Is Paulist Bible commentary better or Jerome biblical commentary, 3rd edition? Which one is more rigorous and honest?
@victoriassecretisluv2 күн бұрын
Use your brain and think critically . The talmud came 500 years AFTER Jesus died . It clearly was jealousy as the Christians were growing 30 times faster than the Jews . Just as they called Trump Hitler today and he is not, clearly anything contrary in speech about Jesus and His precious Mother would help to stop the coversions to Christianity . So the Tora is good as it is the Old Testament in the Bible . The Talmud was subject to error and written by men long after Christ but shortly before the muslims came on the scene . The Church rejected the Talmud even burning it . Today The Christians are the largest religion in the world and the Jews less than 1 percent . And yet we love the SAME God . One day we will all be together happy .
@j2shoes2883 күн бұрын
you're wrong, we have the original Quran ( or parts of it ), it's in Birmingham
@historytheology3 күн бұрын
@@j2shoes288 could you send me a time stamp of when I said we do not have the original Qur’an? I think I made it clear that we have the uthmanic Qur’an
@Matthew-cp2eg20 сағат бұрын
Congrats on admitting the current koran has been corrupted even further as the Birmingham lacks vowels as vowels were created later.
@vincevergara589813 күн бұрын
I'd love to see a video about textual criticism/transmission variants of the Quran. I appreciate all the information on sources i get from your video. Thank you for that. But I do get the sense that the same principles are not being applied evenly to the Quran. I recently watched Yasir Kadhi being interviewd by Mohammed Hajib, and Kadhi appears to be disingenious or unforthcoming at the least, if not frankly dishonest.
@ruddin933 күн бұрын
Skeletal Qur'anic Text canonised with controlled transmission 15 years after The Prophet's death. Multiple readings from the same skeletal Qur'anic Text goes back to The Prophet.
@Jesusislord244314 күн бұрын
The majority of scholars agree that the Bible is reliable. Barth Herman only oversimplifies the variations. Like his 400000 variants for because we can spell John loves Mary in 8 different way . The variants are also mostly about spelling. When ask Bart Herman in a radio interview was asked what would the original Bible say. He said along the lines as : « pretty much what we had »
@Jesusislord244314 күн бұрын
I have read a lot on textual criticism as a Christian to know about it. What’s your opinion on the interview where Herman said he’d only disagree with metzger on 50 places?
@JamesDeleon21 күн бұрын
look into Sam shamoun brother
@Ray30gen22 күн бұрын
Please make a video on Textual criticism on the Quran ?
@hassanmirza23924 күн бұрын
Why? Quranic text is well preserved, unlike Bible manuscripts.
@hassanmirza239224 күн бұрын
Book recommendation: Islam and Christianity: Theological Themes in Comparative Perspective, by John Renard
@PrimaScripturaSemper29 күн бұрын
abdool do you have any thing that Mohammed wrote? Do you have the original quran from uthman? stop talking foolishness .....who wrote your quran?
@historytheology29 күн бұрын
@@PrimaScripturaSemper you are the fool. No muslim claims the prophet wrote down the Qur’an. Go and study
@PrimaScripturaSemper28 күн бұрын
@historytheology that's my point ..your prophet could not read or write.....where is your original quran.....you have a book from a prophet who can write.....lol
@PrimaScripturaSemper24 күн бұрын
@historytheology that's my point ....you making accusation on the bible but your prophet couldn't read or write ....you don't even know who wrote the quran
@kinyouz-nn4897Ай бұрын
What are ur favourite multi-vol bible commentaries?
@historytheology29 күн бұрын
I’m not sure i have a favourite. But the oxford by john barton is good. Or the harper collins
@kinyouz-nn489729 күн бұрын
@historytheology these are one vol i meant ur favorite commentary set
@historytheology29 күн бұрын
@ the Anchor and Hermeneia set probably
@fedesetrtatio1Ай бұрын
*For Islam to be true - Muslims must provide evidence for claims that it makes.* What evidence do you have that Mohammad was visited by angel Gabriel? What evidence do you have that Abraham built the Kaabah? What evidence do you have for the claim that Allah the pre-Islamic pagan god of Mohammad's tribe is Yahweh the true God of Abraham?
@historytheologyАй бұрын
@@fedesetrtatio1 the Qur’an is the evidence. If you can prove that the Qur’an is not from God then bring it on. We can analyse the evidence you bring forward and see how truthful you are in seeking truth or are just finding reasons to fulfil your desires.
@fedesetrtatio1Ай бұрын
@@historytheology To use the Quran as evidence is a logical fallacy. The logical fallacy is circular reasoning because the claims of the Quran are being challenged here. The inability of Islam to provide adequate evidence for these claims automatically forfeits its claim that Islam is a true religion. Say for example if you are unable to provide adequate evidence for the Angelic visitation of Gabriel then it flows that there was no angelic revelation and thus Islam is false.
