When you make the two one ..... His talking about your flesh and you spirit. Which of the two you want to be. to live in the flesh for the flesh is ego and loves the worldy things or to live as ypu should as your true form which is your spirit. For you my brothers and sisters have a mission. and that mission, is to bring the kingdom of God here on earth. How ? Its simple and yet its hard. It is LOVE and it has to be unconditional, To each and every single being in this world. Even to your enemies. Only then will you see the kingdom of God. For its inside you...its inside in each and everyone of us. its all up to you to manifest it. For when you die, you Will simply step in , in that condition you have planted and cultivated when you were alive. It is not true that we "go" to heaven. We grow to heaven. The more you live in love, the more you are closer to GOD for GOD IS LOVE AND LOVE IS GOD. Can you love your enemies, can you love everyone unconditionaly? If you say NO then you will never see the kingdom of GOD. The kingdom of God is not in religion.

Dont forget the letter of pontius and claudia. Those are another accounts.

I know you're white ancestors taught you that Jesus is white but go read the Bible again! Please stop this rhetoric and propaganda on providing false images. AllahuAkbar!

Thank God for the second coming of Jesus... Donald J Trump

It’s obvious Jesus existed 😭 god never existed

You forgot the verse in revelations that describes three frog like expressions going out of the mouth of the beast and out of the mouth of the dragon and onto the world, one example could be hieroglyphs depicting frog beings with the Pharos and many others. Basically the verse would be calling aliens demons, it would make it harder for Christian’s to believe in god that made us but mentions nothing about making other races outside of human kind

Yes 100%

This dude is funny as heck

Can you do an episode on the historical evidence of Jesus life death and resurrection please. I've been obsessed with the topic lately and there is more than a single episode worth of information I'd say. Peace be with you.

I don't really care if Jesus existed, it's believable, there isn't really any great evidence but I can buy it. What I really want to know is if god exists and if you can prove it with empirical evidence. Without proof of god, then Jesus was just a man who died 2000 years ago.

I’m shocked someone on a Shultz podcast is religious

Who here in 2025

3:14 A.D. or Anno Domini, latin for "In The Year of The Lord".

24:59 couldn’t the shroud of Turin be evidence

5:09 two people become one, in child birth,once the prince has been readied for the world, your kingdom may have longevity. if you succeed in your parenting you will learn nurturing your kingdom is like nurturing your son. Both need to grow so that you may live forever.

This is a great video. Hope to see more!

“I had a necklace with him… not at his best moment” lmao bro, that cracked me up, god bless you and all the best brother ❤️

Sick solar bears jersey

I don’t know what I consider myself religiously at the moment definitely not Christian Muslim atheist or Jewish but if all that biblical stuff is real than the aliens would most certainly be fallen Angelic entities, or Satan’s army essentially. According to the information I gathered on the Internet through extensive research.

jesus christ is my lord and savior amen

JESUS HAVING A TWIN IS HILARIOUS <MAKS SENSE TO THIMK HE ROSEFROM THE DEAD LMAO OH MY MEHHHHH

Please pray for discernment and spiritual guidance from our Lord. I suggest watching a few of DLMs Christian lifestyle videos! He covers this topic and it’s very VERY interesting and insightful. I’m a born again Christian and I used to be a believer in the unknown and aliens until God humbled and showed me the real biblical truth. These “aliens” are demonic beings tricking us, their one and only goal is to pull us away from the all living truth of Jesus Christ. There is NO other life force but humans, which our loving Father God made in his image! The wheel mentioned in the Bible is a cherubim. Most likely an angelic being. Continue to pray for God to show you the truth! He’s a loving and honest Father.

Hey it's the guy off Flagrant who isn't actually insufferable

I thought James was a skeptic of Jesus until he saw Jesus after the resurrection?

