Shutup About Road Capacity
12:29
2 ай бұрын
I Went to Ukraine  Here's Why
12:52
Freedom Convoy to Kyiv
1:01
10 ай бұрын
My Street Was Rebuilt
11:44
11 ай бұрын
January Q&A
19:49
11 ай бұрын
Shorts - Quiet vs Loud Asphalt
0:28
Shorts - Turboroundabout
0:34
Жыл бұрын
How Streets Fall Apart
7:24
Жыл бұрын
Shorts - Regional Access Road
0:42
Shorts - Gutter Construction
0:33
Why You Shouldn't Cycle Here
6:10
Why This Project Failed
8:56
Жыл бұрын
Unpacking Janstraat
9:06
Жыл бұрын
This Dutch Street is Brand New
8:33
2 жыл бұрын
Categorizing Dutch Travel Surfaces
19:35
Whats Missing in Street Design
12:33
2 жыл бұрын
Пікірлер
@Quantorful
@Quantorful 3 күн бұрын
I think the success of the Dutch transportation system can be summarized as follows: Incentives, responsibility, democracy, and science. The legal framework forces responsibility, and thus incentivizes good outcomes. The Polderpolitiek is basically a more democratic approach, involving as many voices as possible. And those then lead to decision-making based on evidence and science. And those are basically the principles of all good policy if you want good outcomes. Not just for transportation, but literally all policy. Responsibility, the right incentives, democracy (diverse voices and input), and evidence.
@Jonnesdeknost
@Jonnesdeknost 4 күн бұрын
Funny, i find the keizer karelplein one of the more enjoying roundabouts. I drive around the country for my work and find this one quite exciting. But i would understand it's not as safe as the standard roundabouts.
@jesse291
@jesse291 5 күн бұрын
Smart dutch lights are so great! I go to Belgium weekly, and there you wait endlessly at every light for nothing. Here you can really see how well they react to traffic.
@lucagattoni-celli1377
@lucagattoni-celli1377 5 күн бұрын
And if you replace a big intersection with a roundabout, you save even more money, right?
@BlaBlubb-u4j
@BlaBlubb-u4j 6 күн бұрын
Why is it so hard to find any road safety statistics where the Netherlands are leading? Especially, if they are working so hard for safe road infrastructure and for so long? And what are the metrics they use themselves to measure their progress? I mean, I really love the dutch infrastructure but I find it so hard to understand, that they are almost always behind Germany in any statistic (I'm german). I suspect it's a combination of more people using vulnerable types of transportation (pedestrians, bike vs car) and almost nobody wearing helmets. But damn! It is just so unintuitive!
@RoyalProtectorate
@RoyalProtectorate 6 күн бұрын
there are times when you will see even in the Netherlands lanes that stretch up; to 10 at a time but those are usually reserved for freeways and interstate highways in places that are meant for them. And even when they do have those rare occasions for 10 lane highways they conveniently place them in areas that are away from city street such as building them to go under rivers or tunels so that people don't have to hear the noise or see the cars 24/7
@6Sparx9
@6Sparx9 7 күн бұрын
7:37 huh, just looked up the definition of being orange-pilled, it shares a striking number of similarities and language of becoming woke 😅.
@tommynomad4147
@tommynomad4147 9 күн бұрын
Thanks for a terrific vid. Footage suggests you work in 's-Hertogenbosch, my cycling paradise. What are your thoughts about the city's worst section of bike path: the Emmaplein?
@daanm3869
@daanm3869 9 күн бұрын
10:57 And wheter it rains or not
@weatheranddarkness
@weatheranddarkness 9 күн бұрын
Quality of life? Ya how much will that cost? And how long will it take me to drive there if you add a bike lane?
@raylefley-hean9079
@raylefley-hean9079 10 күн бұрын
I was thinking this was going to be another bike lane rant but you laid out a good argument. Very interesting. Thanks.
@MikeGuarino69
@MikeGuarino69 11 күн бұрын
6:20 Don't extra lanes help more cars get through the light in a shorter amount of time? A single lane at rush hour in a lot of places would mean the guy at the back hasn't even started moving before the lights red again
@therealdutchidiot
@therealdutchidiot 9 күн бұрын
They can, but in most cases it doesn't matter. Because those numbers are never actually reached except in very few cases, and that's where we see multiple lanes right in front of intersections for relevant directions.
@bugluver15
@bugluver15 11 күн бұрын
ROSEVILLE MENTION??
@noodlebin6355
@noodlebin6355 11 күн бұрын
those stroads look fucking terrifying
@foppo100
@foppo100 12 күн бұрын
I grew up in Rotterdam.Metro trams and good bus services.Plus it is easy to drive with a car.I live in the UK but the Dutch are mlies ahead of so many countries.In the UK some of the new round abouts where I live are downright dangerous.Cars changing lanes due to the lay out.I love to know who thought this out.Traffic engineers? Are you having a laugh.