@hassanmirza2392Ай бұрын
@@fedesetrtatio1 Read Bart Ehrman's Orthodox Corruption of Scriptures.
@fedesetrtatio1Ай бұрын
@@hassanmirza2392 What has this red herring statement got to do with my question.
@hassanmirza2392Ай бұрын
@@fedesetrtatio1 You worship Jesus, due to fabrications in NT as pointed out in Ehrman's book.
@fedesetrtatio1Ай бұрын
Jesus is the Kalimat of Allah and the Ruh of Allah. What proceeds from God is God.
@historytheologyАй бұрын
@@fedesetrtatio1 batil
@fedesetrtatio1Ай бұрын
@@historytheology If in Islam it is Halal to have the Eternal word as a book (Quran) why in Christianity is it Haram to have the Eternal word as Man (Jesus)?
@historytheologyАй бұрын
@@fedesetrtatio1 because the Bible says God is not a man
@fedesetrtatio1Ай бұрын
@@historytheology The Bible say God is not a man that he should lie. Insinuating that All Mortal Men lie. Guess what Jesus never lied and thus he was God. Akal before Nakal.
@historytheologyАй бұрын
@@fedesetrtatio1 the god is not a man part already disproves your claim. A zebra also never lie does it mean a zebra is now god?
@hassanmirza2392Ай бұрын
Nice Bible commentaries. I think we Muslims need such one volume extensive Quran commentaries in English language which use traditional Hadith and Fiqh resources.
@kinyouz-nn4897Ай бұрын
Tafsir baydawi but only the first vol is out
@fb.gg.ElDelincuenteАй бұрын
after selay aleykum i understand why your title is bs haha
@عبدالله-ن6ه2صАй бұрын
There is a crisis in the reliability of the Bible, and Christians ignore it even though it destroys their religion, such as: 1. The absence of the original text of the Bible! 2. The unreliability of the Bible writers Mark Paul Matthew Luke because they are unknown people and not disciples of Jesus, There is no continuous chain of transmission for narrators from Jesus’ disciples until this era, so how can a Christian verify the credibility of the narrators and the books he reads! 3. The Bible is messages and stories and not the textual words of the Creator, so it is no longer a holy book, There are many errors, contradictions, additions and omissions in different versions of the Holy Bible, and there is no original text that corrects these errors, and the Creator’s words are complete and there cannot be any deficiency or defect in them. 4. The Bible contradicts the correct scientific facts. This is also a big problem. God is the Creator of science, so how could he make mistakes in the Bible? Dr. Maurice Bucaille discovered some errors, so the Bible is no longer the word of God. 5. There is no text in the Bible whose author claims that He is the Creator and His commands and prohibitions must be followed! This is a problem that Christians ignore. How can they believe in a book whose author did not claim that he is the Creator and that his commands and prohibitions in the Holy Book must be followed? Likewise, the infant who they claim is the Creator never claimed to be God or for us to worship Him. So why do they demand that humanity worship a child who was cared for by a woman?
@historytheologyАй бұрын
I’ve made a follow up video, quoting from top critical New Testament scholars why even Paul rejects the idea Jesus is Fully Human and Fully God.
@kinyouz-nn4897Ай бұрын
These idiots are confusing god's nature and god's attributes
@historytheologyАй бұрын
@@kinyouz-nn4897thanks for your comments. I wouldn’t go far as to call them idiots but perhaps they lack formal understanding. May Allah guide them
@kinyouz-nn4897Ай бұрын
@historytheology ameen , iwas annoyed amd misspoke may allah forgive me for my indecency
@Caffer9286Ай бұрын
Dawah brain does not compute
@historytheologyАй бұрын
@@Caffer9286 my brain will only compute sense, not non-sense
@Caffer9286Ай бұрын
@historytheology listening to Christian apologetics like God Logic, Anthony Rogers, etc talk to Muslims and about the non sensical koran brought me to faith in our Lord Jesus Christ.
