I do see these comments! Now does my ADHD let me reply, only if I do so immediately ;) There is a difference though for your applications from what I talked about here, and I'm not 100% the best person to answer. Because I am utilizing monitors with the end result of my digital work ending up as a printed image. I have to take into account what are the best specs so that I'm seeing what I need on screen (additive) and it will translate well into print (subtractive). You're sticking with on screen, so you don't need to worry about the overall resolution in the same way, QHD is perfect for digital -> print work, but you will need to think about where your final video (ie. digital product) is going to be viewed most often, and you would want to optimize for that. So my homework for you is to think about where your files will be viewed most, what the perfect environment would be for viewing, and then look at what colour capabilities the devices used to show your movies will have and what resolution they are normally at. I would still look for a screen that shows a wider gamut of colour, but I'm guessing having a higher resolution screen will be important because most screens are more high res now. Sorry I can't help with recs!

Comets tend to be in there with updates, but when I posted this video this one wasn't yet. Thanks for the update. Also I don't know why people tend to comment on my appearance online when it has nothing to do with the video content?

I'm glad it was helpful!

I have a lot of students who have used the tokina and had good results so I think you are set for gear to get started!! Awesome :)

The widest lens you have is best to start. This is something we'll talk about in the free training I have coming up!

It is doable with the 3100, it will be very noisy and a bit dark because the sensor only goes natively to 3200, but you can push it to 6400. I think it is worthwhile to get out and try with your 3100 - in the long run if you really wanted to pursue Milky Way photography you would likely upgrade your camera body, but you wouldn't need to right away.

I don't think you looked quite enough! It's a bit different from what is shown here, but it absolutely does give you elements. I have 23.4 now -> Select the type: Comets -> Select the source: Download a list of objects from the Internet -> (dropdown) MPCORB:Comets -> Get orbital elements and then follow along in the video up top. Easy Peasy :)

And yes, it's in the mobile app. I don't recommend Stellarium mobile though, I prefer Planit Pro where it also is updated.

Thanks, I will try that 👍@@KristineRosePhotography

@@kindasport Report back if you have a moment and let me know how it goes! I find it so much easier to navigate on desktop in Stellarium than mobile :)

Hey @@KristineRosePhotography so that worked, thank you! i could have just kept watching 🤷‍♂the video but i was a bit frustrated

You're welcome!!

You're welcome!

That is very odd! I'm glad you found your way here via google! I'm hoping to get a chance at the comet after this full moon cycle before it disappears from sight!

You're very welcome!! Happy it helped :)

I am! I know this video is from 2 years ago, but the same principles apply. If your target is printing your work a 27" QHD resolution is the sweet spot.

Happy to help!