@ronmartin1375
@ronmartin1375 12 күн бұрын
Single lanes are disgusting. Wider is better.
@therealdutchidiot
@therealdutchidiot 9 күн бұрын
Nope. Just more dangerous, and it gets more congested.
@ronmartin1375
@ronmartin1375 9 күн бұрын
@ wrong. Wider lanes are more efficient during non rush hour. This video only taking points on rush hour to hide its poor findings.
@therealdutchidiot
@therealdutchidiot 9 күн бұрын
@@ronmartin1375 Nope. Intersections are always the limiting factor. And North American intersections are insanely inefficient which increases the problem. Here's a suggestion. Time yourself waiting for a red light vs driving. You'll probably find yourself wating for a traffic light for over 90% of your travels. We don't have those insane numbers here.
@ronmartin1375
@ronmartin1375 9 күн бұрын
@ Wrong. Traffic flows differently at different times as conditions as stated in the video.
@therealdutchidiot
@therealdutchidiot 5 күн бұрын
@@ronmartin1375 But adding lanes doesn't make a difference. At all. It just introduced danger. No more, no less.
@netook8
@netook8 12 күн бұрын
I did time myself on trips and yea, I spend 90% of the time at an intersection.
@TonkarzOfSolSystem
@TonkarzOfSolSystem 12 күн бұрын
Wider paths make cycling more comfortable because the capacity increases.
@therealdutchidiot
@therealdutchidiot 9 күн бұрын
Wider paths yes, but you won't find a 3 lane bicycle path.
@KrAzYKARL49
@KrAzYKARL49 12 күн бұрын
6:32 oh yes, Fulton Ave. Perfect example of too many traffic signals. Can confirm, walking would be faster during rush hour.
@AaronSmith-sx4ez
@AaronSmith-sx4ez 12 күн бұрын
The point about intersection capacity nullifying lane capacity is a good one. It's also applicable to urban freeways. Often the bottleneck is not the lack of lanes but the merging ramps (aka suicide lanes). You could have a 100 lane freeway in LA but there would still be traffic jams because the ramps would be bottlenecks. This is why freeways just don't work in urban environments. During slow times they are under-utilized and a waste of space. During rush hour the merging system fails and chaotic jams result. Best would be to replace urban freeways with one-way roads with synced lights. Those are the most efficient ways to move cars though cities.
@CanadianEhHole
@CanadianEhHole 9 күн бұрын
Well not at that absurdity. The ramps would be far less bottlenecks than they are now. Ramps are bottlenecks because they are merging with traffic in what is usually a 2-6 lane highway. Up that to 100 and there's no reason why cars going past a ramp, that are already on the highway, need to remain in the lane where merging traffic needs to enter.
@vroomfondel5447
@vroomfondel5447 13 күн бұрын
Fantastic video! I almost didn't click because I assumed (from the name) that you were a transit hater.
@Ottobon
@Ottobon 13 күн бұрын
i don't understand what the problem is, just delete pedestrians by making faster e bikes
@natelavallee4034
@natelavallee4034 14 күн бұрын
2:19 merges like this only work in theory sadly cause people are asshole and don’t let eachother in
@therealdutchidiot
@therealdutchidiot 5 күн бұрын
They work in practice too. They're everywhere in Europe.
@pollyhasanasbo
@pollyhasanasbo 14 күн бұрын
*laughs in uk at the part about lining up utilities and resurfacing* *jumps, bumps, jostles, and trips over every patch in the tarmac*
@traffic.engineer
@traffic.engineer 17 күн бұрын
Roundabouts are only more efficient up to 1000 total vehicles per hour (1700 for dual lane, 2200 for triple lane). After that, they cause congestion and queuing (which may also help regulate speed). When there is a large volume of traffic conflicting for right of way, signals provide more efficiency to manage the dynamic traffic flow.
@Aiantaschr
@Aiantaschr 17 күн бұрын
6:25 i would assume that "cars are guests" means that the cars shouldn't be entitled to overtaking the biker unless it is safe, and not necessarily that they are not allowed to overtake! 6:25
@aslkdjfzxcv9779
@aslkdjfzxcv9779 19 күн бұрын
fixing traffic requires zooming out. further than your initial thought
@GalaxicJinte
@GalaxicJinte 20 күн бұрын
this video has been in my to watch list for so long and I decided to finally give it a watch and in the first 3 minutes, I already want to comment something which is how genuinely amazing dutch infrastructure is. I live in a town at the east side and we have a train stopping in our town with roughly 10K people. We have busses to places that do not have a station and we recently upgraded the cycling lane across the 80s road so that the only high school in our area is easier accessible for students. My nearest hospital is multiple cities away and it is accessible by bus. Dutch accessibility and infrastructure extends outside of the suburbs even
@CARambolagen
@CARambolagen 20 күн бұрын
All this would be great if Trumpistan had any interest in facts 😂
@harirajah4108
@harirajah4108 21 күн бұрын
Critical thinking should be required for all engineers!! Thank you for this wonderful video!