@j.c.nightwalker5322Ай бұрын
Keep reading into the next paragraph. Then I heard the number of those who were sealed: 144,000 from all the tribes of Israel. 5 From the tribe of Judah 12,000 were sealed, from the tribe of Reuben 12,000, from the tribe of Gad 12,000, 6 from the tribe of Asher 12,000, from the tribe of Naphtali 12,000, from the tribe of Manasseh 12,000, 7 from the tribe of Simeon 12,000, from the tribe of Levi 12,000, from the tribe of Issachar 12,000, 8 from the tribe of Zebulun 12,000, from the tribe of Joseph 12,000, from the tribe of Benjamin 12,000. The Great Multitude in White Robes 9 After this I looked, and there before me was a great multitude that no one could count, from every nation, tribe, people and language, standing before the throne and before the Lamb. They were wearing white robes and were holding palm branches in their hands. 10 And they cried out in a loud voice: “Salvation belongs to our God, who sits on the throne, and to the Lamb.” 11 All the angels were standing around the throne and around the elders and the four living creatures. They fell down on their faces before the throne and worshiped God, 12 saying: “Amen! Praise and glory and wisdom and thanks and honor and power and strength be to our God for ever and ever. Amen!” 13 Then one of the elders asked me, “These in white robes-who are they, and where did they come from?” 14 I answered, “Sir, you know.” And he said, “These are they who have come out of the great tribulation; they have washed their robes and made them white in the blood of the Lamb. Countless people go to heaven. The 144000 are the first Jews who believed and lived holy lives. Please read the whole thing before you make such claims. Jesus himself said neither Jew or Greek, slave or free, or man or woman will enter heaven because we are all the same and like the angels.
@dcrypt9107Ай бұрын
bro said 2 points and brought 4 T-T hahahaha
@dcrypt9107Ай бұрын
Bruh there is no way you said, 5000 manuscripts and fail to mention they were the same and not different or do you mean parts of the original ? can't even clarify your claims
@dcrypt9107Ай бұрын
bro we see you look into your Uthman Dawah Notes hahahahahaahahahahahahaha , please this is a weak claim made by you ya Akhi, go tell that to Sam Shamoun if you so confident
@kinyouz-nn4897Ай бұрын
Scholahs like sam shamshon are so stweng fr even thmslfs
@OvidiuBelciuАй бұрын
1. Jesus Christ is Fully God Jesus is the eternal Son of God, the second person of the Holy Trinity, and shares fully in the divine nature. This is affirmed by the Orthodox Church in passages such as John 1:1 ("In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.") and John 10:30 ("I and the Father are one"). As God, Jesus is uncreated, co-eternal with the Father and the Holy Spirit. His divinity is not diminished by His humanity but is fully present in His person. 2. Jesus Christ is Fully Human Jesus became fully human through His Incarnation-God the Son took on human flesh through the Virgin Mary by the power of the Holy Spirit. Orthodox Christians believe that Jesus was fully human in every way except for sin. He experienced hunger, thirst, pain, temptation, and death. His humanity is real, and He is true man, not a mere appearance of a man or a divine person acting in a human way. He was born as a true human baby, grew up, and underwent all the stages of human life. Passages such as Philippians 2:7-8 ("He emptied Himself, taking the form of a servant, being made in the likeness of men. And being found in human form, He humbled Himself by becoming obedient to the point of death, even death on a cross.") highlight the depths of Jesus' humanity. 3. The Hypostatic Union This is the term used in Orthodox theology to describe the union of Jesus’ divine and human natures in one person (the "hypostasis" of Christ). Jesus is one person, not two separate persons, but in Him exist two complete natures-divine and human. The Council of Chalcedon (451 AD) affirmed this doctrine, declaring that Jesus is "truly God and truly man" and that His two natures are "without confusion, without change, without division, without separation." The union does not mean that the divine nature and human nature are mixed or altered. Instead, they remain distinct yet are united in the person of Jesus. This union is a mystery that transcends human understanding, but it is foundational to Orthodox Christology. 4. Implications of the Hypostatic Union Salvation: The Orthodox Church teaches that Jesus' full humanity and full divinity are essential for the salvation of humanity. Only as a true man could He fully identify with humanity and offer Himself as a perfect sacrifice. Only as God could He have the power to overcome death and sin. Theosis: Through the Hypostatic Union, Orthodox theology also emphasizes the possibility of theosis (deification). Because the Word became flesh, human nature can be united with God. Christ, through His humanity, becomes the bridge by which human beings can be restored to communion with God and partake in divine life. 5. Christ’s Role in Redemption The Orthodox Church teaches that Christ's humanity was necessary for Him to take on the burden of human sin, to suffer and die on the cross, and to rise again, thereby conquering death. His divinity ensures that His sacrifice was of infinite value, sufficient to reconcile all of creation with God. 6. Iconography In Orthodox iconography, the dual nature of Christ is often depicted with symbolic gestures. For example, the face of Christ in icons conveys both the majesty of the divine and the tenderness of the human. This visual representation is intended to help the faithful contemplate the mystery of the God-man.
@sj1517Ай бұрын
The dumb Muslims can't understand the basis of Christian faith. They can accept & believe Mohamed n human form be taken to imaginative heaven from Jerusalem. They can also believe gibreel (actually satan) giving the verses to mhmed
@eyoo369Ай бұрын
The word "impossible" does not exist in the realm of divinity and God. This further shows that Muslims believe in a limited constrained God rather than a superior one that can supersede the laws of physics, math and time and space.
