@@christianmariogreco9330 😎

It kinda feels like a metal gear game! 😂

@@DorminatorX your opinion that my opinion is wrong because it's contrary to what you think is the objective opinion, is in fact a subjective opinion. Video games are art. They are not made for everyone, and therefore not everyone will share the same view.

@@mrdoubleyew6340 no,no,no,no,no. what subjective is if you think the game is good or bad or in other words if you enjoy it or not. i like it, somewhat for what it is. but what objectivly true about this game is that it has the worst controls in the series by far. nothing in the controls feels "smooth". you are blinded by nostalgia of it being your first splinter cell. whenever you are in cover and you want to do cover takedown on an enemy, sam will stand up so all the enemies in the room can see him and will do the slowest animation possible so you will be detected easly. the takedowns in this game are atrocious. they are overly long and they cause you to being detected. every action like opening a door which is the most simple thing ever will start a long animation.if you want to stop from running there is a delay. the animations are also trash in this game. the first splinter cell has better and more realistic animations. the animations in this game are too generic and climbing and moving feel like prince of persia and not splinter cell. i get it if you wanted to make it faster but its so bad its not fun to do anything in this game. the running is wierd and you cant control the levels of speed you want to move like you could do in all splinter cell games prior to this game. sam cant even move fast while cruching, you need to stand up in the middle of room full of enemies if you want to move fast. the cover system and the cover switch is terrible. you can in pandora tommrow switch covers much faster. every time there is a room and you go through the door you are blind to whatever there is in the room. the controls of this game are atrocious and the same bad controls continued in blacklist which is slightly better but not much. you mentioned that you played the demo. most be the malta level. in the malta level you could get stealthy somewhat. but after that the game forces you into action again and again. you have nostalgia googles on and they are effecting your judgement. not to mention that the game was made for a controller while the previous SC games are equally cormftable with a control or a mouse and keyboard. this one is unplayable with a mouse and keyboard

@@ruceblee969 sorry you feel that way??

@@mrdoubleyew6340 no, I'm sorry YOU feel that way.

I'll add "cow mooing garbage" to the tags of this video so it'll be easier for your KZbin algorithm to filter out of.

I wasn't criticizing the plot beats so much, just how they were developed and executed. I liked the story bits you're referring too, I just wanted more from those bits, like Sam going off the rails, and the impact of being reunited with his daughter. The later didn't stick the landing with me. I'm being a bit too critical perhaps, because I tend to scrutinize a Tom Clancy game for not having the same depth in narrative as a feature length movie, but they are just my thoughts, don't let them stop you from enjoying the game bro. Also the trope of out for revenge bad ass dad or whatever you want to call it goes back way before splinter cell, John wick is just a common example.(pretty sure I had Jack Bauer on there, who is much more akin to Fisher, and he predates sam Fisher by about two years.) And that's not really a criticism anyway, just shining a line on a similarity.

No, I wasn't

@@mrdoubleyew6340 *humans having thousands of years of history of maning war* Yeah we’re pretty unconditioned for it

yeah?

Wow hehe gee thanks

This was recorded on PC

@@mrdoubleyew6340 But the game itself is still a console slop.

@@HeadBobOff We gravitate towards things we like. My perspective on the game was that playing it was such an acute experience because I hadn't played anything like it before. Hence why it sticks out to me. Are you really talking down that because I hadn't played better games before it? 👍 Cool I guess

​@@mrdoubleyew6340 Dude. Mate. Bro. "My perspective on the game was that playing it was such an acute experience because I hadn't played anything like it before" is exactly what I (rudely) described by "half an hour of an XBox child gushing over the dumbed down slop" etc. I get it that it was your first Splinter Cell and you were in early teenage years, thus looking on that time in your life and that game in particular through the rose-tinted glasses of nostalgia. And you know, it's perfectly fine for a video to be an essay about one's subjective feelings and experiences. However. In this video you claim to defend the game, to analyze it and to prove its naysayers wrong. All these tasks require some objectivity. But all your analysis and defense boils down to two points: first one is you saying "I really liked the game", and the second one is you (perhaps, unwittingly) repeating all the Ubisoft's marketing points that they would give in interviews and put on jewelboxes' backsides - "streamlined", "fast-paced", "action-oriented", "accessible", "doesn't require any effort", "you press the X button and a Cool Thing happens". All these things might be enjoyable for you and many more like you, yet still it's only a subjective judgment. The people who enjoyed the previous installments see all these things as negatives. Now, I don't claim to be objective, but I don't see any objective defense from your part either - and your video is half an hour long. All the things that you list as positive - like sliding from cover to cover with one button, or just two lighting states (completely in the open and completely hidden) - all these things scream "we want the Call of Duty audience" for me. I regret to inform you, but I'm afraid you might be part of the proverbial Call of Duty audience.

@HeadBobOff You don't need to regret anything. Like most people, I don't lose sleep over what fandoms and interest people associate me with. I get comments like yours from time to time that are worth a screen shot. But your first comment takes the cake - can't help but chuckle when I see gamer personalities live up to the stereotypes they create for themselves. And I am flattered in a weird way that my argument for why I think a video game is good compelled you to show off how far your head is up your ass. You're a living example of why people who prop themselves up by what gaming subcultures they belong to are associated with that Wojak meme. Like man, really. If you want me to take you seriously, try not to make yourself sound like Eric Cartman when you comment. Cause now I'm to distracted by how your brain led you to making a passionate argument by first making yourself out to be a pretentious buffoon. If you want a serious rebuttal/discussion, start off with a condensed version of your *third comment next time. Bro, mate, man.@@HeadBobOff

It was not. Gunplay alone was an absolute dogshit, it had no memorable action sequences and stealth was garbage with absolutely stupid AI. All of this on top of ubi brand "open world" where you have to run around doing stupid shit like tagging barrels, building a "rebellion" AGAIN(literally every ubi slop had this "rebellion" bs since Far Cry 3) and liberating bases (again, just like in every ubi "game" since 2010)

@@KIT2142LAW it was a good game. If you disagree please waste more of your time.

@@reker.a5790 fair, can't fix your shit taste

Wildlands was a lame far cry clone and a mediocre and horrible ghost recon

@@JamesMckenzie-q1z nobody cares

shu up