7 ай бұрын
9 ай бұрын
10 ай бұрын
Жыл бұрын
Жыл бұрын
Пікірлер
@whsbsmith 2 күн бұрын
Thanks for the video. For the grammatical-historical hermeneutic, does the bible itself commend this hermeneutic anywhere?
@BrotherInChrist 2 күн бұрын
Thank you for this message! We see the remnant of Israel is sealed (Revelation 7:3-8), protected (Revelation 9:4), nourished and sustained by God (Revelation 12:6,14,16) until the Son of Man returns as King.
@JosephBoxmeyer-u3d 2 күн бұрын
You have offered a sound presentation. Over the decades, it has become clear that the opposition to Dispensarionalism has its source in dependence on men's traditions and the refusal to base theology and hermeneutics on the Bible alone. This is most evident in Covenant Theology, where their system is purely fiction. Their source is Roman Catholic scholasticism. They call themselves "confessional" because men's confessions are their only source. They strongly reject any system based on the Bible.
@69telecasterplayer 12 күн бұрын
Excellent. Thank you very much for these points.
@ryangallmeier6647 19 күн бұрын
Yes, the Church had a "birthday": "And the Lord God made for Adam and for his wife garments of skins and clothed them." [Gen. 3:21]. There ya' go. *Soli Deo Gloria*
@ts8960 26 күн бұрын
Too bad this chapter is mistranslated by your christian scammers. Read it on Sefaria or Chabad for a clearer picture. The servant and the one in the womb is clearly ISRAEL. not Jesus
@but24God 28 күн бұрын
Excellent and useful. Appreciate listing these foundations for us.
@michaeljvlach7388 14 күн бұрын
Thank you
@BrotherMikeBCSF 28 күн бұрын
LOVING YOUR MINISTRY PREACHER !
@danielfredericks5515 Ай бұрын
Thanks, Mike. Your consistency and clarity in eschatological truth is a must. Thank you! I urge all to listen, read and apply to life and ministry!
@michaeljvlach7388 Ай бұрын
Thank you!
@Frank-r9i Ай бұрын
People really need to watch Michael s. Heiser on the subject.
@Unknown.servant 23 күн бұрын
What is his take? Genuine question
@sharonwhite2143 Ай бұрын
Mmmmm! So many are fooled some of the time but not all of the time. Sad but TRUE
@LindaWelsford Ай бұрын
Very very good. Thank you
@CarlDi3trich Ай бұрын
The Bible speaks of everything being destroyed by elemental heat. Where does that fit in, Dr. Vlach?
@victorhugoguerraguerra2453 Ай бұрын
Puede alguien traducirlo al español
@MrMurfle Ай бұрын
Seems like LGH is, at best, a somewhat misleading term. Literal apparently doesn't mean what we usually think of as literal (Jesus isn't a literal gate). LGH doesn't seem to encompass Intertextuality (verses and passages that connect or correlate in some meaningful way). Historical, as I think is usually understood, doesn't seem to cover audience relevance. All in all, LGH seems like a mess that doesn't convey much useful meaning.
@earlsiebold536 2 ай бұрын
Trying to interpret the New on the base of the Old is a huge mistake. Israel is no longer a biblical concept. It is a fake nation that used Christian zionism as a pretext to exist. It is interesting that it is very likely that in a few years this present fake state calling itself Israel will cease to exist which again follows 'this generation' since the fake state was created in 1948. It is time that dispensationalists get with the game and fully accept Jesus.
@earlsiebold536 2 ай бұрын
As a former dispensationalist I came to reject it because it was 'another gospel' that basically supported Talmudic Judaism. However since I left that doctrine behind me I no observe how much damage this teaching has done to the churches that follow it. They have pretty much lost their witness. The unwavering support of the nation that calls itself Israel is insane and excuses all kinds of evils. It makes the Catholic church of the 1940s seem saintly in comparison to the dispensationalist churches and there acceptance of any evil the nation that calls itself Israel commits. Right now that nation is committing genocide killing many Christians in the process yet here the dispensationalist churches refuse call evil evil since they misguidedly believe that this will hasten the end. Then there is the evil of the belief in the third temple. Jesus Body is the Third Temple and no man made structure will ever take its place. The Sacrifice He made on the Cross will never be supplanted by animal sacrifice made in a 'temple' made of rocks. I call on all true Christians to leave dispensationalism immediately.
@jessedphillips 2 ай бұрын
Thank you so much for this incredible explanation of the different views of eschatology. As I work out my understanding of what the enzymes look like or will look like, this kind of content is incredibly helpful. You explained it very clearly and I really appreciate the effort you put in. I would be really interested in having a copy of the document that you used during the presentation. Thanks!