@historytheologyАй бұрын
@@eyoo369 so you believe that God died?
@QuranandBibleАй бұрын
@@historytheology lol, even muzz...lims believe if their body died, they still alive and will be ask by angel...who is your gg,,odd? etc....see how easy to REFUTE YOU
@eyoo369Ай бұрын
@@historytheology No smartass, God is eternal and cannot die. It was his human nature as flesh that died on that cross.. not his divine nature. You struggle to understand the Hypostatic Union and then falsely bait people with stupid questions like "so you believe that God died?" Stop humiliating yourself
@historytheologyАй бұрын
@ err…(scratches head) how does it refutes my thesis?
@siononerealapex2602Ай бұрын
@@historytheology the answer to your question is a question there you go : So you belive God does not have the power to be omnipresent and also divide or better said reveal himself in the human world while also existing in the Heavenly plane or better said all planes exisiting that we might not be even aware of ?
@AmeliaAlHayekАй бұрын
It's possible and Jesus Christ already proved it.
@عبدالله-ن6ه2صАй бұрын
The original text of the Bible does not exist. If you cling to all the copies of the holy books, you will never be able to prove your religion because there is no original text that you can refer to. All versions of the Bible contain additions, inaccuracies, distortions, and contradictions, so they are not the word of God. These are not my words, but the words of Christian scholars.
@AmeliaAlHayekАй бұрын
@@عبدالله-ن6ه2ص We have thousands and thousands of manuscripts which tells us what the original was once you compare them side by side and as well two thousand year of church history including all the church fathers statements which they all quote the Bible and thus we can construct exactly what the original text says. And the original is what we have today.
@عبدالله-ن6ه2صАй бұрын
@@AmeliaAlHayek Well, these are some books by Christian scholars: 1.The Text of the New Testament: Its Transmission, Corruption, and Restoration by Bruce M. Metzger 2.Misquoting Jesus: The Story Behind Who Changed the Bible and Why by Bart D. Ehrman 3.Myths and Mistakes in New Testament Textual Criticism by Elijah Hixson 4. Jesus of Nazareth by Pope Benedict XVI >> (In this book, the Pope confesses to distorting the Bible) Page 200 On pages 260-261, he confesses here in the conclusion of the Gospel of Mark, chapter 16, verses 19-20, he says that this conclusion is fake and was added to the text in the second century AD, and this is a confession from the head of the largest Catholic church, It relates to a long text in the New Testament. The Gospel of Mark is the oldest of the Gospels, and the oldest text of Mark is distorted, and this is a very important statement. 5. In the book: مفتاح العقد الجديد الجزء الثاني أعال الرسل أو رسائل بولس الرسول والرسائل الجامعة وسفر الرؤيا البابا تواضرس الثاني The Egyptian Pope Tawadros II admits on page 233 that the Second Epistle to Peter was not written by Peter! It is a confession more dangerous than the confession of the Catholic Pope. 6.Hunting for the Original Word of God: the quest for the original text of the New Testament and the Qur'an in light of textual and historical criticism by Sami Ameri. I can send you many books in which Christian scholars admit to distortions, contradictions, errors, additions, etc.. Therefore, they are not the word of God. God is perfect, and the Bible is so full of errors and contradictions. Watch Al Fanous Al Muslim channel and Sheikh Othman bin Al Farouk, you will learn a lot from them. Hundreds of Christians convert to Islam on their channel
@عبدالله-ن6ه2صАй бұрын
@@AmeliaAlHayek Well, these are some books by Christian scholars: 1.The Text of the New Testament: Its Transmission, Corruption, and Restoration by Bruce M. Metzger 2.Misquoting Jesus: The Story Behind Who Changed the Bible and Why by Bart D. Ehrman 3.Myths and Mistakes in New Testament Textual Criticism by Elijah Hixson 4. Jesus of Nazareth by Pope Benedict XVI >> (In this book, the Pope confesses to distorting the Bible) Page 200 On pages 260-261, he confesses here in the conclusion of the Gospel of Mark, chapter 16, verses 19-20, he says that this conclusion is fake and was added to the text in the second century AD, and this is a confession from the head of the largest Catholic church, It relates to a long text in the New Testament. The Gospel of Mark is the oldest of the Gospels, and the oldest text of Mark is distorted, and this is a very important statement. 5. In the book: مفتاح العقد الجديد الجزء الثاني أعال الرسل أو رسائل بولس الرسول والرسائل الجامعة وسفر الرؤيا البابا تواضرس الثاني The Egyptian Pope Tawadros II admits on page 233 that the Second Epistle to Peter was not written by Peter! It is a confession more dangerous than the confession of the Catholic Pope. 6.Hunting for the Original Word of God: the quest for the original text of the New Testament and the Qur'an in light of textual and historical criticism by Sami Ameri. I can send you many books in which Christian scholars admit to distortions, contradictions, errors, additions, etc.. Therefore, they are not the word of God. God is perfect, and the Bible is so full of errors and contradictions. Watch The Muslim Lantern channel and Sheikh Othman bin Al Farouk, you will learn a lot from them. Hundreds of Christians convert to Islam on their channel
@eyoo369Ай бұрын
@@عبدالله-ن6ه2ص The original Quran manuscript doesn't exist either. It got burned down by Ibn Uthman and then recompiled centuries later into 10 qiraats. None of this is ordained by God, angel Gabriel or mohammed. You basically lost your ahrufs which was revealed to your prophet but you think you still got it in the form of Qiraats (all assumptions with 0 historical evidence). Also there are TONS of inconsistencies in-between each of the Qiraats. The Bible like the KJV version might have some wrong year counts which is a translation error but it never changes the meaning. But the Qiraats literally have complete change in pronouns which changes the entire perspective and meaning of the text.
