Жыл бұрын
3 жыл бұрын
3 жыл бұрын
4 жыл бұрын
4 жыл бұрын
4 жыл бұрын
4 жыл бұрын
4 жыл бұрын
4 жыл бұрын
4 жыл бұрын
4 жыл бұрын
4 жыл бұрын
4 жыл бұрын
Пікірлер
@ipekkaraman7577 8 күн бұрын
Thank you so much for your videos, they helped me so much with my exam. I hope more people will see your videos
@AristotelesDeGracia 9 күн бұрын
YOU ARE THE GOAAATTT
@alejandroolveravarela2462 10 күн бұрын
Amazing! Thank you
@benberkebile2773 16 күн бұрын
This is a great explanation, thanks!
@shuchismitachakrabarty3999 18 күн бұрын
Thank you
@MdYasirArafatSiyam Ай бұрын
From Bangladesh 🙂
@FatimaAli-ec6io 2 ай бұрын
Thank you
@kabuya-x8y 2 ай бұрын
Really good
@junaidkhan0501 2 ай бұрын
thanks
@mememaster9279 2 ай бұрын
this is insanely helpfull thank you SO MUCH
@Fru1tpunch 3 ай бұрын
is there a way you found dB is equal to that or is this just a general equation. I didn't find it in my book and my professor is really bad and never mentioned it any lectures. Does it come from ampere's law?
@rjoshi6209 3 ай бұрын
Underrated!
@anandhraj1952 5 ай бұрын
You deserve million likes for this video
@raunakpcgamingandbenchmark3994 5 ай бұрын
Simple and Clear. Thanks Sir .
@kina4288 7 ай бұрын
By integrating the current over dt ,does that give me the graph of charge Q against time? As the energy is stored in magnetic field, does the graph of Q vs time even make sense or it should be magnetic field we should be looking for. Thank you.
@paxshild4924 7 ай бұрын
But explanation doesn't hold well when the charge is moving perpendicular to the wire still experiencing magnetic force
@AuduStephen-kp3gr 8 ай бұрын
please I would love to start from the basics. No kidding 😵
@ericxue3244 8 ай бұрын
great vid sir
@nanas231 9 ай бұрын
my guy just solved a doubt I had for over a week in less than 10 min, just like that 😂😂😂😂
@micaelabaljet8746 9 ай бұрын
Thanks dude! Finally understand this, super helpful!
@omartarek9166 9 ай бұрын
ربنا يرزقك بنت الحلال
@spookynelly912 9 ай бұрын
آمين
@robertvan6018 10 ай бұрын
Very good analysis
@Ahmed-sa99 10 ай бұрын
final in two hours and this helped me use a different right hand rule thank you
@dinethsenuja9067 11 ай бұрын
Thank you very much💙
@mariasalloua 11 ай бұрын
Thank you so much
@miii336 11 ай бұрын
thank you thank you thank you
@gedokhattab3349 Жыл бұрын
I struggled to understand why there is a negative in the change of the potential energy but thanks to you I now get it.
@i_didnt_poop_my_pants Жыл бұрын
Thank you so much !!!
@Black_heartttttt Жыл бұрын
good job🖤
@krishnasaikia6132 Жыл бұрын
Hey fellow scientists
@manavpatel7780 Жыл бұрын
isnt it dL cross r hat instead of I cross r hat/
@danielzheng4612 Жыл бұрын
You resemble alex grey
@InsightInvention Жыл бұрын
The way he approached the problem in new way with frontend glass backend he is standing giving different perspective 3:27 . It's means that he's thinking about viewers perspective. Good try 🎉 background black contrast also maintained well. I liked it. 🎉❤
@alisonminer2454 Жыл бұрын
Nice Craig,but you need to do the mirroring thing or whatever it’s called so what other people see is readable. It’s all reversed, but you probably know that.
@SkillarenaaOfficial Жыл бұрын
Thank you so much sir....please don't stop posting such videos
@KifiluAmanu Жыл бұрын
Does not matter
@KifiluAmanu Жыл бұрын
Good please attach the content of action of electric and magnetic field on the optical absorption
@isaaksousa9551 Жыл бұрын
good job sr.
@figefago Жыл бұрын
There is one problem. In first scenario force is zero when test charge is not moving so there is no interaction. In second scenario even if test charge is stationary there is a force :) When test charge is moving whith a speed equal 1/2 of electrons in a wire then it "sees" protons moving in one direction and electrons in opposite direction and then net charge is zero -> electric force is zero -> no interaction -> Lorentz force does not works -> faulty phisics :D
@erinleal8878 Жыл бұрын
no other youtube video explains it as well as you did thank you
@emiliano9471 Жыл бұрын
thanks for the video !
@anotheryoutuberperson38 Жыл бұрын
7 years later, thanks Craig. I was so lost, and yours made it finally click when the other KZbin videos made me even more confused
@CraigWLooney Жыл бұрын
glad it helped!
@johnex04 Жыл бұрын
Bless you Craig 😁
@moodman6426 Жыл бұрын
where did the integration go lol??
@CraigWLooney Жыл бұрын
The integral of dL around the full loop is the circumference of the loop which is equal to 2*pi*R
@moodman6426 Жыл бұрын
@@CraigWLooney how would It look with like the integration boundaries? Would it be integration (length max) - integration (length min) so just 2pir-0?
@CraigWLooney Жыл бұрын
If you integrating with respect to L (with "dL" infinitesimal length) you could pick a point on the circle and call it L=0 and then integrate L all the way around the circle back to that same point and call it L=C (where C is circumference, equal to 2*pi*R). Or, you could use an angular representation and represent the infinitesimal dL as R*d(theta), and integrate this from theta=0 to theta=2*pi [and the R can "pass through" the integral sign because it is constant].
@seanferguson6355 Жыл бұрын
great explanation!
@qhfgva Жыл бұрын
physics!🤩
@وحيدالمطار-ج5س Жыл бұрын
very amazing explanation, thank you very much 🌷🌹
@bigpdaddyammalucydagoat4652 2 жыл бұрын
Thanks!
@isurangacooray 2 жыл бұрын
Great content. Clear and straight to the point 👊 thank you so much
@vwcanter 2 жыл бұрын
Good video. I learned this before, but I did not realize that I really just utilized the result and kind of fudged the derivation of the result. It really helps to go slowly and make sure you keep the measurements straight. It is easy to mix them up.