Пікірлер
@infomeee9459
@infomeee9459 23 күн бұрын
Hello father
@Lancer-y5g
@Lancer-y5g 3 ай бұрын
Let’s not be disingenuous and say the Catholic Church views marriage as indissoluble anymore. Not when dozens of diocese have 100% rate of finding marriages null-many that are decades long and produced several children. The current tribunal system is a scandal and mocks God. With the grounds they use now any marriage can be annulled.
@AnnulmentProof
@AnnulmentProof 3 ай бұрын
"Good of the spouses" was moved by the spirit of Vatican II from non-essential to essential. 20,000 % increase in American annulments thereafter.
@JuanARivera-z9d
@JuanARivera-z9d 6 ай бұрын
Advoiding the sacrament of penance reconciliation
@Malachor8091
@Malachor8091 6 ай бұрын
The Catholic position about divorce and annulment has zero to do with the Bible, but a lot to do with control and money. Research Ted Kennedy and his annulment.
@JohnParks-zc1pn
@JohnParks-zc1pn 8 ай бұрын
When is a marriage null? A strong hint is when it was performed by a Catholic priest, because over 90% of petitions for declaration of nullity are granted by the church. We need to adopt the practice followed in much of Europe and Central and South America, which is that religious marriage is not recognized, and that only civil marriages are valid. Indeed, in France, a priest is prohibited from performing a religious marriage unless he is first presented with the couple's civil marriage certificate.
@AnnulmentProof
@AnnulmentProof 3 ай бұрын
Your first line was good
@JohanSimonsson
@JohanSimonsson 9 ай бұрын
What happens if one spouse starts to abuse the other, i.e. wife abuse. So the person invited evil into the marriage? Could that be a reason for nullification? Or do you need to prove that the evil was there from day 1?
@JohnLowell-xs8ro
@JohnLowell-xs8ro 9 ай бұрын
Pretty much explained as clear as mud.
@groblerful
@groblerful Жыл бұрын
Is it true that for a marrage between baptised catholics to be valid, a catholic priest must preside?
@lambertthongnirit3150
@lambertthongnirit3150 Жыл бұрын
Thank you father. God bless you always
@budjeansonne4482
@budjeansonne4482 Жыл бұрын
I'm confused. How can you annul something that doesn't exist in the first place?
@Boogerpickandeater
@Boogerpickandeater 7 ай бұрын
As far as I know it is simply a clarification from authority of something that did not take place from the beginning. But I’m no canon lawyer.
@MrGus.1
@MrGus.1 3 ай бұрын
The Church merely states that a marriage never exists. The Church does not annul the marriage.
@budjeansonne4482
@budjeansonne4482 3 ай бұрын
@@MrGus.1 If that is so then why do they call it an annulment?
@MrGus.1
@MrGus.1 3 ай бұрын
​@budjeansonne4482 Ha! Precisely because it is an annulment! The Church declares the marriage did not exist.
@CherylSimon-ij2db
@CherylSimon-ij2db Жыл бұрын
Where is your Bible?? The Word of God specifically lays out all of the laws or God’s commands concerning marriage, divorce and remarriage. I am no expert on the entire Word of God, but I have studied all scriptures concerning marriage and remarriage after a divorce. You have spoken a lot of words. I have not listened to all of your videos on marriage, but what I’ve heard enough to know that you have not mentioned one verse of scripture from the Bible, God’s Holy Word. I am 63 yrs old and have been married for over 45 years. I was raised by very strict Catholic parents. I am very grateful for the parents God blessed me with. My father instilled my strong faith in God. Once I was married, I realized that I did not know any of the Bible, God’s Holy Word. It is then that I left the Catholic Church and converted to a non denominational church where I learned God’s Word. The Bible is very simple to understand and God has blessed me with understanding how to live a Godly life and continue to learn more everyday for the past 30 years or so. It just really surprised me that as you explained the what, who and why of God’s Holy institution of marriage, you never referred to any of the scriptures that are in the Bible with lots of scripture given to man and inspired by the Holy Spirit as they were written. Jesus refers to marriage, divorce and remarriage in all 4 gospels. Every person has to make a decision that they will have faith that the Word of God is TRUTH or decide that they don’t believe that God’s Word is the one and only truth. I chose many years ago to have faith that every word written in the Bible was truly Holy Spirit led to write every word and was directly from God. And after my study on the subject right out of the Bible, I am convinced that marriage, divorce and remarriage is explained very well and it’s very simple. There aren’t whole books and new laws to be written to know God’s guidance on the subject.