@CynHicksАй бұрын
You confine God to your own understanding. You don't actually believe that everything is possible with God.
@historytheologyАй бұрын
@@CynHicks no i define god according to critical reading of the bible. With god everything is logically possible. But you define god as logically impossible.
@عبدالله-ن6ه2صАй бұрын
But Jesus could not do much because he was a human being, and he was a woman's child. We understood as Muslims that God had no beginning, while Jesus had a birth date. God is a creator, Jesus is a creature, for Christians God is a creator and a creature at the same time. God dies and revives Himself even though He is dead! God is strong and weak at the same time. Your religion is based on contradictions, because your book is distorted. There are many books on that, but you ignore that
@eyoo369Ай бұрын
@@historytheology The very fact you believe "God can't do X" shows you believe in a limited constrained God.
@historytheologyАй бұрын
@@eyoo369 your very premise is flawed, which is why you think and conclude that way. Even your very Bible refutes you. God does not change. Mal 3:6. God does not become a man. For God to become a man does not befit His majesty. If You say that God becomes a man, Jesus, but this is not the doctrine of the Trinity. God the father does not become the man Jesus. And if God becomes the man Jesus, and he died at the cross, that means God died.
@QuranandBibleАй бұрын
@@historytheology ACCORDING TO BIBLE Matthew 19:26: "With men this is impossible, but with God all things are possible" Luke 1:37: "For with God nothing will be impossible" Luke 18:27: "The things which are impossible with men are possible with God" Philippians 4:13: "I can do all things through him who" Luke 1:37-45 For with God nothing is ever impossible and no word from God shall be without power or impossible of fulfillment. Matthew 19:26 Jesus looked at them and said, “With man this is impossible, but with God all things are possible.” this is your ALL....AAH Sūrah 6:101 Originator of the heavens and the earth. How can He have a son when He has no wife and He created all things? And He is Knowing of all things. REMARKS: The god of ISLAM, he cannot have a son unless he has a GIRLFRIEND. Allah himself questioned his INABILITY. 3:54 ALLL....AA..H THE BEST D.E.CI.E.V.E.R....IF S.A.T.A.N PRETENDS TO BE GG...O..DD that is the B.E.S.T. D.E.C.E.P.T,I,O.N
@عبدالله-ن6ه2صАй бұрын
My brother, you will not find a text in the Bible that says that Jesus is God or that we should ever worship him. There are many texts that prove that Jesus was a prophet in the Bible, But Christians ignore the texts that prove that Jesus was a prophet such as: Mark 6:4 But Jesus said unto them, A prophet is not without honour, but in his own country, and among his own kin, and in his own house. John 17:3 And this is life eternal, that they might know thee the only true God, and Jesus Christ, whom thou hast sent. Matthew 21:11 And the multitude said, This is Jesus the prophet of Nazareth of Galilee. Luke 24:19 And he said unto them, What things? And they said unto him, Concerning Jesus of Nazareth, which was a prophet mighty in deed and word before God and all the people: John 1:45 Philip findeth Nathanael, and saith unto him, We have found him, of whom Moses in the law, and the prophets, did write, Jesus of Nazareth, the son of Joseph. Acts 13:23 (KJV) Of this man's seed hath God according to his promise raised unto Israel a Saviour, Jesus: 1 Timothy 2:5 For there is one God, and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus John 13:31 KJV Therefore, when he was gone out, Jesus said, Now is the Son of man glorified, and God is glorified in him. John 6:14 KJV Then those men, when they had seen the miracle that Jesus did, said, This is of a truth that prophet that should come into the world. Acts 13:30 (KJV) But God raised him from the dead: Mark 13:32 (KJV) But of that day and that hour knoweth no man, no, not the angels which are in heaven, neither the Son, but the Father. Matthew 26:36 Then cometh Jesus with them unto a place called Gethsemane, and saith unto the disciples, Sit ye here, while I go and pray yonder. Mark 11:12 And on the morrow, when they were come from Bethany, he was hungry: Luke 24:19 KJV And he said unto them, What things? And they said unto him, Concerning