I love this, brother! Keep up the good work! Love the new format where you are in the video too! Praise God!

This is definitely one of my favourite conversations you have posted yet, thank you for sharing. I will be showing this to people as it made some very good points and Riley was very receptive to hearing the Gospel.

wtf i did just listen to, why did I randomly get recommended this dogshit content...ryandaniel you need to take your meds brotherrrrr

Excellent job, my brother! I love this format where we can see both of you sitting and having a conversation. Your interview technique has improved tremendously since I first knew you. Shelly and Darin are doing a great job behind the scenes! I really like Riley. My heart goes out to him. Maybe because he reminds me of N***. I pray that seeds were planted! God bless and shalom!

Excellent job, my brother! It’s sad how there are many professing Christians who don’t know the Gospel.

I think reincarnation is one of two things, we stay here on earth until we find the living God lord Jesus . OR its a great big deception done to humanity . Wise woman ,,Honestly I think you can learn a few things from her.

Amen !!

this was quite un-best. And a non-cosmologer talks about the cosmological constant. Surerightokay.

Bruh

This conversation felt like it was on rails. The guest hardly said a word, he mostly stood their saying "yah" as the host preached at him and went down a script. Samuel, did you notice the sneaky thing you did. You even pointed out at 8:28 that the commandment isn't against "lying", but against "bearing false witness". To quote the Bible "Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbour" - Exodus 20:16 KJV Right after this comment, you proceeded to dishonestly take the guest down a railroad conversation about lying. Do you know what false equivalencies, or non-sequiturs are? First you ask "have you ever lied?" then proceed to use false equivalencies, and non-sequiturs to compare lying as lying to God. But even so, you pointed out the commandment doesn't say not to lie! I'm sure you're doing this because you believe it to be the best way to do your God's bidding, but you are being disingenuous in blasphemous in this conversation. I used to try to witness to people in similar ways. Why do you think it is prudent to go down the laundry list of sins which you think the guest has committed according to your morality? Is this to try to guilt trip the guest? The guest said he thinks he is a good person, but not according to your morality. He didn't claim to be a good person in *your morality*. This reeks of emotional manipulation. At 20:40 you bring up J. Warner Wallace. If you are interested in understanding what scholars really think about the Bible, then please listen to scholars, not apologists. Samuel, if you read this. I hope you are well, and seek an understanding in epistemology.

I am a former Catholic AND a former Christian/Evangelical/Pentecostal. I am agnostic (don't know) and atheist (don't believe). I have no reason to believe there is anything after death. The concept of "eternal life" is horrendous. Life is precious because it is limited. Starting around (10:45) this "have you ever lied? then you are a liar. have you ever stolen? then you are a thief." (Ray Comfort's method) I don't like this line of questioning. Do people really know what the (so called) 10 C's really mean? They are all punishable by death. "“Honor your father and your mother, so that you may live long in the land..." Deut 21:20 They shall say to the elders, “This son of ours is stubborn and rebellious. He will not obey us. He is a glutton and a drunkard.” 21 Then all the men of his town are to stone him to death. You must purge the evil from among you." Anyway, it was an interesting video, but not "meaty" like some I have seen. It came up in my suggestions, so I thought I would watch.

It appears that if you are "confused" about "atheism" and "agnosticism" You should check a little more. I'm an atheist I do not believe the claims of theists that their gods exists. A god may exist out there, though the gods that have been proposed so far, have not met their burden of proof. An agnostic atheist does not *know* that gods don't exist. a gnostic atheist *knows* that gods don't exist, and as such has the burden of proof to support this claim. I have not yet come across a gnostic atheist. Look up the etymology of these words. You appear to be an agnostic Christian, if you are always questioning.

It was funny to hear you state the problem with scepticism today, is people think that is what you should hold to always. This demonstrates that you are getting scepticism confused with dogma. skepticism is the attitude of doubting knowledge claims set forth in various areas. Sceptics challenge the adequacy or reliability of these claims by asking what principles they are based upon or what they actually establish. Sceptics often change their position on what they accept to be true. Sceptics work with the reliability of information available, if better information becomes available a sceptic will change their viewpoint. Sceptics accept that the expansion of the universe occurred, What was before this expansion of the singularity, we don't know. Theists like yourself claim that magic is involved, yet as magic has yet to be demonstrated, we are currently do not believe you. It is equally likely that universe creating pixies created the universe, they don't desire to be worshipped, as they simply enjoy creating universes. This has also not been demonstrated, as this also requires magic for this to occur. So to date, sceptics don't know, and neither do you. Dogmatism is the tendency to lay down principles as undeniably true, without consideration of evidence or the opinions of others. With regards to Christianity, Christians for example dogmatically believe their god exists, and these *"... people think that is what you should hold to always."* despite not having any good evidence to hold these beliefs. Your assertion here is ass backwards. I am sceptical with regards to the claims that the Hindu god Brahma exists. I see no good evidence to support this. This is scepticism. Do you believe that Brahma exists?

