Пікірлер
@RedRose-R
@RedRose-R 2 сағат бұрын
Thank you!
@Theophilus703
@Theophilus703 3 сағат бұрын
100
@IDontSuckAtLifeakaJanis3975
@IDontSuckAtLifeakaJanis3975 2 күн бұрын
The pencils... Think of a modern day hobby or craft that requires any type of instruments or tools or product that you NEED to do it... The drawing pencils would've been a huge thing for her and her art. *Hair* Is nothing sacred anymore? The time period in which the story was written (and throughout much of history) a woman's (long) hair was her crowning glory! It would've been devastating for her to cut it. 🤔 Many people living in those times are likely rolling in their graves seeing all of the intentionally bald women today.
@Serioussamurai300
@Serioussamurai300 2 күн бұрын
Sister Marie Bernard 🌹
@GodLovesYou1980
@GodLovesYou1980 2 күн бұрын
Thank you
@Armee5000
@Armee5000 2 күн бұрын
So as Catholics, should we go watch this movie or not?
@radonpq99
@radonpq99 2 күн бұрын
Fluff you dickheads , using deception to attract visitors, you should be reported to YT
@josephnelson3516
@josephnelson3516 3 күн бұрын
Suggestion for an audiobook: Solzhenitsyn's TWO HUNDRED YEARS TOGETHER (in English).
@jamesjaudon8247
@jamesjaudon8247 4 күн бұрын
Still excellent. Most of the early Father's I've heard of. But this one is elusive.
@aleks1203
@aleks1203 4 күн бұрын
Thank-you for the historical readings. The music is also a treat.
@Anton-Soloviev
@Anton-Soloviev 4 күн бұрын
46:00
@undergroundpublishing
@undergroundpublishing 4 күн бұрын
I can't get anyone to see that Origen and Clement were Gnostics. Clement flat out calls his teaching gnosticism hundreds of times in his Stromata, and Origen calls Jesus "The Demiurge" in his commentary on John. People just do not want to see.
@CatholicCulturePod
@CatholicCulturePod 4 күн бұрын
To be fair, gnosis means knowledge and there was some attempt to reclaim that term from the Gnostics. It has been too long since I read Clement, I don't remember him being as weird as Origen, but maybe you're right. He was removed from the liturgical calendar for doctrinal reasons after all.
@undergroundpublishing
@undergroundpublishing 4 күн бұрын
@@CatholicCulturePod Yeah. I get that he was trying to "baptize" the term, but he was blatantly replacing the God of Scripture with the Nous of Stoicism, and basically claiming that we are called to rid ourself of emotion to become like him. That's why the unbiblical practice of forbidding marriage among the clergy was pushed at Nicaea, and probably why Origen castrated himself. From my research, it all goes back to Justin Matryr recommending that people read Philo to understand the OT. Philo made the Logos and Wisdom a joint created archangel and called it the son of God, but he was making up a Duad to match the Monad of Pythagoreanism. These guys took in the mysteries and philsophers as inspired and definitely subjected their scriptural reasoning to thier ideas. But they made this out to be "for the initiated," so it was not taught broadly in the church.
@CatholicCulturePod
@CatholicCulturePod 4 күн бұрын
underground publishing Merry Christmas! I disagree about forbidding marriage among the clergy. It has a basis in St. Paul's preference for virginity as allowing one to devote oneself wholly to the Lord. I think it's eminently logical and justifiable as a discipline even if it isn't required of all the churches. But even in the East, the incompatibility of intercourse with celebrating Mass is recognized in their sacramental discipline. (In fact someone told me that one reason they don't have Mass every weekday as in the West is because their priests are married...see the problem that can arise?) (Also given your claim about the influence on Nicea, maybe it's interesting that Origen was much more influential in the East than in the West and yet the East has always allowed married clergy)
@undergroundpublishing
@undergroundpublishing 4 күн бұрын
@@CatholicCulturePod You have to read about the push in Socrates Scholasticus. Also rememebr that much of the east rejected Nicaea for a generatoin and remained contentious against imperial interference in general. But they were mostly Origenists at Nicaea. As for your mass argument, Paul calls the forbidding of marriage a doctrine of demons. It's unnatural. As the making of the eucharist into a daily ritual sacrifice rather than a weekly communal memorial is a post-apostolic innovation, I don't find the rite authoritative in overturning nature itself; especially when Paul makes married men who have orderly children the standard for qualification for the office of a bishop. Also, Paul's statement about it being better to remain unmarried is based on the fact that he is addressing a 3 year old church full of people already engaged in fornication, or engaged, or of marriable age with few Christian prospects. He's not saying "its not sin" to marry in general. He's saying its not sin to marry an unbeleiver in the present circumstance. That's why he encourages young widows to marry in Ephesus, and only tells older widows (over 60) to marry in the Lord or remain single. For the young and the restless, he recommends marriage over the struggle with lust. It's a supernatural gift to remain single and not struggle with lust, not a prerequisite for entry level ministry.