Jesus of Nazareth, which was a prophet mighty in deed and word before God and all the people John 4:19 KJV The woman saith unto him, Sir, I perceive that thou art a prophet. John 11:35 (KJV) Jesus wept. John 4:21 (KJV) Jesus saith unto her, Woman, believe me, the hour cometh, when ye shall neither in this mountain, nor yet at Jerusalem, worship the Father. Luke 11:2 (KJV) And he said unto them, When ye pray, say, Our Father which art in heaven, Hallowed be thy name. Thy kingdom come. Thy will be done, as in heaven, so in earth. Luke 2:21 KJV And when eight days were accomplished for the circumcising of the child, his name was called JESUS, which was so named of the angel before he was conceived in the womb. Luke 2:14 KJV Glory to God in the highest, And on earth peace among men in whom he is well pleased. Luke 11:2 (KJV) And he said unto them, When ye pray, say, Our Father which art in heaven, Hallowed be thy name. Thy kingdom come. Thy will be done, as in heaven, so in earth. Matthew 21:19 KJV And when he saw a fig tree in the way, he came to it, and found nothing thereon, but leaves only, and said unto it, Let no fruit grow on thee henceforward for ever. And presently the fig tree withered away. Luke 2:27 KJV And he came by the Spirit into the temple: and when the parents brought in the child Jesus, to do for him after the custom of the law Matthew 26:39 After walking a little farther away from them, Jesus fell to the ground and prayed, “My Father, if it is possible, do not give me this cup of suffering. But do what you want, not what I want.” There are many texts that deny the divinity of Jesus and prove that he was a weak human being who ate, went hungry, breastfed with milk, was cared for by his mother, and asked for help from God in heaven. Indeed, many texts say that he is a prophet, and those who know him say that he is a prophet, etc. Many of these texts I knew from the dialogues of Muslim preachers such as Sheikh Othman bin Al-Farouq and The Muslim Lantern and Sh. Ibn Hazm .
@historytheologyАй бұрын
@@عبدالله-ن6ه2ص thank you for sharing these valuable passages that provides proof against the divinity of Jesus as God.
@عبدالله-ن6ه2صАй бұрын
@@historytheology My brother, I wrote another comment in which there are many references in comparative religions that are very important. Watch them and copy the references you have into your computer notebook.
@historytheologyАй бұрын
@@عبدالله-ن6ه2ص thank you for your efforts. may Allah reward you
@nadaiduitАй бұрын
@@عبدالله-ن6ه2ص why lantern and the likes refused to debate with CP?
@عبدالله-ن6ه2صАй бұрын
@@nadaiduit You may not know that I am an Arab. I watched the Christian princess lie a lot on his channel, so no one deserves to discuss liars. But I remember Sheikh Othman asked the Christian princess to come to him and debate him, but she was still hiding behind the keyboard. He is an unknown character and will remain so.
@عبدالله-ن6ه2صАй бұрын
Thank you, brother. Other most important books of Aqeedah that a Muslim should learn: 1. Commentary On Kitab At Tawheed by Salih Al- Utaimeen or Concise Commentary on the Book of Tawhid by Dr. Salih al Fawzan Sheikh Al-Fawzan (One of the most important basic books that explain Islamic monotheism.) 2. The Creed of Al-wasitiyyah by Ibn Taymiyyah ( To know the attributes of the Creator in Islam) >>> Sharah al Aqeda al Wasitiyah 2 Volume Set by Shykh Muhammad bin Salih Al Uthaimin 3. Explanation of a Summary of Al Aqeedatul Hamawiyyah: Authored by Ibn Taymiyyah 4. Towards Understanding of Tadmuriyyah by Shaykh-Al-Islam Ibn Taymiyyah 5. Explanation of the Three Fundamental Principles of Islaam by Shaykh Muhammad ibn Saalih al-Uthaymeen 6. An Explanation of the Four Rules Regarding Shirk of the Imaam and Mujaddid Muhammad Bin Abdil Wahhab by Luhaydaan Fawzaan 7. Explanation Of Important Lessons For Every Muslim by Shaykh-'Abdur-Razaq Al-Abad 8. Nawaqid Al Islam : The Ten Nullifiers Of Islam by Shaikh Muhammad Ibn Abdul Wahhab 9. Qawaidul Arba’ah by Shaikh Muhammed ibn Abdul Wahhab 10. Kashf Al Shubuhaat : The Clearing Of Doubts by Shaikh Muhammed ibn Abdul Wahhab
@clarkkent52Ай бұрын
You are muslim you have no father just a slave...no reedemer you carry the weight of your own sin
@jacobortega3424Ай бұрын
Imagine saying God cant do the impossible… okey so now we’re limiting God?
