Thx for viewing, they are wayne’s mini, I know they were all plastic, perry or warlord, sorry cannot be more specific

Thank you

@@philRminiatures thank you, very kind. I did enjoy painting them.

@@RiccardoRingo hi, thank for viewing. I cocked up the graphics, Graham should have had 1 more foot unit and i had 3 mounted warriors not 4. In the game the points were correct.

@grahamswargamevault2635 yes, I gave a look at the match. I'm starting play SAGA and finding some options or ideas. I choosed Late Romans for tribute, but I'm looking for a second list Do you have some advises?

@@RiccardoRingo Byzantines. Can use a lot of what you already have, they are age of crusades so compatible with new age of chivalry…. Also see I recently game I played, they have recently had rules FAQ’d and kick ass! 😉

@@RiccardoRingo spot on, thank you.

@@roberthultz9023 Yep this kinda correct with the standard rules. if warlord is within 12 inches you get a reroll. there is a option in the advanced rules, where you roll each unit once, this does work better for games bigger than 24 points.

@@robandrosehobden3344 hehe. Thank you for viewing. I do enjoy playing Alex. Not sure he got lucky though. Wish i just bypassed the village with my Guard!. merry Christmas to you too.

@@kepihead Thank you for viewing>. Yep a fun game, reassuring enjoying using my figures in a slightly larger game. like you i am very new to BP. Buildings are tricky to take, agree maybe shapers to prolonged bombardment would have helped. Merry Christmas to you.

@@mikedemana Hi Mike, interesting comment.. Re LR, the game definitely doesn’t have the depth of saga, it is also too variable and not a competition ruleset. But it gives a great club night game, beer, pretzels and giggles. The series of games do have the same game mechanic, rebels and patriots is slightly different though regarding fatigue. Only played 1 game of xenon, with ww2, not sure about them tbh. The medieval and dark age are different, courtesy of different troop types. I would say though racial differences are not so obvious. I would say the lack of depth is made with the fun element of the games. Like you, I am waiting for age of chiv, I just hope I am not disappointed.

@@mikedemana yep, Rich is a top player at our club, he played them well. I think i should have gone with 3 points of hg, in 3 units of 4. I did make some fundamental errors. This is the problem with me chopping and changing factions all the time. not an excuse thou, i deserved the kicking :-)

@@Cymrusaint actually playing Friday. Might record , jot sure it records that well? Interesting about reduce, most play the original rules.

Yes indeed, broke the jinx of the new army. I think the Swiss are a interesting faction. I learned a lot, research these while painting.

Thank you Alex, As you know been working on these for a while. Think they come out ok. :-)

@@wargameshobby hehe. Yep, gone flag heavy, also distracts the eye from my tabletop standard painting:-)

@@wargameshobby how about you getting a Italian army? Milanese , now that could be a new project for you.

Yep indeed, alot of new history i have learned. Germans, Hussite's, humm, some more to come

@@mikedemana Hi. Mike, i did get a tad frustrated with the minis i had to drill, pin and green stuff. saying that think thy came out ok. fingers crossed i come over next autumn.. looks hopeful.

Hi Mike, although we have some house rules, there is a advanced rule from rule book, where you try to activate each unit once, I would say this works better with warbands bigger than 24 points.

@@Kincaid1110 my pleasure and thank you flirt your kind words.. Yep, needed a colour to unite them. Was looking into having them as mercenaries from a particular region, but couldn’t find any that specialised in hard gunners..

@@mikedemana hehe. Yep Christopher is very good sport.

@@JasonCarey-t6s thank you for kind words, yep got a bear coming

@@BootsontheTable Thank you Dom. yep steel fist minis are great when constructed. but when i have to Drill, pin and green stuff, it all become ardious!.

Fabulous, thanks for viewing. Used them in a Lion Rampant game, I was pleased on how they looked, not sure it is a killer army though 😊

@@DavidCrawf hi David, Pete’s flags off eBay is one, think flags of war another

@@robandrosehobden3344 kind words, thank you. I did enjoy painting them.

@@Vortigernrex ohhh nice force. We only know a couple of the merc/specialist units, not heard of mounted xbows yet.

@@raycarpenter6466 ohhhh now that’s a interesting tweak. Like black powder/hail ceasar..I like it👍😀. Yep I roll the Swiss out on Saturday.

@@Swindondruid2 thx SD. The weight argument is a good one, however I am an average/easily frustrated modeller, also my plastic naps, have many snapped bayonets. I think (?) plastic ages and becomes brittle.

@grahamswargamevault2635 Yes, I lost 4 bayonets on my 16 French battalions, but I still prefer the plastics

@@Swindondruid2 i know and understand the pain.

@@philRminiatures thank you…. I doubt it is finished 😉

Hehe yep these are my favourite games, hope you are well Mike, fingers crossed for 2025 atc

@RobJones262 yep agree, costs a flag and target can still share casualoities n between others in a formation-with 4 inches…. I think, from memory. Tbh i do think a house rule, would make this less ambitious/uncomplicated.

@@mitchellberdinka1403 I think formations only fire directly forward. All the feedback on fb sp pages and indeed on comments on my query video stated this, however I think the 45 degree arc would be a good house rule. Thank you for viewing and commenting,

@@grahamswargamevault2635 I do use this rule.

@@cyrilvache5284 maybe worth considering, thank you,

@@robandrosehobden3344 fabulous thank you.

@@robandrosehobden3344 hehe thank you

@@anthonyhinton-west9944 hehe. Yes i did enjoy this game. Some very good banter..

@@nirnman it was quite a bump,, ouch!

@@robandrosehobden3344 hehe fun game.. points wise the French had fractionally more, but militia in sp are overpowered. Reckon Prussian’s needed to loss 15 points to level. Not all games / scenarios are equal. Still good.

@@creedencecookson2516 interesting dilemma. I really like 28mm, the mini’s are large enough to make them in dual. Epic scale it does happen, however, Epic is a lot cheaper ( well i prefer lead min;s) they also alllow you to play battles at a division level, which unis of 16 in 28s donot look quite as effective.

@grahamswargamevault2635 I think I might go with Epic Scale, because I can paint small things pretty okay, and I still think the 13.5mm ones look great. And I love having a massive army.

@ got to say if you have a lot on the table, epic do look great.

hehe, tbh i have tired a bit of saga, but very excited for age of chiv, i have 5 or 6 factions ready to go, when it drops, looking forward to it.

yep agree with this, think we was playing it correctly, albeit it seemed a bit harsh.... I guess also tight formations fired straight ahead, after a while into the smoke. That was the way they were trained.

Glad it was useful. The main thing to bear in mind is that all figures in the firing formation count. It also means you can put a few single groups outside their zone of fire to break the formation and they can’t fire back at you. No more ‘walls of death’. Pat

Yeaap agree, i am sure there is something about limited visibility, as with alot of LR, common sense prevails.

I agree, LR is alot of fun.

yep the rules do need some interpretation sometimes. The arc of fire and those targets with the arc of fire is the key statment.

Thank you, appreciate the kind words.

@@robandrosehobden3344 yep got to agree with you, always fun.

@@nirnman haha. Yep always forget the parishes rules…. Good fun game.

@@paulbenson9015 yep all the Mini’s are mine, very pleased with them.