@CatholicCulturePod
@CatholicCulturePod 3 күн бұрын
St. Paul didn't say a bishop should be married, he said a bishop should not have been married more than once. If he had children, they should be orderly. Regardless, even for a married man, becoming a priest or certainly a bishop in the early Church meant embracing celibacy from then on. This is shown by the universal discipline that someone cannot marry *after* becoming a priest, even if a married man can become a priest. Yes, remaining single and not struggling with lust is a supernatural gift, but so is the priesthood itself - and history shows that a *greater* number are called to religious celibacy than are called to ordination, not a lesser number. It is religious celibacy that has historically been "entry-level" in that one does not have to be virtuous already to enter monastic life, whereas it is expected that one be already virtuous in order to become a priest.
@marknovetske4738
@marknovetske4738 5 күн бұрын
Good program! Thanks 🙏
@Serioussamurai300
@Serioussamurai300 5 күн бұрын
Pray for us Bernadette❤
@user-ht9fr6eh9u
@user-ht9fr6eh9u 5 күн бұрын
Wonderful Priest+ IQ off the scale yet humble
@Maya-yp2ey
@Maya-yp2ey 6 күн бұрын
Bergoglio is a perfect definition of a false prophet next to Muhammad etc etc etc
@EremiasRanwolf-d6z
@EremiasRanwolf-d6z 6 күн бұрын
In Church history there has always been this weird schizophrenia: the idea of hhe massa damnata vs. the idea of Romans 5 or St. John Chrysostom's famous Easter sermon. God the cosmic terror vs. God who leaves the 99 to find the 1. I have no idea how these two sides can be reconciled. One idea makes the universe benevolent and the other turns it into a sick joke, the joke being on us.
@margiehayes7456
@margiehayes7456 6 күн бұрын
Thanks, very well done. It's not really bashing one vs. the other, but a nice intellectual discussion of the topics...I'm glad that people are interested enough in this that they think about the differences between the two and how they help them celebrate the liturgy. God Bless! GO TO MASS whichever version you attend!
@melissaking6019
@melissaking6019 7 күн бұрын
My father was an Episcopal priest and theologian. His Christmas sermons covered the traditional subjects, but I noticed in my teens that he didn't devote one to St. Joseph. I suggested a Josephcentric sermon and he told me that he didn't have enough source material for a sermon about him.
@godchild7490
@godchild7490 8 күн бұрын
John Paul THE GREAT! Love his explaining human reality through INTEGRATING reason AND Faith! The wings to enable flying! Full living is NOT about FEELINGS!
@Flyingscotsman93
@Flyingscotsman93 9 күн бұрын
Is the channel just for Catholics ,can I have a swatch though I'm Protestant 😂.