@historytheologyАй бұрын
@@jacobortega3424 so using your logic god can decided not to exist?
@عبدالله-ن6ه2صАй бұрын
There is no greater restriction than God becoming a human being, and this contradicts the wisdom of the Great and Powerful God. Watch Ibn al-Qayyim al-Jawziyya’s poem To the Christians. It will briefly explain to you that the attributes of the Creator in Christianity contradict the greatness of the Creator.
@nadaiduitАй бұрын
@@jacobortega3424 Yasir Qadhi: The Current Narratives of the Quran has Holes.
@CynHicksАй бұрын
@historytheology God can decide not to exist; that's a condition of being all powerful. YOU can't not exist; God can. If not God couldn't create something from nothing, friend. When God chose to exist infinite reality began. God IS the beginning and the end. God wills all things. Using your rationale is easy to dismiss God from existence at all. Do you really think that God can't choose to exists?
@عبدالله-ن6ه2صАй бұрын
@@nadaiduit Yasir Qadhi does not know the Islamic monotheism that Muslim children know, Learn from trustworthy people.
@AP.i3Ай бұрын
Jesus is fully man and fully God scriptures reveal that 😅
@historytheologyАй бұрын
no it didn’t
@thanushkАй бұрын
@@historytheology It did . But you are still ignorant of the fact
@messibooks6530Ай бұрын
@@AP.i3 which scriptures? Please share
@nadaiduitАй бұрын
@@messibooks6530also in your scripture Q3:45
@nadaiduitАй бұрын
@@messibooks6530 [John 1:1] "In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God." The theme of the Gospel of John is the revelation that the Lord Jesus is God.
@orandegellogaming4793Ай бұрын
““Who is this that darkens counsel by words without knowledge? Dress for action like a man; I will question you, and you make it known to me. “Where were you when I laid the foundation of the earth? Tell me, if you have understanding. Who determined its measurements-surely you know! Or who stretched the line upon it? On what were its bases sunk, or who laid its cornerstone, when the morning stars sang together and all the sons of God shouted for joy? “Or who shut in the sea with doors when it burst out from the womb, when I made clouds its garment and thick darkness its swaddling band, and prescribed limits for it and set bars and doors, and said, ‘Thus far shall you come, and no farther, and here shall your proud waves be stayed’? “Have you commanded the morning since your days began, and caused the dawn to know its place, that it might take hold of the skirts of the earth, and the wicked be shaken out of it? It is changed like clay under the seal, and its features stand out like a garment. From the wicked their light is withheld, and their uplifted arm is broken. “Have you entered into the springs of the sea, or walked in the recesses of the deep? Have the gates of death been revealed to you, or have you seen the gates of deep darkness? Have you comprehended the expanse of the earth? Declare, if you know all this.” Job 38:2-18
@gamerjj777Ай бұрын
11:03 no one believes prophets!don't sin.
@historytheologyАй бұрын
@@gamerjj777 so according to you Jesus sin?
@gamerjj777Ай бұрын
@@historytheology nope. He is God.
@historytheologyАй бұрын
@@gamerjj777 no, Jesus was born, so he was a human. Can God be born?
@gamerjj777Ай бұрын
@@historytheology yes.
@historytheologyАй бұрын
@ bring one evidence from the Bible that states God can be born? In fact Malachi 3:6 God does not change. So God will remain God, He does not become a human
@robertpearson835Ай бұрын
He is God,except it
@historytheologyАй бұрын
@@robertpearson835 the book says he is also human
@jacobortega3424Ай бұрын
Accept*
@zeek6510Ай бұрын
@historytheology thanks for just refuting yourself pagan
@historytheologyАй бұрын
@@zeek6510 prove your claim. In fact, being God and human at the same time is an impossibility, which actually supports my video. When people resort to name calling, they do that because they know that they have no strong argument to support their beliefs yet want to play the emotional card as a means of justifying their beliefs.
@williecutter5531Ай бұрын
Let’s get you on with sam shamoun and see if you can’t get an explanation you can understand.
@j2shoes288Ай бұрын
salam, brother, so I have a question. When do they say, the codex sinaiticus is the oldest complete New Testament manuscript , what do they mean, if the verses are taken from later sources?