@JGULLIF
@JGULLIF Жыл бұрын
What about the thrice married Newt Gingrich? ... so he's NOT married? Good to know.
@michaelsayen4360
@michaelsayen4360 Жыл бұрын
Marriages in the Old Testament did not need approval from the priests. However, it was subject to law. It was presumed valid unless challenged. Thanks. Great words of encouragement
@AdaraBalabusta
@AdaraBalabusta 8 ай бұрын
True. In addition, for good and sufficient cause (the definition of which varied over time), divorce with the possibility of remarriage for both parties was allowed.
@michaelsayen4360
@michaelsayen4360 8 ай бұрын
@@AdaraBalabusta no. Women were never allowed to divorce and remarry. It has been that way for most of history. Women weren’t allowed to divorce in England till 1857. That is because, the woman is under her husband’s rule, subject to him, and under the law of her husband (Gen. 3:16). The church allowing women to divorce for adultery or abuse is new for the church. That is, because it is not allowed in scripture
@Malachor8091
@Malachor8091 6 ай бұрын
​@michaelsayen4360 But men were allowed to do anything including adultery. You could ask Ted Kennedy if he was alive.
@michaelsayen4360
@michaelsayen4360 6 ай бұрын
@@Malachor8091 men were not allowed to commit adultery. If adultery happened, both the man and woman were to die. Marriages were unilateral. Only the man made a promise for marriage. The woman was acquired through the bride price. Marriages were not designed to be bilateral (conditional). Because of this, men were able to marry more than one wife. Women were under the husband’s rule (the law of the husband). It was not adultery for a married man to sleep with an unmarried woman. It was adultery for a man to sleep with a married woman. It was looked at as stealing. Therefore, a married man sleeping (or marrying) another woman, that was not married, was not adultery according to scripture.
@niranjantopno-si5dl
@niranjantopno-si5dl Жыл бұрын
Could u explain about the impediment ,deriment and deffect in the marriage plz
@judeb8252
@judeb8252 Жыл бұрын
Eaaaa Mann how r ya it judeeee
@ChessContentTimely
@ChessContentTimely Жыл бұрын
Hi jude
@richardwalker1405
@richardwalker1405 Жыл бұрын
Thank you❤
@judeb8252
@judeb8252 Жыл бұрын
Excuse meh 😕😑 u haven't mad a video sir ....
@judeb8252
@judeb8252 2 жыл бұрын
Father night englal sorry I don't know how to spell your name I see you every day
@iNdUsTrIaLrOcKeR4U
@iNdUsTrIaLrOcKeR4U 2 жыл бұрын
Annulments are ONLY a need in extremes. A forced marriage or one party in the marriage has hidden and hideous designs against the other. Not loopholes spun by the worms. Not to escape the responsibility one owes HIM most, deed.
@AdaraBalabusta
@AdaraBalabusta 8 ай бұрын
Yes. Unless one of the parties deliberately deceived the other, as was the case with Edward Kennedy and his unfortunate wife, Joan: he never had the intention to be faithful per his own comments.
@JuanARivera-z9d
@JuanARivera-z9d 6 ай бұрын
Avoiding the sacrament of penance
@iNdUsTrIaLrOcKeR4U
@iNdUsTrIaLrOcKeR4U 2 жыл бұрын
The HOLY SPIRIT is ALONE the TEACHER. HE likes me for some reason, can NOT explain. Though i am a wretch only.