@ZUL8R_DAVE
@ZUL8R_DAVE 9 күн бұрын
Heretic
@shensha927
@shensha927 10 күн бұрын
The analogy on the eternality of the Father and Jesus can be likened to how Eve was brought forth or came about. We know that Eve was brought forth or taken from a rib of Adam and God made the rib a woman.. Eve, being once a rib or one of the ribs of Adam, can be or is as old as Adam ( logic: your head is as old as your eyes, hands, or in the whole body), although Eve had come out later or after Adam existed. In like manner, the word of God (Jesus) is an integral of the Father's being ( who was at the bosom of the Father), that is why, Jesus is co eternal or the same eternality of the Father just like Eve who had the same age of Adam. The Word was later on brought Forth ( begotten) before the works of old/ creation. That is why he was called as the first born, meaning - was ahead among created beings because all things created are created thru Jesus ( the Word).
@francescaderimini2931
@francescaderimini2931 10 күн бұрын
I’m Roman Catholic and the Russian Orthodox Church has apparitions of the Virgin Mary! Saints that She visited with! St Seraphim of Sarov for one. 1200’s
@Tubulous123
@Tubulous123 10 күн бұрын
Thank you.
@ClayDeboe
@ClayDeboe 11 күн бұрын
My hero.
@maggiekeenan4830
@maggiekeenan4830 11 күн бұрын
Thank you. It is true that the best gift from God is not health, beauty or wealth, but Salvation. I pray that from now onwards , I happily unite my suffering to Jesus. God's will be done, always. I learn, to surrender all to God's will.
@followerofchristofthetrini1692
@followerofchristofthetrini1692 11 күн бұрын
I’m 38 cradle Catholic. I have only heard the Roman Canon in my local Novus Ordo Mass 3 times in my lifetime.
@CatholicCulturePod
@CatholicCulturePod 10 күн бұрын
That's criminal.
@lisamoag6548
@lisamoag6548 11 күн бұрын
This man is brilliant! Clear and simple communication with a gentle voice, ahh. Thank you
@joekeegan937
@joekeegan937 11 күн бұрын
Thank you for an excellent talk.
@macbride33
@macbride33 11 күн бұрын
💯
@wintam8319
@wintam8319 12 күн бұрын
St Bernadette please pray for us amen 🙏
@813infinityfilms123
@813infinityfilms123 12 күн бұрын
✝Jesus, Mary, Joseph, St Gemma & St Bernadette, we love ❤ you, save souls! 🙏
@jordahnpeck1158
@jordahnpeck1158 13 күн бұрын
Thank you for a explanation
@SisterShirley
@SisterShirley 13 күн бұрын
The Holy See ❤
@tonyl3762
@tonyl3762 13 күн бұрын
One of the best so far ❤
@CatholicCulturePod
@CatholicCulturePod 13 күн бұрын
I agree, this is one of my favorite episodes Mike did.
@BrightyAlbo
@BrightyAlbo 13 күн бұрын
It’s my favourite Catholic channel/page! Underrated, yet amazing! Keep it up with great work!
@CatholicCulturePod
@CatholicCulturePod 13 күн бұрын
Thanks so much!
@gonzo7one203
@gonzo7one203 13 күн бұрын
Wait a minute, why is my book different from this. It’s not majorly different by the wording and order of wordings abut dif
@CatholicCulturePod
@CatholicCulturePod 13 күн бұрын
Different translation?
@tuvoca825
@tuvoca825 14 күн бұрын
"Judiazer" is a loaded term... it kept popping up in the Inquisition readings. You are right that there were factions with factions so to simplify the discussions, scholars got (lazy?) and sometimes chose one representative they wanted to argue as if it represented everyone. Once I noticed... even made the mistake of assuming Scottland and Ireland were the same thing... 300 years after Scottland was created! Weird.
@marilynmelzian7370
@marilynmelzian7370 14 күн бұрын
Are you sure that the early fathers did not use philosophy? It certainly seems to me they did, but that it is subject to scripture, as is proper. Certainly Augustine uses philosophy. I am not sure the dividing line was that sharp.
@CatholicCulturePod
@CatholicCulturePod 13 күн бұрын
They did use it - though it was controversial at times - but I don't know if you find many of them making extensive purely philosophical arguments the way Boethius does in the Consolation, for instance.
@marilynmelzian7370
@marilynmelzian7370 13 күн бұрын
@ That may be true.
