Who has invaded more countries in the last 75 years, Russia or the US? The money the US spends on 'defense' is actual spend to finance wars abroad and not in their own country. Nobody is threatening the US border.

It is an important partnership between two countries, complimenting each other. It is also an important renewal of contacts between two ancient cultures.

Bad ai script

lmao

Europer should get rid of NATO which is just another armed branch of the US in Europe. Why should Europe pay for NATO?

Indo-israeli Industries; manufacturing ; for india for israel and the world SYMBIOTIC Value added. state of art SCI-FI..

What is India’s total GDP 3.95/3.73/4.01 now?Pls Write me a real one😢

america hardly spends any money on education, health care as MOST go to defence spending. If only we use the funds and technology on making life better for everyone instead of WARFARE. mankind has been Glorify and Romanticise the HORRORS of war

Total nonsense video. Jumla 😂😂😂

Now everyone abroad should think twice before signing an agreement with the U.S.A. because every new President comes with a different set of "ideas", and gets out of a commitment without question, but Europe deserves more than this, its leaders look more like cheerleaders of the U.S.A.

You deserve at least 100k+ subscribers

One of the best vlog about India - Israel partnership...Perfect analysis, very informative... Since last 8-10 yrs India is transforming very rapidly & the changes r quiet visible...and PM Modi , a man of action , promised in next 5 yrs to achieve development 3 times than the achievements in last 10 years...Main focus is Defence, Infra ( Expressways , Rail , ports) , Renewable, manufacturing under make in India, Digital economy...l

There is no future for Europe with Trump crazy ideas like buying Greenland and loving dictators.

It seems your doing propaganda for the CCP

Why do you show all video clips about India 🇮🇳 like a congested, poor, cycle peddling country? Why not new developments in Mumbai, our tech cities, largest airports??...a typical WESTERN NARRATIVE...SO IM GIVING A 👎 TO YOUR VIDEO

Timeline back on track

That's why he wants Greenland, of course he could sell oil there, Putin just goes to war (the mad man of Krimlin)

This video is very misleading. Germany may be the largest economy in Europe but due to history (1939 - 1945) Germany is legally obligated to keep their military small. Plus the currency in Europe is NOT the US dollar.

That chart is misleading. These figures show how each country spends on their own military. Of its 3.5% military budget, the US spends only a small fraction of that on NATO (I believe 0.5%). The rest is spent on protecting US interests around the rest of the world. European countries, on the other hand, may spend less on their own military (some actually spend more like Poland for example), most if not all goes to NATO. This means that the US spends less on NATO than European countries. I know it's not what you've been told but all you have to do is use logic, do some basic math and if that fails listen to US generals who are/retired in NATO who will tell you the same thing.

Why don't these types of reports ever mention that NATO was formed to service US interests? Originally it was due to fear of communist expansion. It was convenient for the US to have military bases (particularly in Germany and Italy) as they are geographically strategic. Yet the American narrative makes it sound like the alliance was formed purely to protect Europe. After 1991 NATO really should have been dissolved. Why wasn't it? Another point that's never mentioned is that many European countries only very recently (2006 for the UK ad 2018 for Italy) finished paying their debt to the US for WWII. I hear Americans say how they saved Europe in WWII. The reality is that the US would have left us to rot had they not been attacked themselves. The US also made a ton of money from those they were "helping" (and all Americans I've ever spoken with, on the topic, downplay the help the allies gave the US in the Pacific). Americans have such an issue with Europeans having stability and social programs and put it all down to being "subsidised" by the US. This is nonsense because NATO is a peacetime alliance (wars are far more expensive) and used mostly as a deterrent and/or in defence. The only time NATO has been used to actively defend one of its members was after 9/11 (so it wasn't Europe being defended). Europeans have different objectives than the US. We've been focused on stability and social programs because these are the things that promote long-term security and peace. We know what it's like to have war on our own soil and after WWII the plan was to create an environment where that would not happen again. The US has never had to endure years of war on their own soil (have only had brief attacks: Pearl Harbor and 9/11). Thanks to geographical isolation, it's easy for them to cause chaos in other countries and then retreat to safety in their ivory tower. Americans can't stand that we have a better quality of life in Europe so want to undermine it. The US only profits when it can create the conditions for war so of course they're not happy. At least for America, NATO wasn't about keeping peace in Europe but about intimidating Russia (and the expansion of communism) by its presence (which is the stated reason for the invasion of Ukraine, ironically). It would never do for the US if Russia became bigger and more powerful. The US doesn't give a toss about Europe or promoting "democracy" but only its own skin and its own imperialistic goals. However, that's not what they American citizens are told. Americans are told that Europe takes advantage of the generosity of the US. Europeans are not meeting their obligations by spending at least 2% of their GDP is empty rhetoric. First of all this is a target, not an obligation, and second of all it's money that each country spends on its own military, not money owed to the US or NATO. It's not up to the US to dictate how much we spend on our own military and it's none of the US's business whether we prefer to spend on social programs. But, as the US is the biggest contributor (in terms of $ not in terms of %), they think they own us (conveniently forgetting that the alliance is just as much if not more in their interest than ours) and dictate how we should manage our own affairs. Yes, the US spends more of it's GDP on its own military but only a small fraction of that budget goes to NATO. In fact the US spends far less (in terms of % of its military budget) on NATO than many European countries do. Europeans may spend less of their GDP on their own military than the US spends on its military, but what they do spend goes entirely to NATO. Why? Because NATO is used only for defence (not offence which is more costly) whereas the US is a global power (European countries are not nor are we interested in bullying/being aggressive towards other nations like the US is) so US military spending goes towards policing the world, protecting its interests globally (not just Europe) as well as space programs. So, while I think European countries should up their game (especially as we've finished paying our WWII debts), it's really skewed logic to suggest that European countries should invest as much as the US in military spending. Americans are under the impression that NATO was formed to keep peace in Europe and Europeans know that the best way to keep peace is to create stability and the way to achieve that is to invest in social programs. The US, on the other hand, aren't really interested in peace because 1) they are geographically isolated which affords them protection from direct invasion 2) they make money from war. So of course their main priority is having a strong military (so they can intimidate/coerce other countries to get their own way) and a big GDP (so they can invest in the military which in turn is used to bully other countries into giving them have their way - which includes economic interests). The big GDP is created by unrestrained capitalism and lower taxes for corporations (so they don't have to invest in social programs). However, this creates a lot of misery for ordinary Americans. The American elite have found the solution to preventing civil unrest in the US: keep educational standards low so that people can't think critically, feed them false narratives about their own role in the world and how incompetent other countries are, tell Americans that they are right about everything (which is the reason why America is rich: not because they live on stolen land and the country was built and still is powered by exploitation even of its own citizens), indoctrinate them from a young age to believe that they live in the best country in the world and tell them lies about how other countries are freeloaders who take advantage of them. In Europe we have social programs because we pay higher taxes. The US could have the same if they invested their money differently. They wouldn't even have to reduce military spending. Despite heavy investment in its military, America has very low taxes compared to Europe so it could afford to increase them slightly in order to offer a few social programs. However, Americans don't want to pay more taxes as they have been conditioned to believe that social programs are bad (that they take away incentive which would be bad for production/the economy). This is what their leaders tell them and what's drummed into them since childhood. What their leaders fail to tell them is that the real reason is that the US government wants to keep corporations happy (to keep GDP high so that government has plenty of money to invest in its military) and corporations thrive on exploitation. It's far more difficult to exploit when citizens have fundamental rights. Social programs don't discourage incentive, they create a better quality of life which means a healthier and more productive workforce. The flip side, though, is that corporations can't make the same insane amount of money. The US system only benefits corporations not ordinary people. Americans don't realise that they are being duped. They only get it when they leave America to live elsewhere for a while and are able to see things clearly (not bombarded by relentless brainwashing/propaganda). So stop peddling this narrative that the reason Americans are suffering is because they are paying for Europe. I get that a con man like Tr0mp will say anything to keep people from understanding the real source of their issues because if they did they just might start to aggressively demand change from their own government.