@iNdUsTrIaLrOcKeR4U
@iNdUsTrIaLrOcKeR4U 2 жыл бұрын
The Canon Laws were written because HIS priests could not hear HIM. Plane and Plain, LOST.
@iNdUsTrIaLrOcKeR4U
@iNdUsTrIaLrOcKeR4U 2 жыл бұрын
prophets were given the right to speak to the priests. i the long and short of it, MOST.
@iNdUsTrIaLrOcKeR4U
@iNdUsTrIaLrOcKeR4U 2 жыл бұрын
Holy Matrimony is a man and woman united in CHRIST. Even if not seeing so. Or an abomination MOST. There is only one human marriage as in CHRIST the same. EVER.
@AnnulmentProof
@AnnulmentProof 2 жыл бұрын
If you can make babies, you have capacity to consent.
@MrGus.1
@MrGus.1 3 ай бұрын
Mmmmm....not categorically true, but there is a kernel of truth in what you staye.
@AnnulmentProof
@AnnulmentProof 3 ай бұрын
@@MrGus.1 what else does a spouse need capacity for besides baby making?
@AnnulmentProof
@AnnulmentProof 3 ай бұрын
​@@MrGus.1hello?
@MrGus.1
@MrGus.1 3 ай бұрын
@@AnnulmentProof I do not think reducing individuals to their barest potentials serves this discussion. The sacrament of marriage is, indeed, in its essence "a deal", but it was created by God to give grace and provide the partners help in getting to heaven. Yes, we make babies, but today, so do mad scientists. Stripping away the beauty, splendor and romance of marriage is like what Prorestanrs have done to scripture when they strip it from the Church from whence it came. John, you are examining marriage through binoculars constructed of soda straws.
@AnnulmentProof
@AnnulmentProof 2 жыл бұрын
There is nothing in the Bible pertaining to annulment.
@MrGus.1
@MrGus.1 3 ай бұрын
True.
@Lancer-y5g
@Lancer-y5g 3 ай бұрын
True. The annulment system mocks the Creed “in accordance with the scriptures”
@AnnulmentProof
@AnnulmentProof 3 ай бұрын
@@Lancer-y5g before 1965, false. After 1965, true bcz the "personalistic norm" contradicts Scripture.
@jamespatrickskelton437
@jamespatrickskelton437 2 жыл бұрын
Keep on posting. Soon I am studying for a licentiate in canon law. Thanks for refreshing my memory. Cheers, Fr. James Skelton.
@AnnulmentProof
@AnnulmentProof 2 жыл бұрын
All tribunals in the USA use an illegal (essential love) definition of marriage.
@AnnulmentProof
@AnnulmentProof 3 ай бұрын
@@christinaann8193 yes, what grounds are you thinking of?
@AnnulmentProof
@AnnulmentProof 3 ай бұрын
@@jamespatrickskelton437 question for your professor: if the legal essence of marriage is objective / unchanging, why does jurisprudence determine what it is?
@christinaann8193
@christinaann8193 3 ай бұрын
@@AnnulmentProof is there somewhere I can message you privately?
@michaelciccone2194
@michaelciccone2194 2 жыл бұрын
The Amish and conservative Mennonites don't condone divorce and remarriage...period. Nor do they have a list of psychological and 'invalid form' reasons to annul a marriage. If one is in a marriage gone off the rails...counseling is done but none of this annulment and RC tribunal court. What's with all these RC annulments? The RCC supposedly has Marriage Encounter and marriage preparation courses.
@michaelciccone2194
@michaelciccone2194 2 жыл бұрын
What about the countless of Catholics prior to VATICAN 2 who faithfully remained true to their vows....???. No annulments, no divorce and remarriage. Yes, they were in bad marriages...but sacrificed much to remain true Catholics and raise their children in the faith...NO ANNULMENTS....that was that ....and many RC priests wouldn't condone annulments.