UNFORTUNATELY THERE IS NO REAL EVIDENCE AT ALL. There are countless of reasons to question if Jesus ever existed. It is not just ideological zeal from fundamentalist atheists. I will refer to the much worn out non-Christian sources to point out the conceptual mistakes and inaccuracies associated to them. In the first place, erudition is necessary at this point and not speculation or ideology. - The Talmud dates from the III century AD at best; based on the Gospels, its account of Jesus´ ministry is highly biased and builds and expands by adding events intended to disparage his image and present him as a cheap wizard or a quack. The rabbinic Jews, faithful to the theology of the Second Temple, wanted to distinguish themselves from the Christian heresy. Most important of all, it is not a primary source but a counterpoint to the evangelical legend. - Pliny the younger NEVER mentions the name of Jesus. He simply describes the rituals and practices of the Christian sect and states that the Christians are followers of Christ. He has no idea of a historical Jesus neither from Nazareth nor from Galilee. He wrote around 110 AD, more than eighty years after the alleged events. He could hardly be taken as a primary source; he was torturing Christians and got the information directly from them. - Tacitus has been interpolated in more than one occasion; not only is he ignorant of the very name of Jesus (he mentions Christ like Pliny) but he also states that Pilate was procurator and we know that this fellow was not such a thing but prefect (=praefectus Judaea); the office of the procurator came later (after Claudius to be more precise). Tacitus could not make such an egregious mistake: he had access to the Imperial Archives along with Suetonius (at least the records of the “bad emperors” that preceded the Antonines). It was already noticed by Hershfeld in 1905 that the whole passage accuses a Christian copist; on the other hand, his account of Rome´s fire does not agree with the accounts of Suetonius and Dion Cassius on the same subject; the passage was a Christian re-elaboration of the fire of Antiochia by the rebellious Jews in 67 AD as described by Josephus in The Jewish War (almost with the same words). To top it all, he is of late date: 115 AD. I can expand on this point if desired. .- Then comes Suetonius: though he mentions “Chrestus” in his account of emperor Claudius (41-54 AD) he clearly states that that emperor expelled Jews from Rome (and not Christians). We also know that there were Christological (that is Messianic) Jewish sects in Rome and the whole Mediterranean long before the Christians. Again, no reference to Jesus but the mythical Christ. We must remember that Suetonius wrote his main work in 116 AD. Needless to say, apart from the fact that there is nothing about a historical character, the two passages where he mentions Christians are contradictory (I can extend myself on this if required). - In any case, the three Roman authors were contemporary with the growth of a Christological sect and were only marginally aware of this fact; yet they knew nothing at all of Jesus of Nazareth. Far more important, if they had any idea of this sect adoring Christ is because they knew it from the same Christians and not independently of them. - Much worse with Thalus: his work is lost and Julius Africanus (160-240 AD), a Christian apologist, does claim that Thalus refers to the seismic movement and the eclipse of the sky during Pilate´s tenure of his office; yet there is no evidence that Thalus ever connected those events with the crucifixion. It is Julius the one that takes advantage of those events to claim that there was a supernatural darkening of the sky (not an eclipse) in order to reassert the myth of the crucifixion. See the dates. Too late to be taken as a reliable source; moreover, geologists clearly established that there were two earthquakes in Judea under Pilate (26-36 AD) and neither Thalus nor Julius had even a faintest idea as of which of the two is the one in the Gospels. - As for Mara-bar-Serapion you will be just as disappointed: it was stated by van Horst that it goes back to the second half of the second century AD; it was the product of a Christian author under the Antonines´ persecution. He appears disguised as a stoic philosopher to avoid being caught and keep intact the Christian attitude of empathy and forgiveness since he is definitely vituperating the Jews who rejected the Christian version of the Messiah. - As for Josephus: after much debate for decades, it was clearly established recently that the Testimonium Flavianum is false (and not partially false as some scholars feebly claim). Jewish scholars long ago have already dismissed it as a Christian forgery. More important, the Church Fathers do not mention it until Eusebius (after 325 AD). Even more serious is the fact that the version of it in Photius´ library (IX century AD) and the scholar Vossius (XVI century AD) did not have these interpolations made by Christian scribes. I can give you more documented information if required and a more extended explanation. Yet, even if it were genuine, it dates from 97 DC; if this is the case, it is too tardive a source to be used as a primary and reliable one; he could only learn the information from the Christians and not from an independent unbiased source. No wonder that he mentions nothing of the sect or Jesus´ biography in the entire corpus of his work beyond two disconnected allusions out of context (even the use of the aorist as a verbal tense is anomalous: the Testimonium, as referring to Pilate, is in passive voice contrasting with the active in the whole passage). Not even the slaughter of the innocents -a fantastic gruesome impossible event-is ever mentioned while he spares nothing to attack Herod´s memory. Neither does he connect Jesus with the Baptist and his account of that character differs from the Gospels just as gruesomely. - At last, it was not until Celsus and Lucian of Samosata in 175 AD that the name Jesus appears in more or less reliable non-Christian sources. And it was at that time that Irenaeus of Lyon mentions the four canonical ones and the Book of Acts!!! Thirty years before, Justin Martyr vaguely alludes to the Memories of the Apostles. He mentions no passage that we may confer with the Gospels in order to attest the historicity of those facts attributed to Jesus and he has no idea of the word “Gospel”. The Apostolic Fathers fare even worse when it comes at this. This is simply a gentle lighting upon the subject to indicate how flimsy is the claim to build an alleged historicity of Jesus from pagan authors. I strongly advise to review the subject. Let me add that you would be surprised that the information from early Christian writers is not free of tremendous inconsistencies; I would add they are even worse. But that´s another story; I will gently rejoin the conversation to point out at these, if required. Thank you for the video and keep it up!

I made the mistake of subscribing to this guy. The fact that he gives any time to these forgeries, that he knows are wrong, tell you all you need to know. If you are looking for a good teacher look for Mike Winger.

Jesus definitely existed he is King of All KINGS 👑✝️

Yes, there was an apocalyptic preacher named Joshua or Jesus if your Geeek. Miracles? Up for debate.

Cause we came from space

I saw that wheel inside wheel with eyes on dmt breakthrough i just don’t know because I read about this before that’s why i saw that in my trip or it was really alien encounter 🤔

The greatest story ever told

Alot of people don't realize we humans are proof of God the omega is real his scripture is real Jesus gave us the word to believe in him and have faith

they are demons

Yes he did

❤

Such a good video man.Amen❤️

14:30 it was the orbs 💫

Hey Mark. Can you wright the name of that nors drink, I can’t find it from what you write. 👋 from Norge

Jesus is fake news

Love the idea of the “wheels” being aliens! I believe though the “wheels” are supposed to be what Angles really look like, at least the ones close to God

Dude, love your videos. Thank you for such informative and interesting content. God bless!

Caucasian Jesus

Mark 6 verse 3 😌

John, Paul never saw Jesus. Jesus never knew John and Paul.

God love this channel

this video could've been 10 minutes if it weren't for all the side quests

Im just glad i didnt have someone laugh aggressively to lmk when to laugh lol great work

Stopped listening under 5 minutes guys mocking it

You forgot the most heavy evidence. The letter from Abgar Ukama.

You know, Quasimodo predicted all of this.