How long till you get to dirac equation? 😅😅

Question, age of nuclear mass, there degrade over time , so a nuclear weapon will degrade in time ? As mass is loss would this degrade of power ?

QM classicalized in 2010. Forgotten Physics website uncovers the hidden variables and constants and the bad math of Wien, Schrodinger, Heisenberg, Einstein, Debroglie,Planck,BOHR,etc. So,no.

One question: Why does the calculations use mv²/2 for the electron speed? Doesn't this equation suitable for bigger objects?

This gives rise to the question of orthogonal deconstruction across the 3sub1 X M. Is space and time rationally irreducible?

Another banger, thanks Dr :3

Thank you for this. It must have been an exciting time to be a physicist.

This channel deserves more subs and viewer count

The argument against the Rutherford model of the electron having a acceleration is laughable at best. If you have a particle remain at the same distance to the other particle whose existence cause the force, how can that "count" as a acceleration. No change is distance is clearly not a acceleration. Specific energy levels does require some more refinement though!

I'm not sure I like calling bohrs model quantum. To me it's an intermediate step between classical models and the schrödinger model. Neither quantum nor classical. Some really important aspects of quantum theories are missing still. Maybe "the first model of a quantized atom", similar to how einsteins description of the photoelectric effect didn't give us a quantum theory of light, but rather a theory of quantized light. Btw my quantum theory prof told this story fairly similarly, but derived the quantised levels by treating the electron as a wave with wavelength obeying einsteins relation. Given that de boglie won't publish for another decade, I find that kind of hard to believe. Do you know if that has an ounce of truth in it, or was he just mixing up history a bit?

tbh your videos are great and very detailed in every aspect (historical, biographical, formulas and graphs/models) but I hate to say that your view and subscription number might not be as high as you deserve, for some time. so dont be upset about it.

so bohr got lucky just by applying the popular trend in other areas into his

Rutherford was less than impressed with the Nobel for chemistry. He thought of himself as a physicist not a chemist. Chemistry after all was just stamp collecting 😂

Thank you for publishing this video.

I look forward to every one of your videos :)

How about a detailed video on Larmor's formula? I have always wondered how the emission process of accelerated electrons can be described mathematically starting from Maxwell's equations.

Haha, i just wondered today when the next video is coming! Love it :)

Great video once again! The derivation of laws seems fairly simple yet very meaningful, the implications of electron orbits and how they behave was surely a very impactful discovery for the field

Awesome 👏

Mi novela acaba de empezar

Oh, time to brush some basics of QM now! 🙂

At 5:10 "In 900...". Do you mean 1900?

Surely we were aware that induced voltages were proportional to rate of change of magnetic field, since 1831 (Faraday) ? It is entirely logical that the voltage in the photoelectric effect is a consequence of the frequency (colour) of light. What threw people off track is the nature of vision systems, which decode frequency as colour instead of voltage, and flux density as "intensity", which is naturally thought of as analogous to voltage, which is of course quite wrong. I cannot understand why the photoelectric effect should have baffled people familiar with basic Electromagnetic induction theory.

Great presentation. Thank you.

I come back to you to ask a specific question. There has been a lot of hassle around whether Einstein deserves so much credit for the theory of relativity or was it poincare who did all the mathematics. Could you make some content or share some resources decoding the exact role of all physicists in relativity? And some good sources to study relativity would be great as well. Thanks!

Thanks for this and the complete series of physics story. BEAUTIFUL!

Zhavlan Ovchinnikov. Kazakhstan. Almaty. SAPAR. Hello. With the help of the “HYBRID gyroscope” you can make scientific discoveries; in astronomy, astrophysics, cosmology, higher theoretical physics,... I am writing to you with a proposal for the joint invention of a HYBRID gyroscope from non-circular, TWO coils with a new type of optical fiber with a “hollow core photonic-substituted vacuum zone or (NANF)” where - the light travels 48000 meters in each arm, while it does not exceed the parameters 40/40/40 cm, and the weight is 4 kg. Manufacturers of “Fiber Optic Gyroscopes” can produce HYBRID gyroscopes for educational and practical use in schools and higher education institutions. Einstein dreamed of measuring the speed of a train, an airplane - through the Michelson-Morley experiment of 1881/2024, and only then would the experiment be more than 70% complete. This can be done using a fiber optic HYBRID gyroscope. Based on the completion of more than 70% of Michelson's experiment, the following postulates can be proven: Light is an ordered vibration of gravitational quanta, and dominant gravitational fields adjust the speed of light in a vacuum. (We are not looking for ether, we will see the work of gravitational quanta) The result is a «theory of everything» in a simple teaching device and a new tape measure for measuring the universe.