This partnership is very important for both countries in all fields.

Good content

I live in Vancouver and I love it here I won’t live anywhere else ,

That graph is wrong lol Poland is the leading country in EU considering what they use on defence/military !

Excellent. Very informative .

Simply amazing, thanks 🙏🏻

Tbh, Trump is a good leader, his all agenda are clear. To make America great again and that's what a leader should do, if Europe becomes scape goat i don't see why not, what's the harm? Every country should look after their own people

First blowing up our gas pipeline to ruin our economy ,and now coming with demands?...... Time to rid ourselves of this so-called friend! Better a good neighbor , than a far friend!

Europe and US deserve Trump

In economic terms, Indian companies appreciate the experience of U.K. companies, experience that covers international trade.

OMG! What a bunch of BS!! Paid for by the CCP??

USA created the war with Russia and the pressure for Ukraine in NATO. European countries should double all tariffs that Trump imposes. Defense spending it’s not about security, it’s about buying to USA. We need to put a stop on Trump , Netanyahu and Putin

AI generated video. God I hate this.

Tide is turning.Nothing is permanant,wealth ,Laxmi changes hands.

Mexico is booming right now. Projects all over the country, passenger trains connecting the entire country, skyscrapers in many cities, even Tijuana is transforming, they are building a tower of almost 500 meters and there are already plans to build a tower of 700 meters high, it is incredible the development that the country is experiencing.

Whatever happens in the past is gone. The future looks truly awesome for India.

I fled British Columbia for Australia and I find it to be much more affordable in Aus. Could not be happier to have left Canada!

All economic data are lies. Especially those in the West.

Problem is,,Only the government gets Ritch

europeans collectively decided it was more important to inflict pain on Russia than it was to help their own countries. even after economic disasters, europeans are still wed to this war with Russia. what is perhaps more shocking is europes's full support of their war crimes ( this was the finding of the ICJ...so please don't deletes comments that are facts) Who exactly is supposed to attack europe? nobody wants that mess. Russia was happy to get out of their in 1991! the USSR built and subsidised eastern europe, one of the reasons that went bankrupt.

They are struggling because they adopted Socialist governing years ago.

Why should America have to pay for NATO's wars if they won't pay?

Tell us you don't know how NATO works, how little the US matters, or how tariffs work without telling us. The US hasn't ever won a war without European support and barely shows up for them anyway.

Australia is close to China for visits and has better weather.

New Zealand flag shown twice.. Has the red stars..

Don't forget Canada still tips, Australia doesn't.

👍👍👍😁

Pay up Trump!!!!!!!!!!!

Another factor to consider. Canada is closer to Europe, USA and South America. Makes living in Canada more attractive, also Canada has much more larger cities and many American cities are close by.

How can it be easy when the globalist planted their modern day tyrants running the show.