Michael is not an engel. He is the head of the angels

words create images and pictures.

Classical example of a straw-man argument if I ever heard one. (a) materialism is only one form of naturalism. Some naturalists include universals (properties), numbers, propositions and a whole zoo of abstracta in their ontologies. Those can't exist w/o a God? Try your luck with making that case. We can't know them w/o the existence of God? Try making that case w/o begging the question. We can't know them w/o presupping the existence of God? Try making *that* case. Whatever enables us to discern the laws of logic is irrelevant to our knowledge that we can do so. (Denying that is a genetic fallacy.) How come? Why? Because they are self-evident. How do I know my brain isn't deceiving me? You've mis-understood me; they're *self* -evident. Sensible naturalists don't hold their position as a presupposition (and theists can't hold theirs as a presupposition either). As the philosopher John Locke pointed out a couple of hundred years ago, we have *no choice* but to rely on our cognitive faculties as we find them, to evaluate any evidence. How can we be on solid ground? Because some truths are: you got it - self evident. Examples? 2+2=4; I exist; I am thinking now; I am in pain; if either P or Q is true, then if P isn't, Q is. Presuppositionalism leads straight to relativism. I thought theists despise relativism.

All the muslim and the muslim in this world must be watch this video!

Todd, you're doing great brother ❤! I actually miss the old podcasts when Ray and Kirk Cameron on in the old days-- you 🤓 never did that annoying 'moo-wahhh' after clarification on a sentence 😂😂❤ Love you, mean it--

O people of the Gospel! They who were not in the Kingdom have now entered it, whilst We behold you, in this day, tarrying at the gate. Rend the veils asunder by the power of your Lord, the Almighty, the All-Bounteous, and enter then in My name My Kingdom. Thus biddeth you He Who desireth for you everlasting life. He, verily, is potent over all things. Blessed are those who have recognized the Light and hastened unto it. They, verily, dwell in the Kingdom, and partake of the food and drink of God's chosen ones. - Baha'u'llah

Peace be with you.

As Bill Clinton testified: “it depends what the definition of the word Is….is”.

9:00

This is an absolutely beautiful explanation of the first answer of this.

Speaking in tongues occurred after the Pentecost so the Christian Jews would witness a miracle of the Holy Spirit which was Gentiles speaking in languages they did not know. That gift has ceased and it certainly was mindless babble like it is today.

You wait…. How about the Los Angeles fire …and your reading half baked truth and only part of it

These hucksters tout "signs and wonders" as if it's some kind of holy snake oil. Attendee's will become caught up in a group emotional frenzy and open their wallets accordingly. To all who seek after these "signs": Christ alone is sufficient as is His grace and His Word. You don't need anything else. Period.

Let's keep in mind that gold is something that the Almighty has his streets paved with. It's like having asphalt or concrete dust being blown out the HVAC vents. 😏

St Ignatius of Antioch > some protestant 2000 years later making up his own interpretation

I'd like to share a gospel doctrine that I believe in hopes it might bring someone else peace about this matter. I have also been taught this principle of Christ atoning for our sins to provide us a way to repent and become perfected through him. To answer her legitimate concerns about those who have not been given the opportunity to learn of Christ in this life, there is a doctrine taught in the religion I attend that answers this and allows anyone the opportunity to accept Jesus Christ as their Savior regardless of their circumstances or exposure to Christianity. I believe God allows missionary work to continue after this life and any who choose to accept his atonement for them can have the opportunity do so, if they so desire. I am a member of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints and this is exactly why we study genealogy so diligently and research names of those who have passed, so we can perform proxy baptisms for them that they can choose to accept or reject. I believe she's right in that God is not selective about who He offers mercy to and that he would never be so unjustified to not ever give people a chance or place them in circumstances where they could never be given an opportunity. And I also believe that because Christ suffered for us, He is capable of judging or determining our level of repentance or lack therof so justice can be served where needed. I can testify that I have felt His love for me and people I weep for. You can of course believe whatever feels right in your heart, and I just wanted to add this extra layer that I believe in hopes that it might bring someone more peace. God does love you and He has a loving plan that will overcome pain and the sting of death. You are loved. There is sometimes a difference between being loved and feeling loved. And you are loved by God even if you don't feel loveable. You are His child and I pray you can feel his love and compassion for you.