Throwing banalities to each other is apparently "the best" encounter. This channel is overrated.

I’m loving these videos so far ❤

Awesome job as usual, brother!

Great job, my brother! Keep up the good work that you are doing! That Lady was given a new hunger for the Lord! ❤😊

Excellent job, my brother! You gave this dear young man plenty to think about! I pray that God works in his heart. Keep up the good work and may God continue to bless!

It sounds like your starting assumption is that there is something bigger than yourself that transcends the individual and involves the existence of a superhuman/supreme being (God). You are then arguing from that point and are bound by that assumption. Your explanations are then restricted to that view and must fit those preconceived boundaries. You actually already believe in your God and his existence and that it equals the existence of an objective truth and morality. Your guest argued that you can't 100% know any objective truth or morality because you are only able to interpret the world around you from your subjective perspective and can't see this higher plane of objectivity that this God supposedly exists on. Perhaps due to your indoctrination into Christianity from childhood, you have already assumed that God exists and thus objective morality exists, and I think it is impossible for you to admit you don't 100% know that God exists or that objective morality exists. You have already committed to a belief before you started forming your arguments. It should be logically simple for anyone to acknowledge that we are individuals with small brains that can only do limited analysis with the limited information collected from our own mind's subjective perspective and can't know 100% whether anything is objectively true. We could think things make sense from our subjective interpretations but actually be objectively wrong without knowing it, in fact. But if you can only interpret the world around you from your subjective perspective, how could you possibly know there is an objective God and that he exists on a plane of objectivity above our plane of existence? Your guest, on the other hand, says that as an atheist, he can't assume a god exists. So his starting point carries no assumptions about the existence of anything objective before he begins his analysis of the world. As a result, he is free to evaluate the world without restrictions and find an explanation that he thinks best explains what he sees and feels. I just don't think you have that freedom, because your arguments are restricted by the limits of your starting assumption that you do know God exists and that his objective plane of truth and morality exists. But you as an individual human can't know that 100%, so it isn't consistent logic to make that claim. Yet it is your starting core claim and the position you can't budge from, no matter if you can't actually know it because you aren't on God's objective plane of existence yourself.

It’s funny because I got interviewed by them

miss you brother , God/s love and strength always ,dan pozzi

Sigue orando amigo eres un ángel para muchas personas Dios te usa mucho keep going friend

Christian v Soft Christian - apparent conflict but they both basically agree and (according to me) are both wrong

Mi amigo samuel

Mi amigo y angel

My friend samuel

My angel friend

It's not sad to watch someone realize that they arrived at their beliefs in a thoughtless way. It IS sad to watch them justify it to themselves by pretending everyone was so lazy.

Theres no credible evidence for the supernatural. NDE's are an abysmal form of evidence. So your oxygen deprived brain/ altered state of mind under the influence are hilarious forms of evidence for life after death. Why are people scared of being dead forever? I am not. Get over it