@michaeljvlach7388 Ай бұрын
Thank you!
@jessedphillips Ай бұрын
@michaeljvlach7388 do you have a copy of that document anywhere for download?
@andreamccormack 2 ай бұрын
Where can we get physical access to this chart? Is this in one of your books?
@Parkeri1313 3 ай бұрын
30:10 the Lord Jesus is presently reigning according to Acts 2:36, “Let all the house of Israel therefore know for certain that God has made him both Lord and Christ, this Jesus whom you crucified.” It is even more clear in 1 Cor. 15:25-26 where Paul says, "For he must reign until he has put all his enemies under his feet. The last enemy to be destroyed is death.” Is this not clear that Jesus, the Lord, is presently reigning?
@Parkeri1313 3 ай бұрын
13:47 Doesn't Jesus redefine the Passover (1 Cor 5:7 ... “Christ our Passover has been sacrificed”) -- yes. Based on your statement, "Disp. hold that the NT does not reinterpret OT passages..." this means that Disp. is in error hermeneutically, right? What am I missing here? How do Disp. explain the bulk of the letter to the Hebrews? I see this as a huge problem that needs to be addressed.
@RobertEdmunds-pz6ir 3 ай бұрын
A very accurate depiction. A shame more believers don't share it. The Mystery of the blindness of Israel. Rom. 11:25.
@wtbryant 3 ай бұрын
Amen x1000. I've argued this for a long, long time. It's unfathomable to me that covenant theologians have been able to convince anybody otherwise.
@pauladams6067 3 ай бұрын
Hello Michael, I really enjoy your books and teaching. I understand the mystery revealed of Jew and Gentile in Christ as new man in the Church. Do you teach that the Church and that distinction of one new man ceases to exist in the millennium and eternal state?
@LouieQ316 3 ай бұрын
This is great! I’m thinking of taking this course
@manonthestars 3 ай бұрын
Are you aware of a dispensational critique, review, or interaction with the works of Jason A. Staples? His two books on this topic are: 1. "The Idea of Israel in Second Temple Judaism: A New Theory of People, Exile, and Israelite Identity" (2021) 2. "Paul and the Resurrection of Israel: Jews, Former Gentiles, Israelites" (2023) From my understanding he is not a covenant theologian; he is a biblical scholar who also does not align with the traditional or New Perspective on Paul. It seems he is approaching the Israel/Church distinction from a different perspective than Reformed theology and dispensationalism, so I thought it would be interesting to hear any interaction with his work from the dispensational side. Any resources or your take on it would be very much appreciated. Thanks.
@adamradford2285 3 ай бұрын
Hi Michael thanks so much for posting this , it has really helped me understand what in an incredible and mind blowing prophesy and passage. I have heard that the Jewish faith claim the servant is referring to the Nation of Israel. But I agree with you and my pastor that clearly it refers to an individual.. of which clearly Jesus Christ is the only saviour. Best wishes from the UK
@michaeljvlach7388 3 ай бұрын
Thank you. I agree
@justindaugherty475 3 ай бұрын
Is there a way we can access this word document? I’m an OT teacher and this would be very helpful for me.
@empese1127 3 ай бұрын
Greetings from Puerto Rico, and thanks for your work.
@empese1127 3 ай бұрын
Thanks for this clear explanation!
@michaeljvlach7388 3 ай бұрын
Glad it was helpful!
@gerard4870 3 ай бұрын
I recently went through your tms theology 4 material online, and loved the format of the bible you use. Can you tell me the edition? Thanks!