It's so easy. Just assert your position as that which is a necessary precursor to your opponent's position, and deny any rebuttals or requests to evidence your view as your opponent rebutting themself. It's so easy anyone can use it. *Atheist/materialist?* Presuppose that the universe itself is necessary and logical and deny rebuttal as self refuting. *Last Thursdayist?* Presuppose that the universe only makes sense if it were created last thursday and deny rebuttal as self refuting. *Infinite regress proponent?* Presuppose an infinity of previous universes each setting the foundation for logic and deny rebuttal as self refuting.

She is reading too much fantasy story 🤣

Bahnsen's weakness was his poor theology.

King James Bible The Stubbornness of the People Jeremiah 44 15 Then all the men which knew that their wives had burned incense unto other gods, and all the women that stood by, a great multitude, even all the people that dwelt in the land of Egypt, in Pathros, answered Jeremiah, saying, 16 As for the word that thou hast spoken unto us in the name of the LORD, we will not hearken unto thee. 17 But we will certainly do whatsoever thing goeth forth out of our own mouth, to burn incense unto the queen of heaven, and to pour out drink offerings unto her, as we have done, we, and our fathers, our kings, and our princes, in the cities of Judah, and in the streets of Jerusalem: for then had we plenty of victuals, and were well, and saw no evil. 18 But since we left off to burn incense to the queen of heaven, and to pour out drink offerings unto her, we have wanted all things, and have been consumed by the sword and by the famine. 19 And when we burned incense to the queen of heaven, and poured out drink offerings unto her, did we make her cakes to worship her, and pour out drink offerings unto her, without our men? The Final Judgment 20 Then Jeremiah said unto all the people, to the men, and to the women, and to all the people which had given him that answer, saying, 21 The incense that ye burned in the cities of Judah, and in the streets of Jerusalem, ye, and your fathers, your kings, and your princes, and the people of the land, did not the LORD remember them, and came it not into his mind? 22 So that the LORD could no longer bear, because of the evil of your doings, and because of the abominations which ye have committed; therefore is your land a desolation, and an astonishment, and a curse, without an inhabitant, as at this day. 23 Because ye have burned incense, and because ye have sinned against the LORD, and have not obeyed the voice of the LORD, nor walked in his law, nor in his statutes, nor in his testimonies; therefore this evil is happened unto you, as at this day. 24 Moreover Jeremiah said unto all the people, and to all the women, Hear the word of the LORD, all Judah that are in the land of Egypt: 25 Thus saith the LORD of hosts, the God of Israel, saying; Ye and your wives have both spoken with your mouths, and fulfilled with your hand, saying, We will surely perform our vows that we have vowed, to burn incense to the queen of heaven, and to pour out drink offerings unto her: ye will surely accomplish your vows, and surely perform your vows. 26 Therefore hear ye the word of the LORD, all Judah that dwell in the land of Egypt; Behold, I have sworn by my great name, saith the LORD, that my name shall no more be named in the mouth of any man of Judah in all the land of Egypt, saying, The Lord GOD liveth. 27 Behold, I will watch over them for evil, and not for good: and all the men of Judah that are in the land of Egypt shall be consumed by the sword and by the famine, until there be an end of them.

Nice content, thanks Lito! There is instability with the stream in a few areas that cuts out the audio.

my blog extranos.blogspot.com; the prayer to Mary I recited was taken from this RC website www.catholicdoors.com/prayers/english3/p02293.htm

