Nice Good awareness massage سوشل موبلائیزر محمد مشتاق یونس آباد ڈسکہ ٹو محکمہ بہبود آبادی ضلع سیالکوٹ

I've tried this kind of medicine with duration of 25 days treatment and it was so easy, unfortunately on day 28 I returned into addiction. Now you need to have about 2 months of brake if you would like to try again and I will in upcoming days! But now I have to set a plan, a goal of 100 days abstinence in my mind, previously I was about to 25 + 7 days without medication just to check if there were any side effects. There were none physical but some physiological catched me :) good luck everyone, worth to try

If cytisine pills can help me stop smoking great,I’m 23 and smoke around 40-60 cigarettes a day😳 I’ve tried everything,I have the will power but the effects of stopping smoking is a nightmare and I’m of an extremely nervous disposition . When I’ve tried to stop smoking before every small sound would make me jump out of my skin , I’d get so jittery I could hardly hold a spoon and I’d get depressed,also I’d get fixated on those who were smoking. I lift weights every day and swim up to two hours each day,I know if I don’t stop now by the time I’m 30 I’ll not be able to do any of those things!! I gave up drinking alcohol 2 years ago because I was getting drunk every day,I knew alcohol was controlling me,I wasn’t controlling alcohol. I found it easier to stop drinking alcohol than quitting smoking!!

Thanks for this.

👌

Awesome video🎖️💯🎖️

Thanks !!

Bought the book but needed a short overview to grasp the basics first. This was perfect. Thank you.

The problem I have with all of these discussions is that they start out talking philosophy, but by the end they are describing physical attributes of nature. If you want to know about nature and how it works, you have to start with observation and go from there, but at no point will you find ethics or morality since these things don't exist in nature.

A very lucid and enjoyable presentation of the ways in which we think about free will. I agree with Dr Horner’s concluding remark - that freedom is so much more than mere freedom of choice. More please!

It has often been pointed out that the only alternative to physical determinism is physical indeterminism, and that if things only happened at random then no kind of deliberate control, conscious or otherwise, would be possible - which it most certainly is. The fact is that physical and psychological explanation are very different ways of describing exactly the same world. In so far as the world as experienced by any conscious being, it is entirely subjective. Yet within that world we infer the coexistence of an external objective world. Descartes himself, the often supposed main proponent of mind-body dualism, pointed out that at the point where these worlds interact, where the objective impinges on the subjective via the senses, and the subjective on the objective via free will, motor control and the limbic system, there is a transitional state between these two modes of existence which is neither wholly subjective or objective. The moment of subjective-objective transition, where the past meets the future in the present, is momentary and can by definition never be either experienced or observed because the processes of wilful control and of observation both require order 10 milliseconds to occur. It is within this neither mind nor body transition state of existence that certain other-worldly phenomena arise, including mathematics, weird quantum physics effects, consciousness and meaning. In particular, the subjective meaning of all words and concepts fade out and cease to exist, along with their subjective instantiation, disappearing via non reflective pure animal experience. The closer the wilful action of any kind is observed, the more completely determined it becomes. Crime first appears due less to evil and more to lack of education, ingrained ideology, poverty, mind altering drugs or mental disease. Even closer and all wilful behaviour is directly due to electro-chemical reactions between brain cells, complex molecules, atoms, sub-atomic particles, quantum effects and, finally, the mathematical rules of physics - whose outcome, even when the present physical state is accurately measured, are generally beyond practical computation.

Wonderful discussion. I hope there will be a part 2 to take up the conversation where this one ends!

With regards to our own actions and those we directly interact with, I don't think there is a serious option of denying freewill. Now this might ultimately only be a matter of seeing the world as if free will exists, nevertheless this 'as if' is unavoidable. As soon as we do treat others behaviour (or our own) as inevitable we are dehumanising them. Responsibility is baked into our notion of human being.

One distinction that seems to have been ignored is that between responsibility and punishment. It seemed to have been assumed that if someone is seen as responsible for a bad action then they must be punished. Surely the mental state of acknowledging responsibility is a first step to behaviour change. It may well be enough for acknowledgement of responsibility. That individual may or may not be punished but this is a different question.

Very helpful. Thank you for sharing this.