@BrotherInChrist 4 ай бұрын
Thank you for this message, Mike. I value you your insights! Natural sons of Abraham (and Isaac and Jacob) = Israel Spiritual sons of Abraham, counted righteous by faith = Israel of God (cultivated olive tree) I believe the spiritual sons of Abraham, including all saints in salvation history (Hebrews 11), made perfect together (Hebrews 11:40;12:23), will also receive a fulfillment of the promises to Abraham and to his Seed. ***** Key verse for the fulfillment to the natural descendants: Romans 9:4 "They are Israelites, and to them belong the adoption, the glory, the covenants, the giving of the law, the worship, and the promises." ***** To the natural descendants of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, a fulfillment of: - People (Jeremiah 23:3,5-6; Ezekiel 11:17; Ezekiel 20:33-38; Zechariah 13:9; Romans 11:26-27) - Land (Leviticus 26:42; Deuteronomy 11:21; Ezekiel 20:42; Ezekiel 36:28; Jeremiah 30:3) - Blessing (Isaiah 59:20-21; Jeremiah 31:33; Ezekiel 11:19-20; Ezekiel 36:26-27; Ezekiel 37:14; Zechariah 12:10) ***** Key verse for the fulfillment to the spiritual descendants of Abraham, counted righteous by faith; the OT & NT saints: Romans 4:13 "For the promise to Abraham and his offspring that he would be heir of the world did not come through the law but through the righteousness of faith. ***** To the spiritual descendants of Abraham, counted righteous by faith, a fulfillment of: - People (Daniel 7:18,22; John 10:16; Ephesians 2:15; Hebrews 11:40, 12:23; Revelation 1:5-6; 5:9; 7:9; 14:4; 19:7-8; 20:4) - Land (Daniel 7:27; Romans 4:13; Matthew 5:5) - Blessing (Daniel 12:1-2; Hebrews 11:40, 12:23; Romans 8:29-30; 1 Corinthians 15:42-44; Philippians 3:20-21; Colossians 3:4; 1 John 3:2; Revelation 20:6) ***** To recap, I believe the promises to Abraham and to his Seed (in the Messianic kingdom) are fulfilled to the natural descendants of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, and to the spiritual descendants, the sons of Abraham counted righteous by faith. People - Repentant Israel/resurrected saints of God Land - Israel (expanded)/the whole earth Blessing - regeneration/glorification And all of this occurs when the Son of Man returns as King (Daniel 7:14; Matthew 25:31; Revelation 11:15). Blessings
@BrotherInChrist 4 ай бұрын
Mike, can you explain why there are instances where you capitalize the term "church," and others you don't? I'm sure you have spoken about it before but I am not familiar with the reasoning... Thank you.
@conniemarmo8234 4 ай бұрын
I liked most of it
@doctrinematters 4 ай бұрын
The claim, "the church is not mentioned in the OT," is frequently heard, in dispensational circles. I'm wondering if it matters to distinguish between implicit and explicit references? Paul does put the church into the category of a musteirion, defined as one of “the mystery" (ies) "of Christ, which in other generations was not made known to the sons of men, as it has now been revealed...". Would it be correct to say that Paul's use of "made known" doesn't necessarily mean not mentioned at all, to previous "sons of men", it's just that it is not clearly defined in the OT? As I now understand it, the explicit NT scriptures, that give us a complete description of what the church is, is not found in the OT. But, there are implicit OT references to the church, though the church is not plainly defined in these verses. It was helpful that you pointed out those very OT passages.
@hajoel5505 4 ай бұрын
To me “implicit mentions” seem to be spiritualisation/allegorisation of OT passages.
@doctrinematters 4 ай бұрын
"I am the door." Symbolism. The gospels teach implicitly that God raised Jesus from the dead (stone rolled away, presence of angels, Jesus' appearance, etc.) but Paul teaches explicitly, in Eph., "...when he raised him from the dead." It was a literal stone rolled away, literal angels present, and literally Jesus who appeared, but the concept of the resurrection is implied in the gospels, not stated directly, as it is said by Paul. Likewise, the OT verses Dr. Vlach pointed out are all literal promises made to Gentiles, but I do see them as allusions to the Church, compared to the clearly defined teachings, in the NT, in terms of its body, indwelling, being the Bride, and the Church's translation. My first comment was me wondering, out loud, why many dispensationalists say "...the Church isn't mentioned in the OT," when, clearly, this video points out otherwise. True, the "mystery" of the Church isn't made completely known until the NT. Are those who say the Church isn't mentioned in the OT referring to the explicit teaching on the Church as not being in the OT? I don't know the answer to that. We'll have to ask Tommy Ice.
@michaeljvlach7388 4 ай бұрын
Jesus has to arrive with His person and work to have the church.
@doctrinematters 4 ай бұрын
Still wondering why the OT passages you reference aren't more widely recognized as direct references to what will become the Church, at Christ's coming (i.e. those who say the Church is not mentioned in the OT). Are they just not familiar with what you showed in this video? If so, well, then, problem solved with the posting of this video.