Great example

This WOMAN had a LYING ANGEL. 😂

@everyone The foundation to morality as an objective and universal foundation exists necessarily so. Otherwise, all moral complaints against the actions of others become meaningless! Please try to comprehend. It's not a matter of how I define morality (right or wrong). It's a matter of how we all treat morality. How it's comports to reality via. it's application! Not if, but when you make a moral proclamation. You are making assumptions about the individual you are critiquing. In order for your words to be meaningful, you, by necessity, have to umbrella them under the same moral standard that you are following. Their adherence to your standard has to be mandatory. And there must be consequences for non-compliance. Again... there is no way around this fact if you want your words to be meaningful (rational). Subjectivism, empathy, well-being, common good, harm reduction, etc. All these social conventions do nothing to rationalize your moral proclamations. For as soon as you have more that one standard, all moral standards become meaningless. Why? Think... honestly.... How do you determine who is following the correct version of morality? Are we all required to follow that (so-call) correct version? And how can I be in violation of my version of morality if I am in keeping with my version? It is for these very reasons that this system doesn't work! My words, either for or against you action become irrational... meaningless. The theist, is not arguing for his own version of morality. He is arguing for the only logical conclusion when examining how we all treat morality in application. Again... think... honestly... You comments about the actions of others become meaningful when we assume that everyone is following the same standard. They become meaningful when all people are required to follow this moral standard. Your comments have authority when there are consequences for non-compliance. These are the logical premises that the theist uses as a foundation to argue that the unchanging character of God is this universal and objective foundation to morality. Now, if you want to argue against God as the source for morality. Fine... what is your answer? You still make moral proclamations! You still make all of these assumptions! You do want your words to be meaningful! You want to say prove God exists first when every time you make a moral proclamation. Your actions are testifying to something more... something greater than subjective social conventions. Just because you say, "Not God!". This doesn't get you off the hook for your actions! They still need accounting! So.. I will leave it like this... Show me a "Not God!" scenario as an alternative that actually works! Till then... I will rely on the only rational and logical conclusion that fits! So even my giving a definition to morality doesn't grant you the rationale to justify your own position. Thoughts?...

Chuck Missler has great teacher w/ Mark Eastman called” Alien Encounters “( book) and on u tube. He knew exactly what what is coming upon us now ( this was in 90s he knew) . Dr. Heiser as well” Postmodernism, Neopaganism, Science Fiction, Biblical Apologetics. Long but so much related to our day just a wealth of knowledge! Love and peace to all

I belive in all the Jewish Prophets.

Debate William Albrecht or Sam Shamoun pls 😂🍿

You have to look beyond authorities. It's God's authority the one that counts. Each preacher must be empowered by the Holy Spirit. To preach is not simply preach the gospel but rather to call people towards repentance according to actual societies. The words must be full of grace and power. The words must touch the human heart. A preacher is the very image of Christ who calls his people to receive words of comfort and guidance.

RC church says Jesus is ours and ours only no one else can have him. Christ says if you don’t believe that I am he you will die in your sins. That’s why the reformation was needed.

Their god is thier money

The prosperity gospel seems very similar to the catholic faith of giving them money to recive a blessing or miracle and also for forgiveness of sin,scammers ,snake oil salsemaen

In the 28 fundamental beliefs it says she is "INFALLIBLE "

I think you could make 1000 points why Jesus is better than Mo and it still wouldn't be enough 😅

Where can I get this sermon in its original version without the distracting music and backtracking?

Don’t compare my farther to anyone

Im going to have to getting used to the Lutheran order of commandments.

Excellent video

Good to see you back making another video brother!

No, the early Church did not oppose the veneration of icons. For further information on this refuted argument, please review Craig Truglia's recent documentary, which illustrates the development of icon veneration from Jewish practices of venerating consecrated objects, thus establishing iconodulia as a natural progression of relic veneration.

i hate how they clap at him hes getting it wrong and the people following him are too - Jesus yes is God in flesh but doesnt fail- he NEVER fails you. hes perfect because God created him to be that way he was tempted - but never fell into it he wept- but hes not weak he was human - but didnt sin ever

Sorry, I'm tired of Oneness Pentecostals telling me if i don't gibber-jabber im not saved. Thats proof right there its false doctrine

You went back to John 15 again but John 15 has nothing to do with conversion because the gospel wasn’t even revealed yet. The 11 faithful apostles didn’t even know why Jesus was being crucified yet. They didn’t understand it until after His resurrection. John 15 has nothing to do with conversion or believing the gospel.