@AnnulmentProof
@AnnulmentProof 3 ай бұрын
The answer is the spirit of Vatican 2 changed the legal definition of marriage to make love primary, procreation secondary. This means no legal definition... Annulment on demand
@ptn...amos.8475
@ptn...amos.8475 2 жыл бұрын
Fr i focus eg: Mr z they have daughter but suddenly father was dead and daughter was adopted by Mr h .. so daughter was growth up and he want to marry but his boy friend was Mr h family(clan )so they can lot to marriage or not? I need to know clearly..
@bobbilisagar7350
@bobbilisagar7350 2 жыл бұрын
Well explained father
@brandonwhite3899
@brandonwhite3899 2 жыл бұрын
What about if one or both of the spouses are narcissist?????
@MrGus.1
@MrGus.1 3 ай бұрын
If two narcissists are validly married, they are married until death do they part. That question illogically suggests that circumstances after the vows changes the validity of a marriage. Mental health issues may dictate a separation, but once married...only death terminates the contract.
@CatholicBaseball8
@CatholicBaseball8 2 жыл бұрын
Could Canon 1101 include a spouse that only agreed to have marital relations only when they wanted to?
@GoodGod2512
@GoodGod2512 2 жыл бұрын
A horrendous experience going through the "Annulment" proceedings of the Catholic Church - kzbin.info/www/bejne/g3uuamBjmKaVgrc
@aravindmanu7576
@aravindmanu7576 2 жыл бұрын
とうございます」、
@JGULLIF
@JGULLIF 2 жыл бұрын
Can someone explain to me how the thrice married Newt Gingrich got married in the church with his girlfriend from his SECOND marriage (who was the girlfriend from his FIRST marriage)?
@m_d1905
@m_d1905 2 жыл бұрын
Money talks, even in the RCC.
@AdaraBalabusta
@AdaraBalabusta 8 ай бұрын
My speculation would be that he was declared not psychologically mature when he married the first wife (he was age 19 per his Wikipedia page). The second marriage was probably declared null because he had no intention to be faithful. Again, this is my speculation. The third marriage does appear to be sacramental in nature. HTH.
@Malachor8091
@Malachor8091 6 ай бұрын
The Church can annual any marriage if the price is right. Got two kids with first wife, no problem, pay the fee.
@MrGus.1
@MrGus.1 3 ай бұрын
​@Malachor8091 Maybe just a technicality, but no one can annul a valid marriage...not even the Pope. The Church can state that a marriage never existed.
@AnnulmentProof
@AnnulmentProof 3 ай бұрын
One can marry / divorce/anull as many times as they want in the USA Catholic Church, bcz if the relationship hits the rocks, that's proof of incapacity for "interpersonal relationship of life and love." The spirit of Vatican 2 changed the legal definition of consent..
@jamesndungu5681
@jamesndungu5681 2 жыл бұрын
Can being gay be an impediment?
@finallythere100
@finallythere100 2 жыл бұрын
Do you mean if a man with same sex attraction marries a woman, and either does or does not inform her of his same sex attraction? Is he also attracted to his wife (bisxual)??
@yj3147
@yj3147 2 жыл бұрын
One week after my wedding at the church, I found my husband cheated 9 months before the wedding, while we were in a long distance relationship, and right before he proposed to me. He was cheating for a month, and quit before the propose. I felt so betrayed. But I tried to live with him for 4 months since it was marriage at the church. But I could endure my pain and anger. We are currently physically separated. Is it possible to null my marriage? I couldn’t prevent myself from being mad at him, and deeply depressed… I quit my job due to the depression…..
@mrloski2915
@mrloski2915 2 жыл бұрын
I hope so, what did you find out?
@MrGus.1
@MrGus.1 3 ай бұрын
Lady, you need neither a divorce nor an annulment. You need to forgive! There are zero blameless spouses out there....zero. Forgiveness is the essential part of every marriage. Trust me. I've been in a successful marriage of two sinners for 58 years.
@ramsesramos4502
@ramsesramos4502 3 ай бұрын
If something of high matter was concealed that could have resulted in a different outcome and was not presented to you before the vows took place, you have a very strong case to present to the priest and tribunal
@ChristianTrinity411
@ChristianTrinity411 3 жыл бұрын
If your spouse abandons you, and marries another, that is when a marriage is nullified. The abandoned party is then free to remarry with God's blessing.