@ARIZJOE
@ARIZJOE 15 күн бұрын
Many people consider "Out of the Past" to be the zenith of film noir. I'm not sure what it has to do with Catholicism. Robert Mitchum smokes in almost every scene. Great acting, great directing all the way around. B&W, with shady nighttime shenanigans, as well as stark views of rural, natural California. The populace has always had a noir element. However, after the horrors of WWll, people felt much less inhibited about expressing it, in life and in art. It has gotten worse with deindustrialization and less government and less organized religion as foundational elements. Now everyone is an unmoored rugged individual fighting for consumer goods in an ownership society. Times were better when we could just watch Kirk Douglas doing bad things at the movies.
@ARIZJOE
@ARIZJOE 15 күн бұрын
Is it not the duty of all Catholics to be as Christ, to act as Christ to the other, and thus form the Invisible Church? We form the body of Christ through the Eucharist, in unity with Jesus and each other. At the end of Mass, we are dismissed to be as Christ in ameliorating suffering without distinction. Could not a non-member of the church or even an atheist be part of the Invisible Church through acts of goodwil?
@stevemillerecon
@stevemillerecon 16 күн бұрын
On subjective value I'd describe it as "subjective means it varies with the subject". The subject of analysis is the person making consumption decisions for himself/herself, or typically, for a household.
@gregm6894
@gregm6894 16 күн бұрын
Clement's letter speaks to the succession of the Overseers, or bishops of local congregations -- not of a succession of 'popes'. In addition, in 1 Clement 32:4 he say: "And so we, having been called through His will in Christ, are not justified through ourselves or through our own wisdom or understanding or piety or works which we wrought in holiness of heart, but through faith, whereby the Almighty God justified all men that have been from the beginning; to whom be the glory for ever and ever. Amen." So Clement clearly stated that we are justified through faith, not by "piety or works which we wrought in holiness of heart" -- in direct opposition to the Roman Catholic Church teaching that we are saved by a combination of faith and works.
@CatholicCulturePod
@CatholicCulturePod 15 күн бұрын
All the Apostolic Fathers say that we can lose our salvation through evil works and that we will be rewarded according to our deeds. There are also Scripture passages that speak of us being judged according to our works. Clement here is saying that we are not justified through ourselves, which is the Catholic position - the Church indeed teaches that we are not saved by our own righteousness, but that works are made meritorious only insofar as God Himself is acting in us through grace. We are justified through faith, it is true, and precisely part of what that means is that faith gives our works eternal value. Faith is a work, you will say a work of God not of man, and we will say yes, and so is the charity that imbues the good works of a Christian: "I no longer live but Christ lives in me."
@gregm6894
@gregm6894 15 күн бұрын
@@CatholicCulturePod In Romans 7:14-25 Paul clearly describes the inward struggle with sin -- I'm fairly certain he did not lose his salvation. The Apostolic Fathers weren't talking about losing salvation, but just like the Apostle John in his three epistles, they were saying that a saved person (reborn) does not continue in an unabated lifestyle of sin. Romans 12:3 (as well as other passages) clearly states the both grace and faith are gifts of God -- not of ourselves, so no one can boast. In John 6:28-29, Jesus clearly stated what the required works of God are: "Then they asked him, “What must we do to do the works God requires? Jesus answered, “The work of God is this: to believe in the one he has sent.”" We are saved by grace, through faith -- good works are a consequence, not a cause of our salvation. When I carefully read Scripture, it is clear on this point.
@richardkasper5822
@richardkasper5822 16 күн бұрын
I related to the part of false oracles as these truly are demonic and are the perverted spirits that cause the dionysian mysteries. Aka elusinian mysteries, and John in the book of Revelation reveals this as the works of the Nicolaitans the thing that Jesus hates. Many are percieving this phenomena to be the Holy Spirit. These demons are very present in alchemy, and in the freemasonic rituals.
@Mannard74
@Mannard74 16 күн бұрын
The vision was symbolism.. The unclean things represented Gentiles. The vision was to tell Peter it's ok for a Jew and non-Jew to eat together if they are of one accord.