Unfortunately an intellectual case cannot be made. I don't mean this as an insult but people who don't know much will make a case that sounds intellectual to them but it is far from intellectual and it is only in knowing more that you can identify why someone's supposed intellectual case fails. The man being interviewed is somewhat of an intellectual and understands he chose Christianity not because there is an intellectual case for it but because there are components of Christianity that he likes and can agree with. Thomas Jefferson is another famous person who liked certain truth components and wrote the Jefferson Bible to remove the supernatural bits. I have come to learn that there is such a thing as Christian atheists, again like Jefferson, like the true and "believable" parts of Christianity but reject the magical/supernatural bits. There are certainly things that lend themselves to God belief. The fine tuning argument is one of the better arguments, but even this guy being interviewed knows why it fails even though he can agree it is better than other arguments. Near death experiences are another thing, but many near death experiences are made up, leaving a person attempting to discern the real ones from the fake ones. There is also a mix of NDE's with a God, advanced beings that could be consider Gods, and those with no Gods at all, just meeting up with loved ones who have passed on. NDE's would be something that potentially is real but has no real evidence or science to back it up where you have to either rely on personal testimonies, which we know some are lies, or have an actual experience yourself. Hallucinations was the excuse science used to give, but there are too many similarities in my opinion to consider them random hallucinations. NDE's at least gets you to there is life after death and many people considering a certain source as God. While there is more room to suspect a potential God, there is less room to accept the biblical version of God. The more you learn about the bible and especially its history, the harder it is to completely take it seriously. While the bible offers plenty of truths where an atheist wants to become a Christian for those truths as well as the other benefits of social infrastructure, there are plenty of parts of the bible that inform the reader that it is not from a Higher Intelligence. It is because Christianity has problems including the problems of the bible itself that some Christians, sometimes for decades, find that they can no longer believe in Christianity and become ex-Christian. I can tell the guy you interviewed knows the many pitfalls of Christianity and even of God belief itself. My final thought is that even though there is not an intellectual case to be made for God's existence, that doesn't mean a God doesn't exist. It simply means that mankind is still too igorant to make that intellectual case and that collectively there is far more that we don't know and understand than we do. The most interesting videos are of ex-apologists who once had an ego that they had a solid case to evangelize only to realize in hind sight just how ignorant they were and appeared to some who knew better. Christianity certainly has support up to a point, but it is the most important and crucial parts that have no support and must be taken on faith.

Firstly, don't put yourself down. I don't know many, but christians can be intellectuals too. You just have to believe.

The claim that theistic morality is somehow "objective" is ridiculous. Theists are merely substituting their own subjective moral standards with the morals standards of the god they subjectively determine represents the "correct objective" morality. 🙄🤔

So this isn’t necessarily the case . In pantheism, because everything and everyone is One (god, Brahman, etc) then morality actually makes more sense here since it leads with the idea that, if you and I are the same, what reason do I have to hurt you or have any bad intentions against you if all I’m doing is hurting myself. Sure, there are no consequences in terms of hell or such things, but because we are all One, there is no need for hell, since in the material world there already exist consequences to our actions in real forms. But because not everyone lives with the notion that we are all One, and don’t have that knowledge (or if they do have the knowledge, they attach so much to their personal egos that they don’t listen to that divine, universal Self) then this creates the illusion that we are all separate, unfamiliar beings and our egos will get so strong that we end up harming each other or make bad moral choices. But the point is that pantheism doesn’t equal to having a lack of a sense of morality, this is the real illogical thinking.

Excellent job, brother! Keep up the good work! God bless!

Your goalposts were on wheels and your guest still kept scoring.

You haven’t actually read the Book of Mormon have you. You talk about it as someone who has heard about what it says, but hasn’t actually read it. Be better please. Don’t talk about what you don’t know

Haha imagine telling someone else they aren’t reading gods word the way it was intended, then think they’re the ones who are deceived

This is such a sweet interview. Keep witnessing my friend! 👐

Excellent job, my brother! This young man, Ein, is amazingly knowledgeable, especially being a Catholic. He is definitely on the right track. I will be praying for him!

Don't confuse the situation by speaking Spanish just to sound smart.

Dear brother, my heart goes out to this sweet young lady. I pray that you planted a seed in her heart and that the Lord draws her to Himself.

Excellent job, my dear brother! I will pray for these two dear young people. We want them to spend eternity with us!

Well done, my brother! This is one of your best interviews. This man gave you quite a challenge!

Your logic-unknown therefore theistic god, like come on man we both know you don’t buy that I’m not mad I’m just disappointed

Such an excellent job, my brother! My hope and prayer is that this man will consider what you told him and turn to Jesus!

Dear brother, such a great job! This young lady seems very sweet and I pray that seeds were planted in her heart.

Might be my favourite interview you've had so far, great job

I love how the sun is setting as you talk to him. Very good lighting effect, brother!

Great job, my brother. This young man, you can tell he was really thinking about what you were saying. And I love it when someone admits they are not a good person. Those rare people are most likely to be accepting of Jesus. The first thing a person needs to do is admit they are a sinner. Praise God and shalom!

This is an attempt at indoctrination. What a religious twat.