It is not a game, but rather a Demo scene in Godot. Check the GitHub page in the description and try it yourself, it runs well on my 1660super. Or download a compiled version from here: perfoon.itch.io/abandoned-spaceship-godot-4-demo

You can find this demo scene from Godot asset library or Github: github.com/perfoon/Abandoned-Spaceship-Godot-Demo It is just a scene that shows Godot's rendering features.

no ahora

@@Perfoon pero si lo portearan?

@@Perfoon hay un port de android es de ustedes?

no

@@Perfoon solo pa pc?

I'm good, thanks for asking. Still working on Blastronaut updates and experimenting with new projects as well.

The licencing terms are in Github. The art is under CC BY-NC, so you can use it in free games. All code is under MIT, so use it whenever you like.

I really like the dust particles btw

If they are embedded into the package file, then yes.

Godot is an incredibly flexible and easy to use engine. A real joy to work with. The new Godot 4 has a nice dynamic GI option as well, displayed here by another fellow developer: kzbin.info/www/bejne/Y321Z4WgrZWbd6s It is also possible to re-bake the lighting at runtime, however it is not as smooth as it could be. So if you need destructible environment and dynamic GI, then maybe check UE5 and lumen at the time being.

Dagor engine (well known for War Thunder and Enlisted) just got opensourced. It has fully dynamic ligting system you might want to check and these games are well known for their dynamic environments. Wait until they publish some more samples, so it could be used in production.

You right

Is this good or bad performance wise?

@@seth-blank Pretty good, I would say. The GTX 1650 isn't the latest and greatest considering that the 4000 series are available now and notebooks can't compete with desktops anyway.

@@opt4games878 I got a 1650 aswell in my Desktop Computer and Notebook and in Hogwarts Legacy both GPUs compare roughly the same

​@@maff1917the wonders of baked lighting (I'm guessing, because it looks good and It doesn't slows down)

He made a video about this. Just search "The Making of Abandoned Spaceship Demo Scene" 50 minutes talk on KZbin. Unfortunately I can't link it, because commentary will be deleted (auto-moderation thinks it's spam).

The arcade machine is currently running a video, altough the same technique can be used to play another game as well, as it just renders the content of a viewport.

Godot will never have the level of realism of Unreal, but it's not a bad thing. UE is really impressive visually but also very heavy and do not work on all machines. Godot engine is very light and work on almost every machine. Every engines have pros and cons, and the way they work is very different.

@@pierrotA i think we can catch up. i mean, its not like unreal can make their graphics look 10x better in the future or anything like that, so if godot keep evolving and they dont have how to evolve too much we can catchup. soon or later epic will have to invest in other stuff like user experience for their engine users instead.

@@igorgiuseppe1862 I worked years on UE and I'm now on Godot. But I do not agree. Technologies like Lumens cost billions to make... One day Godot will have a similar technology, but then UE will have make something even more realistic. In addition, even if Godot have Lumens and other advanced technologies tomorrow, it would make the engine very heavy... Which is not their goal.

@@pierrotA i dont think we can get much more realistic than unreal already is. it may be heavy, but soon or later we will have enoguh hardware that even the potato pcs from that year would be able to run this. as for the cost, sure the tech is expensive to do, it can be done by far less thanks to the help of volunteers, i mean, look at blender for example... godot is also in a good track record to receive more money, maybe more than blender considering they are an younger project and are already making a good fraction of blender earnings, i doubt they will have a fraction of the money that epic does, but i think epic will have to invest in something else, the issue is, by the point that godot get those graphics, it might not worth using it anymore because unreal would have all it benefits and more.

This project was built for Vulkan renderer (Forward+), I have not tested nor optimized it for GL3. It might be possible to get it working on GL3 as well, but it will not be 1 click solution, but rather requires quite a lot of setting tweaking and rebaking.

Because we become sick of the same UE lightning in every modern game 😅

You can download the repository in the description link, open it in Godot 4 and see yourself ;)