国际乒联竞赛手册对于比赛申诉的规定 国际乒联2023裁判员工作手册Handbook for MATCH OFFICIALS,第7页,4.6条Appeals申诉部分,4.6.1A player, or in a team match his or her captain, may appeal against what he or she believes to be a wrong rule interpretation by the umpire, assistant umpire or stroke counter, but no appeal may be made against a decision on fact by any of these officials in accordance with his or her designated authority. Such an appeal may be made to the referee, whose decision is final on any question of rule interpretation.运动员可以对自己认为的裁判判例错误可以提出申诉,并最终申诉至裁判长,但违背【fact事实】的申诉不被受理。一切以裁判长的决定为准。 根据国际乒联2024手册【The International Table Tennis Federation Statutes 2024】第三部分3: Regulations for International Competitions即国际比赛竞赛规程中,3.3.3Appeals申诉部分,3.3.2中所描述的,No appeal may be made to the referee against a decision on a question of 【fact】 by the responsible match official or to the management committee on a question of interpretation of Laws or Regulations by the referee.只是提到对于主裁做出的基于【事实】的决定不得提出申诉。 那么问题来了,这些规则里丝毫没有提及禁止申诉和禁止看回放,只是写了不能基于【fact事实】提出异议,那请问何谓基于事实?具体到跟覃予萱的正常比赛,情况是,比赛正常进行中,在裁判未做出暂时手势的情况下(说明裁判当时没看出来球有问题),王曼昱擅自举手中断比赛。然后,是她自己跟裁判席说的【2跳】了。随即立即回放球没有2跳。那这种情况下,何谓【基于事实】?难道王曼昱只要说句话,就是事实?所有赛事规程写的清清楚楚,只要不违背【fact事实】就可以提出异议和申诉。 附上原文链接 国际乒联2024手册t.cn/A68TGJBS 国际乒联2023裁判员工作手册t.cn/A6uaolMU
@Sunny-m7v22 күн бұрын
I have asked around about this one, all the pingpang lovers here believe its only hit once after watched the video. China needs better judge, current ones are not that kind qualified I believe.