@shelbzillathrilla
@shelbzillathrilla 26 күн бұрын
Our culture is retarded beyond belief, especially when it comes to driving and anything to do with driving. Unhealthy obese entitled over consuming nature deficit disorder having busy dummies with no vision for the future
@casey45289
@casey45289 26 күн бұрын
I enjoyed your lecture you did where you showed an example of a project you worked on in Netherlands, but I think it would be interesting to see you apply that framework to a North American example, just to show how that change could incrementally improve the stroad networks.
@roscius6204
@roscius6204 26 күн бұрын
Reaction time is a biggy.
@plangineer1375
@plangineer1375 26 күн бұрын
Isn't the "real issue" with US urban freeways that they have an entrance/exit every mile (or less)? The Interstate System was originally intended exactly as you described - for longer distance trips - with limited entrance/exit points several miles apart. Somewhat like the more rural Interstate Highways operate. However, everywhere they approved an entrance/exit became highly valuable land that the local jurisdictions wanted to see developed to increase their tax base (revenue stream). Then every area of the metropolitan region wanted to share in the perceived benefits. How could politicians, who survive by bringing home the goodies, resist expanding access to the communities they represent? Add to that a lack of regional land use planning control and the result is the congestion we have today.
@billalumni9142
@billalumni9142 26 күн бұрын
Completely agree with the intersection problem, however, I am much more skeptical about reducing lanes making no difference. Your ideas about reducing lanes makes sense for efficiency however, ask a mathematician and they will tell you that 100% efficiency = collapse. Every time. A real life example would be in California they reduced to one lane in an area and many people ended up dying because they could not get out of that area when a fire came through.
@therealdutchidiot
@therealdutchidiot 9 күн бұрын
What you're missing here is that multiple lanes introduce the weave conflict. It's more dangerous, and cars suddenly having to brake because people don't know how to merge slows down traffic.
@hive_indicator318
@hive_indicator318 5 күн бұрын
"an area"? Where is this area? What were the conditions? That's a huge state so me trying to find this supposed example of it not working isn't feasible. Also, one example doesn't mean the idea is bad
@themessfact0ry
@themessfact0ry 26 күн бұрын
7:11 roundabouts every 250 metres? Welcome to Milton Keynes, UK
@ivanmishev5659
@ivanmishev5659 27 күн бұрын
In Toronto we just spent millions turning a 2 lane road into a one lane with lanes for turning, and nice bikes lane. But now we’re ripping those bike lanes out and going back to the 2 lane road lined with parked cars so still effectively 1 lane. And it’s only going to cost 50 more million 🙃
@therealdutchidiot
@therealdutchidiot 9 күн бұрын
Yes, and what we're seeing is that car traffic will most likely slow down.
@chris1549
@chris1549 27 күн бұрын
Build infrastructure to the needs of the city rather than theoretical capacity or something. idk I'm just a guy.
@watchmenoobing9815
@watchmenoobing9815 28 күн бұрын
Nice thumb nail how u mean no license needed on the frikin high way naaah u do need one
@buildthelanes
@buildthelanes 27 күн бұрын
No engineering license needed to design it
@yvrelna
@yvrelna 28 күн бұрын
I think it's the difference between calming and intensity. Calming is a matter of safety. Calmer traffic is slower speed and safer. It does not concerns the volume of traffic. Traffic intensity on the other hand is primarily concerned about volume of traffic. More intense traffic is traffic that carries more vehicles, no matter the speed. They might sound related, but they're not. They're two different metrics.
@buildthelanes
@buildthelanes 27 күн бұрын
Im going to disagree with you. Car intensity is just as important to safety as speed is. A car moving at 25 mph is still dangerous for a pedestrian or cyclist to have a collision with. Just because its not a guaranteed death sentence doesnt make it safe.
@MarkusWitthaut
@MarkusWitthaut 28 күн бұрын
Nice video. I am working for an organisation that designs transport systems in the are of logistics (warehouse, production facilities, supply chains). The capacity of a system is always determined by its bottlenecks. Adding capacity to a non-bottleneck part of the systems just means that you get quicker to the bottleneck so that you can wait longer there. This is very old knowledge which is applied when, for instance, the transport system of warehouse is designed. Papers how to this have been published before the 1970ies. Sadly, the lack of system thinking when making transport system design choices is substantial. If you want to know how it is done you just have to look around (Netherlands, Switzerland, Japan come to mind first).