@sanctuslex478 3 ай бұрын
@@michaeljvlach7388 In my opinion, the entire Psalm 22 is the only one in the entire OT, but at the same time a very clear fragment announcing the emergence of the ethno-Christian Church after the crucifixion of the Messiah. We can see the faith of Israel of the first century and then the faith of the nations from the ends of the world. In the Septuagint and Vulgate, the word Church is even mentioned there. I consider Psalm 22 as a unique and clear fragment in the entire OT announcing the Church and I believe it has solid foundations, especially considering verse 22:23 (in the Septuagint), where the word "ekklēsia" appears - translated as "Church". Many exegetes agree that this Psalm contains messianic prophecies that include the suffering of the Messiah, and also extend to the future impact of this event on the nations, which can be interpreted as a prediction of the Church. Although Paul does speak in Ephesians 3:6 of a mystery that was not fully revealed in the OT, Psalm 22 may be considered a unique passage in the entire OT that suggests a future inclusion of the nations in the plan of salvation within the Church, not the Millennial Kingdom. Of course, the word "ekklēsia" translated as "Church" literally means "Assembly," in this case "assembly of the nations in Messiah." Of course, I do not question the belief in a literal Millennial Kingdom, but I believe that Psalm 22 is not speaking of that period but of the present period of the Church. This exegesis is confirmed by the Epistle to the Hebrews, where in Heb. 2:12 Psalm 22 is quoted to members of the Jewish Church.
@rogeraraujo502 4 ай бұрын
Very helpful - thank you Michael!
@chrislabrec 4 ай бұрын
Thank you very clear and helpful!
@CuisinerosTribu 4 ай бұрын
Thank God for this Dr. Vlach. Truly you're a blessings for us as novices on this particular belief. Just bought your book, Has the Church Replaced Israel last month. God willing, will purchase more of your books especially that He Will Reign Forever.
@michaeljvlach7388 4 ай бұрын
Thank you for your kind words.
@SergioCastriCar 5 ай бұрын
Dr. Vlach, I'm enjoying watching all your videos. I've learned so much about the Kingdom and the New Creation Model. I have a question about this video. It is clear from Matthew 23:39 that the Lord is pointing to his second coming (because they are pronounced after Palm Sunday), but in Luke 13:35, that looks like a parallel text, these words are pronounced BEFORE Palm Sunday. How to reconcile this? Blessings
@yohanneskebede7170 5 ай бұрын
thank you very much
@BrotherMikeBCSF 5 ай бұрын
BROTHER MICHAEL, HOW COME CHARTS DONT SHOW THE POST RAPTURE/TRIBULATION PERIOD AS A DISPENSATION ?
@Unknown.servant 23 күн бұрын
Because all the Christian's are already out of here by the time Post comes along 😂😂😂
@manueleteofilo5270 5 ай бұрын
Bible reference for 7 dispenssation? you only use man understanding
@Unknown.servant 23 күн бұрын
Its a philosophical method to understand the Bible.....as is RT
@manueleteofilo5270 23 күн бұрын
@@Unknown.servant so dispensation interpretation is philosophy and not Christian theology. Thanks for the clarification. In that case is worthless!
@Unknown.servant 23 күн бұрын
@manueleteofilo5270 philosophy is the study of the fundamental nature of knowledge, reality, and existence, especially when considered as an academic discipline. I wouldn't consider it worthless as long as the Bible controls the philosophy, and not the other way around. Obviously we are not to lean on a man made philosophy that misinterpret Scripture. However, we are human and to better interpret any of the writings there are usually systematic that everyone reads through the lenses of. Display is much more coherent than Replacement Theology to me
@manueleteofilo5270 23 күн бұрын
@@Unknown.servant I believe putting the ideas of John Nelson Darby, C.I Scolfield on a pedal stool (likewise reformed theology raise up the ideas of John Calvin) is idolatry and alot of the time misleading. !The Bible is clearly understood when you take away the noise. Bless you buddy!
@Unknown.servant 23 күн бұрын
@@manueleteofilo5270 i done believe in idolizing any man, or woman for that matter. However, just because some unseemly characters have held to a particular belief doesn't mean I'm going to throw out a belief that may be true. God bless
@1969cmp 5 ай бұрын
Are there some shared ideas with preterism and post-millenialism.
@paulbrennan4163 3 ай бұрын
Yes, he addresses that at 1:26 in the video. In the table where two cells on one row are both in bold text then they agree with each other.
@rogeraraujo502 5 ай бұрын
Highly recommend 'The Old in the New' book by Michael. Thoroughly enjoyed it and packed with wonderful content
@rickcampanella4254 6 ай бұрын
Catholicism has been a lie from the very beginning. Beware of Ecumenicalism
@rickcampanella4254 6 ай бұрын
Some books in the New Testament are describing what happened in the Old Testament. I'm not a Jew and I'm not under the law.
@rickcampanella4254 6 ай бұрын
Never mix law with grace or you will have neither.
@rickcampanella4254 6 ай бұрын
Check Webster's dictionary, it will tell you what it is.
@rickcampanella4254 6 ай бұрын
We are in the dispensation of grace right now.
@TheBarryHughes 6 ай бұрын
Keep up that podcast on Spotify. What a blessing!
@TheBarryHughes 6 ай бұрын
The video series on The Kingdom would be great!