You just said that if we think that we can do anything good like repentance without the Holy Spirit then that means we can do good without grace but grace precedes the indwelling of the Holy Spirit. The calling is a grace. The calling precedes the baptism of the Spirit. Grace does not have just one meaning it has numerous meanings. Grace is ANYTHING that God does for someone. As I pointed out in my other comments people were believing before they received the Holy Spirit according to the scriptures. The gospel is the calling to repentance and it has the power to elicit a response in anyone who hears it. Romans 1:16. Once someone hears the gospel they have the ability to believe it because the gospel is the calling to repentance.

Being a slave to sin doesn’t mean that we can’t repent. Everyone is a slave to sin unless they abide in Christ. For many are called but few are chosen. This means that not everyone who comes to Christ remain in Him. Those who fall away to apostasy once again become slaves to sin because you are a slave to the one whom you serve Romans 6:16. If Christ is drawing all men to Him after His crucifixion then all men are able to repent and be saved so the determining factor between those who repent and those who don’t is their free will choice to either humble themselves to God or reject Him. What Jesus said about The Father drawing people to Him in John 6 no longer applies after Christ’s crucifixion because He said “when I am lifted up I will draw all men to myself”. The passage specifically states that His lifting up was in reference to how He would die which means when He is crucified He will draw all men to Himself.

You quoted John 6 saying that no one can come to Christ unless The Father draws him. The problem with this is that statement was made during Christ’s ministry and He specifically stated that “when I am lifted up, I will draw all men to myself”. So what Jesus said about The Father drawing people in John 6 changed after His crucifixion, it doesn’t apply to us today.

I’m utterly shocked at the irresponsible misuse of scripture to support these anathemas. John 15 being used to support the idea that no one can believe the gospel unless the Holy Spirit enables them? John 15 was about Jesus telling His 11 faithful apostles to remain in Him. They were already converted, they had been following Christ for 3 years and their conversion was NOTHING like what we experience today. They were called by Christ to follow Him and the reason they followed Him was because they thought He was a prophet because He was performing miracles so that they would follow Him. They didn’t believe the gospel at that time because the gospel hadn’t even been revealed yet. They didn’t know that He was God, they didn’t know about the Trinity, and they certainly didn’t know that He came to die for our sins. They didn’t know any of that which means that they didn’t know anything about the gospel when they began following Him. They didn’t understand the gospel until after His resurrection. Furthermore what Jesus said to them in John 15 “without Me you can do nothing” was in reference to bearing fruit, it had absolutely nothing to do with their conversion or anyone else’s conversion. 1 Corinthians 15:10 is another bad example of a misuse of scripture because Paul said I AM what I Am by the grace of God, present tense. Paul wasn’t talking about his conversion he was talking about his current state as being a new creation in Christ. And again Paul’s conversion is nothing like what we experience today. His particular case is extremely rare and isn’t comparable to how we come to Christ today. Christ literally appeared before him, spoke to him face to face, then blinded him forcing him to convert. Paul had no other option but to accept what he had seen, we don’t experience that today. His statement in 1 Corinthians 15:10 had nothing to do with his conversion or how we are converted, it was about how he had become a new creation in Christ which we all know only happens by the grace of God. I’m very disappointed in the misuse of scripture to support these particular anathemas by the 5th & 6th century ecumenical councils because they are NOT being used in the proper context of the passages.

You’re not making any sense when you say that SYNERGISTS think that they believe apart from God’s calling because the very definition of a SYNERGIST is someone who is acting in COOPERATION with God. The word SYNERGY literally means working together. Not everyone who is called by God actually believes. The gospel is that calling. Nobody can believe anything until they first hear the gospel because they have nothing to believe. Once they hear the gospel they’ve heard the calling, but not everyone who hears the gospel believes. The only people who believe are the ones who are acting in cooperation with that calling. For many are called but few are chosen.

You’re not making any sense when you say that SYNERGISTS think that they believe apart from God’s calling because the very definition of a SYNERGIST is someone who is acting in COOPERATION with God. The word SYNERGY literally means working together. Not everyone who is called by God actually believes. The gospel is that calling. Nobody can believe anything until they first hear the gospel because they have nothing to believe. Once they hear the gospel they’ve heard the calling, but not everyone who hears the gospel believes. The only people who believe are the ones who are acting in cooperation with that calling. For many are called but few are chosen.