movie than it is to digitally enhance film stock. Remember, each frame was 8mm, about a third of an inch. I forgot what the shutter time on the Bell and Howell and never did learn the film speed. What's the image resolution on your smart phone? The frame rate on digital cameras is faster, too--50 or 60 interlaced frames per second (25 to 30 images) for standard videos. What I'm claiming is that there is a limited amount of information that the 8mm camera can capture--time is one of them, within a limited set of parameters. I made a 7.5-minute movie using a Super-8 film camera and the finished project was edited from several cassettes--nothing like experience with vintage equipment! Speaking of time, the time frame of the assassination was too short for split-second accuracy. At the time, the Atomic Clock was a big deal. I mentioned stop watches--nobody timed the events with an atomic clock. How much precision and accuracy was needed to time the assassination? The laptop I type this on has an onboard atomic clock, but the time standard is slaved to my internet service provider or else my digital signal wouldn't sync up and data wouldn't stream. My processor is 5.2GHz. If my onboard camera had been used to record the Kennedy assassination, I'd have had significantly more accurate time hacks--until grabby cops seized my equipment and accidentally broke it. It takes talent to smash a laptop. Perhaps I'd have been mistaken for someone wielding a Buck Rodgers death ray or something. People do weird things when they're scared and/or mad. Actual duration of gunfire is only one issue--and the difference between four and eleven seconds for between three and five shots is elastic enough to create controversy. It is possible that Oswald fired five shots in four seconds or even fired just two shots in eleven seconds--and it is possible that Oswald was on the second floor during the gunfire. Oswald was seen on the second floor from 5 minutes to 1 minute prior to the shots, and then seen on the second floor from 1 to 3 minutes after the gunfire. Oswald wore brown shirt and blue trousers, but the person seen in the window of the sixth floor up to a full minute after the shots was reported by witnesses to be wearing white or light clothing. I checked Brennan's story from his reported observation position, but I was in May around 4 PM instead of November at 12:30 PM and my experiment is invalid by my standards. The shadows from overhead sunlight versus the shadows from the sun in the south-east would be different--and today's Dealey Plaza has taller buildings surrounding the place. I saw that the sixth-floor windows were in shadow in May 2021. Modern florescent lights versus vintage incandescent lights used to light the interior changed the picture to an unknown degree, making my experiment invalid. There was no open window--modern air conditioning made that unnecessary. I saw daylight reflections and was unable to determine if anybody were looking through the closed windows. Again--May 2021 and not November 1963--my own experiment was invalid. Silly question--but can I both impeach my witnesses while cherry picking their testimony? Evidence in court isn't a scientific certainty. Come to think of it, the Heisenberg Principle and the Observer Effect seem to prove "scientific certainty" is an oxymoron.

8 rounds in 3 seconds. It's that rotary bolt. Fastest cycling in it's category. I have one with PDX1 rounds. As well as slugs and 00 buck.

This is an excellent video, and you are clearly well-informed about the facts of the JFK assassination. When weighing all of the evidence properly in this case I don't think there is any other reasonable conclusion than that LHO killed JFK and J.D. Tippit on his own. I am not a shooter, so I have a question for you. It seems to me that the shot on Houston, while closer, may actually have been more difficult because the limo was moving towards Oswald (is it more difficult to track a target moving toward you or away from you?) and also because Houston runs beside the TSBD, so there would have been some lateral movement of the limo on Houston relative to Oswald's line of sight. What do you think? There is also of course the fact that you mentioned, which is that everyone would have known immediately where the shot came from, and also I think Oswald would have had to have made himself fully visible in the window taking the shot while the limo was on Houston, as opposed to being able to hide back in the corner when taking the shot on Elm. The windshield and two rows of passengers would also be between Oswald and JFK on Houston, but not on Elm. Of course, if the shots did come from the 6th floor of the TSBD all of this speculation about how difficult the shots were is moot, since someone clearly was able to make those shots that day. You probably already know this, but in the rapid-fire part of Oswald's Marine Corps shooting test he was able to hit 8 out of 10 bullseyes from 200 yards and 7 out of 10 bullseyes from 300 yards, both of which results are rated above expert level.

When you want to know forensically if there have been two or more bullets fired from two or more trajectories, investigators will analyze blood splatter pattern evidence left behind on different surfaces at a crime scene. When Jackie's dress is open to public viewing in 2103, hopefully, there will still be some interest in finding the truth in this case. Until then, I guess we can continue to call each other morons over the internet.

The House Assassinations Committee determined in 1978 that there were more than one shooter.

If you think Oswald did this alone then you just ignored over 20 doctors who examined jfk and determined it was a front shot that killed him.

Anyone who believes the Warren Report is delusional. Oswald could not have fired the frontal headshot.