@historytheologyАй бұрын
@@j2shoes288 wsalam. the first complete New Testament bound together. It also contains additional works that are not in the current canon. The verses were actually taken from earlier sources not later, both sinaiticus and vaticanus were primarily “Alexandrian” in their textual family., meaning their texts are the best attested among others
@phillipmakungu7775Ай бұрын
If he was born out of Mary, who is he? And if Mary's pregnancy was of the Holy Spirit (no human sperms), who was he? God did the impossible. So your logic is logical.
@historytheologyАй бұрын
@@phillipmakungu7775 so using your logic, Adam is a greater God than Jesus since Adam had no human sperm and eggs)
@gamerjj777Ай бұрын
@historytheology that's worst arguemnt by zakir naik. When noone was there God made Adam. When there were hundreds of people why did God made Mary conceive Jesus Christ? That point u have to think.
@ForTheGloryOfCHRISTАй бұрын
@@historytheologyhow else was Adam being the first human supposed be made 🤦🏻 there's a reason why jesus was born of a virgin
@eyoo369Ай бұрын
@@historytheology Brother how dumb are you? Did you really think Jesus claimed his divinity purely because of the Immaculate conception? Jesus claimed his divine authority when he died on that cross and resurrected after 3 days.
@ronladАй бұрын
@@historytheologyNo one said adam is greater 😂
@messibooks6530Ай бұрын
Jesus Christ was not 100% human, he had a form of a human.
@historytheologyАй бұрын
@@messibooks6530 that’s not what the book says
@AP.i3Ай бұрын
He was fully god and fully human, my friend. God bless
@messibooks6530Ай бұрын
@@historytheology which particular verses gives you those percentages? Please share
@messibooks6530Ай бұрын
Philippians 2:6 Who, being in the very form of God, did not consider equality with God something to be used to his own advantage; 7 rather, he made himself nothing by taking the very form of a servant, being made in human likeness. 8 And being found in appearance as a man, he humbled himself by becoming obedient to death- even death on a cross! Jesus Christ was 100% God who appeared in the physical with a body form of a human
@messibooks6530Ай бұрын
100% human is a seed of Adam
@MahdiHassanOsmanАй бұрын
MashAllah keep up the content!
@j2shoes288Ай бұрын
Salam. Are you interested in debating Christians?
@amth3400Ай бұрын
Good video. Keep it up. But don't neglect ur financial needs.
@hassanmirza2392Ай бұрын
Oxford Catholic Study Bible, Jewish Study Bible and New Oxford Annotated Bible are all liberal-mainline versions of Bible. So is New Jerome Biblical Commentary and Oxford Bible Commentary. Hence these are not for devotional-conservative Bible followers.
@historytheologyАй бұрын
Yup that is right
@hassanmirza2392Ай бұрын
@@historytheology I believe people who are interested mostly in Biblical text, and not much in classical 4th century AD Catholic-Orthodox tradition, are better off with focusing on Jewish-Protestant canon of Bible. Jewish & Protestant traditions are much less mystical and philosophical and more text focused than Catholic & Orthodox one. Whether mainline-liberal or devotional-conservative.
@hassanmirza2392Ай бұрын
@@historytheology Book recommendations: Early Judaism: A Comprehensive Overview, edited by John J. Collins The Historical Jesus in Context Edited by Amy-Jill Levine, Dale C. Allison
@historytheologyАй бұрын
@@hassanmirza2392 how’s the historical jesus book by dale alison? Do u know that amy jill levine has a jesus book of her own? In fact 2 of them. The NT with and without Jesus as well as the minunderstood jew
@hassanmirza2392Ай бұрын
@@historytheology Man KZbin keeps removing my comments. The book is a collection of academic essays by different scholars, appears to be academic, like the one on Early Judaism by John Collins. Both one can find on rus lib gen as pdf.
@carolinevandertholen2697Ай бұрын
Salam alaykum thank you
@wilsonian42362 ай бұрын
Any study bible you think underrated and overrated? And how about commentaries?
@historytheology2 ай бұрын
@@wilsonian4236 i think the cultural background study bible is underrated. It has a lot of historical information that provides insights to the context to the Greco Roman world. I don’t have an opinion for which study Bibles are overrated. For commentaries, I also refer to the Anchor Bible and Hermeneia. But for single volume Bible commentaries, I’d pick the New Collegeville and Jerome
@geolazakis2 ай бұрын
Just a quick question, is Being, one or many?
@meezanali65652 ай бұрын
Very nice brother your videos are very helpful who want to increase their knowledge in comparative religion.
@hassanmirza23922 ай бұрын
Bro, can you post names of all the books in the comments, you showed?