Здравствуй With the help of the “HYBRID gyroscope” you can make scientific discoveries; in astronomy, astrophysics, cosmology, higher theoretical physics,... I am writing to you with a proposal for the joint invention of a HYBRID gyroscope from non-circular, TWO coils with a new type of optical fiber with a “hollow core photonic-substituted vacuum zone or (NANF)” where - the light travels 48000 meters in each arm, while it does not exceed the parameters 40/40/40 cm, and the weight is 4 kg. Manufacturers of “Fiber Optic Gyroscopes” can produce HYBRID gyroscopes for educational and practical use in schools and higher education institutions. Einstein dreamed of measuring the speed of a train, an airplane - through the Michelson-Morley experiment of 1881/2024, and only then would the experiment be more than 70% complete. This can be done using a fiber optic HYBRID gyroscope. Based on the completion of more than 70% of Michelson's experiment, the following postulates can be proven: Light is an ordered vibration of gravitational quanta, and dominant gravitational fields adjust the speed of light in a vacuum. (We are not looking for ether, we will see the work of gravitational quanta) The result is a «theory of everything» in a simple teaching device and a new tape measure for measuring the universe.

Heroic, beautiful, marvellous. This very well illustrates my own experience of research: a process that this 'Age of Stupidity' has (hopefully, temporarily!) murdered. The Pheonix of scholarship and advance will return! It will!

The length of the circular segment is less than the side of the triangle . Therefore, the visual where the piece rolling inside the triangle is not possible.

My world came crashing down on me.....did he just call Kirchoff "Kirhoff"?!

The sponsor is questionable but the science content of this video is solid gold from start to finish. Will 100% use in class

Love the video! Small nitpick - At 14:23 the next step of the equation is not simply squaring and rearranging, the law of cosines is applied to introduce theta.

Thanks

In my opinion this offers a type of insight rarely discussed: the mental path of genius. So often we celebrate contributors for their outcomes (such as Planck and the others discussed herein), but we don't really understand the mental processes they had to go through for those outcomes. Here, by contrast, the mental journey of Planck - and the circumstances upon which it depended - are explored. Further, this video dramatically emphasizes the difference between a scientist versus those who prefer emotional preference over analysis. The fantastic electronic tools of this era (and all of their derived experiential opportunities) do not owe their development to religion or the comforts of emotional preference. If we were relegated to reliance on what they say we would still be living in the era of push-carts and plows. Instead, in this era we have the opportunity to celebrate those humans willing to grapple with objective analysis, such as all of the minds discussed in this video. It is from their minds, and penchant for discovering how the world really works, that we now live in an era where wonderful people across the planet, such as Dr. Diaz, may offer their insights in order to teach us how genius makes it contributions.

Thanks for the discussion of the compression of the pit. When I first heard of the implosion method, I assumed they were compressing a hollow sphere into a smaller sphere with thicker walls, ie, closer to a solid sphere. When I heard the pit was solid, I was surprised because I had assumed the bulk modulus of a solid (or even liquid) material was too high for even high explosives to compress it much. Sure, explosives can mangle metal, but normally the explosive is on only one side of the metal, so there's a high pressure and low pressure side of the metal, and it bends towards the low pressure side.

Applying physics to real world problems almost always involves some approximations and some "simplifying assumptions" (ie, "assume the cow is spherical"). I think your assumption that the horizontal speed of the falling bomb is the same as the plane's speed will not be very accurate. The bomb has no propulsion to overcame air resistance, so I think it would slow down considerably during the time it is falling. That could explain why your answer of 154 degrees is somewhat different from what the pilot claims Oppenheimer said was optimal, 159 degrees.

Warning: typo in laplacian of f at 10:10.

Niels Bohr did what? He did not do anything before 1913.

QM classicalized in 2010. Forgotten Physics website uncovers the hidden variables and constants and the bad math of Wien, Schrodinger, Heisenberg, Einstein, Debroglie,Planck, Bohr etc. Further: light is a cluster of expanding electrons; particles, objects,matter with ‘mass.’ “The Final Theory: Rethinking Our Scientific Legacy “, Mark McCutcheon for proper physics including the CAUSE of gravity, electricity, magnetism, light and well.... everything.

Fantastic as always, have a coffee and a bagel on me

Awesome channel. Vaguely remember my high school physics classes but these videos makes it fun.

What was the purpose of the crystal in front of the ionisation chamber? Was it to select individual wavelengths from among the secondary X-ray continuum (if it's one)?

I have a theory about light (but I am not sure whether it's correct or incorrect).

Naive questions; So light is quantumtized but ????Iwhat is the empiric proof light is an atomic particle??? For ex: atomic particles might be well-described as frozen/condensed light or something