Thats where shooter shot connely not JFK

Last 3 shot went in building guess where was on second floor wake up people smell roses government won't open up files because government did it LBJ and mob and government cover up

JFK- the limo did not even need to be in dealy plaza for the President to be assassinated. All that was necessary was for the President to be seated in the back seat of the Limo. Both bullets entered the back in an upward trajectory, the first exited the neck, pierced the windshield, hit the curb downrange, nicked James Tagues cheek. The second entered the back in the same upward trajectory, exited the right temple, hit the windshield frame, ripped into two pieces, fell to the floorboard. Both originated just behind the seat. The entire ‘crime scene’ was in control of the ‘government’ from C-130, to love field, to dealy plaza, to parkland, back to C-130, to Whitehouse garage, to Dearborn Mi. Where it was stripped and rebuilt. I suspect the ‘device’ from which two projectiles transited the president was placed and removed while the aircraft was aloft. How do you kill a man riding in an open car on a public street in front of hoards of people without being seen? Mount a remotely activated device, just behind the seat, capable of firing two projectiles from point blank range on a slightly upward (8-10 degrees)trajectory. Video synopsis of evidence generated in Dealy Plaza that day to that conclusion. Short version 6:31. kzbin.info/www/bejne/qX-Tf4GYeqecm8U Long version 19:25. kzbin.info/www/bejne/hmfOnYFmlpqcoq8

Excellent video

Not sure . witness that we're there said that at leasted one shot was fired from the fence. I believe there was two shooters. Oswald being one.

Great video. It's nice that someone with sensible thinking posted this. I didn't always believe there was more than one shooter. To put this in perspective, I was only 3 when JFK was killed, so anything I read didn't start until I was about 12. And those first accounts were only about the 4 days so I had no reason to believe anybody but Oswald was involved. And then, like millions of others, saw the Zapruder film and saw that backward snap of his head. Well, yes, it DID look like someone shot from the front. But it wouldn't until the NOVA special from 1988 that I learned that, well, just because his head snapped backward, didn't mean he was shot from the front. Ugh. Then in 1991 I had the opportunity to visit Dealy Plaza. And like any other sensible person who has visited the place, was surprised at how small the area was. I saw for myself that anybody with any kind of rifle could have easily shot from that window down into that car. And the other surprise I got was just how close the fence really was to the street - meaning that it was a little hard for me to believe that a rifleman could have been there and nobody noticed. Yes, I realize there is a possibility, but as I write this, nobody has been able to irrefutably prove there was a second gunman. But isn't it amazing that this is the most photographed murder ever (22 cameras were there at the time of the attack) and despite all those photos we STILL can't come to an unarguable conclusion.

Big Pimping approves!!!!!

U point to the 7th story dumbbell.

Good video. Yes. Oswald was the only one firing at the President that fateful day. He was in the 6th floor corner window of depository. There were 2 guys that day watching the President motorcade in the 5th floor window of depository directly under Oswald. They knew someone was above them shooting at the President in the building. Nobody ever mentions that.

Now to the right of the zapruder pedestal is cement steps where 3 people were standing on the Moorman photo, if a shot came from the knoll it would have sailed over their head, wouldn’t, you holler to high heaven to anyone who would listen that these shots were their, their was little from these 3 to verify and they were there.

Oswald was "a shooter". And he made it work. So why listen to one who DIDN'T murder JFK from the TSBD? Oswald already did it.....

What do you say about Dr. McClellan who was in the emergency room within inches of the president , believes the head shot came from the front? Especially after he saw Zepruder film.

The 6.5 cacarno was a pig of a rifle!! Many people said they heard what they thought were fire crackers..the 6.5 makes a very loud boom..where as a rifle with a sound moderator does sound more like a fire cracker. The way Kennedys head exploded looks like a shot from a light caliber high velocity bullet. The 6.5 wldng have made the same head wound.

Just know Browning Arms, has a 1911 380. And a 22. 17 % smaller than a full size 1911. Good for small hands. St.Paul,Minnesota.

They made a silencer in 1909

Amazing that Oswald denied everything. Amazing that a mafia man Ruby shoots Oswald in police custody. amazing that Clint Hill over the last couple years now remembers that the exit wound was in the right front side of the head, instead of the right rear of the head as he said for years. Unreal that 22 of the Parkland staff said that the hole in the mans head was at the rear of his head, behind the ear in the left rear quadrant. Ever do some research and know that the money order for the Carcano was never cashed? Ever ask yourself fat boy that you must be cleaed by the CIA to run radar for U2 spy planes in Japan? Ever ask your own silly fat ass how Oswald got to Russia and got back with no questions asked? No you don't. You know nothing. looks like you eat everything.

The perfect shot would have been in the middle of the turn. Even with a head-on shot, the windshield and the other occupants wouldn't have been in the way from the 6th floor. The shooter wouldn't have to expose himself to make the shot. He could sit on book boxes. He would have had to expose himself to take the shot he allegedly took.