@ChristianTrinity411
@ChristianTrinity411 2 жыл бұрын
@@helloman1051 If I ain’t seen her in fifteen years, by her design, we ain’t married.
@jacobkalee
@jacobkalee 2 жыл бұрын
@@ChristianTrinity411 That's not how it works with God. It's about the validity at the time of the vows. Canon lawyer explains annulments here. kzbin.info/www/bejne/pIaqZYZoZsZrprM
@johnmcdonough8038
@johnmcdonough8038 2 жыл бұрын
Wrong!!! It doesn't matter if your spouse abandons you. If it was a valid sacramental marriage from the beginning, it is still valid and binding.
@grant2149
@grant2149 Жыл бұрын
Wrong!!
@noni-ayannaroach8180
@noni-ayannaroach8180 8 ай бұрын
@delbert372- I saw that in the Bible too
@williamwarrenconkright3973
@williamwarrenconkright3973 3 жыл бұрын
God decides not the catholics
@superiorshotgun4348
@superiorshotgun4348 Жыл бұрын
God established the Catholic Church
@Malachor8091
@Malachor8091 6 ай бұрын
@@superiorshotgun4348 Christ established His church, not the Catholic Church.
@superiorshotgun4348
@superiorshotgun4348 6 ай бұрын
@@Malachor8091 Catholic Church is His Church😂😂😂
@vjstv0101
@vjstv0101 3 жыл бұрын
Father, both spouses must have at least one of the impediments to be declared null? Or is it sufficient only one spouse (only one spouse with an impediment).
@daviatejasu8431
@daviatejasu8431 3 жыл бұрын
Let marriage be held in honor among all, and let the marriage bed be undefiled, for God will judge the sexually immoral and adulterous. Your presentation is very pleasent, going doing many videos. May God bless you.
@ajlouviere202
@ajlouviere202 3 жыл бұрын
These scriptures should help answer your questions about the importance of covenants: Joshua 9:11-14: 11So our elders and all the inhabitants of our country spoke to us, saying, ‘Take provisions in your hand for the journey, and go to meet them, and say to them, “We are your servants; now then, make a covenant with us.”’ 12This bread of ours was hot when we took it for our provisions from our houses on the day that we left to come to you; but now behold, it is dry and has become crumbled. 13And these wineskins which we filled were new, and behold, they are split open; and these clothes of ours and our sandals are worn out from the very long journey.” 14So the men of Israel took some of their provisions, and did not ask for the counsel of the LORD. 15And Joshua made peace with them and made a covenant with them, to let them live; and the leaders of the congregation swore an oath to them. 16However, it came about at the end of three days after they had made a covenant with them, that they heard that they were neighbors and that they were living within their land. 17Then the sons of Israel set out and came to their cities on the third day. Now their cities were Gibeon, Chephirah, Beeroth, and Kiriath-jearim. 18But the sons of Israel did not attack them because the leaders of the congregation had sworn to them by the LORD, the God of Israel. And the whole congregation grumbled against the leaders. 19But all the leaders said to the whole congregation, “We have sworn to them by the LORD, the God of Israel, and now we cannot touch them. 20This we will do to them, even let them live, so that wrath will not be on us because of the oath which we swore to them.” 21So the leaders said to them, “Let them live.” And they became gatherers of firewood and labor to draw water for the whole congregation, just as the leaders had spoken to them. 2 Samuel 21:1-2: 1Now there was a famine in the days of David for three years, year after year; and David sought the presence of the LORD. And the LORD said, “It is because of Saul and his bloody house, because he put the Gibeonites to death.” 