@DanielSmith-r-1982
@DanielSmith-r-1982 17 күн бұрын
I think the spiritual life blossoms when understanding our relationship to God is not one of equal give and take. It is one of loving receptivity and response which is itself a gift. Our acts are real, but we never take spiritual initiative. The canons of the council of orange 529 make this so clear. To realize our prayer and desire is a response to a love that goes before us is a consolation. We would not love nor choose Him had he not loved us and infused this love into us and touched our souls. It's interesting because this shows the intersection of feminism and pelagianism. The wrong idea that grace is something we can match with nature and collaborate equally with it is similar to the feminist usurpations of the role of the masculine and the rejection of femininity as exemplified by Our Lady. She who is full of grace is the model of abandonment to the advances of grace. She is truly feminine. Every soul must imitate our Lady's fiat and truly admit itself the bride of the divine bridegroom.
@CatholicCulturePod
@CatholicCulturePod 16 күн бұрын
Totally agree, Daniel! Awesome comment.
@theresatumidajski5219
@theresatumidajski5219 17 күн бұрын
Please include the occasional female guest to blunt the male egos on display.
@CatholicCulturePod
@CatholicCulturePod 17 күн бұрын
I have female guests on regularly. Just look at the playlist of Catholic Culture Podcast episodes. And please repent your judgmental comment.
@charliek2557
@charliek2557 17 күн бұрын
Comment not cool
@garfieldodie3106
@garfieldodie3106 18 күн бұрын
I had been trying to figure out if Boethius was a saint or not since I first heard of the Consolation of Philosophy about a year back.
@CatholicCulturePod
@CatholicCulturePod 18 күн бұрын
He's technically locally venerated in the diocese of Pavia, not by the universal Church.
@CatholicCulturePod
@CatholicCulturePod 15 күн бұрын
Actually, I was wrong - his sanctity was recognized by Rome in 1883.
@garfieldodie3106
@garfieldodie3106 15 күн бұрын
@@CatholicCulturePod Gotcha, that's really interesting. Thanks for the info!
@CountSolo
@CountSolo 18 күн бұрын
Longtime listener here. Thanks for all your hard work putting together these podcast episodes. Been a cinephile long before I started listening to you guys but it’s always great to hear your perspective on cinematic masterpieces like “The Tree of Life” (one of my all-time favourite films). At the urging of our parish priest, I actually recently started an initiative in our parish here in Vancouver (or Richmond, BC, more accurately) where we would screen a movie every month, followed by discussions after the screening. The first movies I showed were “Toy Story 3” and “It’s a Wonderful Life”, and they both had decent turnouts and generated lively discussions. We’ll be watching “Of Gods and Men” in January. I’m trying to start with films that are a bit more accessible to mainstream audiences, before gradually easing them into stuff from Ozu, Kubrick, S. Ray, etc. I’m also a big Star Wars fan (and a *huge* defender of the prequels, which are an absolute masterclass in pure filmmaking), so I’ll definitely find some way to insert that into this event 😅 Unrelated to this episode, but I also had a question. I’ve known about the Vatican Film List for a long time (read Steven Greydanus’ article when I was still in high school, and have seen 41 of the 45 films in the list). However, the only sources I can find for the list are secondary sources - eg, Steven Greydanus’ article, your podcast, Word on Fire’s “Popcorn with the Pope”, etc. Do you know if the primary source (ie, the pamphlet or booklet that was sent by the Vatican in 1995 that originally contained this list) is available anywhere online? The secondary sources I’ve looked at sometimes seem to quote from this original pamphlet, but I can’t find it anywhere. If they’re not online, are they accessible elsewhere?
@CatholicCulturePod
@CatholicCulturePod 18 күн бұрын
That's awesome! Did you know Nathan lives in Vancouver? As to the original document, I got a file of it by email from the head of the Vatican Film Archive, who was also on the VFL committee. There's not much to it, it's just the list and three paragraphs which I read in our Vatican Film List finale episode. There's also the 100 Years of Cinema document put out alongside the VFL. Linked here: www.catholicculture.org/commentary/we-watched-whole-vatican-film-list/