2So the king called the Gibeonites and spoke to them (now the Gibeonites were not of the sons of Israel, but of the remnant of the Amorites, and the sons of Israel had made a covenant with them, but Saul had sought to kill them in his zeal for the sons of Israel and Judah). Malachi 2:13-16: 13And this is another thing you do: you cover the altar of the LORD with tears, with weeping and sighing, because He no longer gives attention to the offering or accepts it with favor from your hand. 14Yet you say, “For what reason?” Because the LORD has been a witness between you and the wife of your youth, against whom you have dealt treacherously, though she is your marriage companion and your wife by covenant. 15But not one has done so who has a remnant of the Spirit. And why the one? He was seeking a godly offspring. Be careful then about your spirit, and see that none of you deals treacherously against the wife of your youth. 16“For I hate [divorce,” says the LORD, the God of Israel, “and him who covers his garment with violence,” says the LORD of armies. “So be careful about your spirit, that you do not deal treacherously.” Galatians 3:15-17: 15Brethren, I speak in the manner of men: Though it is only a man’s covenant, yet if it is confirmed, no one annuls or adds to it. 16Now to Abraham and his Seed were the promises made. He does not say, “And to seeds,” as of many, but as of one, “And to your Seed,” who is Christ. 17And this I say, that the law, which was four hundred and thirty years later, cannot annul the covenant that was confirmed before by God in Christ, that it should make the promise of no effect. Romans 1:28-32: 28And even as they refused to have God in their knowledge, God gave them up unto a reprobate mind, to do those things which are not fitting; 29being filled with all unrighteousness, wickedness, covetousness, maliciousness; full of envy, murder, strife, deceit, malignity; whisperers, 30backbiters, hateful to God, insolent, haughty, boastful, inventors of evil things, disobedient to parents, 31without understanding, covenant-breakers, without natural affection, unmerciful: 32who, knowing the ordinance of God, that they that practise such things are worthy of death, not only do the same, but also consent with them that practise them.
@mylifeforthelord5535
@mylifeforthelord5535 3 жыл бұрын
God bless you, greetings from Germany! Please do more videos!
@mylifeforthelord5535
@mylifeforthelord5535 2 жыл бұрын
@Sayyid 'Abbās Yes brother! :)
@ladyfreedomsrawnarratives
@ladyfreedomsrawnarratives 3 жыл бұрын
Thank you Father!
@canonlaw101
@canonlaw101 3 жыл бұрын
@THE BHSC 1 Cor 4:15 "In Christ Jesus I became your father through the gospel."
@moviestars9098
@moviestars9098 4 жыл бұрын
Fr Can you date or marry your God sister
@nighm24
@nighm24 4 жыл бұрын
There used to be an impediment relating to godparents (spiritual affinity), but this no longer exists. It is now permissible to date or marry godparents or their relatives.
@lharrfrias4394
@lharrfrias4394 3 жыл бұрын
@@nighm24 Father can you explain me public propriety and examples of it? I need it for my assignment.
@maimailovechannelhamed3662
@maimailovechannelhamed3662 5 жыл бұрын
Fr what is canonical impedement
@sbusisontsele3962
@sbusisontsele3962 5 жыл бұрын
Beautifully explained
@sdraper2011
@sdraper2011 5 жыл бұрын
Interesting, looking forward to more. My question is: how does a lay person pay for canon law school?? I understand orders usually pay for it for their members, but it's prohibitively expensive for lay people, especially at a time when the Church keeps saying they desperately need more canon lawyers.
@canonlaw101
@canonlaw101 5 жыл бұрын
In the US, I can’t imagine studying it without a diocese sponsoring, but the costs in Europe are much more feasible, e.g. a year of tuition at the Gregorian is only around $3000.
@sdraper2011
@sdraper2011 5 жыл бұрын
​@@canonlaw101 Is that PUG?
@canonlaw101
@canonlaw101 5 жыл бұрын
Yes, the Pontificia Università Gregoriana. I imagine the Angelicum and Santa Croce (both in Rome) have prices similar to that.
@davf0789
@davf0789 5 жыл бұрын
I wonder if there is an example in Shakespeare for each of these...
@canonlaw101
@canonlaw101 5 жыл бұрын
Good point! I can already think of ones related to crime and consanguinity...
@davf0789
@davf0789 5 жыл бұрын
Nice job Father!